Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
Confirmatory Results

Assessing cats’ (Felis catus) sensitivity to human pointing gestures

Margaret Mäses, View ORCID ProfileClaudia A.F. Wascher
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.12.484069
Margaret Mäses
Behavioural Ecology Research Group, School of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claudia A.F. Wascher
Behavioural Ecology Research Group, School of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Claudia A.F. Wascher
  • For correspondence: claudia.wascher@gmail.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

A wide range of non-human animal species have been shown to be able to respond to human referential signals, such as pointing gestures. The aim of the present study was to replicate previous findings showing cats to be sensitive to human pointing cues (Miklósi et al. 2005). In our study, we presented two types of human pointing gestures - momentary direct pointing and momentary ipsilateral (cross-body) pointing. We tested nine rescue cats in a two-way object choice task. On a group level, the success rate of cats was 74.4 percentage. Cats performed significantly above chance level in both the direct pointing and ipsilateral pointing condition. Trial number, rewarded side and type of gesture did not significantly affect the cats’ performance in the experiment. On an individual level, 5 out of 7 cats who completed 20 trials, performed significantly above chance level. Two cats only completed 10 trials. One of them succeeded in 8, the other in 6 of these. The results of our study replicate previous findings of cats being responsive to human direct pointing cues and add additional knowledge about their ability to follow ipsilateral pointing cues. Our results highlight a domestic species, socialised in a group setting, to possess heterospecific communication skills, however we have to consider parsimonious explanations, such as local and stimulus enhancement.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • NA

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 30, 2022.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessing cats’ (Felis catus) sensitivity to human pointing gestures
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Assessing cats’ (Felis catus) sensitivity to human pointing gestures
Margaret Mäses, Claudia A.F. Wascher
bioRxiv 2022.03.12.484069; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.12.484069
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Assessing cats’ (Felis catus) sensitivity to human pointing gestures
Margaret Mäses, Claudia A.F. Wascher
bioRxiv 2022.03.12.484069; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.12.484069

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Animal Behavior and Cognition
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3697)
  • Biochemistry (7801)
  • Bioengineering (5686)
  • Bioinformatics (21316)
  • Biophysics (10592)
  • Cancer Biology (8193)
  • Cell Biology (11954)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6772)
  • Ecology (10411)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13890)
  • Genetics (9719)
  • Genomics (13083)
  • Immunology (8158)
  • Microbiology (20037)
  • Molecular Biology (7865)
  • Neuroscience (43116)
  • Paleontology (321)
  • Pathology (1279)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2264)
  • Physiology (3358)
  • Plant Biology (7242)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1314)
  • Synthetic Biology (2009)
  • Systems Biology (5545)
  • Zoology (1130)