Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Evaluating a Human/Machine Interface with Redundant Motor Modalities for Trajectory-Tracking

View ORCID ProfileAmber H.Y. Chou, Momona Yamagami, View ORCID ProfileSamuel A. Burden
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.29.498180
Amber H.Y. Chou
*Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, WA 98105, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Amber H.Y. Chou
  • For correspondence: hachou@uw.edu
Momona Yamagami
*Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, WA 98105, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samuel A. Burden
*Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, WA 98105, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Samuel A. Burden
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

In human/machine interfaces (HMI), humans can interact with dynamic machines through a variety of sensory and motor modalities. Redundant motor modalities are known to have advantages in both human sensorimotor control and human-computer interaction: motor redundancy in sensorimotor control provides abundant solutions to achieve tasks; and incorporating diverse features from different modalities has improved the performance of gesture-, movement-, and brain-controlled computer interfaces. Our objective is to investigate whether redundant motor modalities enhance performance for a continuous trajectory-tracking task. We designed a multimodal human/machine interface with combined manual (joystick) and muscle (surface electromyography, sEMG) inputs and evaluated its closed-loop performance for tracking trajectories through second-order machine dynamics. In a human subjects experiment with 15 participants, we found that the multimodal interface outperformed the manual-only interface while performing comparably to the muscle-only interface; and that the multimodal interface enabled users to coordinate sensorimotor noise in individual modalities to improve performance. Multimodal human/machine interfaces could be beneficial in systems that require stability and robustness against perturbations such as motor rehabilitation and robotic manipulation.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • (e-mails: hachou{at}uw.edu, my13{at}uw.edu, sburden{at}uw.edu)

  • ★ This research was funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation (Awards #1836819, 2045014).

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 04, 2022.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluating a Human/Machine Interface with Redundant Motor Modalities for Trajectory-Tracking
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Evaluating a Human/Machine Interface with Redundant Motor Modalities for Trajectory-Tracking
Amber H.Y. Chou, Momona Yamagami, Samuel A. Burden
bioRxiv 2022.06.29.498180; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.29.498180
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Evaluating a Human/Machine Interface with Redundant Motor Modalities for Trajectory-Tracking
Amber H.Y. Chou, Momona Yamagami, Samuel A. Burden
bioRxiv 2022.06.29.498180; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.29.498180

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Bioengineering
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3689)
  • Biochemistry (7789)
  • Bioengineering (5674)
  • Bioinformatics (21282)
  • Biophysics (10576)
  • Cancer Biology (8173)
  • Cell Biology (11937)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6762)
  • Ecology (10401)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13863)
  • Genetics (9708)
  • Genomics (13070)
  • Immunology (8139)
  • Microbiology (19983)
  • Molecular Biology (7842)
  • Neuroscience (43053)
  • Paleontology (319)
  • Pathology (1279)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2258)
  • Physiology (3351)
  • Plant Biology (7232)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1312)
  • Synthetic Biology (2004)
  • Systems Biology (5537)
  • Zoology (1128)