Abstract
By reproducing differential expression analysis simulation results presented by Li et al, we identified a caveat in the data generation process. Data not truly generated under the null hypothesis led to incorrect comparisons of benchmark methods. We provide corrected simulation results that demonstrate the good performance of dearseq and argue against the superiority of the Wilcoxon rank-sum test as suggested by Li et al. Please see related Research article with DOI 10.1186/s13059-022-02648-4.
Competing Interest Statement
BPH, RT and DA originally authored the dearseq method. KB declare that he has no competing interests.
Footnotes
Copyright
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.