Abstract
Background Studying a new species using high-throughput sequencing requires a high-quality reference genome. However, assembling chromosome length sequences remains challenging. Recent advances in chromatin conformation capture (Hi-C) have provided a new approach to scaffolding genome assemblies, and the last ten years have seen a proliferation of such methods. However, to our knowledge no comprehensive benchmarking of Hi-C scaffolders has been conducted to date.
Results Through a literature review we identified the most popular Hi-C scaffolders – Lachesis, HiRise, 3d-dna, SALSA, and AllHiC. We tested their ability to scaffold four well studied genomes – S. cerevisiae, L. tarentolae, A. thaliana, and H. sapiens. Scaffolders were tasked with both scaffolding fragmented versions of the reference genome as well as de novo assemblies derived from long read datasets. We found that all scaffolders can exceed 80% accuracy under ideal circumstances but that their performance quickly deteriorates under more challenging conditions. Surprisingly, many scaffolders also showed poor performance on the best assemblies, where contigs are near chromosome length. Overall, we found that HiRise and Lachesis offer the best performance on average across all conditions.
Conclusions We compare the performance of five Hi-C scaffolders using multiple reference species under both ideal and real-life conditions, thereby illuminating their strengths and weaknesses.
Competing Interest Statement
A.S had a summer internship with Phase Genomics in 2018, a company which provide Hi-C services. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest.
