Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

The activation of mGluR4 rescues parallel fiber LTP, motor learning and social behavior in a mouse model of Fragile X Syndrome

View ORCID ProfileRicardo Martín, Alberto Samuel Suárez-Pinilla, Nuria García-Font, M. Luisa Laguna-Luque, View ORCID ProfileJuan C. López-Ramos, María Jesús Oset-Gasque, View ORCID ProfileAgnes Gruart, View ORCID ProfileJosé M. Delgado-García, Magdalena Torres, José Sánchez-Prieto
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.29.490046
Ricardo Martín
aDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense, Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Neuroquímica, 28040 Madrid, Spain
bInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ricardo Martín
  • For correspondence: rmartinh@ucm.es jsprieto@ucm.es
Alberto Samuel Suárez-Pinilla
aDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense, Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Neuroquímica, 28040 Madrid, Spain
bInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nuria García-Font
aDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense, Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Neuroquímica, 28040 Madrid, Spain
bInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Luisa Laguna-Luque
cDivision de Neurociencias, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013-Sevilla, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juan C. López-Ramos
cDivision de Neurociencias, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013-Sevilla, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Juan C. López-Ramos
María Jesús Oset-Gasque
bInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain
dDepartamento de Bioquímica, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense, Instituto Universitario Investigación en Neuroquímica, 28040 Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Agnes Gruart
cDivision de Neurociencias, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013-Sevilla, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Agnes Gruart
José M. Delgado-García
cDivision de Neurociencias, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013-Sevilla, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for José M. Delgado-García
Magdalena Torres
aDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense, Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Neuroquímica, 28040 Madrid, Spain
bInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
José Sánchez-Prieto
aDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense, Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Neuroquímica, 28040 Madrid, Spain
bInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rmartinh@ucm.es jsprieto@ucm.es
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Fragile X patients and mice lacking the Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein (FMRP) suffer from multiple behavioral alterations, including deficits in motor learning. We found that enhanced synaptic vesicle (SV) docking in cerebellar parallel fiber to Purkinje cell Fmr1KO synapses was associated with enhanced asynchronous release, which not only occludes further potentiation, but it also compromises presynaptic parallel fiber long-term potentiation (PF-LTP). A reduction in extracellular Ca2+ restored the readily releasable pool (RRP) size, rescuing β adrenergic receptor-mediated potentiation and parallel fiber LTP. Interestingly, VU 0155041, a selective positive allosteric modulator of mGluR4, also restored both the RRP size and parallel fiber LTP. Moreover, when injected into Fmr1KO mice, VU 0155041 improved motor learning in skilled reaching, classical eyeblink conditioning and vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) tests, as well as improving the social behavior of these mice. Thus, pharmacological activation of mGluRs may offer therapeutic relief for motor learning and social deficits in Fragile X Syndrome.

1. INTRODUCTION

Fragile X syndrome (FXS), the most common inherited intellectual disability, is associated with multiple behavioral alterations, such as cognitive deficits, hyperactivity, anxiety and impaired social interactions (Hagerman et al., 2009; MacLeod et al., 2010). FXS patients also experience deficits in the acquisition of motor skills, affecting fine and gross motor activities. (Will et al., 2018). FXS is caused by the silencing of the Fmr1 gene, which encodes the fragile mental retardation protein (FMRP). FMRP is an RNA-binding protein that negatively regulates protein synthesis (Bassell and Warren, 2008) and in its absence, the expression of many postsynaptic proteins is altered, affecting long-term forms of postsynaptic plasticity (Huber et al., 2002). FMRP can be found in axons and presynaptic nerve terminals (Akins et al., 2012; Christie et al., 2009). Indeed, proteomic studies on a mouse model of FXS, Fmr1KO mice, revealed a presynaptic phenotype (Klemmer et al., 2011), with altered expression of presynaptic proteins involved in excitability, Ca2+ homeostasis and neurotransmitter release (Christie et al., 2009; Darnell et al., 2011, 2001; Liao et al., 2008). Electron microscopy (EM) studies of Fmr1KO synapses identified an increase in the number of docked synaptic vesicles (SVs) (Deng et al., 2011a, 2013; García-Font et al., 2019) that was driven by a series of factors. FMRP interacts with the Ca2+ activated K+ channels that control the duration of action potentials (APs) and thus, the loss of FMRP leads to AP broadening and an ensuing increase in Ca2+ influx (Deng et al., 2013). In addition to a higher Ca2+ influx, Fmr1KO cells also accumulate more diacylglycerol (DAG) due to the loss of the diacylglycerol kinase (Tabet el al., 2016). Both Ca2+ and DAG can enhance SV docking and priming through the activation of the Munc13 proteins that bind to these messengers (Rhee et al., 2002; Shin et al., 2010), and that may also bind to calmodulin (CaM) (Junge et al., 2004). Changes in SV docking could affect neurotransmitter release, as the number of docked vesicles is correlated with the size of the readily releasable pool (RRP) of SVs (Rosenmund and Stevens, 1996; Schikorski and Stevens, 2001). Specifically, the enhanced SV docking at Fmr1KO synapses may occlude presynaptic forms of synaptic plasticity, such as Long Term Potentiation (LTP) at cerebellar parallel fibers (PFs), which is expressed through an increase in neurotransmitter release.

LTP at PF to Purkinje cell (PF-PC) synapses depends on enhanced neurotransmitter release, which is mediated by a Ca2+-induced increase in presynaptic cAMP (Salin et al., 1996; Storm et al., 1998) and the active zone (AZ) protein RIM1α (Castillo et al., 2002). We recently found that PF-PC LTP requires a β-adrenergic receptor (β-AR) dependent increase in SV docking and an increase in the RRP size (Martín et al., 2020), events that contribute to enhanced neurotransmitter release (Martín et al., 2020; Ferrero et al., 2013). However, the potentiation of release by β-ARs is impaired in Fmr1KO synaptosomes (García-Font et al., 2019). Plasticity at PF-PC synapses is involved in cerebellar motor learning (Ito, 2002; Schonewille et al., 2010; Gutierrez-Castellanos et al., 2017) and this may be related to the motor learning deficits evident in Fmr1KO mice (Padmashri et al., 2013). Thus, we hypothesized that rescuing the eventual loss of PF-PC LTP in Fmr1KO mice could help ameliorate their motor learning deficits (Padmashri et al., 2013).

Here we found that PF-PC LTP is lost in Fmr1KO synapses because they have more docked SVs in the basal state and a larger RRP size than wild type (WT) synapses, such that β-AR mediated potentiation is occluded. Lowering extracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]e) to 1 mM restored SV docking, the RRP size and PF-PC LTP. These ameliorating effects were also produced by the selective positive allosteric modulator (PAM) of mGluR4, VU 015504, which reduces Ca2+ influx at nerve terminals. Interestingly, the motor learning of Fmr1KO mice that received VU 0155041 improved, as did their social interactions. Thus, pharmacological activation of mGluR4 may offer therapeutic relief from the motor and behavioral deficits in FXS.

2. RESULTS

2.1. The lack of FMRP increases aEPSC frequency and occludes isoproterenol induced potentiation despite normal β-AR expression and cAMP generation

There is enhanced SV docking at synapses in Fmr1KO mice (Deng et al., 2011a) and thus, we asked whether this results in an increase in spontaneous neurotransmitter release. However, as it is not possible to distinguish PF from climbing fiber miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs), we measured asynchronous release in the presence of Sr2+. Under these conditions, asynchronous release represents single release events, and it is associated with PF stimulation (Carey and Regehr, 2009). In WT slices, isoproterenol increased synchronous release (P<0.0001, Fig. 1A,B) and the frequency (P<0.0001, Fig. 1C,D,E) but not the amplitude (P=0.7443, Fig. 1C,F,G) of asynchronous release. However, isoproterenol failed to enhance sEPSCs at Fmr1KO slices (P=0.4958, Fig. 1H,I), and as the frequency of asynchronous aEPSCs in Fmr1KO mice was higher than in WT slices (P=0.0001, Fig. 1D,K), this further occluded the potentiation by isoproterenol (P=0.8764, Fig. 1J,K,L).

We assessed whether the failure of isoproterenol to potentiate neurotransmitter release at Fmr1KO synapses was a consequence of changes in β-AR expression and/or activity, which was examined in a preparation of cerebellar nerve terminals (synaptosomes). The spontaneous release of glutamate from WT cerebellar synaptosomes increased in the presence of isoproterenol (P=0.0005, Supplementary Material: Fig. S1A,C). However, there was more spontaneous release in Fmr1KO synaptosomes under basal conditions (P=0.011, Supplementary Material: Fig. S1C) but this was not further potentiated by isoproterenol (P= 0.719, Supplementary Material: Fig. S1B,C). Thus, Fmr1KO cerebellar synaptosomes recapitulate the occlusion phenotype evident in Fmr1KO slices.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1. An increased aEPSC frequency and occlusion of isoproterenol induced potentiation at Fmr1KO synapses.

(A, H) Isoproterenol (100 μM, 10 min) enhances the sEPSCs recorded in the presence of Sr2+ (2.5 mM) in WT (A) but not in Fmr1KO slices (H). (B, I) Quantification of the effects of isoproterenol on the sEPSC amplitude in WT (B) (n=9, P<0.0001) and in Fmr1KO slices (I) (n=6, P=0.4958). (C, J) Individual traces showing asynchronous release events in control (black) and isoproterenol exposed (red) WT (C) or Fmr1KO slices (J). (D, F, K, M) Quantification of the isoproterenol induced changes in aEPSC frequency in WT (D) (n=306 events/9 slices and, n=502 events/9 slices: P<0.0001) and Fmr1KO slices (K) (n=305 events/6 and n=312 events/6 slices: P=0.8764), as well as in amplitude in WT (F) (P=0.7443) and in Fmr1KO slices (M) (P=0.9463). (E, G, L, N) Cumulative probability plots of isoproterenol induced changes in aEPSC frequency (inter event interval, IEI) WT (E) (P=0.0003) and Fmr1KO slices (L), (P=0.7583), and amplitude in WT (G) (P=0.0885) and Fmr1KO (N) (P=0.4917). The data represent the mean ± SEM. Scale bars in (A, H) and (C, J) represent 100 pA and 10 ms, and 25 pA and 10 ms, respectively. Unpaired student’s t test in (B,D,F,I,K,M). Kolmogrov-Smirnov test in (E,G,L,N). **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.

The absence of β-AR mediated potentiation of spontaneous release in Fmr1KO synaptosomes could be due to weaker expression of this receptor. However, β1-AR expression was similar in Fmr1KO and WT synaptosomes when assessed in western blots (P=0.5773, Supplementary Material: Fig. S2A,B). We also assessed β-AR expressing synaptosomes by immunofluorescence using antibodies against β1-AR and synaptophysin as a marker of SVs. There were a similar number of Fmr1KO and WT cerebellar synaptosomes labeled for synaptophysin that also expressed β1-AR synaptosomes (P=0.2000, Supplementary Material: Fig. S3A,B,C). These data indicate that a change in β1-AR expression is not responsible for the failure of isoproterenol to potentiate spontaneous release in Fmr1 KO synaptosomes. β-ARs activate Adenylyl Cyclase (AC) and generate cAMP, which activates downstream signals to potentiate spontaneous release (Ferrero et al., 2013). The lack of isoproterenol induced potentiation was not due to loss of receptor function as there was a similar β-AR mediated increase in cAMP in Fmr1KO synaptosomes as that in WT synaptosomes (P=0.848, Supplementary Material: Fig. S4A), reinforcing the idea that potentiation mediated by β-ARs is occluded at Fmr1 KO synapses.

2.2. Fmr1KO synapses have more docked SVs than WT synapses and they are insensitive to isoproterenol

The number of docked vesicles at PF-PC WT synapses (those located within 10 nm of the AZ membrane) were increased by exposure to isoproterenol (P<0.001, Fig. 2A,C,D). Notably, there were more docked SVs at PF-PC Fmr1KO synapses in the basal state than in WT synapses (P<0.001) and isoproterenol failed to significantly increase this parameter (P>0.05, Fig. 2E,G,H). Together, the failure of β-ARs to potentiate neurotransmitter release seems to be due to these receptors failing to enhance the docking of SVs to the plasma membrane AZ, which is already enhanced at Fmr1KO PF-PC synapses.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2. Enhanced SV docking of Fmr1 KO synapses and lack of an effect of isoproterenol.

Isoproterenol (100 μM, 10 min) increases SV docking in WT (A,C,D) but not in Fmr1KO (E,G,H) PF-PC synapses. (A) Isoproterenol changes SV distribution (0-10 nm) in WT (n=250/3 and 203/3 synapses/mice: P<0.001) but not in Fmr1KO slices (0-10 nm) (n=238/4 and 224/4 synapses/mice, P>0.05). Note the increase in SV docking in WT control as opposed to Fmr1KO control slices (###P<0.001). (C,D,G,H) Electron microscopy of PF-PC synapses. (B,F) The effect of isoproterenol on the SV distribution: WT (0-5 nm: P<0.001); WT (5-10 nm: P<0.01); Fmr1KO (0-5 nm: P>0.05) and Fmr1KO (5-10 nm: P>0.05). Fmr1KO control vs WT control (###P<0.001). The values represent the mean ± S.E.M. Scale bar in (C,D,G,H) 100 nm. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni in (A,B,E,F). **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.

Loosely docked and primed SVs located 8 nm from the AZ membrane due to the partial zippering of SNARE complexes were distinguished from the tightly docked and fully primed SVs in which SNARE complex zippering has progressed much further, bringing the SVs closer to the AZ membrane (0-5 nm) (Fernández-Busnadiego et al., 2013; Imig et al., 2014; Taschenberger et al., 2016; Neher and Brose, 2018). There were more SVs within 0-5 mm of the AZ membrane in WT slices following exposure to isoproterenol (P<0.001) at the expense of SVs within 5-10 nm, which decreased in number (P<0.01, Fig. 2B). However, Fmr1KO synapses had more SVs within 5 nm than WT synapses (P<0.001, Fig. 2F) and isoproterenol failed to further increase this parameter (P>0.05). Isoproterenol did not change the SVs at a distance of 5-10 nm from the AZ membrane in Fmr1KO synapses (P>0.05, Fig. 2F). Thus, Fmr1 KO synapses have more tightly docked and fully primed SVs than WT synapses, and the ability of β-ARs to further increase this parameter is occluded.

2.3. Cerebellar parallel fiber LTP is absent in PF-PC Fmr1 KO synapses

The enhanced SV docking and increased RRP size mediated by β-ARs is essential for PF-PC LTP, and indeed, β-AR antagonists prevent this presynaptic form of plasticity (Martín et al., 2020). Presynaptic LTP at PF-PC synapses depends on a Ca2+ mediated increase in presynaptic cAMP (Salin et al., 1996) and on the RIM1α protein at the AZ, a Rab-3 interacting molecule (Castillo et al, 2002). As presynaptic responses of β-ARs are occluded at Fmr1KO PF-PC synapses, we assessed whether PF-PC LTP was lost at these synapses. PF-PC LTP can be induced by stimulating PFs at 10 Hz for 10s (Castillo et al., 2002) and it is expressed as a long lasting increase in EPSC amplitude (P=0.0001, Fig. 3A,B). The presynaptic origin of this LTP was evident by the decreased paired-pulse ratio (PPR; P=0.0317, Fig. 3C,D), and the β-AR receptor antagonist propranolol prevented PF-PC LTP in WT slices (P=0.7125, Fig. 3A,B). However, stimulation of PFs at 10 Hz for 10 sec failed to induce LTP at PF-PC Fmr1KO synapses (P=0.8955, compared to the baseline: Fig. 3A,B).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 3. Fmr1 KO synapses lack cerebellar PF-PC LTP.

(A) Changes in EPSC amplitude induced by a 10 Hz stimulation. (B) Quantification of EPSCs 30 min after stimulation (2) compared to the respective values before stimulation (1): WT, (n=9 cells/9 slices/5 mice: P=0.0001, unpaired Student’s t test); WT/propranolol (100 μM, 30 min, n=10 cells/10 slices/6 mice: P=0.7125, Welch’s test); Fmr1 KO (n=12 cells/12 slices/9 mice: P=0.8955, Welch’s test). (C) Changes in the PPR. (D), Quantification of the changes in PPR: WT (P=0.0317 Welch’s test); WT/propranolol (P=0.9595, unpaired Student’s t test); Fmr1KO (P=0.677, unpaired Student’s t test). (E, G), RRP size in WT and Fmr1KO slices. (F,H) Quantification of the RRP size: WT (n=11 cells/11 slices/5 mice: P=0.0015); Fmr1KO n=13 cells/13 slices/6 mice: P=0.6302). RRP size WT basal vs Fmr1KO basal (#P=0.0185). The data are shown as the means ± S.E.M. Scale bars in (A, H) 50 pA and 10 ms, and in (C) 25 pA and 10 ms. Unpaired Student’s t test in F and H. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.

PF-PC LTP involves an increase in the RRP size (Martín et al., 2020) and hence, we determined if a change in the RRP size could explain the lack of LTP at Fmr1KO PF-PC synapses. An increase in the RRP size was evident 30 min after LTP induction at WT PF-PC synapses (P=0.0015, Fig. 3E,F). However, the basal RRP was larger in Fmr1 KO synapses than in WT slices (P=0.0185) and it was not further enhanced by stimulation at 10 Hz (P=0.6302, Fig. 3E,F,G,H). As such, Fmr1KO synapses have a larger RRP under basal conditions that impedes LTP.

2.4. Reducing extracellular Ca2+ rescues parallel fiber LTP in Fmr1KO slices

Some presynaptic changes in Fmr1KO mice include a loss of functional Ca2+-activated K+ channels, which results in AP broadening during repetitive stimulation, enhanced presynaptic Ca2+ influx and increased neurotransmitter release (Deng et al., 2013). By activating proteins of the release machinery involved in SV docking and priming, such as Munc13 (Shin et al., 2010; Dimova et al., 2006, 2009), presynaptic Ca2+ can modulate the docking of SVs and the size of the RRP (Taschenberger et al., 2016; Thanawala and Regehr, 2013; Martín et al, 2018). Thus, we tested whether reducing [Ca2+]e re-established isoproterenol mediated potentiation in Fmr1KO synapses. When slices were maintained at a low [Ca2+]e concentration (1 mM), isoproterenol increased the sEPSCs amplitude (P=0.0021, Fig. 4A,B). Moreover, the aEPSC frequency of Fmr1KO synapses decreased to values similar to those of WT synapses in normal 2.5 mM [Ca2+]e (P=0.5054, Fig. 4D), and consequently, exposure to isoproterenol increased the aEPSC frequency (P=0.0396, Fig. 4C,D,E) with no change in aEPSC amplitude (P=0.9819, Fig. 4F,G). When the [Ca2+]e was lowered PF-PC LTP was also recovered at Fmr1KO slices (P=0.0001, Fig. 4H,I), even though LTP was not supported in WT slices at this low [Ca2+]e (P=0.9571, Fig. 4H,I), consistent with earlier reports on the sensitivity of PF-PC LTP to decreases in [Ca2+]e (Myoga and Regehr, 2011). Interestingly, the rescued LTP in Fmr1KO slices also exhibited other features of PF-PC LTP seen in WT synapses (Martín et al., 2020), such as its sensitivity to the β-AR antagonist propranolol (P=0.9283, Fig. 4H,I) and the increase in RRP size (P=0.0002, Fig. 4J,K). Indeed, reduced [Ca2+]e counteracted the changes that led to increased SV docking and the enhanced RRP in Fmr1KO PF-PC synapses, rescuing the presynaptic potentiation by β-ARs and PF-PC LTP.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 4. Reducing extracellular Ca2+ re-establishes isoproterenol induced potentiation of asynchronous release and parallel fiber LTP at Fmr1KO slices.

Isoproterenol (100 μM, 10 min) enhances the sEPSC amplitude recorded in the presence of Sr2+ (1.0 mM). (B) Quantification of the effects of isoproterenol on sEPSC amplitude: (n=6: P=0.0021, Unpaired Student’s t test). (C) Individual traces showing asynchronous release events in control (black) and after exposure to isoproterenol (red). (D,F) Quantification of the isoproterenol induced changes in aEPSC frequency (D) (n=305 events/10 slices and n=474 events/10 slices: P=0.0396) and in aEPSC amplitude (F) (P=0.9819, unpaired Student’s t test). (E,G) Cumulative probability plots of isoproterenol induced changes in aEPSC frequency (inter event interval, IEI) (E) (P=0.0001) and aEPSC amplitude (G) (P=0.6499, Kolmogrov-Smirnov test). (H), PF LTP was recovered in Fmr1KO slices, yet no LTP was induced in WT slices in the presence of 1 mM Ca2+. Experiments in Fmr1KO slices were also performed in the presence of the β-AR antagonist propranolol (100 μM, added 30 min prior to LTP induction). The EPSC sample traces represent the mean of 6 consecutive EPSCs at 0.05 Hz. (I) Changes in EPSC amplitude 30 min after stimulation (2) compared to basal (1): in Fmr1KO (n=14 cells/14 slices/7 mice: P=0.0001, unpaired Student’s t test); in Fmr1KO slices treated with propranolol (n=9 cells/9 slices/4 mice: P=0.9283, Welch’s test); and in WT (n=10 cells/10 slices/4 mice: P=0.9571, unpaired Student’s t test). (J), RRP size in synapses from basal 10 Hz stimulated slices of Fmr1KO mice. (K), Quantification of the RRP in Fmr1KO slices (n=12 cells/12 slices/4 mice and n=12 cells/12 slices/5 mice, before and after LTP induction: ***P=0.0002, Welch’s test). The data are the means ± S.E.M. Scale bar in (A, C) 10 pA and 100 ms; and in (H) 50 pA and 30 ms. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001.

2.5. The mGluR4 PAM VU0155041 rescues parallel fiber LTP at Fmr1 KO slices

Since decreasing [Ca2+]e re-establishes LTP at Fmr1KO synapses, it may be possible to rescue LTP using pharmacological tools that reduce Ca2+ influx at PF synaptic boutons, for example through the activation of G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). Significantly, mGluR4 reduces Ca2+ influx and synaptic transmission at PF synaptic boutons (Pekhletski et al., 1996; Daniel and Crepel, 2001), where mGluR4 is the only group III mGluR present (Abitbol et al., 2008). When mGluR4s were activated by L-AP4 (40 μM) there was a reduction in the EPSC amplitude and once a new baseline was established, 10 Hz stimulation induced a strong and sustained increase in the EPSC amplitude (P<0.0001, Fig. 5A,B). We also tested whether VU 0155041, a potent and selective PAM of mGluR4s that is active in vivo (Niswender et al., 2008; Williams et al., 2009), rescued PF-PC LTP. VU 0155041 reduced the EPSC amplitude and after 5 min, a 10 Hz stimulation provoked a sustained increase in EPSC amplitude (P<0.0001, Fig. 5A,B). The rescued LTP at Fmr1KO synapses required β-AR activation, as does WT LTP, and indeed, the β-AR antagonist propranolol prevented this rescue by VU 0155041 (P=0.1255, Fig. 5A,B). VU 0155041 reduced the RRP size in Fmr1KO synapses under basal conditions (P=0.0100, Fig. 5C,D) and permitted a further increase by 10 Hz stimulation (P=0.0014, compared with VU 0155041 in basal conditions). Thus, the mGluR4 PAM VU 0155041 rescued normal RRP size and PF LTP in Fmr1KO slices.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 5. Activation of mGluR4 rescues PF-PC LTP in Fmr1KO slices.

(A) LAP4 (40 μM) and the mGluR4 PAM VU 0155041 (100 μM) rescues PF LTP in Fmr1KO slices. The β-AR antagonist propranolol (100 μM) was added 30 min prior to LTP induction. EPSC traces are the mean of 6 consecutive EPSCs at 0.05 Hz. (B) Quantification of EPSC amplitude 30 min after stimulation (2) compared to the respective values before stimulation (1): LAP4 (n=10 cells/10 slices/5 mice: P<0.0001); VU (n=11 cells/11 slices/6 mice: P<0.0001); propranolol + VU (n=10 cells, 10 slices/6 mice: P=0.1255). (C) RRP size in Fmr1KO slices in the presence or absence (basal) of VU (100 μM, 10 min) and with or without 10 Hz stimulation. (D) Quantification of the RRP size in the above conditions: Basal (n=10 cells/10 slices/7 mice); VU (n=12 cells/10 slices/7 mice: P=0.0100); VU plus 10 Hz (n=8 cells/8 slices/4 mice: ##P=0.0014, compared to VU alone). (E) VU restores Ca2+ dynamics to Fmr1KO cerebellar synaptosomes. Changes in the cytoplasmic free Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]c) in the presence and absence of VU (100 μM) added at least 5 min prior to KCl. (F) Quantification of the changes in [Ca2+]c: KCl/WT (n=18/5 preparations); KCl/Fmr1 KO (n=16/5 preparations: ###P<0.001 compared to KCl/WT); VU/KCl/WT (n=11/4 preparations: P<0.05, compared to KCl/WT); and VU/KCl/Fmr1KO (n=12/4 preparations: P<0.001, compared to KCl/Fmr1KO). (G) Scheme showing the preparation of cerebellar slices from VU or saline injected Fmr1KO mice. (H) Response to a 10 Hz stimulation in slices from VU and saline injected Fmr1KO mice. EPSC traces are the mean of 6 consecutive EPSCs at 0.05 Hz. (I) EPSC amplitude 30 min after stimulation (2) compared to the respective values before stimulation (1): VU (5 mg/Kg) injected Fmr1KO mice (n=14 cells/14 slices/10 mice, P=0.0117); saline injected Fmr1KO mice (n=10 cells/10 slices/8 mice, P=0.7178). The data are the means ± S.E.M. Scale bars in (A, H) 100 pA and 10 ms. Unpaired Student’s t test (B,D). Two-way ANOVA with Tukey in (F). Welch test (I). *P<0.05, ***P<0.001.

Ca2+ homeostasis is altered in Fmr1KO mice (Deng et al., 2013; García-Font et al., 2019; Ferron et al., 2014), which led us to test whether VU 0155041 might rescue Ca2+ dynamics in Fmr1KO mice by measuring the depolarization induced change in the cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations ([Ca2+]c) of fura-2 loaded cerebellar synaptosomes. The KCl-induced increase in [Ca2+]c was larger in Fmr1KO than in WT synaptosomes (P<0.001, Fig. 5E,F), compatible with the prolonged APs at Fmr1KO synapses (Deng et al., 2013). VU 0155041 reduced the KCl-induced change in [Ca2+]c in WT synaptosomes (P<0.05, Fig.5E,F) and it restored the KCl-induced increase in [Ca2+]c in Fmr1KO to the levels of WT synaptosomes (P>0.05 Fig. 5E,F). Together, these data indicate that Ca2+ homeostasis is deregulated in Fmr1KO cerebellar synaptosomes but can be restored with the mGluR4 PAM VU 0155041.

We also tested whether VU 0155041 injected “in vivo” rescue PF-PC LTP in cerebellar slices. Fmr1KO mice were injected (i.p.) with VU 0155041 (or the saline vehicle alone) and cerebellar slices were prepared 2 hours later. PF-PC LTP was rescued in slices from VU 0155041 injected Fmr1KO mice (P=0.0117, Fig. 5G,H,I) but not in those from Fmr1KO mice injected with saline alone (P=0.7178, Fig. 5G,H,I). Then, the injection of mGluR4 PAM VU 0155041 “in vivo” also rescued PF-PC LTP in cerebellar slices.

2.6. VU0155041 ameliorates the motor learning and social deficits of Fmr1KO mice

In order to assess the behavioral consequences of the loss of PF-PC LTP we tested the performance of Fmr1KO mice in tests that evaluate motor learning. Fmr1 KO mice display impaired motor learning in a forelimb-reaching task (Padmashri et al., 2013). In this test, mice are trained to use their forelimbs to grasp and retrieve food pellets through a narrow slit (Fig. 6A), and the cerebellum contributes substantially to the coordination of the skilled movements that require speed, smoothness and precision, such as reaching to grasp movements (Sakayori et al., 2019; Becker and Person, 2019). We tested whether rescuing the PF-PC LTP with VU 0155041 improved skilled reaching. After two days of habituation, the animal’s efficiency (number of pellets retrieved/number of attempts) was measured over 5 days and compared to that on day 1. After 5 days, WT mice that received saline (WT sal) increased test performance (P<0.0001), unlike similarly treated Fmr1KO mice (Fmr1 KO sal) (P=0.244, Fig. 6B). Interestingly, VU 0155041 injection improved the learning of this task by Fmr1KO mice (Fmr1KO VU) (P=0.004, Fig. 6B), while it did not alter that of WT mice (WT VU) (P<0.0001, Fig. 6B).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 6. VU 0155041 ameliorates skilled reaching and classical eyeblink conditioning deficits of Fmr1KO mice.

(A) Skilled reaching test. Mice use their forelimbs to grasp and retrieve food pellets through a narrow slit. (B) Efficiency in test performance (number of pellets retrieved per attempt) in the four experimental groups: WT/sal (n=31); Fmr1KO sal (n=33); WT VU (n=31); and Fmr1KO VU (n=32). The increase in efficiency is shown for day 2, 3, 4 and 5 relatives to day 1: WT sal: P=0.078, P=0.009, P<0.0001 and P<0.0001; Fmr1 KO sal: P=0.883, P=0.515, P=0.319 and P=0.244; WT VU: P=0.015, P=0.002. P<0.0001 and P<0.0001; Fmr1 KO/VU: P=0.112, P=0.137, P=0.02 and P=0.004. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by LSD (C) Classical eyeblink conditioning was evoked with a conditioning stimulus (CS) consisting of a 350 ms tone (2.4 kHz, 85 dB) supplied by a loudspeaker located 50 cm in front of the animal’s head. The unconditioned stimulus (US) was presented at the end of the CS, and consisted of an electrical shock (a square, cathodal pulse, lasting for 0.5 ms) presented to the left supraorbital nerve. Conditioned responses (CRs) were determined from the EMG activity of the orbicularis oculi (O.O.) muscle ipsilateral to US presentations. (D) Examples of EMG recordings collected from representative WT sal and Fmr1KO sal mice during the 8th conditioning session. Note the presence of a noticeable CR in the WT sal mouse and its absence in the Fmr1KO sal animal. (E) CRs after 10 conditioning sessions of WT sal (n=10), Fmr1KO sal (n=10), P<0.01, WT VU (n=10), P>0.05 and Fmr1KO VU (n=10), P>0.05. The data are the mean ± S.E.M. (*P<0,05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001). Two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak method (all comparisons were to WT sal).

We also tested classical eyeblink conditioning and the VOR, two paradigms that specifically evaluate cerebellar-dependent motor learning related to plasticity at PF-PC synapses (Ito, 2002; Gutierrez-Castellanos et al., 2017; Hirano, 2018). Fmr1KO mice show deficits in classical eyeblink conditioning (Koekkoek et al., 2005). In the classical eyeblink conditioning the mouse learn to associate a conditioned stimulus (CS), such as a tone, with an unconditioned stimulus (US) such as a mild electric shock to the supraorbital nerve, which evokes eyeblinks (Fig. 6C,D). As a result of the CS-UC association during training the eyeblink conditioned response (CR) is progressively enhanced (Sánchez-Campusano et al., 2009). After 10 conditioning sessions there was a significant deficit in the number of CRs of Fmr1KO sal mice compared to WT sal mice (P<0.01, Fig. 6E). VU 0155041 administration improves the performance of the Fmr1KO (P=0.072, Fig. 6E), but not that of the WT (P=0.333, Fig. 6E).

The VOR helps to stabilize gaze when the head turns (Fig. 7A). The cerebellum plays an important role in the control of phase and gain dynamics of the VOR (Ito, 2002). Illustrative examples of eye movements during table rotation at different frequencies are shown (Fig. 7A). Fmr1KO sal mice showed significant deficits in gain (0.1 Hz: P<0.05, Fig. 7B) and phase (0.6 Hz: P=0.016, Fig. 7C). VU 0155041 administration compensated the differences in gain (0.1 Hz: P>0.05) (Fig 7B), and phase (P>0.446, Fig. 7C). Fmr1KO sal mice presented an increase in the number of fast phases per vestibuloocular cycle (0.6 Hz: P<0.05; 0.3 Hz: P=0.013), that was compensated following VU 0155041 administration (0.6 Hz: P>0.05; 0.3 Hz: P=0.470, Fig. 7D). The relation between vestibuloocular gain and fast phases frequency was also different between WT sal and Fmr1KO sal mice (0.6 Hz: P<0.05; 0.3 Hz: P<0.01, Fig. 7E), and these differences were restored after VU 0155041 administration to Fmr1KO (0.6 Hz: P>0.05; 0.3 Hz: P>0.05, Fig. 7E). Then, VU 0155041 may offer some therapeutic relief to the motor learning deficits in FXS.

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 7. VU 0155041 ameliorates VOR and social interaction deficits of Fmr1KO mice

A, Experimental design. Table rotations (red) and eye positions (green). Examples of eye movements. (B) VOR gain. 0.1 Hz: WT sal (n=10), Fmr1KO sal (n=10), P<0.05, WT VU (n=11), P>0.05 and Fmr1KO VU (n=11), P>0,05. Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s test. (C) VOR phase. 0.6 Hz: Fmr1KO sal, P=0.016, WT VU P=0.382, Fmr1KO VU, P=0.446. One-way ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak. (D) Fast phases per vestibuloocular cycle. 0.6 Hz: Fmr1KO sal, P<0.05, WT VU P>0.05 and Fmr1KO VU, P>0.05, Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s test. 0.3 Hz: Fmr1KO sal, P=0.013, WT VU, P=0.468, Fmr1KO VU, P=0.470, one-way ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak. (E), Relation between VOR gain and fast phases frequency. 0.6 Hz: Fmr1KO sal, P<0.05, WT VU, P>0.05, Fmr1KO VU, P>0.05. Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s method. 0.3 Hz: Fmr1KO sal, P<0.01, WT VU, P>0.05, Fmr1KO VU, P>0.05, Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s method. (F) Sociability test set-up. (G) the interaction time (s) with the mouse-containing and empty cages is measured: WT sal (n=31); Fmr1KO sal (n=30, P<0.0001); WT VU (n=31, P=0.652); (Fmr1KO VU (n=32, P=0.021). (H), Social novelty test set-up. (I), The social novelty test measures the interaction time with familiar and unfamiliar mice: WT sal (n=31); Fmr1 KO sal (n=30, P<0.001); WT VU (n=31, P=0.578); (Fmr1 KO VU (n=32, P=0.131). Two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by LSD (G,I). The data are the mean ± S.E.M. (*P<0.05; **P<0.01, ***P<0.001). All post-hoc comparisons were to WT sal.

Fmr1KO mice shown no defects in other motor tests such as the rotarod, that measures the time that each animal remained on the rod of and an accelerating rotarod treadmill (time to fall) (Supplementary Material: Fig. S5A), or in the elevated path that measures the time spent by a mouse placed in the center on an elevated bar to reach one of the two platforms (Supplementary Material: Fig. S5B)

The cerebellum also controls some non-motor activities such as social cognition (Van Overwalle et al., 2020). Thus, we assessed whether VU 0155041 also ameliorates the social impairments of these Fmr1KO mice. The sociability test evaluates the time animals interact with a cage containing another mouse as opposed to that with an empty cage (Fig 7F). Fmr1KO sal mice spend less time than WT sal mice interacting with another mouse in a cage (P<0.0001), although VU 0155041 injection partially reduced this deficit (P=0.0210, Fig. 7G). We also evaluated social novelty by measuring the interaction time with a familiar as opposed to an unfamiliar mouse (Fig. 7H). Fmr1KO sal mice spend less time with unfamiliar mice than WT sal mice (P=0.001), yet again this deficit was reversed by the injection of VU 0155041 (P=0.131, Fig. 7I). These results indicate that VU 0155041 ameliorates the alterations in social behavior of Fmr1KO mice.

3. DISCUSSION

In this study, the lack of presynaptic PF-PC LTP in Fmr1KO mice is shown to be a consequence of the increase in SV docking and priming, and in the RRP size, which precludes further potentiation of neurotransmitter release. These parameters can be restored by either diminishing the [Ca2+]e concentration or through a decrease in Ca2+ influx at PFs induced by the mGluR4 PAM, VU 0155041. Fmr1KO mice also show deficits in skilled reaching, classical eyeblink conditioning and in the VOR. Interestingly, administration of VU 0155041 ameliorates these motor learning deficits and the impaired social interactions of these Fmr1KO mice.

The RRP of SVs is made up of docked and fully primed SVs, whose membrane fusion can be triggered by Ca2+ influx. The number of docked SVs is strongly related to the size of the RRP (Rosenmund and Stevens, 1996; Schikorski and Stevens, 2001) and therefore, an increase in tightly docked and fully primed SVs may explain the increased aEPSC frequency at Fmr1KO synapses. However, it is important to understand why Fmr1 KO synapses have more docked/primed SVs in order to design strategies to revert this phenotype. Two protein interactions influence the docking and priming of SVs: the formation of the Munc13-Rim1-Rab3 complex (Dulubova et al., 2005); and the assembly of the SNARE complex promoted by the priming activity of Munc13 (Ma et al., 2011). As such, neurons deficient in Munc13s have no docked SVs (Imig et al., 2014) and Munc13-2 deficient synapses fail to display the mGluR7 receptor mediated potentiation associated to enhanced SV docking/priming (Martín et al., 2018). Munc13-1 is translocated to membranes upon DAG binding (Brose et al, 1995; Brose and Rosenmund, 2002), promoting its interaction with RIM1 to form a heterodimer with priming activity (Deng et al., 2011b). In addition to the DAG binding C1 domain (Betz et al., 2001), Munc13-1 is also activated by Ca2+ through its Ca2+-CaM (Dimova et al., 2006, 2009) and Ca2+-phospholipid binding domains (Shin et al., 2010). Cerebellar granule cells express Munc13-1 and Munc13-3, the latter also containing binding sites for Ca2+ and DAG (Augustin et al., 2001). Thus, it is likely that the decrease in [Ca2+]e dampens Munc13 activity and that this provokes a reduction in the RRP size of sufficient magnitude to counterbalance the effect that elevated Ca2+ and DAG levels may have in Fmr1 KO synapses (Deng et al., 2013; Tabet et al., 2016).

Decreasing [Ca2+]e re-establishes β-AR mediated potentiation and PF-PC LTP at Fmr1KO synapses. However, as this strategy has limited translational potential, we tested whether PF-PC LTP can be also rescued pharmacologically by activating presynaptic responses that reduce Ca2+ influx at PF synaptic boutons. We found that mGluR4 activation, either by the group III mGluR agonist L-AP4 or the mGluR4 specific PAM VU 0155041, restores PF-PC LTP. This response is consistent with the presynaptic localization of these receptors at PF-PC synapses (Kinoshita et al., 1996), and with their capacity to depress synaptic transmission and presynaptic Ca2+ influx (Daniel and Crepel, 2001). VU 0155041 also restores the Ca2+ responses of cerebellar synaptosomes to those of WT synaptosomes.

We found that the acquisition of motor skills that affect movements involved in reaching and grasping is impaired in Fmr1KO mice as shown previously by (Padmashri et al., 2013), consistent with the deficient fine motor skills acquisition of FXS patients (Will et al., 2018). The motor skills required for reaching and grasping are high-level functions that involve multiple circuits and brain regions, including the cerebellum, basal ganglia and motor cortex (Shmuelof and Krakauer, 2011). The cerebellum contributes substantially to the coordination of skilled movements, such as those involved in reaching to grasp tasks (Sakayori et al., 2019; Becker and Person, 2019). Thus, patients with lesions in the cerebellar cortex have impaired reach to grasp movements (Rand et al., 2000). At the cellular level, PCs encode limb movements during reaching tasks (Sakayori et al., 2019). It is well established that classical eyeblink conditioning and VOR represent two forms of cerebellar motor learning. For many years the prevailing view has been that cerebellar motor learning depends on postsynaptic LTD at the parallel fiber to Purkinje cell synapses (Ito, 2001). However, it has also been shown that postsynaptic LTP also contributes to cerebellar motor learning providing a reversal of the LTD induced synaptic changes (Gutierrez-Castellanos et al., 2017). Now we found that cerebellar motor learning may also depend on presynaptic PF-PC LTP, thus widening the dynamic range of the synaptic changes that control this cerebellar function.

In addition to the lack of presynaptic PF-PC LTP described here, other changes at PF-PC Fmr1 KO synapses include spine elongation and enhanced postsynaptic LTD (Koekkoek et al., 2005), both of which are associated with motor learning deficits (Galliano et al., 2013). It is therefore attractive to hypothesize that the presynaptic changes at Fmr1KO PF synapses described here (enhanced SV docking, RRP size and aEPSC frequency) could represent a compensatory mechanism to counterbalance the postsynaptic changes (enlarged and immature spines, and enhanced LTD) (Koekkoek et al., 2005). Interestingly, presynaptic LTP in the anterior cingulate cortex is also abolished in Fmr1KO mice (Koga et al., 2015).

We also found that rescuing PF LTP with the mGluR4 PAM, VU 015541 favors the social interaction of Fmr1KO mice. Recent work revealed that the cerebellum controls not only motor functions but also social behavior (Van Overwalle et al., 2020). Early developmental damage to the cerebellum is associated with deficits in social contact in autism (Limperopoulos et al., 2007), and cerebellar abnormalities that affect the structure and function of PCs have been detected in mouse models of autism (Tsai et al., 2012), linking cerebellar dysfunction with autistic behavior. FXS patients also suffer cerebellar alterations, with a reduced size and density of PCs (Greco et al., 2011).

In conclusion, our data points to the cerebellum as a potential target for pharmacological intervention to ameliorate not only the motor learning deficits but also, the social interactions of FXS patients. We are aware that one limitation of the study is that activating mGluR4s via systemic administration of VU 155041 can have broad effects that are likely to affect many neurons and circuits across several brain regions. However, cerebellar granule cells have the strongest expression of mGluR4 in the brain (Corti et al., 2002) and therefore, it is likely to be in this region where the effects of VU 155041 would be most significant.

4. MATERIALS AND METHODS

4.1. Synaptosome preparation

Fmr1KO mice or WT littermate (3 months old) were anaesthetized with isoflurane (1.5-2% in a mixture of 80% synthetic air/20% oxygen) and sacrificed by decapitation. Synaptosomes were purified from 4-5 cerebella on discontinuous Percoll gradients (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden). Briefly, the tissue was homogenized and centrifuged for 2 min at 2,000 x g, and the supernatant was then centrifuged again for 12 min at 9,500 x g. The pellets obtained were gently resuspended in 0.32 M sucrose [pH 7.4] and placed onto a 3 ml Percoll discontinuous gradient containing: 0.32 M sucrose; 1 mM EDTA; 0.25 mM DL-dithiothreitol; and 3, 10 or 23 % Percoll [pH 7.4]. After centrifugation at 25,000 x g for 10 min at 4 ºC, the synaptosomes were recovered from between the 10 % and 23 % Percoll bands, and they were resuspended in HEPES buffered medium (HBM) (Millán et al., 2002). The preparation of cerebellar synaptosomes largely represents the synaptic boutons of granular cells, by far the most abundant cells in the brain (Andersen et al., 1992).

4.1.1. Glutamate release

Glutamate release from cerebellar synaptosomes was assayed by on-line fluorimetry (1) based on the reduction of NADP+ (1 mM: Calbiochem) by glutamate dehydrogenase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The fluorescence of the NADPH generated was measured in a Perkin Elmer LS-50 luminescence spectrometer at excitation and emission wavelengths of 340 and 460 nm, respectively, and using FL WinLab v. 4.00.02 software. Spontaneous glutamate release was determined in the presence of the Na+-channel blocker, Tetrodotoxin (TTx, 1 μM: Abcam, Cambridge, UK).

4.1.2. cAMP accumulation

The accumulation of cAMP was determined using a cAMP dynamic 2 kit (Cisbio, Bioassays, Bagnols sur-Cèze, France). Synaptosomes were incubated for 1 h at 37 ºC (0.67 mg/ml) in HBM and after 15 min, 1.33 mM Ca2+ and 1 mM of the cAMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX: Calbiochem, Damstard, Germany) were added to the synaptosomes for 15 min. Isoproterenol (100 μM) was then added for 10 min, the synaptosomes were collected by centrifugation and transferred to a 96-well assay plate, and the assay components were added having been diluted in lysis buffer: the europium cryptate-labeled anti cAMP antibody and the d2-labeled cAMP analog. After incubation for 1 h at room temperature (RT), the europium cryptate fluorescence and TR-FRET signals were measured over 50 ms on a FluoStar Omega microplate reader (BMG Lab Technologies, Offenburg, Germany) at 620 and 665 nm, respectively, after excitation at 337 nm [see (García-Font et al., 2019)]. The data were obtained using Omega BMG Labtech v.1.00 software.

4.1.3. Immunofluorescence

Immunofluorescence was performed using an affinity-purified rabbit polyclonal antiserum against β1-AR (1:200, Cat# sc-568: Santa Cruz Biotechnology, RRID:AB_2225388) and a mouse monoclonal antibody against synaptophysin 1 (1:500, Cat# 101 011: Synaptic Systems, RRID:AB_887822), as described previously (Ferrero et al., 2016). As a control for the immunofluorescence, the primary antibodies were omitted from the staining procedure, whereupon no immunoreactivity resembling that obtained with the specific antibodies was evident. After washing in Tris Buffered Saline, TBS, the labelled synaptosomes were incubated for 2 hours with secondary antibodies diluted in Tris TBS: Alexa fluor 488 Donkey anti-mouse IgG (1:500, Cat# A-21202: Invitrogen, RRID:AB_141607) and Alexa fluor 594 Donkey anti-rabbit IgG (1:500, Cat# A-21207: Invitrogen, RRID:AB_141637). After several washes in TBS, the coverslips were mounted in Prolong Antifade Kit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA), and the synaptosomes were viewed on a Nikon Diaphot microscope equipped with a 100x objective, a mercury lamp light source and fluorescein-rhodamine Nikon filter sets. Images were acquired with AQM 4800_80 software and analyzed using Image J 1.43m software.

4.1.4. Western Blotting

The P2 crude synaptosomal fraction (4 μg of protein per lane) was diluted in Laemmli loading buffer with β-mercaptoethanol (5% v/v), resolved by SDS-PAGE (8% acrylamide, Bio-Rad), and analyzed in Western blots following standard procedures. The proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes (Hybond ECL: GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Madrid, Spain) and after several washes, the membranes were probed with a polyclonal rabbit anti-β1-AR antiserum diluted 1:200 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Cat# sc-568, RRID:AB_2225388) and a monoclonal mouse anti-β-actin antibody diluted 1:5000 (Sigma cat# A2228, RRID:AB_476697). After several washes, the membranes were incubated with the corresponding IRD-labeled secondary antibodies: goat anti-rabbit and goat anti-mouse coupled to IRDye 800 (LI-COR Biosciences Cat# 925-32211, RRID:AB_2651127) or IRDye 680 (LI-COR Biosciences Cat# 925-68020, RRID:AB_2687826). The membranes were scanned in an Odyssey Infrared imaging system, and the immunolabeling of proteins was compared by densitometry and quantified using Odyssey 2.0 software. The data were normalized to the β-actin signal to account for loading differences.

4.1.5. Cytosolic free Ca2+

The cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]c) was measured with fura-2. P2 crude synaptosomes were resuspended in HBM (1.5 mg/ml) with 16 μM BSA in the presence of CaCl2 (1.3mM) and fura-2-acetoxymethyl ester (fura 2-AM, 5 μM: Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA), and they were incubated at 37 °C for 25 min. After fura-2 loading, the synaptosomes were pelleted and resuspended in 1.1 ml fresh HBM medium without BSA. A 1 ml aliquot was transferred to a stirred cuvette and CaCl2 (1.3 mM) was added. Fluorescence was monitored at 340 and 510 nm, taking data points at 0.3 s intervals, and the [Ca2+]c was calculated using the equations described previously (Grynkiewicz et al., 1985).

4.2. Electrophysiology

Fmr1 KO mice or WT littermate (18-30 days old) were anaesthetized with isoflurane (1.5-2% in a mixture of 80% synthetic air/20% oxygen) and sacrifice by decapitation. Cerebellar parasagittal slices (325 μm thick) were obtained in ice-cold Ringer’s solution [119 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.3 mM MgSO4, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 26 mM NaHCO3, 1 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM glucose] on a Leica VT 1200S vibratome. The slices were kept in a holding chamber containing Ringer’s solution for at least 1 hour and then transferred to a superfusion chamber for recording. The Ringer’s solution in the superfusion chamber was supplemented with 0.1 mM picrotoxin to block the GABAA receptors and it was bubbled with 95% O2/5% CO2 at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Recordings of the PF-PC synapses were obtained at 25 ºC using a temperature controller (TC-324C Warner-Instruments) as described previously (Salin et al., 1996).

Theta capillaries with a 2–5 μm tip and filled with Ringer’s solution were used for bipolar stimulation. The electrodes were connected to a stimulator (S38, GRASS) through an isolation unit and placed near the pial surface of the molecular layer to stimulate PF input to PCs. Stimuli (<50 pA, 100 ms) were delivered at 0.05 Hz with paired pulses applied 80 ms apart to obtain the PPR as EPSC2/EPSC1.

Whole cell recordings from individual PCs were obtained with a PC-ONE amplifier under voltage-clamp conditions and the membrane potential was held at -70 mV to record glutamatergic evoked EPSCs (eEPSCs). Signals were fed to a Pentium-based PC through a DigiData1322A interface board (Axon Instruments) and the pCLAMP 10.2 software was used to generate stimuli, as well as for data display, acquisition, storage and analysis. Patch pipettes (3-4 MΩ) were pulled from thin-walled borosilicate glass (1.5 mm outer diameter) on a P-97 puller (Sutter-Instrument), and they were filled with an internal solution containing: 122.5 mM cesium gluconate, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM BAPTA, 2 mM Mg-ATP, 8 mM NaCl and 5 mM QX-314-Br (pH 7.3 adjusted with CsOH, osmolarity 290 mOsm). Series and input resistances were monitored throughout the experiment using a -5 mV pulse, and the recordings were considered stable when the series and input resistances, resting membrane potential and stimulus artifact duration did not change >20%. Cells that did not meet these criteria were discarded. To avoid irreversible effects of agonists/antagonists/inhibitors or LTP protocols, only one neuron per slice was analyzed. Recordings were also made in cerebellar slices from Fmr1 KO mice 2 hours after intraperitoneal injection of the mGluR4 PAM, VU 0155041 (5 mg/Kg) (Duvoisin et al., 2011) or the saline vehicle alone.

To measure aEPSCs, CaCl2 was replaced with 2.5 mM SrCl2, the stimuli were adjusted to yield a EPSC amplitude between 150 and 250 pA, and they were delivered every 20 s. Asynchronous release associated with each stimulus was estimated after 20 ms and over 500 ms. The asynchronous events associated with the last six stimuli of a 5 min period were quantified in the basal condition and after 10 min in the presence of isoproterenol (100 μM).

For LTP induction, a tetanic train of 100 stimuli delivered at 10 Hz was applied at least 15 minutes after the beginning of the recording to permit adequate time for the diffusion of BAPTA into the dendritic tree. The baseline PF eEPSC amplitude was less than 300 pA to avoid sodium spikes that escaped voltage clamp, particularly during and after tetanization.

The size of the RRP was estimated as described previously (Schneggenburger et al., 2002). To minimize the variability of these estimates, the stimulus intensity prior to LTP induction was adjusted to yield EPSC amplitudes between 150-200 pA. A tetanic train (100 stimuli at 40 Hz) was applied 30 minutes after application of the 10 Hz train to induce presynaptic LTP. The cumulative EPSC amplitudes during this train were plotted and the y-intercept that extended from the linear part of the curve (times longer than 1.5 s, when the cumulative amplitude curve reaches a steady state) was used to estimate the size of the RRP. When the effect of decreasing [Ca2+]e on RRP size was studied, the slices were maintained at low Ca2+ for at least 1 h and they were incubated with 2.5 mM Ca2+ for 3 min prior to applying the tetanic train. OriginLab 8 software was used for plotting and fitting.

4.3. Electron microscopy analysis of synaptic vesicle distribution at the active zone

Parasagittal slices (325 μm thick) from the cerebellum were obtained as described above for the electrophysiology experiments, transferred to an immersion recording chamber and superfused at 1 mL min−1 with gassed Ringer’s solution including 0.1 mM picrotoxin. In some cases, the slices were also treated with isoproterenol (100 μM) for 10 min. The slices were fixed immediately afterwards by immersion in 3.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M PB (pH 7.4) at 37 °C for 45 min and they were then left in glutaraldehyde solution for 30 min at RT before storing them for 20 h at 4 °C. The slices were then rinsed six times with large volumes of 0.1 M Phosphate Buffer (PB) and post-fixing it in 1% OsO4–1.5% K3Fe(CN)6 for 1 h at RT. After dehydrating through a graded series of ethanol (30, 50, 70, 80, 90, 95 and 100%), the samples were then embedded using the SPURR embedding kit (TAAB, Aldermaston, UK). Ultrathin ultramicrotome sections (70–80 nm thick: Leica EM UC6 Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) were routinely stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and images were obtained on a Jeol 1010 transmission electron microscope (Jeol, Tokyo, Japan). Randomly chosen areas of the cerebellar molecular layer were then photographed at 80,000x magnification and only asymmetric synapses with clearly identifiable electron-dense postsynaptic densities were analyzed with ImageJ software. The number of SVs was determined by measuring the distance between the outer layer of the vesicle and the inner layer of the AZ membrane, and distributed in 10 nm bins. The SVs that were at the maximal distance of 10 nm were considered as docked vesicles. SVs were also distributed in 5 nm bins to distinguish fully primed and tightly docked SVs (0-5 nm) from loosely docked SVs (5-10 nm). The data were analyzed blind to the genotype and treatment, and the images were analyzed using Image J 1.43m and Origin 8.0 software.

4.4. Drug application in “in vivo” experiments

“In vivo” experiments were carried out with 3-month-old male Fmr1KO mice and littermate WT. Animal were housed in individual cages until the end of the experiment. Mice were kept on a 12-h light/dark cycle with constant ambient temperature (22 ± 0.5°C) and humidity (55 ± 3%). They had food and water available ad libitum.

The mice were intraperitoneally (i.p.) injected with mGluR4 PAM (VU 0155041, 5 mg/Kg) (Duvoisin et al., 2011), or the saline vehicle alone, 2 hours prior to performing the behavioral experiments. Four experimental groups were established: WT and Fmr1KO mice injected with either saline or VU 0155041. Animals from each genotype were randomly allocated to one of two groups (saline or VU 0155041).

4.4.1. Rotarod

We used an accelerating rotarod treadmill (Ugo Basile, Varese, Italy). A mouse was placed on the rod and tested at 2–20 rpm (of increasing speed) the first day, for a maximum of 5 min. Mice were tested two times with an interval of one hour during the same first session. Animals were re-tested 24 and 48 h later. Between these trials, mice were allowed to recover in their cages. The total time that each animal remained on the rod was computed as latency to fall (s), recorded automatically by a trip switch located under the floor of each rotating drum. Results were evaluated by averaging the data collected from each of the 4 trials (Rossi et al., 2020).

4.4.2. Elevated path

The elevated path consisted of a 40 cm long, 5 cm wide bar located 60 cm over a soft cushion. Each mouse was placed in the center of the elevated bar and allowed a maximum of 40 s to reach one of the platforms (12 × 12 cm) located at each end of the bar. The time spent to reach one of the two platforms was quantified (Rossi et al., 2020).

4.4.3. Skilled reaching test

Mice were food deprived (70% of normal intake) before performing the test (Tomassy et al., 2010). Briefly, a Plexiglas reaching box was used (20 cm long × 8 cm wide × 20 cm high) with a 1 cm wide vertical slit in the front of the box. Animals have to reach the palatable food pellet (20 mg dustless precision sucrose-flavored food pellets, F0071: Bio Serv) on a shelf (4 cm wide × 8 cm long) in front of the vertical slit. There is a 4 mm gap between the platform that holds the food pellets and the slit that prevents the mice from sliding the food pellets toward them. The mice were habituated to the food pellets by during the two days before testing (20 min each). Those animals that did not even attempt to grasp the pellet were discarded from the study. In the first day the food pellets were put in the box, and during the second day on the shelf. The 5 days of testing consisted of a 20 min session each day. Pellet grasping and retrieval was scored as a success, whereas pellet displacement without retrieval or grasping the pellet, dropping it before it was retrieved, and pellet displacement were considered an unsuccessful attempt. Results were represented as the ratio of total successes/total attempts.

4.4.4. Animal’s preparation for chronic recording experiments

Animals were deeply anesthetized with 1.2% isoflurane supplied from a calibrated Fluotec 5 (Fluotec-Ohmeda, Tewksbury, MA, USA) vaporizer at a flow rate of 0.8 L/min oxygen. The gas was delivered via an anesthesia mask adapted for mice (David Kopf Instruments, Tujunga, CA, USA). Animals were implanted with bipolar recording electrodes in the left orbicularis oculi muscle and with bipolar stimulating electrodes on the ipsilateral supraorbital nerve. Implanted electrodes were made of 50 μm, Teflon-coated, annealed stainless steel wire (A-M Systems, Carlsborg, WA, USA), with their tips bent as a hook to facilitate a stable insertion in the orbicularis oculi muscle and bared of the isolating cover for 0.5 mm. Two 0.1-mm bare silver wires were affixed to the skull as ground. The 6 wires were soldered to a six-pin socket and the socket fixed to the skull with the help of 2 small screws and dental cement. In a final surgical step, a holding system was fixed to the skull for its proper stabilization during head rotation and eye movement recordings. Further details of this chronic preparation have been detailed elsewhere (Gruart et al., 2006; Sergaki et al., 2017).

4.4.5. Classical eyeblink conditioning

Experimental sessions started a week after surgery and were carried out with six animals at a time. Animals were placed in individual and ventilated plastic chambers (5 × 5 × 10 cm) located inside a larger Faraday box (35 × 35 × 25 cm). For classical eyeblink conditioning, we used a delay paradigm consisting of a 350 ms tone (2.4 kHz, 85 dB) as a conditioned stimulus (CS) followed at its end by an electrical shock (0.5 ms, 3 x threshold, cathodal, square pulse), applied to the supraorbital nerve, as an unconditioned stimulus (US).

A total of two habituation and 10 conditioning sessions were carried out for each animal. A conditioning session consisted of 60 CS-US presentations and lasted for about 30 min. Paired CS-US presentations were separated at random by 30 ± 5 s. For habituation sessions, the CSs were presented alone, also for 60 times per session, at intervals of 30 ± 5 s (Gruart et al., 2006).

The electromyographic (EMG) activity of the orbicularis oculi muscle was recorded with Grass P511 differential amplifiers (Grass-Telefactor, West Warwick, RI, USA), at a bandwidth of 0.1 Hz-10 kHz.

4.4.6. Vestibular stimulation and recording of the VOR

For vestibular stimulation, a single animal was placed on a home-made turning-table system. Its head was immobilized with the help of the implanted holding system, while the animal was allowed to walk over a running wheel. Table rotation was carried out by hand following a sinusoidal display in a computer screen. Actual rotation of the table was recorded with a potentiometer attached to its rotating axis. The animal was rotated by ± 20 deg at three selected frequencies (0.1, 0.3, and 0.6 Hz) for about ten cycles with intervals of 5 s between frequencies. The mouse right eye was illuminated with a red cold light attached to the head holding system. Eye positions during rotation were recorded with a fast infrared CCD camera (Pike F-032, Allied Technologies, Stadtroda, Germany) affixed to the turning table, at a rate of 50 or 100 pictures/s.

Recordings of head rotations and eye positions were synchronized and analyzed offline with an analog/digital converter (CED 1401 Plus, Cambridge, England) for gain and phase. Gain was computed as the averaged angular displacement of the eye (peak-to-peak) divided by the angular displacement of the head evoked experimentally. VOR gain in mice is usually << 1 (de Jeu and de Zeeuw, 2012; Stahl et al., 2006). Phase was determined as the averaged angular difference (in degrees) between peak eye position vs. peak head position (Sergaki et al., 2017; de Jeu and de Zeeuw, 2012).

4.4.7. Social interaction test

To evaluate social interaction the subject (male adult mice) was allowed to move freely in a neutral cage (69 × 41 × 37cm), containing a small inverted grid box on each side. For habituation each mouse was placed in the cage for 5 min with both boxes empty to discard mice that preferred either half of the cage. In the sociability session, a strange juvenile mouse that had not previously been encountered was put underneath one of the grid inverted boxes. In the social novelty session, another stranger mouse was put inside the previously empty box. Each session lasted 10 min, and all the experiments were video recorded and analyzed by the researcher. The test estimates the time spent by the subject in close proximity to the juvenile mice, including the time during which the subject oriented its nose to the occupied box and sniffed in a distance <1 cm, and the time the subject touched the occupied box.

4.4.8. Data collection and analysis of “in vivo” experiments

Recorded videos from each test were analyzed blind to the genotype and treatment. For classical eyeblink conditioning, unrectified EMG activity of the orbicularis oculi muscle, and 1-V rectangular pulses corresponding to CS and US presentations were stored digitally in a computer through an analog/digital converter (CED 1401-plus) for quantitative off-line analysis. Collected data were sampled at 10 kHz for EMG recordings, with an amplitude resolution of 12 bits. A computer program (Spike2 from CED) was used to display the EMG activity of the orbicularis oculi muscle. For experiments involving the VOR, head and eye positions were stored digitally in the same an analog/digital converter and processed off-line with the help of a MATLAB based (MathWorks, Natick, MA) home-made tracking program.

4.5. Statistics

The appropriate sample size was previously computed depending on the power of each test using Statgrahics Centurion XVII.2. For statistical analysis GraphPad InStat v2.05a (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA); SigmaPlot 10 (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA USA) and OriginPro 8.0 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA) were used. For comparison between two sets of data unpaired two-tailed Student t test was used or the Welch test when the variances of the populations were significantly different. When more than two sets of data were compared, one-way ANOVA (post hoc Holm-Sidak’s method), two-way ANOVA (Bonferroni’s or Tukey’s post hoc tests) or two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by all paired multiple comparisons procedure Holm-Sidak’s or LSD post hoc tests, were used. When variances of the populations were significantly different the Kruskal-Wallis test was used and Dunn’s as post hoc test. For details see (Gruart et al., 2006). The data are represented as the mean ± S.E.M.: *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. Differences were considered statistically significant when P<0.05 with a confidence limit of 95%.

4.6. Study approval

Fmr1KO (Strain #:003025, RRID:IMSR_JAX:003025) or WT (Strain #:000664, RRID:IMSR_JAX:000664) mice were used to establish the colonies at the Animal House Service at the Complutense University, an authorized center for the breeding of genetically modified mice. Fmr1KO and mice and WT littermate were used in this study. These mice were also supplied to the Pablo de Olavide Animal House (Sevilla, Spain). Experiments were carried out in accordance with guidelines of the European Union Council (2010/276:33-79/EU) and Spanish (BOE 34:11370-421, 2013) regulations for the use of laboratory animals in chronic studies and, in addition, were approved by the Ethics Committee of Comunidad de Madrid (PROEX 012/18) and of the Junta de Andalucía (code 06/04/2020/049).

FUNDING

This work was financed by grants from the Spanish ‘MINECO’ (BFU 2017-83292-R to JS-P and PID2020-114030RB-100 to MT), and the ‘Instituto de Salud Carlos III’ (RD 16/0019/0009), ‘Comunidad de Madrid’ (B2017/BMD-3688) to JS-P and by grant PY18-82 from the Spanish Junta de Andalucía to AG. NG-F holds a Predoctoral Contract UCM-Banco de Santander 2017. AS-P holds a Predoctoral contract from the Spanish MICINN (PRE2018-083202). M.L.L.-L. was a pre-doctoral fellow supported by a fellowship from the Spanish Junta de Andalucía assigned to PIA-BIO-122 group.

AUTORSHIP CONRIBUTION

J.S.-P., M.T., N.G.-F., R.M., A.G., J.M.D.-G. conceived and designed the experiments; R.M., N.G.-F., A.S-P., M.J.O.-G., M.L.L.-L., J.C.L.-R., A.G. and J.M.D.-G. acquired and analyzed the data; J.S.-P., J.M.D.-G. wrote the paper.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no competing interests.

DATA AVAILABILITY

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and Supplementary Material. Source data files for main figures and supplementary figures have also been provided.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE LEGENDS

Figure S1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure S1 Lack of isoproterenol-induced potentiation of glutamate release in Fmr1 KO cerebellar synaptosomes.

(A, B) Mean traces from WT (A) and Fmr1 KO (B) cerebellar synaptosomes showing spontaneous release of glutamate in the presence of the Na+ channel blocker tetrodotoxin (1 μM, TTx), and in the presence or absence (control) of isoproterenol (100 μM). (C) Diagram summarizing the isoproterenol effect on glutamate release in the aforementioned conditions from WT (n=8/3 synaptosomal preparations: P=0.0005) and Fmr1 KO synaptosomes (n=7/3 preparations: P= 0.719). Basal release from Fmr1 KO vs WT synaptosomes (#P=0.011). The data represent the mean ± SEM. Unpaired Student’s t test in C. ***P<0.001

Figure S2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure S2. The expression of β-AR is not altered in Fmr1 KO cerebellar synaptosomes.

(A) Western blot analysis of β1-AR in the P2 crude synaptosomes fraction from WT and Fmr1 KO mice. (B) The data were normalized to the WT values (n=3/3preparations (Fmr1 KO, n=3/3 preparations: P=0.5773). The data represent the mean ± SEM. Unpaired Student’s t test in B.

Figure S3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure S3. The distribution of β-AR is not altered in Fmr1 KO cerebellar synaptosomes.

(A,B) Quantification of β-AR expressing cerebellar synaptosomes. Immunofluorescence of WT (A) and Fmr1 KO (B) synaptosomes stained with antibodies against β1-AR and the vesicular marker synaptophysin. (C) Co-expression of β-AR/synaptophysin in WT (24.9 ±1.1%, n=16,804/63 fields/2 preparations) and in Fmr1 KO synaptosomes (26.7 ±0.9%, n=18,712/75 fields/2 preparations, P=0.200). Scale bar in A and B, 5 μm. The data represent the mean ± SEM. Unpaired Student’s t test.

Figure S4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure S4. The isoproterenol induced generation of cAMP is not altered in Fmr1 KO cerebellar synaptosomes.

The effect of isoproterenol on the cAMP levels in WT (n=14/3 preparations: P=0.032) is similar (P=0.848) to that in Fmr1 KO synaptosomes (n=15/3 preparations: **P=0.0043, unpaired Student’s t test). The data represent the mean ± SEM. *P<0.05. **P<0.01.

Figure S5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure S5. Fmr1 KO performance in rotarod and elevated path is unchanged.

(A), Latency to fall of the mouse in an accelerating rotarod. WT sal (n=11), Fmr1KO sal (n=14) P>0.05, WT VU (n=10) P>0.05, and Fmr1KO VU (n=11) P>0.05. Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s test. All comparisons were to WT sal. (B), In the elevated path the time spent to walk from the center of a 5 cm wide bar to one of its ends is measured. WT sal, Fmr1KO sal P>0.05, WT VU P>0.05, and Fmr1KO VU P>0.05, Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s test. All comparisons were to WT sal. The data represent the mean ± SEM.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank ML. García and M. González from the electron microscopy facility at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid for technical support, and J.M. Gonzalez Martin and M. Sanchez Enciso from Universidad Pablo de Olavide for their help in the performed experiments. Miguel Delicado Miralles, a visiting fellow from the INA-CSIC of Alicante, also helped in some in vivo experiments. We also thank Dr Bartolomé-Martín (Departamento de Ciencias Médicas Básicas (Fisiología), Universidad de la Laguna) for his help with statistics. We thank Mark Sefton for editorial assistance and Dr I Galve-Roperh (Facultad de Biología at UCM) for facilitating the chamber to perform the skilled reaching tests.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Abitbol K. et al., 2008. Depression of excitatory transmission at PF-PC synapse by group III metabotropic glutamate receptors is provided exclusively by mGluR4 in the rodent cerebellar cortex. J. Neurochem. 105, 2069–2079
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    Akins M.R., et al., 2012. Systematic mapping of fragile X granules in the mouse brain reveals a potential role for presynaptic FMRP in sensorimotor functions. J. Comp. Neurol. 520, 3687–3706
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Andersen B.B., Korbo L., Pakkenberg B., 1992. A quantitative study of the human cerebellum with unbiased stereological techniques. J. Comp. Neurol. 326, 549–560
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Augustin I. et al., 2001. The cerebellum-specific Munc13 isoform Munc13-3 regulates cerebellar synaptic transmission and motor learning in mice. J. Neurosci. 21, 10–17
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Bassell G.J., Warren S.T., 2008. Fragile X syndrome: loss of local mRNA regulation alters synaptic development and function. Neuron. 60, 201–214
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    Becker M.I., Person A.L., 2019. Cerebellar control of reach kinematics for endpoint precision. Neuron.103, 335–348
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    Betz A. et al., 2001. Functional interaction of the active zone proteins Munc13-1 and RIM1 in synaptic vesicle priming. Neuron. 30, 183–196.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. Brose N. et al., 1995. Mammalian homologues of Caenorhabditis elegans unc-13 gene define novel family of C2-domain proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 25273–25280
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Brose N., Rosenmund C., 2002. Move over protein kinase C, you’ve got company: alternative cellular effectors of diacylglycerol and phorbol esters. J. Cell. Sci. 115, 4399–4411
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. Carey M.R. and Regher W.G., 2009. Noradrenergic control of associative synaptic plasticity by selective modulation of instructive signals. Neuron. 62112–122
  11. ↵
    Castillo P.E. et al., 2002. RIM1alpha is required for presynaptic long-term potentiation. Nature. 415, 327–330
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    Christie S.B. et al., 2009. The FXG: a presynaptic fragile X granule expressed in a subset of developing brain circuits. J. Neurosci. 29, 1514–1524
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Corti C. et al., 2002. Distribution and synaptic localisation of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 4 (mGluR4) in the rodent CNS. Neuroscience. 110, 403–420
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Daniel H., Crepel F., 2001. Control of Ca2+ influx by cannabinoid and metabotropic glutamate receptors in rat cerebellar cortex requires K+ channels. J. Physiol. 537, 793–800
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    Darnell J.C. et al., 2001. Fragile X mental retardation protein targets G quartet mRNAs important for neuronal function. Cell. 107, 489–499
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    Darnell J.C. et al., 2011. FMRP stalls ribosomal translocation on mRNAs linked to synaptic function and autism. Cell. 146, 247–261
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    de Jeu M., De Zeeuw C.I., 2012. Video-oculography in mice. J. Vis. Exp. 65: e3971. doi: 10.3791/3971.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Deng P.Y. et al., 2011a. Abnormal presynaptic short-term plasticity and information processing in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. J. Neurosci. 31, 10971–10982
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Deng L. et al., 2011b. RIM proteins activate vesicle priming by reversing autoinhibitory homodimerization of Munc13. Neuron. 69, 317–331
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    Deng P.Y. et al., 2013. FMRP regulates neurotransmitter release and synaptic information transmission by modulating action potential duration via BK channels. Neuron. 77, 696–711
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    Dimova K. et al., 2006. Characterization of the Munc13-calmodulin interaction by photoaffinity labeling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1763, 1256–1265
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    Dimova K. et al., 2009. Structural insights into the calmodulin-Munc13 interaction obtained by cross-linking and mass spectrometry. Biochemistry. 48, 5908–5921
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    Dulubova I. et al., 2005. A Munc13/RIM/Rab3 tripartite complex: from priming to plasticity. EMBO J. 24, 2839–2850
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Duvoisin R.M. et al., 2011. Opposing roles of mGluR8 in measures of anxiety involving non-social and social challenges. Behav. Brain Res. 221, 50–54
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Fernández-Busnadiego R. et al., 2013. Cryo-electron tomography reveals a critical role of RIM1alpha in synaptic vesicle tethering. J. Cell. Biol. 201, 725–740
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Ferrero J.J. et al., 2013. Beta-adrenergic receptors activate exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (Epac), translocate Munc13-1, and enhance the Rab3A-RIM1alpha interaction to potentiate glutamate release at cerebrocortical nerve terminals. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 31370–31385
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Ferrero et al. J.J., 2016. Cross-talk between metabotropic glutamate receptor 7 and beta adrenergic receptor signaling at cerebrocortical nerve terminals. Neuropharmacology. 101, 412–425
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Ferron L. et al., 2014. Fragile X mental retardation protein controls synaptic vesicle exocytosis by modulating N type calcium channels density. Nat. Commun. 5, 3628. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4628
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Galliano E. et al., 2013. Silencing the majority of cerebellar granule cells uncovers their essential role in motor learning and consolidation. Cell Rep. 3, 1239–1251
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    García-Font N. et al., 2019. The loss of beta adrenergic receptor mediated release potentiation in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. Neurobiol. Dis. 130, 104482
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    Greco C.M. et al., 2011. Neuropathologic features in the hippocampus and cerebellum of three older men with fragile X syndrome. Mol. Autism. 2, 2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Gruart A. et al., 2006. Involvement of the CA3-CA1 synapse in the acquisition of associative learning in behaving mice. J. Neurosci. 26: 1077–1087.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Grynkiewicz G. et al., 1985. A new generation of Ca2+ indicators with improved fluorescence properties. J Biol Chem. 260, 3440–3450
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Gutierrez-Castellanos N. et al., 2017. Motor learning requires purkinje cell synaptic potentiation through activation of AMPA-receptor subunit GluA3. Neuron. 93, 409–424
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Hagerman R.J. et al., 2009. Advances in the treatment of fragile X syndrome. Pediatrics. 123, 378–90
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Hirano T., 2018. Regulation and interaction of multiple types of synaptic plasticity in a purkinje neuron and their contribution to motor learning. Cerebellum. 17, 756–765
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    Huber K.M. et al., 2002. Altered synaptic plasticity in a mouse model of fragile X mental retardation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 7746–7750
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Imig C. et al., 2014. The morphological and molecular nature of synaptic vesicle priming at presynaptic active zones. Neuron. 84, 416–31
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Ito M., 2001. Cerebellar long-term depression: characterization, signal transduction and functional roles. Physiol. Rev. 3, 1143–1194
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    Ito M., 2002. Historical review of the significance of the cerebellum and the role of Purkinje cells in motor learning. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 978, 273–288
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. ↵
    Junge H.J. et al., 2004. Calmodulin and Munc13 form a Ca2+ sensor/effector complex that controls short-term synaptic plasticity. Cell. 118, 389–401
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    Kinoshita A. et al., 1996. Presynaptic localization of a metabotropic glutamate receptor, mGluR4a, in the cerebellar cortex: a light and electron microscope study in the rat. Neurosci. Lett. 207, 199–202
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    Klemmer P. et al., 2011. Proteomics, ultrastructure, and physiology of hippocampal synapses in a fragile X syndrome mouse model reveal presynaptic phenotype. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 25495–25504
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    Koekkoek S.K. et al., 2005. Deletion of FMR1 in Purkinje cells enhances parallel fiber LTD, enlarges spines, and attenuates cerebellar eyelid conditioning in Fragile X syndrome. Neuron. 47, 339–352
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    Koga K. et al., 2015. Impaired presynaptic long-term potentiation in the anterior cingulate cortex of Fmr1 knock-out mice. J. Neurosci. 35, 2033–2043
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    Liao L. et al., 2008. Quantitative proteomic analysis of primary neurons reveals diverse changes in synaptic protein content in fmr1 knockout mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 15281–15286
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    Limperopoulos C. et al., 2007. Does cerebellar injury in premature infants contribute to the high prevalence of long-term cognitive, learning, and behavioral disability in survivors. Pediatrics. 120, 584–593
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    Ma C. et al., 2011. Munc13 mediates the transition from the closed syntaxin-Munc18 complex to the SNARE complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 542–549
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    MacLeod L.S. et al., 2010. A comparative study of the performance of individuals with fragile X syndrome and Fmr1 knockout mice on Hebb-Williams mazes. Genes Brain Behav. 9, 53–64
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. ↵
    Martin R. et al., 2018. Bidirectional modulation of glutamatergic synaptic transmission by metabotropic glutamate type 7 receptors at Schaffer collateral-CA1 hippocampal synapses. J. Physiol. 596, 921–940
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    Martín R. et al., 2020. β-adrenergic receptors/Epac signaling increases the size of the readily releasable pool of synaptic vesicles required for parallel fiber LTP. J. Neurosci. 40, 8604–8617
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    Millan C. et al., 2002. The inhibition of glutamate release by metabotropic glutamate receptor 7 affects both [Ca2+]c and cAMP: evidence for a strong reduction of Ca2+ entry in single nerve terminals. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 14092–14101
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    Myoga M.H., Regehr W.G., 2011. Calcium microdomains near R-type calcium channels control the induction of presynaptic long-term potentiation at parallel fiber to Purkinje cell synapses. J. Neurosci. 31, 5235–5243
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    Neher E., Brose N., 2018. Dynamically primed synaptic vesicle states: key to understand synaptic short-term plasticity. Neuron. 100, 1283–1291
    OpenUrl
  55. ↵
    Niswender C.M. et al., 2008. Positive allosteric modulators of the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 4 (mGluR4): Part I. Discovery of pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidines as novel mGluR4 positive allosteric modulators. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18, 5626–5630
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    Padmashri O. et al., 2013. Altered structural and functional synaptic plasticity with motor skill learning in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. J. Neurosci. 33, 19715–19723
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    Pekhletski R. et al., 1996. Impaired cerebellar synaptic plasticity and motor performance in mice lacking the mGluR4 subtype of metabotropic glutamate receptor. J. Neurosci. 16, 6364–6373
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    Rand M.K. et al., 2000. Effects of accuracy constraints on reach-to-grasp movements in cerebellar patients. Exp. Brain Res. 135, 179–88
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  59. ↵
    Rhee J.S. et al., 2002. Beta phorbol ester- and diacylglycerol-induced augmentation of transmitter release is mediated by Munc13s and not by PKCs. Cell. 108, 121–133
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. ↵
    Rosenmund C., Stevens C.F., 1996. Definition of the readily releasable pool of vesicles at hippocampal synapses. Neuron. 16, 1197–1207
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. ↵
    Rossi, D. et al., 2020. Reelin reverts biochemical, physiological and cognitive alterations in mouse models of Tauopathy. Progress Neurobiol. 186, 101743.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  62. ↵
    Sakayori N. et al., 2019. Motor skills mediated through cerebellothalamic tracts projecting to the central lateral nucleus. Mol Brain. 12, 13
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  63. ↵
    Salin P.A. et al., 1996. Cyclic AMP mediates a presynaptic form of LTP at cerebellar parallel fiber synapses. Neuron. 16, 797–803
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  64. Sanchez-Campusano R., 2009. Dynamic association in the cerebellar-motoneuron network during motor learning. J Neurosci. 29, 10750–10763
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    Schikorski T., Stevens C.F., 2001. Morphological correlates of functionally defined synaptic vesicle populations. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 391–395
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  66. ↵
    Schneggenburger R. et al., 2002. Vesicle pools and short-term synaptic depression: lessons from a large synapse. Trends Neurosci. 25, 206–212
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  67. ↵
    Schonewille M. et al., 2010. Purkinje cell-specific knockout of the protein phosphatase PP2B impairs potentiation and cerebellar motor learning. Neuron. 67, 618–628
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  68. ↵
    Sergaki, M.C. et al., 2017. Compromised Survival of Cerebellar Molecular Layer Interneurons Lacking GDNF Receptors GFRα1 or RET Impairs Normal Cerebellar Motor Learning. Cell Rep. 19: 1977–1986.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    Shin O.H. et al., 2010. Munc13 C2B domain is an activity-dependent Ca2+ regulator of synaptic exocytosis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 280–288
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  70. ↵
    Shmuelof L., J.W. Krakauer J.W., 2011. Are we ready for a natural history of motor learning. Neuron. 72, 469–476
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  71. ↵
    Stahl J.S., 2006. Eye movements of the murine P/Q calcium channel mutant tottering, and the impact of aging. J. Neurophysiol. 95: 1588–1607.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  72. ↵
    Storm D.R. et al., 1998. Impaired cerebellar long-term potentiation in type I adenylyl cyclase mutant mice. Neuron. 1998 20, 1199–1210
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  73. ↵
    Tabet R. et al., 2016. Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein (FMRP) controls diacylglycerol kinase activity in neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113, 3619–3628
    OpenUrl
  74. ↵
    Taschenberger H. et al., 2016. Superpriming of synaptic vesicles as a common basis for intersynapse variability and modulation of synaptic strength. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113, 4548–4557
    OpenUrl
  75. ↵
    Thanawala M.S., Regehr W.G., 2013. Presynaptic calcium influx controls neurotransmitter release in part by regulating the effective size of the readily releasable pool. J. Neurosci. 33, 4625–4633
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. ↵
    Tomassy G.S. et al., 2010. Area-specific temporal control of corticospinal motor neuron differentiation by COUP-TFI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107, 3576–3581
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  77. ↵
    Tsai et al. P.T. 2012., Autistic-like behaviour and cerebellar dysfunction in Purkinje cell Tsc1 mutant mice. Nature. 488, 647–651
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  78. ↵
    Van Overwalle F., et al., 2020. Consensus paper: cerebellum and social cognition. Cerebellum. 19, 833–868
    OpenUrlPubMed
  79. ↵
    Will et al. E.A., 2018. Adaptive behavior in infants and toddlers with Down syndrome and fragile X syndrome. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 177, 358–368.
    OpenUrl
  80. ↵
    Williams R. et al., 2009. Synthesis and SAR of a novel positive allosteric modulator (PAM) of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 4 (mGluR4). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19, 4967–4970
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 30, 2022.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The activation of mGluR4 rescues parallel fiber LTP, motor learning and social behavior in a mouse model of Fragile X Syndrome
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The activation of mGluR4 rescues parallel fiber LTP, motor learning and social behavior in a mouse model of Fragile X Syndrome
Ricardo Martín, Alberto Samuel Suárez-Pinilla, Nuria García-Font, M. Luisa Laguna-Luque, Juan C. López-Ramos, María Jesús Oset-Gasque, Agnes Gruart, José M. Delgado-García, Magdalena Torres, José Sánchez-Prieto
bioRxiv 2022.04.29.490046; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.29.490046
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The activation of mGluR4 rescues parallel fiber LTP, motor learning and social behavior in a mouse model of Fragile X Syndrome
Ricardo Martín, Alberto Samuel Suárez-Pinilla, Nuria García-Font, M. Luisa Laguna-Luque, Juan C. López-Ramos, María Jesús Oset-Gasque, Agnes Gruart, José M. Delgado-García, Magdalena Torres, José Sánchez-Prieto
bioRxiv 2022.04.29.490046; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.29.490046

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4658)
  • Biochemistry (10310)
  • Bioengineering (7629)
  • Bioinformatics (26218)
  • Biophysics (13463)
  • Cancer Biology (10638)
  • Cell Biology (15354)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (8461)
  • Ecology (12768)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (16782)
  • Genetics (11368)
  • Genomics (15418)
  • Immunology (10565)
  • Microbiology (25078)
  • Molecular Biology (10169)
  • Neuroscience (54205)
  • Paleontology (398)
  • Pathology (1659)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2878)
  • Physiology (4320)
  • Plant Biology (9206)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1582)
  • Synthetic Biology (2543)
  • Systems Biology (6759)
  • Zoology (1455)