Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

On the normative advantages of dopamine and striatal opponency for learning and choice

Alana Jaskir, View ORCID ProfileMichael J Frank
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.10.483879
Alana Jaskir
1Department of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: alana_jaskir@brown.edu michael_frank@brown.edu
Michael J Frank
1Department of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael J Frank
  • For correspondence: alana_jaskir@brown.edu michael_frank@brown.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Much research focuses on how the basal ganglia (BG) and dopamine (DA) contribute to reward-driven behavior. But BG circuitry is notoriously complex, with two opponent pathways interacting via several disinhibitory mechanisms, which are in turn modulated by DA. Building on earlier models, we propose a new model, OpAL*, to assess the normative advantages of such circuitry in cost-benefit decision making. OpAL* dynamically modulates DA as a function of learned reward statistics, differentially amplifying the striatal pathway most specialized for the environment. OpAL* exhibits robust advantages over traditional and alternative BG models across a range of environments, particularly those with sparse reward. These advantages depend on opponent and nonlinear Hebbian plasticity mechanisms previously thought to be pathological. Finally, OpAL* captures patterns of risky choice arising from manipulations of DA and environmental richness across species, suggesting that such choice patterns result from a normative biological mechanism.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 13, 2022.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
On the normative advantages of dopamine and striatal opponency for learning and choice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
On the normative advantages of dopamine and striatal opponency for learning and choice
Alana Jaskir, Michael J Frank
bioRxiv 2022.03.10.483879; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.10.483879
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
On the normative advantages of dopamine and striatal opponency for learning and choice
Alana Jaskir, Michael J Frank
bioRxiv 2022.03.10.483879; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.10.483879

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4230)
  • Biochemistry (9118)
  • Bioengineering (6764)
  • Bioinformatics (23960)
  • Biophysics (12108)
  • Cancer Biology (9508)
  • Cell Biology (13746)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7621)
  • Ecology (11672)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15486)
  • Genetics (10625)
  • Genomics (14307)
  • Immunology (9473)
  • Microbiology (22811)
  • Molecular Biology (9083)
  • Neuroscience (48906)
  • Paleontology (355)
  • Pathology (1480)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2566)
  • Physiology (3837)
  • Plant Biology (8320)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1468)
  • Synthetic Biology (2294)
  • Systems Biology (6176)
  • Zoology (1298)