Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

The use of pigs vocalisation structure to assess the quality of human-pig relationship

Avelyne S Villain, Carole Guérin, Camille Noûs, Céline Tallet
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.15.484457
Avelyne S Villain
1PEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, 35590 Saint Gilles, France
2Behavioural Ecology Group, Section for Ecology & Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: avelyne.s.villain@protonmail.com celine.tallet@inrae.fr
Carole Guérin
1PEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, 35590 Saint Gilles, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Camille Noûs
3Cogitamus laboratory, 75000 Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Céline Tallet
1PEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, 35590 Saint Gilles, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: avelyne.s.villain@protonmail.com celine.tallet@inrae.fr
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Studying human-animal interactions in domestic species and how they affect the establishment of a positive Human-Animal Relationship (HAR) may help us improve animal welfare and better understand the evolution of interspecific interactions associated with the domestication process. Understanding and describing the quality of an HAR requires information on several aspects of the animal biology and emotional states (social, spatial and postural behaviours, physiological and cognitive states). Growing evidence shows that acoustic features of animal vocalisations may be indicators of emotional states. Here, we tested the hypothesis that vocal structure may indicate the quality of HAR. At weaning, 30 piglets were positively handled by an experimenter who talked to and physically interacted with them three times a day, while 30 other piglets only received the contact necessary for proper husbandry. After two weeks, we recorded the behaviours and vocalisations produced in the presence of the static experimenter for 5 min. We repeated this test two weeks later, after a conditioning period during which human presence with additional positive contacts was used as a reward for all piglets. We hypothesized this conditioning period would lead to a positive human-piglet relationship for all piglets. As expected, piglets that were positively handled at weaning expressed a higher attraction toward the experimenter, and, after the conditioning, piglets that were not positively handled at weaning expressed a similar level of attraction than the positively handled ones. Piglets positively handled at weaning produced shorter grunts than the other ones, regardless of the context of recording, which may indicate a more positive affect. During reunions with the static experimenter, a more positive HAR was associated with a decrease in vocal reactivity to human proximity. However, during reunions with the experimenter providing additional positive contacts and over the conditioning, proximity to the human systematically triggered shorter and higher pitched grunts, indicator of positive a emotional state. Results first show that changes in vocal structure are consistent with indicators of positive states in the presence of a human. Second, these changes are stronger when the human positively interact with the piglets, supposedly emphasizing a higher positive arousal state during these interactions. We show that vocalisation structure may be a promising indicator of the quality of human-pig relationship.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • Several parts of the text were clarified following reviews.

  • https://doi.org/10.15454/RTBO3O

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 04, 2023.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The use of pigs vocalisation structure to assess the quality of human-pig relationship
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The use of pigs vocalisation structure to assess the quality of human-pig relationship
Avelyne S Villain, Carole Guérin, Camille Noûs, Céline Tallet
bioRxiv 2022.03.15.484457; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.15.484457
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The use of pigs vocalisation structure to assess the quality of human-pig relationship
Avelyne S Villain, Carole Guérin, Camille Noûs, Céline Tallet
bioRxiv 2022.03.15.484457; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.15.484457

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Animal Behavior and Cognition
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4685)
  • Biochemistry (10362)
  • Bioengineering (7682)
  • Bioinformatics (26341)
  • Biophysics (13534)
  • Cancer Biology (10692)
  • Cell Biology (15445)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (8501)
  • Ecology (12824)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (16867)
  • Genetics (11401)
  • Genomics (15484)
  • Immunology (10619)
  • Microbiology (25225)
  • Molecular Biology (10225)
  • Neuroscience (54481)
  • Paleontology (402)
  • Pathology (1669)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2897)
  • Physiology (4345)
  • Plant Biology (9252)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1586)
  • Synthetic Biology (2558)
  • Systems Biology (6781)
  • Zoology (1466)