Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Beyond variance: simple random distributions are not a good proxy for intraspecific variability in systems with environmental structure

View ORCID ProfileCamille Girard-Tercieux, View ORCID ProfileGhislain Vieilledent, View ORCID ProfileAdam Clark, James S. Clark, View ORCID ProfileBenoit Courbaud, View ORCID ProfileClaire Fortunel, View ORCID ProfileGeorges Kunstler, View ORCID ProfileRaphaël Pélissier, View ORCID ProfileNadja Rüger, View ORCID ProfileIsabelle Maréchaux
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.06.503032
Camille Girard-Tercieux
1AMAP, Université de Montpellier, CIRAD, CNRS, INRAE, IRD, Montpellier, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Camille Girard-Tercieux
  • For correspondence: camillegirardtercieux@gmail.com
Ghislain Vieilledent
1AMAP, Université de Montpellier, CIRAD, CNRS, INRAE, IRD, Montpellier, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ghislain Vieilledent
Adam Clark
2Institute of Biology, Karl-Franzens University of Graz, Graz, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Adam Clark
James S. Clark
3Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham (NC), USA
4Université Grenoble Alpes, INRAE, LESSEM, St. Martin-d’Heres, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benoit Courbaud
4Université Grenoble Alpes, INRAE, LESSEM, St. Martin-d’Heres, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Benoit Courbaud
Claire Fortunel
1AMAP, Université de Montpellier, CIRAD, CNRS, INRAE, IRD, Montpellier, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Claire Fortunel
Georges Kunstler
4Université Grenoble Alpes, INRAE, LESSEM, St. Martin-d’Heres, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Georges Kunstler
Raphaël Pélissier
1AMAP, Université de Montpellier, CIRAD, CNRS, INRAE, IRD, Montpellier, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Raphaël Pélissier
Nadja Rüger
5Department of Economics, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
6German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
7Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Ancón, Panama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nadja Rüger
Isabelle Maréchaux
1AMAP, Université de Montpellier, CIRAD, CNRS, INRAE, IRD, Montpellier, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Isabelle Maréchaux
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The role of intraspecific variability (IV) in shaping community dynamics and species coexistence has been intensively discussed over the past decade and modelling studies have played an important role in that respect. However, these studies often implicitly assume that IV can be represented by independent random draws around speciesspecific mean parameters. This major assumption has largely remained undiscussed, although a great part of observed IV is structured in space or time, in particular when environmental dimensions that influence individual performance are imperfectly characterised or unobserved in the field. To test the impact of this strong assumption on the outcome of community dynamics models, we designed a simulation experiment where we varied the level of knowledge of the environment in virtual communities, resulting in different relative importance of explained vs unexplained individual variation in performance. We used a community dynamics simulator to generate communities where the unexplained individual variation is, or is not, added as an unstructured random noise. Communities simulated with unstructured IV never reached the community diversity and composition of those where all the variation was explained and structured (perfect knowledge model). This highlights that incorporating unstructured IV (i.e. a random noise) to account for unexplained (but structured) variation can lead to incorrect simulations of community dynamics. In addition, the effects of unstructured IV on community diversity and composition depended on the relative importance of structured vs unstructured IV, i.e. on the level of knowledge of the environment, which may partly explain the contrasting results of previous studies on the effect of IV on species coexistence. In particular, the effect of unstructured IV on community diversity was positive when the proportion of structured IV vs unstructured IV in the model was low, but negative when this proportion was high. This is because unstructured random noise can either limit the competitive exclusion of inferior competitors in low dimensions or destabilise thigh niche partitioning in high dimension. Our study suggests that it is crucial to account for the sources and structure of observed IV in real communities to better understand its effect on community assembly and properly include it in community dynamics models.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • Following the first round of a peer-review in PCI Ecology (the answer will be public).

  • https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6929042

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 26, 2023.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Beyond variance: simple random distributions are not a good proxy for intraspecific variability in systems with environmental structure
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Beyond variance: simple random distributions are not a good proxy for intraspecific variability in systems with environmental structure
Camille Girard-Tercieux, Ghislain Vieilledent, Adam Clark, James S. Clark, Benoit Courbaud, Claire Fortunel, Georges Kunstler, Raphaël Pélissier, Nadja Rüger, Isabelle Maréchaux
bioRxiv 2022.08.06.503032; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.06.503032
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Beyond variance: simple random distributions are not a good proxy for intraspecific variability in systems with environmental structure
Camille Girard-Tercieux, Ghislain Vieilledent, Adam Clark, James S. Clark, Benoit Courbaud, Claire Fortunel, Georges Kunstler, Raphaël Pélissier, Nadja Rüger, Isabelle Maréchaux
bioRxiv 2022.08.06.503032; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.06.503032

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Ecology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4397)
  • Biochemistry (9629)
  • Bioengineering (7123)
  • Bioinformatics (24937)
  • Biophysics (12670)
  • Cancer Biology (9994)
  • Cell Biology (14400)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7989)
  • Ecology (12147)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (16025)
  • Genetics (10951)
  • Genomics (14778)
  • Immunology (9905)
  • Microbiology (23739)
  • Molecular Biology (9506)
  • Neuroscience (51049)
  • Paleontology (370)
  • Pathology (1545)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2692)
  • Physiology (4038)
  • Plant Biology (8693)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1512)
  • Synthetic Biology (2404)
  • Systems Biology (6458)
  • Zoology (1350)