New Results
Timing of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at M1 Does Not Affect Motor Sequence Learning
View ORCID ProfileHakjoo Kim, View ORCID ProfileBradley R. King, View ORCID ProfileWillem B. Verwey, View ORCID ProfileJohn J. Buchanan, View ORCID ProfileDavid L. Wright
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.17.504318
Hakjoo Kim
1Motor Neuroscience Lab, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
Bradley R. King
2Lifespan Motor Neuroscience Lab, Department of Health and Kinesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
Willem B. Verwey
3Section Cognition, Data & Education, Department of Learning, Data-Analytics and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
John J. Buchanan
1Motor Neuroscience Lab, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
David L. Wright
1Motor Neuroscience Lab, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
Article usage
Posted August 18, 2022.
Timing of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at M1 Does Not Affect Motor Sequence Learning
Hakjoo Kim, Bradley R. King, Willem B. Verwey, John J. Buchanan, David L. Wright
bioRxiv 2022.08.17.504318; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.17.504318
Subject Area
Subject Areas
- Biochemistry (12806)
- Bioengineering (9690)
- Bioinformatics (31296)
- Biophysics (16118)
- Cancer Biology (13197)
- Cell Biology (18873)
- Clinical Trials (138)
- Developmental Biology (10217)
- Ecology (15201)
- Epidemiology (2067)
- Evolutionary Biology (19418)
- Genetics (12890)
- Genomics (17789)
- Immunology (12921)
- Microbiology (30225)
- Molecular Biology (12617)
- Neuroscience (65963)
- Paleontology (487)
- Pathology (2042)
- Pharmacology and Toxicology (3519)
- Physiology (5455)
- Plant Biology (11310)
- Synthetic Biology (3124)
- Systems Biology (7771)
- Zoology (1758)