Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Molecular insights into the effect of alkanediols on FUS liquid-liquid phase separation

View ORCID ProfileTheodora Myrto Perdikari, View ORCID ProfileAnastasia C. Murthy, View ORCID ProfileNicolas L. Fawzi
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.05.490812
Theodora Myrto Perdikari
1Center for Biomedical Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Theodora Myrto Perdikari
Anastasia C. Murthy
2Molecular Biology, Cell Biology & Biochemistry Graduate Program, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
3Department of Early Discovery Biochemistry, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Anastasia C. Murthy
Nicolas L. Fawzi
4Department of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology & Biochemistry and Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nicolas L. Fawzi
  • For correspondence: nicolas_fawzi@brown.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Numerous cell biology studies have used high concentrations of 1,6-hexanediol to dissolve membraneless organelles and disordered protein biomolecular condensates. Yet, little is known about how alkanediols effect liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), and why certain alkanediol isomers are more effective. Here, we evaluate the effect of various alkanediols on the archetypal phase separating protein FUS. Low-complexity domain and full-length FUS LLPS is decreased varyingly, while LLPS of FUS RGG-RNA condensates is even enhanced by some alkanediols. NMR experiments show that all diols act similarly, correlating atomistic changes with LLPS-preventing effects. Furthermore, we find no evidence for specific residue interactions – the largest perturbations are seen at backbone and glutamine side-chain hydrogen bonding sites, not hydrophobic/aromatic residues. Furthermore, 1,6 hexanediol favors formation of protein-solvent hydrogen bonds and increases FUS local motions. These findings show how alkanediols affect water-disordered protein interactions, underscoring the difficulty in using alkanediol-derivatives to target dissolution of specific membraneless organelles.

Competing Interest Statement

N.L.F is a member of the scientific advisory board of Dewpoint Therapeutics. A.C.M is currently employed by Genentech Inc. The authors declare no other conflicts of interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 06, 2022.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Molecular insights into the effect of alkanediols on FUS liquid-liquid phase separation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Molecular insights into the effect of alkanediols on FUS liquid-liquid phase separation
Theodora Myrto Perdikari, Anastasia C. Murthy, Nicolas L. Fawzi
bioRxiv 2022.05.05.490812; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.05.490812
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Molecular insights into the effect of alkanediols on FUS liquid-liquid phase separation
Theodora Myrto Perdikari, Anastasia C. Murthy, Nicolas L. Fawzi
bioRxiv 2022.05.05.490812; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.05.490812

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Biochemistry
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3514)
  • Biochemistry (7367)
  • Bioengineering (5347)
  • Bioinformatics (20326)
  • Biophysics (10046)
  • Cancer Biology (7777)
  • Cell Biology (11353)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6453)
  • Ecology (9980)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13357)
  • Genetics (9373)
  • Genomics (12614)
  • Immunology (7725)
  • Microbiology (19104)
  • Molecular Biology (7465)
  • Neuroscience (41153)
  • Paleontology (301)
  • Pathology (1235)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2142)
  • Physiology (3180)
  • Plant Biology (6880)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1276)
  • Synthetic Biology (1900)
  • Systems Biology (5328)
  • Zoology (1091)