Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

DNA metabarcoding reveals the threat of rapidly expanding barred owl populations to native wildlife in western North America

View ORCID ProfileNicholas F. Kryshak, View ORCID ProfileEmily D. Fountain, Daniel F. Hofstadter, Brian P. Dotters, Kevin N. Roberts, Connor M. Wood, Kevin G. Kelly, Isabel F. Papraniku, Paige J. Kulzer, Amy K. Wray, H. Anu Kramer, John P. Dumbacher, John J. Keane, Paula A. Shaklee, R.J. Gutiérrez, M. Zachariah Peery
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.19.488820
Nicholas F. Kryshak
aDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nicholas F. Kryshak
  • For correspondence: nkryshak@gmail.com
Emily D. Fountain
aDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Emily D. Fountain
Daniel F. Hofstadter
aDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian P. Dotters
bSierra Pacific Industries, Anderson, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin N. Roberts
bSierra Pacific Industries, Anderson, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Connor M. Wood
cK. Lisa Yang Center for Conservation Bioacoustics, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin G. Kelly
aDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isabel F. Papraniku
aDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paige J. Kulzer
aDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amy K. Wray
aDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Anu Kramer
aDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John P. Dumbacher
dCalifornia Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John J. Keane
eUSFS Pacific Southwest Research Station, Davis, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paula A. Shaklee
eUSFS Pacific Southwest Research Station, Davis, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R.J. Gutiérrez
aDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
fDepartment of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Zachariah Peery
aDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Invasive predators can have detrimental impacts on native species and biological communities through direct consumptive effects and indirect effects on trophic interactions. As an invasive, apex predator achieving high densities, barred owls (Strix varia) may pose a substantial threat to native wildlife in western North American forests. Studies of the trophic ecology of barred owls in their invasive range, however, have involved morphological examinations of prey remains with limited taxonomic resolution. We conducted DNA metabarcoding using intestinal samples collected from barred owls at the leading edge of their range expansion in northeastern California. Using customized primers, we screened the intestinal contents of 124 barred owls and detected a broad diet of 78 unique prey types (48 vertebrates and 30 invertebrates), including many previously undetected prey types. Mammals were the most consumed vertebrate class (frequency of occurrence = 65%), followed by amphibians (32%), birds (22%), and reptiles (19%). Diets differed regionally but were similar among ages and sexes and exhibited limited variation in response to local environmental conditions. Our work highlights the generalist predatory strategy of invasive barred owls, indicates that they will not serve as ecological replacements for the congeneric spotted owls (S. occidentalis) they displace, and identifies numerous native species potentially threatened by their range expansion. Expanding currently limited barred owl removals could benefit native species and wildlife communities in western North America. More broadly, DNA metabarcoding provides a powerful tool for conducting detailed assessments of species consumed by invasive predators, potentially incentivizing conservation actions and improving outcomes.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors report that they remain involved in barred owl removal studies in California.

Footnotes

  • Funding Sources: This work was supported by US Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 8; US Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento Field Office; US Forest Service, Region 5, and Sierra Pacific Industries

  • Abbreviations

    MOTU
    Molecular Operational Taxonomic Unit
    FOO
    Frequency of Occurrence
    wPOO
    Weighted Percent of Occurrence
    QMD
    Quadratic Mean Diameter
    DEM
    Digital Elevation Model
    GLM
    Generalized Linear Model
    RDA
    Redundancy Analysis
    GNN
    Gradient Nearest Neighbor
    CDFW
    California Department of Fish and Wildlife
    CNDDB
    California Natural Diversity Database
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted April 20, 2022.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    DNA metabarcoding reveals the threat of rapidly expanding barred owl populations to native wildlife in western North America
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    DNA metabarcoding reveals the threat of rapidly expanding barred owl populations to native wildlife in western North America
    Nicholas F. Kryshak, Emily D. Fountain, Daniel F. Hofstadter, Brian P. Dotters, Kevin N. Roberts, Connor M. Wood, Kevin G. Kelly, Isabel F. Papraniku, Paige J. Kulzer, Amy K. Wray, H. Anu Kramer, John P. Dumbacher, John J. Keane, Paula A. Shaklee, R.J. Gutiérrez, M. Zachariah Peery
    bioRxiv 2022.04.19.488820; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.19.488820
    Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    DNA metabarcoding reveals the threat of rapidly expanding barred owl populations to native wildlife in western North America
    Nicholas F. Kryshak, Emily D. Fountain, Daniel F. Hofstadter, Brian P. Dotters, Kevin N. Roberts, Connor M. Wood, Kevin G. Kelly, Isabel F. Papraniku, Paige J. Kulzer, Amy K. Wray, H. Anu Kramer, John P. Dumbacher, John J. Keane, Paula A. Shaklee, R.J. Gutiérrez, M. Zachariah Peery
    bioRxiv 2022.04.19.488820; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.19.488820

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Ecology
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4866)
    • Biochemistry (10822)
    • Bioengineering (8068)
    • Bioinformatics (27384)
    • Biophysics (14030)
    • Cancer Biology (11167)
    • Cell Biology (16106)
    • Clinical Trials (138)
    • Developmental Biology (8808)
    • Ecology (13333)
    • Epidemiology (2067)
    • Evolutionary Biology (17399)
    • Genetics (11706)
    • Genomics (15964)
    • Immunology (11062)
    • Microbiology (26170)
    • Molecular Biology (10681)
    • Neuroscience (56750)
    • Paleontology (422)
    • Pathology (1737)
    • Pharmacology and Toxicology (3012)
    • Physiology (4570)
    • Plant Biology (9671)
    • Scientific Communication and Education (1617)
    • Synthetic Biology (2699)
    • Systems Biology (6997)
    • Zoology (1515)