Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Antibiotic resistance response to sulfamethoxazole from the intracellular and extracellular DNA fractions of activated sludge

View ORCID ProfileM. Martínez-Quintela, View ORCID ProfileD. Calderón-Franco, M. C. M. van Loosdrecht, View ORCID ProfileS. Suárez, View ORCID ProfileF. Omil, View ORCID ProfileD. G. Weissbrodt
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.14.516377
M. Martínez-Quintela
1CRETUS, Department of Chemical Engineering, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain
2Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Martínez-Quintela
  • For correspondence: m.martinez.quintela@usc.es
D. Calderón-Franco
2Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D. Calderón-Franco
M. C. M. van Loosdrecht
2Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Suárez
1CRETUS, Department of Chemical Engineering, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. Suárez
F. Omil
1CRETUS, Department of Chemical Engineering, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for F. Omil
D. G. Weissbrodt
2Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
3Department of Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D. G. Weissbrodt
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

In activated sludge, the antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) can be present either in the intracellular (iDNA) or extracellular DNA fraction (exDNA). Recent advances in the exDNA extraction methodology allow a better profiling of the pool of ARGs. However, little is known about how stress conditions modify the distribution of ARGs between both DNA fractions. Here, we performed two batch tests for analyzing the effects of two different stress conditions, namely nutrient starvation and high concentrations of sulfamethoxazole (1, 10 and 150 mg L-1) in activated sludge. We tracked by qPCR the resulting relative abundances of four target genes, namely the universal 16S rRNA gene, the class 1 integron-integrase gene intI1, and the sulfonamide resistance genes sul1 and sul2 in both the iDNA and exDNA fractions. In the exDNA pool, unlike starvation, which provoked a decrease of 1-2 log10 [copies] ng DNA-1 in the concentration of sul1 and intI1, the presence of sulfamethoxazole did not influence the abundances of sul1 and sul2. However, high concentrations of sulfamethoxazole (150 mg L- 1) selected for microorganisms harboring sul1 and, more remarkably, sul2 genes in their iDNA during their exponential growth phase. The abundances of intI1 and sul1 were positively correlated in the exDNA fraction (r>0.7), whereas no significant correlation (p<0.05) between the abundance of these two genes was found in the iDNA fraction of the sludge. High SMX concentrations influenced the abundance of ARGs in the iDNA; their abundance in the exDNA was influenced by nutrient limitations. Further studies should consider the profiling of exDNA fractions because of the relationship between ARGs and mobile genetic elements. Besides, the surveillance of antimicrobial resistance is encouraged in wastewater treatment plants facing high antibiotic concentrations.

Highlights

  • Starvation caused a decrease in the exDNA concentration of the activated sludge.

  • A positive correlation in the abundances of intI1 and sul1 was found in the exDNA fraction.

  • High concentrations of SMX selected for antibiotic resistant microorganisms.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 15, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Antibiotic resistance response to sulfamethoxazole from the intracellular and extracellular DNA fractions of activated sludge
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Antibiotic resistance response to sulfamethoxazole from the intracellular and extracellular DNA fractions of activated sludge
M. Martínez-Quintela, D. Calderón-Franco, M. C. M. van Loosdrecht, S. Suárez, F. Omil, D. G. Weissbrodt
bioRxiv 2022.11.14.516377; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.14.516377
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Antibiotic resistance response to sulfamethoxazole from the intracellular and extracellular DNA fractions of activated sludge
M. Martínez-Quintela, D. Calderón-Franco, M. C. M. van Loosdrecht, S. Suárez, F. Omil, D. G. Weissbrodt
bioRxiv 2022.11.14.516377; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.14.516377

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Bioengineering
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4105)
  • Biochemistry (8807)
  • Bioengineering (6508)
  • Bioinformatics (23446)
  • Biophysics (11783)
  • Cancer Biology (9196)
  • Cell Biology (13307)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7428)
  • Ecology (11402)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15141)
  • Genetics (10429)
  • Genomics (14036)
  • Immunology (9167)
  • Microbiology (22142)
  • Molecular Biology (8802)
  • Neuroscience (47533)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1427)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2489)
  • Physiology (3729)
  • Plant Biology (8076)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1437)
  • Synthetic Biology (2220)
  • Systems Biology (6036)
  • Zoology (1252)