Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Comparison of dry and wet electrodes for detecting gastrointestinal activity patterns from body surface electrical recordings

View ORCID ProfileJonathan C. Erickson, Emily Hassid, Elen Stepanyan
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.23.489246
Jonathan C. Erickson
1Department of Physics and Engineering, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, VA 24450 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jonathan C. Erickson
  • For correspondence: ericksonj@wlu.edu
Emily Hassid
1Department of Physics and Engineering, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, VA 24450 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elen Stepanyan
1Department of Physics and Engineering, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, VA 24450 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective Gastrointestinal motility patterns can be mapped via electrical signals measured non-invasively on the body surface. However, long-term monitoring (≥ 24 hr) may be hindered by skin-irritation inherent with traditional Ag/AgCl pre-gelled (“wet”) electrodes. Therefore, the aim of this work was to investigate the practical utility of using dry electrodes for GI body-surface electrical measurements.

Approach To directly compare dry versus wet electrodes, we simultaneously recorded electrical signals from both types arranged in a 9 electrode (3 × 3) array during an ≈ 2.5 hr colonic meal-response study. Wavelet-based analyses were used to identify the signature post-meal colonic cyclic motor patterns. Signal quality was assessed for each electrode type through quantitative comparison of the dominant frequency, amplitude, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and signal energy vs time in the colonic frequency band. Blinded comparison of signal quality was carried out by four expert manual reviewers in order to assess the practical utility of each electrode type for identifying GI activity patterns.

Main results Dry electrodes recorded high-quality GI signals comparable to that of wet electrodes, with dominant frequency in the range 2.85 - 3.25 cpm; peak-peak amplitudes of 120 ± 40 µV, and SNR in the range 7.5 - 11 dB. The CWT colonic frequency band energy versus time correlation coefficient value was ≥ 0.71 for the majority of studies (6 out of 7) indicating very good agreement between dry and wet electrode signals overall. Whereas wet electrodes were rated by expert reviewers as having slightly better signal quality for identifying GI activity patterns, dry electrodes caused no skin irritation and were thus better-tolerated by all subjects.

Significance Dry electrodes are a viable option for long-term GI monitoring studies, offering a potentially more comfortable alternative to conventional wet electrode systems.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • E-mail: ericksonj{at}wlu.edu

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 25, 2022.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of dry and wet electrodes for detecting gastrointestinal activity patterns from body surface electrical recordings
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Comparison of dry and wet electrodes for detecting gastrointestinal activity patterns from body surface electrical recordings
Jonathan C. Erickson, Emily Hassid, Elen Stepanyan
bioRxiv 2022.04.23.489246; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.23.489246
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Comparison of dry and wet electrodes for detecting gastrointestinal activity patterns from body surface electrical recordings
Jonathan C. Erickson, Emily Hassid, Elen Stepanyan
bioRxiv 2022.04.23.489246; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.23.489246

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3698)
  • Biochemistry (7809)
  • Bioengineering (5689)
  • Bioinformatics (21330)
  • Biophysics (10595)
  • Cancer Biology (8199)
  • Cell Biology (11961)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6777)
  • Ecology (10419)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13900)
  • Genetics (9726)
  • Genomics (13094)
  • Immunology (8164)
  • Microbiology (20058)
  • Molecular Biology (7871)
  • Neuroscience (43147)
  • Paleontology (321)
  • Pathology (1280)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2264)
  • Physiology (3362)
  • Plant Biology (7246)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1315)
  • Synthetic Biology (2010)
  • Systems Biology (5547)
  • Zoology (1132)