Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Agent-based vs. equation-based multi-scale modeling for macrophage polarization

Sarah B. Minucci, Rebecca L. Heise, View ORCID ProfileAngela M. Reynolds
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.20.496801
Sarah B. Minucci
1Department of Mathematics & Applied Mathematics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca L. Heise
2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angela M. Reynolds
1Department of Mathematics & Applied Mathematics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Angela M. Reynolds
  • For correspondence: areynolds2@vcu.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Macrophages show high plasticity and result in heterogenic subpopulations or polarized states identified by specific cellular markers. These immune cells are typically characterized as pro-inflammatory, or classically activated M1, and anti-inflammatory, or alternatively activated M2. However, a more precise definition places them along a spectrum of activation where they may exhibit a number of pro- or anti-inflammatory roles. To gain a greater understanding of the mechanisms of the immune response from macrophages and the balance between M1 and M2 activation, we utilized two different modeling techniques, ordinary differential equation (ODE) modeling and agent-based modeling (ABM), to simulate the spectrum of macrophage activation to general pro- and anti-inflammatory stimuli on an individual and multi-cell level. The ODE model includes two hallmark pro- and anti-inflammatory signaling pathways and the ABM incorporates similar M1-M2 dynamics but in a spatio-temporal platform. Both models link molecular signaling with cellular-level dynamics. We then performed simulations with various initial conditions to replicate different experimental setups. Similar results were observed in both models after tuning to a common calibrating experiment. Comparing the two models' results sheds light on the important features of each modeling approach. When more data is available these features can be considered when choosing techniques to best fit the needs of the modeler and application.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 21, 2022.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Agent-based vs. equation-based multi-scale modeling for macrophage polarization
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Agent-based vs. equation-based multi-scale modeling for macrophage polarization
Sarah B. Minucci, Rebecca L. Heise, Angela M. Reynolds
bioRxiv 2022.06.20.496801; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.20.496801
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Agent-based vs. equation-based multi-scale modeling for macrophage polarization
Sarah B. Minucci, Rebecca L. Heise, Angela M. Reynolds
bioRxiv 2022.06.20.496801; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.20.496801

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Systems Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3586)
  • Biochemistry (7545)
  • Bioengineering (5495)
  • Bioinformatics (20732)
  • Biophysics (10294)
  • Cancer Biology (7951)
  • Cell Biology (11611)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6586)
  • Ecology (10168)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13580)
  • Genetics (9521)
  • Genomics (12817)
  • Immunology (7906)
  • Microbiology (19503)
  • Molecular Biology (7641)
  • Neuroscience (41982)
  • Paleontology (307)
  • Pathology (1254)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2192)
  • Physiology (3259)
  • Plant Biology (7025)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1294)
  • Synthetic Biology (1947)
  • Systems Biology (5419)
  • Zoology (1113)