Abstract
Eusocial insects have evolved different strategies to share information about their environment and workers can recruit nestmates to food sources or new nest sites. Ants are the most species-rich social insect group and are known to use pheromones, visual and tactile signals to communicate and inform nestmates about resources. However, how these different strategies evolved and whether there was a predominant evolutionary sequence that led to present day recruitment strategies is not well understood. In our study we explored two competing hypotheses about the ancestral recruitment communication: (1) ant ancestors did not recruit nestmates and species evolved more complex recruitment strategies over time vs. (2) early ants used mass-recruitment, which was lost repeatedly in some lineages. We combined an extensive search of the scientific literature and ancestral state reconstruction to estimate the ancestral recruitment strategy, focusing on the categories (i) no recruitment, (ii) tandem running, (iii) group-recruitment and (iv) chemical mass-recruitment. Stochastic character mapping suggests that mass-recruitment was ancestral in ants (59-61%), whereas “no recruitment” was unlikely to be the ancestral condition (21%). Similarly, marginal ancestral state reconstruction suggests that mass-recruitment (44-81%) or group-recruitment (48-50%) represented the original state. Our results are consistent with the finding that early ants lived in colonies containing up to several thousand individuals, which are typically associated with mass-recruiting in ants. However, our ability to robustly identify patterns in the evolution of communication in ants remains hampered by a lack of natural history information for most ant species.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
