Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

The phase of sensorimotor mu and beta oscillations has the opposite effect on corticospinal excitability

View ORCID ProfileMiles Wischnewski, Zachary J. Haigh, View ORCID ProfileSina Shirinpour, Ivan Alekseichuk, Alexander Opitz
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.22.481530
Miles Wischnewski
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Miles Wischnewski
  • For correspondence: mwischne@umn.edu
Zachary J. Haigh
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sina Shirinpour
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sina Shirinpour
Ivan Alekseichuk
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Opitz
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Neural oscillations in the primary motor cortex (M1) shape corticospinal excitability. Power and phase of ongoing mu (8-13 Hz) and beta (14-30 Hz) activity may mediate motor cortical output. However, the functional dynamics of both mu and beta phase and power relationships and their interaction, are largely unknown. Here, we employ recently developed real-time targeting of the mu and beta rhythm, to apply phase-specific brain stimulation and probe motor corticospinal excitability non-invasively. For this, we used instantaneous read-out and analysis of ongoing oscillations, targeting four different phases (0°, 90°, 180°, and 270°) of mu and beta rhythms with suprathreshold single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to M1. Ensuing motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the right first dorsal interossei muscle were recorded. Twenty healthy adults took part in this double-blind randomized crossover study. Mixed model regression analyses showed significant phase-dependent modulation of corticospinal output by both mu and beta rhythm. Strikingly, these modulations exhibit a double dissociation. MEPs are larger at the mu trough and rising phase and smaller at the peak and falling phase. For the beta rhythm we found the opposite behavior. Also, mu power, but not beta power, was positively correlated with corticospinal output. Power and phase effects did not interact for either rhythm, suggesting independence between these aspects of oscillations. Our results provide insights into real-time motor cortical oscillation dynamics, which offers the opportunity to improve the effectiveness of TMS by specifically targeting different frequency bands.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 25, 2022.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The phase of sensorimotor mu and beta oscillations has the opposite effect on corticospinal excitability
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The phase of sensorimotor mu and beta oscillations has the opposite effect on corticospinal excitability
Miles Wischnewski, Zachary J. Haigh, Sina Shirinpour, Ivan Alekseichuk, Alexander Opitz
bioRxiv 2022.02.22.481530; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.22.481530
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The phase of sensorimotor mu and beta oscillations has the opposite effect on corticospinal excitability
Miles Wischnewski, Zachary J. Haigh, Sina Shirinpour, Ivan Alekseichuk, Alexander Opitz
bioRxiv 2022.02.22.481530; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.22.481530

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3686)
  • Biochemistry (7781)
  • Bioengineering (5672)
  • Bioinformatics (21253)
  • Biophysics (10565)
  • Cancer Biology (8165)
  • Cell Biology (11916)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6744)
  • Ecology (10391)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13847)
  • Genetics (9698)
  • Genomics (13060)
  • Immunology (8131)
  • Microbiology (19973)
  • Molecular Biology (7839)
  • Neuroscience (42997)
  • Paleontology (318)
  • Pathology (1276)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2257)
  • Physiology (3350)
  • Plant Biology (7217)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1309)
  • Synthetic Biology (2000)
  • Systems Biology (5529)
  • Zoology (1126)