Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

A natural variation-based screen in mouse cells reveals USF2 as a regulator of the DNA damage response and cellular senescence

View ORCID ProfileTaekyu Kang, View ORCID ProfileEmily C. Moore, View ORCID ProfileEmily E. K. Kopania, View ORCID ProfileChristina D. King, View ORCID ProfileBirgit Schilling, View ORCID ProfileJudith Campisi, View ORCID ProfileJeffrey M. Good, View ORCID ProfileRachel B. Brem
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.21.489100
Taekyu Kang
1Buck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, CA;
2Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Taekyu Kang
Emily C. Moore
3Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Emily C. Moore
Emily E. K. Kopania
3Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Emily E. K. Kopania
Christina D. King
1Buck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, CA;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christina D. King
Birgit Schilling
1Buck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, CA;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Birgit Schilling
Judith Campisi
1Buck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, CA;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Judith Campisi
Jeffrey M. Good
3Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jeffrey M. Good
Rachel B. Brem
1Buck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, CA;
2Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rachel B. Brem
  • For correspondence: rbrem@berkeley.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Cellular senescence is a program of cell cycle arrest, apoptosis resistance, and cytokine release induced by stress exposure in metazoan cells. Landmark studies in laboratory mice have characterized a number of master senescence regulators, including p16INK4a, p21, NF-kB, p53, and C/EBPβ. To discover other molecular players in senescence, we developed a screening approach to harness the evolutionary divergence between mouse species. We found that primary cells from the Mediterranean mouse Mus spretus, when treated with DNA damage to induce senescence, produced less cytokine and had less-active lysosomes than cells from laboratory M. musculus. We used allele-specific expression profiling to catalog senescence-dependent cis-regulatory variation between the species at thousands of genes. We then tested for correlation between these expression changes and interspecies sequence variants in the binding sites of transcription factors. Among the emergent candidate senescence regulators, we chose a little-studied cell cycle factor, USF2, for molecular validation. In acute irradiation experiments, cells lacking USF2 had compromised DNA damage repair and response. Longer-term senescent cultures without USF2 mounted an exaggerated senescence regulatory program—shutting down cell cycle and DNA repair pathways, and turning up cytokine expression, more avidly than wild-type. We interpret these findings under a model of pro-repair, anti-senescence regulatory function by USF2. Our study affords new insights into the mechanisms by which cells commit to senescence, and serves as a validated proof of concept for natural variation-based regulator screens.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • Novel screen reveals USF2 as senescence regulator

  • Format updated to adhere to new journal submission guidelines.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 23, 2023.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A natural variation-based screen in mouse cells reveals USF2 as a regulator of the DNA damage response and cellular senescence
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A natural variation-based screen in mouse cells reveals USF2 as a regulator of the DNA damage response and cellular senescence
Taekyu Kang, Emily C. Moore, Emily E. K. Kopania, Christina D. King, Birgit Schilling, Judith Campisi, Jeffrey M. Good, Rachel B. Brem
bioRxiv 2022.04.21.489100; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.21.489100
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A natural variation-based screen in mouse cells reveals USF2 as a regulator of the DNA damage response and cellular senescence
Taekyu Kang, Emily C. Moore, Emily E. K. Kopania, Christina D. King, Birgit Schilling, Judith Campisi, Jeffrey M. Good, Rachel B. Brem
bioRxiv 2022.04.21.489100; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.21.489100

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genomics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4113)
  • Biochemistry (8815)
  • Bioengineering (6519)
  • Bioinformatics (23463)
  • Biophysics (11790)
  • Cancer Biology (9209)
  • Cell Biology (13323)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7438)
  • Ecology (11410)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15151)
  • Genetics (10436)
  • Genomics (14044)
  • Immunology (9171)
  • Microbiology (22154)
  • Molecular Biology (8812)
  • Neuroscience (47570)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1428)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2491)
  • Physiology (3730)
  • Plant Biology (8080)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1437)
  • Synthetic Biology (2221)
  • Systems Biology (6037)
  • Zoology (1253)