Abstract
The scientific reform movement has proposed openness as a potential remedy to the putative reproducibility or replication crisis. However, the conceptual relationship between openness, replication experiments, and results reproducibility has been obscure. We analyze the logical structure of experiments, define the mathematical notion of idealized experiment, and use this notion to advance a theory of reproducibility. Idealized experiments clearly delineate the concepts of replication and results reproducibility, and capture key differences with precision, allowing us to study the relationship among them. We show how results reproducibility varies as a function of: the elements of an idealized experiment, the true data generating mechanism, and the closeness of the replication experiment to an original experiment. We clarify how openness of experiments is related to designing informative replication experiments and to obtaining reproducible results. With formal backing and evidence, we argue that the current “crisis” reflects inadequate attention to a theoretical understanding of results reproducibility.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
