SUMMARY
In their recent commentary in Protein Science, Jaskolski et al. analyze three randomly picked diffraction data sets from fragment-screening group depositions from the PDB and, based on that, claim that such data are principally problematic. We demonstrate here that if such data are treated properly, none of the proclaimed criticisms persist.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Copyright
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Posted June 02, 2022.
Of Problems and Opportunities – How to Treat and How to Not Treat Crystallographic Fragment-Screening Data
