Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Metagenomic analysis of coprolites from three Late Pleistocene megaherbivores from the Southwestern United States

View ORCID ProfileTomos O. Prys-Jones, Tara N. Furstenau, Andrew J. Abraham, Isaac N. Shaffer, Colin J. Sobek, Jordyn R. Upton, Samantha N. Hershauer, Kelvin Wong, Marirosa Molina, Sebastian Menke, Jim I. Mead, Christopher H. Ebert, Mariah S. Carbone, Edward A.G. Schuur, Faith M. Walker, Viachelsav Y. Fofanov, View ORCID ProfileChristopher E. Doughty
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.06.490351
Tomos O. Prys-Jones
1School of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tomos O. Prys-Jones
  • For correspondence: tomos.prysjones@gmail.com
Tara N. Furstenau
1School of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew J. Abraham
1School of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isaac N. Shaffer
1School of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Colin J. Sobek
2Pathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jordyn R. Upton
2Pathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samantha N. Hershauer
2Pathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kelvin Wong
3Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, North Carolina, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marirosa Molina
3Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, North Carolina, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sebastian Menke
4Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jim I. Mead
5The Mammoth Site, Hot Springs, South Dakota, USA
6Desert Laboratory at Tumamoc Hill, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher H. Ebert
7Center for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mariah S. Carbone
7Center for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward A.G. Schuur
7Center for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Faith M. Walker
2Pathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Viachelsav Y. Fofanov
1School of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
2Pathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher E. Doughty
1School of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christopher E. Doughty
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

1. ABSTRACT

Background Determining the life-history traits of extinct species is often difficult from skeletal remains alone, limiting the accuracy of studies modeling past ecosystems. However, the analysis of the degraded endogenous bacterial DNA present in paleontological fecal matter (coprolites) may enable the characterization of specific traits such as the host’s digestive physiology and diet. An issue when evaluating the microbial composition of coprolites is the degree to which the microbiome is representative of the host’s original gut community versus the changes that occur in the weeks following deposition due to desiccation. Analyses of paleontological microorganisms are also relevant in the light of recent studies linking the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene extinctions with modern-day zoonotic pathogen outbreaks.

Methods Shotgun sequencing was performed on ancient DNA (aDNA) extracted from coprolites of the Columbian mammoth (Mammuthus Columbi), Shasta ground sloth (Nothrotheriops shastensis) and paleontological bison (Bison sp.) collected from caves on the Colorado Plateau, Southwestern USA. The novel metagenomic classifier MTSv, parameterized for studies of aDNA, was used to assign bacterial taxa to sequencing reads. The resulting bacterial community of coprolites was then compared to those from modern fecal specimens of the African savannah elephant (Loxodonta africana), the brown-throated sloth (Bradypus variegatus) and the modern bison (Bison bison). Both paleontological and modern bison fecal bacterial communities were also compared to those of progressively dried cattle feces to determine whether endogenous DNA from coprolites had a microbiome signal skewed towards aerobic microorganisms typical of desiccated fecal matter.

Results The diversity of phyla identified from coprolites was lower than modern specimens. The relative abundance of Actinobacteria was increased in coprolites compared to modern specimens, with fewer Bacteroidetes and Euryarchaeota. Firmicutes had a reduced relative abundance in the mammoth and bison coprolites, compared to the African savanna elephants and modern bison. There was a significant separation of samples in NMDS plots based on their classification as either paleontological or modern, and to a lesser extent, based on the host species. Increasingly dried cattle feces formed a continuum between the modern and paleontological bison samples.

Conclusion Our results reveal that any coprolite metagenomes should always be compared to desiccated modern fecal samples from closely related hosts fed a comparable diet to determine the degree to which the coprolite metagenome is a result of desiccation versus true dissimilarities between the modern and paleontological hosts. Also, a large-scale desiccation study including a variety of modern species may shed light on life-history traits of extinct species without close extant relatives, by establishing the proximity of coprolite metagenomes with those from dried modern samples.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 06, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Metagenomic analysis of coprolites from three Late Pleistocene megaherbivores from the Southwestern United States
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Metagenomic analysis of coprolites from three Late Pleistocene megaherbivores from the Southwestern United States
Tomos O. Prys-Jones, Tara N. Furstenau, Andrew J. Abraham, Isaac N. Shaffer, Colin J. Sobek, Jordyn R. Upton, Samantha N. Hershauer, Kelvin Wong, Marirosa Molina, Sebastian Menke, Jim I. Mead, Christopher H. Ebert, Mariah S. Carbone, Edward A.G. Schuur, Faith M. Walker, Viachelsav Y. Fofanov, Christopher E. Doughty
bioRxiv 2022.05.06.490351; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.06.490351
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Metagenomic analysis of coprolites from three Late Pleistocene megaherbivores from the Southwestern United States
Tomos O. Prys-Jones, Tara N. Furstenau, Andrew J. Abraham, Isaac N. Shaffer, Colin J. Sobek, Jordyn R. Upton, Samantha N. Hershauer, Kelvin Wong, Marirosa Molina, Sebastian Menke, Jim I. Mead, Christopher H. Ebert, Mariah S. Carbone, Edward A.G. Schuur, Faith M. Walker, Viachelsav Y. Fofanov, Christopher E. Doughty
bioRxiv 2022.05.06.490351; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.06.490351

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Paleontology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3514)
  • Biochemistry (7367)
  • Bioengineering (5346)
  • Bioinformatics (20324)
  • Biophysics (10045)
  • Cancer Biology (7776)
  • Cell Biology (11352)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6453)
  • Ecology (9980)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13356)
  • Genetics (9373)
  • Genomics (12612)
  • Immunology (7725)
  • Microbiology (19103)
  • Molecular Biology (7465)
  • Neuroscience (41153)
  • Paleontology (301)
  • Pathology (1235)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2142)
  • Physiology (3178)
  • Plant Biology (6880)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1276)
  • Synthetic Biology (1900)
  • Systems Biology (5328)
  • Zoology (1091)