SUMMARY
The dentate gyrus (DG) of hippocampus is hypothesized to act as a pattern separator that distinguishes between similar input patterns during memory formation and retrieval. Sparse ensembles of DG cells associated with learning and memory, i.e. engrams, have been labeled and manipulated to recall novel context memories. Functional studies of DG cell activity have demonstrated the spatial specificity and stability of DG cells during navigation. To reconcile how the DG contributes to separating global context as well as individual navigational routes, we trained mice to perform a delayed-non-match-to-position (DNMP) T-maze task and labeled DG neurons during performance of this task on a novel T-maze. The following day, mice navigated a second environment: the same T-maze, the same T-maze with one route permanently blocked but still visible, or a novel open field. We found that the degree of engram reactivation across days differed based on the traversal of maze routes, such that mice traversing only one arm had higher ensemble overlap than chance but less overlap than mice running the full two-route task. Mice experiencing the open field had similar ensemble sizes to the other groups but only chance-level ensemble reactivation. Ensemble overlap differences could not be explained by behavioral variability across groups, nor did behavioral metrics correlate to degree of ensemble reactivation. Together, these results support the hypothesis that DG contributes to spatial navigation memory and that partially non-overlapping ensembles encode different routes within the context of different environments.
Highlights
Immediate-early-gene labeling strategy revealed spatial navigation ensembles in DG
Sub-ensembles encode separate maze routes within a larger task context
Ensemble reactivation does not correlate with behavioral variables
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
Our revisions focus in particular on clarifying methodologies and statistical analyses, as well as implementing a new method for cell count quantification against statistical chance. We have also revised the discussion to put our results in context of similar research and add nuance to the reader's interpretation of the cell count and behavioral results. Two new figures have been added, the new Figure 1 which details methodological validity and new Figure 6 which describes correlations between cell ensemble data and behavior data.