Abstract
Endogenous variation in brain state and stimulus-specific evoked activity can both contribute to successful encoding. Previous studies, however, have not clearly distinguished among these components. We address this question by analyzing intracranial EEG recorded from epilepsy patients as they studied and subsequently recalled lists of words. We first trained classifiers to predict recall of either single items or entire lists and found that both classifiers exhibited similar performance. We found that list-level classifier output—a biomarker of successful encoding—tracked item presentation and recall events, despite having no information about the trial structure. Across widespread brain regions, decreased low- and increased high-frequency activity (HFA) marked successful encoding of both items and lists. We found regional differences in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, where in the hippocampus HFA correlated more strongly with item recall, whereas in the prefrontal cortex HFA correlated more strongly with list performance. Despite subtle differences in item- and list-level features, the similarity in overall classification performance, spectral signatures of successful recall, and fluctuations of spectral activity across the encoding period argue for a shared endogenous process that causally impacts the brain’s ability to learn new information.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
This work was supported by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Restoring Active Memory (RAM) program (cooperative agreement N66001-14-2-4032), as well as NIH/NINDS grants U01-NS113198 and R01-NS106611. We thank members of the Computational Memory Lab at the University of Pennsylvania for valuable advice on analyses. Most of all we thank the patients who generously devoted their time and energy to this research. DR analyzed data; CW advised on analyses; DR, CW, MK wrote manuscript; MS performed clinical duties related to data collection; MS, MK provided support. The authors declare no competing financial interests. This manuscript has been published as a preprint on bioRxiv (https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.12.511606). Data and associated analysis code are available at http://memory.psych.upenn.edu.
Title edited. New control analysis included (see section entitled "Shuffled List Control"). New classification analysis added, trained on inter-stimulus intervals (see new Supplementary Figure 6). Figure 6 revised and statistics relating to it are reported. Discussion section "Causal vs. Non-causal SME" revised to clarify that we cannot demonstrate absolute causality here. Main text updated for clarity in other parts.