Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

How many cues are sexy? Evolution of mate preference towards multiple traits in sympatric species

View ORCID ProfileLudovic Maisonneuve, View ORCID ProfileCharline Smadi, View ORCID ProfileViolaine Llaurens
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.26.513844
Ludovic Maisonneuve
1Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ludovic Maisonneuve
  • For correspondence: ludovic.maisonneuve.2015@polytechnique.org
Charline Smadi
2INRAE;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Charline Smadi
Violaine Llaurens
3CNRS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Violaine Llaurens
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

While the impact of mate preference on adaptation and speciation has been extensively studied, the evolutionary factors determining which and how many traits are targeted by mate choice are largely unknown. In sympatric species, trait distribution is shaped by similar selective pressure, promoting similar adaptive traits in the different species. When preference targets such adaptive traits, the similarity between species induce heterospecific matings and costs for the choosy partners. The evolution of preference for different traits thus likely depends on the ecological interactions between species. Using a mathematical model, we thus study the evolution of preference towards two evolving traits shared by sympatric species and we investigate how selective regimes on traits, opportunity costs and sensory trade-off shape the evolution of preference for multiple traits. As expected, the evolution of multiple traits preference is favored when females have access to a large number of mates and when there is limited sensory trade-off. More surprisingly, opportunity costs promote preference based on adaptive traits, rather than on traits relevant for species recognition. Since adaptation reduces trait variability in males, the evolution of preferences based on adaptive traits hardly suffers from opportunity costs. Our model thus highlights that the evolution of preferences for different traits in sympatric species depends on within-species mating opportunities but also on the niche overlap between species, tuning the heterospecific interactions.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 27, 2022.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How many cues are sexy? Evolution of mate preference towards multiple traits in sympatric species
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
How many cues are sexy? Evolution of mate preference towards multiple traits in sympatric species
Ludovic Maisonneuve, Charline Smadi, Violaine Llaurens
bioRxiv 2022.10.26.513844; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.26.513844
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
How many cues are sexy? Evolution of mate preference towards multiple traits in sympatric species
Ludovic Maisonneuve, Charline Smadi, Violaine Llaurens
bioRxiv 2022.10.26.513844; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.26.513844

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Evolutionary Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4092)
  • Biochemistry (8784)
  • Bioengineering (6490)
  • Bioinformatics (23376)
  • Biophysics (11761)
  • Cancer Biology (9163)
  • Cell Biology (13267)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7420)
  • Ecology (11379)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15106)
  • Genetics (10407)
  • Genomics (14017)
  • Immunology (9133)
  • Microbiology (22084)
  • Molecular Biology (8792)
  • Neuroscience (47417)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1421)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2483)
  • Physiology (3709)
  • Plant Biology (8057)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1433)
  • Synthetic Biology (2213)
  • Systems Biology (6019)
  • Zoology (1251)