Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Hierarchical processing underpins competition in tactile perceptual bistability

View ORCID ProfileFarzaneh Darki, Andrea Ferrario, James Rankin
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.16.504072
Farzaneh Darki
1Department of Mathematics, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Farzaneh Darki
  • For correspondence: fd332@exeter.ac.uk
Andrea Ferrario
1Department of Mathematics, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
2Biorobotics Laboratory, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James Rankin
1Department of Mathematics, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Ambiguous sensory information can lead to spontaneous alternations between perceptual states, recently shown to extend to tactile perception. The authors recently proposed a simplified form of tactile rivalry which evokes two competing percepts for a fixed difference in input amplitudes across antiphase, pulsatile stimulation of the left and right fingers. This study addresses the need for a tactile rivalry model that captures the dynamics of perceptual alternations and that incorporates the structure of the somatosensory system. The model features hierarchical processing with two stages; a first stage resolves perceptual competition, leading to perceptual alternations; and a second stage encodes perceptual interpretations. The first stage could be located downstream of brainstem nuclei and the second stage could be located within the primary somatosensory cortex (area 3b). The model captures dynamical features specific to the tactile rivalry percepts and produces general characteristics of perceptual rivalry: input strength dependence of dominance times (Levelt’s proposition II), short-tailed skewness of dominance time distributions and the ratio of distribution moments. The presented modelling work leads to experimentally testable predictions. The same hierarchical model could generalise to account for percept formation, competition and alternations for bistable stimuli that involve pulsatile inputs from the visual and auditory domains.

Author summary Perceptual ambiguity involving the touch sensation has seen increased recent interest. It provides interesting opportunity to explore how our perceptual experience is resolved by dynamic computations in the brain. We recently proposed a simple form of tactile rivalry where stimuli consisted of antiphase sequences of high and low intensity pulses delivered to the right and left index fingers. The stimulus can be perceived as either one simultaneous pattern of vibration on both hands, or as a pattern of vibrations that jumps from one hand to the other, giving a sensation of apparent movement. During long presentation of the stimuli, one’s perception switches every 5–20 seconds between these two interpretations, a phenomenon called tactile perceptual bistability. This study presents the first computational model for tactile bistability and is based on the structure of sensory brain areas. The model captures important characteristics of perceptual interpretations for tactile rivalry. We offer predictions in terms of how left-right tactile intensity differences are encoded and propose a location for the encoding of perceptual interpretations in sensory brain areas. The model provides a generalisable framework that can make useful predictions for future behavioural experiments with tactile and other types of stimuli.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 16, 2022.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Hierarchical processing underpins competition in tactile perceptual bistability
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Hierarchical processing underpins competition in tactile perceptual bistability
Farzaneh Darki, Andrea Ferrario, James Rankin
bioRxiv 2022.08.16.504072; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.16.504072
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Hierarchical processing underpins competition in tactile perceptual bistability
Farzaneh Darki, Andrea Ferrario, James Rankin
bioRxiv 2022.08.16.504072; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.16.504072

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4370)
  • Biochemistry (9551)
  • Bioengineering (7071)
  • Bioinformatics (24779)
  • Biophysics (12568)
  • Cancer Biology (9925)
  • Cell Biology (14302)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7932)
  • Ecology (12081)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15959)
  • Genetics (10905)
  • Genomics (14709)
  • Immunology (9848)
  • Microbiology (23587)
  • Molecular Biology (9456)
  • Neuroscience (50711)
  • Paleontology (369)
  • Pathology (1535)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2674)
  • Physiology (4001)
  • Plant Biology (8644)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1505)
  • Synthetic Biology (2388)
  • Systems Biology (6415)
  • Zoology (1345)