Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

The differential effect of age on upper limb sensory processing, proprioception and motor function

View ORCID ProfileLeen Saenen, View ORCID ProfileGeert Verheyden, View ORCID ProfileJean-Jacques Orban de Xivry
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.26.505430
Leen Saenen
aDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium; ,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Leen Saenen
  • For correspondence: leen.saenen@kuleuven.be leen.saenen@kuleuven.be geert.verheyden@kuleuven.be
Geert Verheyden
aDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium; ,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Geert Verheyden
  • For correspondence: leen.saenen@kuleuven.be geert.verheyden@kuleuven.be
Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry
bDepartment of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium,
cKU Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry
  • For correspondence: jj.orban@kuleuven.be
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Sensory processing consists in the integration and interpretation of somatosensory information. It builds upon proprioception but is a distinct function requiring complex processing by the brain over time. Currently little is known about the effect of aging on sensory processing ability, nor the influence of other covariates such as motor function, proprioception, or cognition. In this study, we measured upper limb passive and active sensory processing, motor function, proprioception, and cognition in 40 healthy younger adults and 54 older adults. We analyzed age differences across all measures and evaluated the influence of covariates on sensory processing through regression. Our results showed larger effect sizes for age differences in sensory processing (r=0.39-0.40) compared to motor function (r=0.18-0.22) and proprioception (r=0.10-0.27), but smaller than for cognition (r=0.56-0.63). Aside from age, we found no evidence that sensory processing performance was influenced by motor function or proprioception, but active sensory processing was influenced by cognition (β=0.32-0.46). In conclusion, sensory processing showed an age-related decline, while some proprioceptive and motor abilities were preserved across age.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 26, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The differential effect of age on upper limb sensory processing, proprioception and motor function
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The differential effect of age on upper limb sensory processing, proprioception and motor function
Leen Saenen, Geert Verheyden, Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry
bioRxiv 2022.08.26.505430; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.26.505430
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The differential effect of age on upper limb sensory processing, proprioception and motor function
Leen Saenen, Geert Verheyden, Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry
bioRxiv 2022.08.26.505430; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.26.505430

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4222)
  • Biochemistry (9096)
  • Bioengineering (6744)
  • Bioinformatics (23927)
  • Biophysics (12077)
  • Cancer Biology (9485)
  • Cell Biology (13722)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7614)
  • Ecology (11652)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15469)
  • Genetics (10613)
  • Genomics (14289)
  • Immunology (9453)
  • Microbiology (22767)
  • Molecular Biology (9057)
  • Neuroscience (48818)
  • Paleontology (354)
  • Pathology (1479)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2560)
  • Physiology (3820)
  • Plant Biology (8307)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1467)
  • Synthetic Biology (2285)
  • Systems Biology (6168)
  • Zoology (1297)