Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Lidocaine Induces Apoptosis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells Through Activation of Bitter Taste Receptor T2R14

View ORCID ProfileZoey A. Miller, Jennifer F. Jolivert, Ray Z. Ma, Sahil Muthuswami, Arielle Mueller, Derek B. McMahon, View ORCID ProfileRyan M. Carey, View ORCID ProfileRobert J. Lee
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.22.517413
Zoey A. Miller
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
2Pharmacology Graduate Group
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Zoey A. Miller
Jennifer F. Jolivert
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ray Z. Ma
3Harriton High School, Bryn Mawr, PA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sahil Muthuswami
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arielle Mueller
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Derek B. McMahon
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ryan M. Carey
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ryan M. Carey
Robert J. Lee
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
4Department of Physiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Robert J. Lee
  • For correspondence: rjl@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas (HNSCCs) have high mortality due to late stage diagnosis, high metastasis rates, and poor treatment options. Current therapies are invasive and aggressive, leading to a severe decline in patient quality of life (QoL). It is vital to create new therapies that are both potent and localized and/or targeted to prolong survival while maintaining QoL. Lidocaine is a local anesthetic used in HNSCC surgery settings. Lidocaine also activates bitter taste (taste family 2) receptor 14 (T2R14). T2Rs are G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) that increase intracellular Ca2+ when activated. T2Rs are expressed in mucosal epithelia, including internal regions of the head and neck, and are accessible drug targets. Here, we show that lidocaine increases intracellular Ca2+ and decreases cAMP in several HNSCC cell lines. Ca2+ release from the ER results in Ca2+ uptake into the mitochondria. Ca2+ mobilization is blocked with GPCR inhibitors and T2R14 antagonist, 6-methoxyflavanone. Lidocaine activation of T2R14 depolarizes the mitochondrial membrane, inhibits cell proliferation, and induces apoptosis. Lidocaine activates caspase-3 and -7 cleavage and also increases total caspase protein levels despite no changes in mRNA production. Both total and cleaved caspase products were upregulated even in the presence of cycloheximide, an inhibitor of protein synthesis. This suggests inhibition of the ubiquitin-proteasome system. It is vital to understand Lidocaine-induced apoptosis in HSNCCs to utilize its chemotherapeutic effects as a treatment option. In addition, future studies on T2R14 expression in HNSCC patients could provide insight for implementing lidocaine as a targeted topical therapy.

Introduction

Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas (HNSCCs) arise in the oral and nasal cavities, larynx, and pharynx, typically as a result of exposures to environmental carcinogens and/or human papilloma virus [5-8]. HNSCCs account for 600,000 cancer diagnoses per year, with a 5-year mortality rate of ∼50% [9-11]. This due to frequrent late-stage diagnoses and/or lack of preventive screening. They also have high rates of metastasis [12-14]. Surgical resection is a first line treatment but is aggressive and invasive, leaving with patients with a severe decrease in quality of life (QoL) [7]. These patients can lose the ability to orally communicate or ingest food, have altered taste perception, be prone to asphyxiation, have exterior malformations, and more [15, 16]. In addition to the lasting effects of surgery, HNSCC patients also experience the generalized side effects of combined radiation and/or chemotherapy [17]. The only FDA-approved targeted therapy for HNSCCs is epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor cetuximab. However, cetuximab still does not differentiate between normal and cancerous tissue [18]. It is vital to develop novel targeted therapies to maintain QoL while undergoing treatment and to prolog survival for HNSCC patients.

A majority of HNSCC cases are localized to the oral cavity [19]. A main function of this region is human taste perception. Humans can perceive five main “flavors”: sour, salty, sweet, umami, and bitter [20]. Sour and salty flavors are perceived through the activation of ion channels, whereas sweet, umami, and bitter flavors are perceived through the activation of GPCRs [21-25]. This stimulates the production of secondary messengers to release neurotransmitters from taste bud cells to nearby gustatory nerves [26, 27]. GPCR taste receptors are classified into two groups: taste family 1(T1Rs; sweet and umami) and taste family 2 (T2Rs; bitter) [28]. While there are only 3 isoforms of T1Rs, there are 25 T2R isoforms in humans [29], which function to protect against ingestion of bitter tasting toxins [30]. The canonical T2R signaling pathway is an intracellular calcium (Ca2+) increase and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) decrease [31]. The Ca2+ response is through activation of PLCβ2 via Gβγ subunits of the G-protein heterotrimer [32-34], which produces inositol triphosphate (IP3) and stimulates the release of Ca2+ from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) [35, 36].

GPCRs are leveraged as therapeutic targets in diseases due to their multifaceted roles in cellular functions [37]. As GCPRs, T2Rs are also being investigated for many diseases as they are expressed outside the oral cavity (extraoral) and have been associated with susceptibility to non-taste related diseases [38-40]. Beyond taste, T2Rs play roles in innate immunity, thyroid function, cardiac physiology, and more [41-45].

Extraoral T2R isoforms T2R4 and T2R14 are being investigated in cancer [46]. In models of breast, ovarian and pancreatic cancers, T2R4 and T2R14 agonists killed cancers cells, and in some cases, left normal surrounding tissue unharmed [47, 48]. We hypothesized that T2R4 and/or T2R14 agonists may have similar effects in HNSCCs. We previously showed that bitter agonists cause an increase in nuclear and mitochondrial Ca2+ that leads to apoptosis in squamous de-diffferentiated non-ciliated airway epithelial cells [33] and HNSCC cells [1]. While we found that Ca2+ is required for this apoptosis, the underlying mechanisms of this T2R-induced endpoint are largely unknown despite other studies also linking T2Rs to apoptosis. Nonetheless, because many clinical drugs are bitter, we hypothesized that T2Rs in cancer cells might be targeted by already-approved bitter drugs.

Lidocaine is a commonly used as a local anesthetic in HNSCC surgery settings [49], blocking sodium (Na+) channels to inhibit pain signals from sensory neurons [50]. Lidocaine may also have chemotherapeutic effects and lower rates of metastasis [51-56]. Interestingly, lidocaine is known to be bitter and may interact with heterologously-expressed T2R14 [57]. It also shares structural similarities with multi-T2R agonist denatonium benzoate. From this, we hypothesized that lidocaine might kill HSNCC cells through activation of T2R14.

Here, we show that lidocaine induces Ca2+ responses in HNSCC cells, and that this response is blocked by a T2R14 antagonist. Moreover, lidocaine decreases HNSCC cell viability, depolarizes the mitochondrial membrane potential, and induces apoptosis. Apoptosis is blocked by T2R14 antagonism. Interestingly, we also observe that bitter agonists lidocaine and denatonium benzoate can inhibit the proteasome, revealing another possible mechanism of T2R agonist-evoked apoptosis. Taken together, our data identify a mechanism of action of the apoptotic effects of lidocaine observed in several types of cancer cells and suggest that lidocaine may be useful to repurpose as a chemotherapeutic for HNSCCs.

Methods

Cell Culture

SCC4 (ATCC CRL-1624), SCC47 (UM-SCC-47; Millipore SCC071), SCC90 (ATCC CRL-3239), FaDu (ATCC HTB-43), RPMI 2650 (CCL-30), and HEK 293T (ATCC CRL-3216) cell lines were from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA) or MilliporeSigma (St. Louis, MO USA). All cell lines were grown in submersion in high glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Corning; Glendale, AZ, USA) with 10% FBS (Genesee Scientific; El Cajon, CA, USA), penicillin/streptomycin mix (Gibco; Gaithersburg, MD, USA), and nonessential amino acids (Gibco). Stable SCC90 T2R4 siRNA knockdown cells were generated previously [1]. Unless indicated below, all reagents were from MilliporeSigma.

Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qPCR)

Cell cultures were resuspended in TRIzol (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA). RNA was isolated and purified (Direct-zol RNA kit; Zymo Research), reverse transcribed via High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and quantified using TaqMan qPCR probes for TAS2R4, CASP3, CASP7, and UBC (QuantStudio 5; Thermo Fisher Scientific). UBC was used as an endogenous control due to its stability in expression in cancer cells [2].

Live Cell Imaging

For calcium (Ca2+) imaging, cells were loaded with 5 µM of Fluo-4-AM (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 50 min at room temperature in the dark. Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) buffered with 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) was used as an imaging buffer, containing 1.8 mM Ca2+. Cells were imaged using a Nikon Eclipse TS100 (20x 0.75 NA PlanApo objective), FITC filters (Chroma Technologies), QImaging Retiga R1 camera (Teledyne; Tucson, AZ, USA), MicroManager, and Xcite 120 LED Boost (Excelitas Technologies; Mississauga, Canada). For experiments in Ca2+-free (0-Ca2+) HBSS, cells were loaded with Fluo-4-AM as described above in normal Ca2+-containing HBSS. Bitter agonists were dissolved in HBSS with no added Ca2+ plus 10 mM EGTA (0-Ca2+ HBSS) and was used in the place of regular HBSS (no EGTA). At the start of the experiment, 300 uL of bitter agonist in 0-Ca2+ HBSS was added to 60 uL of Ca2+-containing HBSS for final concentrations of ∼8.3 mM EGTA and 0.3 mM Ca2+ with a predicted free extracellular Ca2+ of 2.1×10−9 mM (MaxChelator, Chris Patton, Stanford University, https://somapp.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/pharmacology/bers/maxchelator/). This method resulted in an acute removal of extracellular free Ca2+ at the exact time of agonist addition.

For mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ imaging, pcDNA-4mt3cpv or pcDNA-D1ER was transfected into cells using lipofectamine 3000 reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific) 24-48 hours prior to imaging [3]. Live cell images were taken on Olympus IX-83 microscope (20x 0.75 NA PlanApo objective), CFP/YFP filters (Chroma 89002-ET-ECFP/ EYFP) in excitation and emission filter wheels (Sutter Lambda LS), Orca Flash 4.0 sCMOS camera (Hamamatsu, Tokyo, Japan), Meta-Fluor (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA USA), and XCite 120 LED Boost (Excelitas Technologies). For cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) imaging, pcDNA3.1(-)Flamindo2 was transfected into cells as described above 48 hours prior to imaging [4]. Cells were imaged as described above for mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ using FITC filters. For diacylglycerol (DAG) imaging, RED Upward DAG Assay Kit (Montana Molecular; Bozeman, Montana, USA) was transduced into cells using 2x the recommended reagents. Cells were used 24 hours-post transduction and imaged as described above for mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum using TRITC filters.

Cell Viability and Proliferation

Cells were incubated with bitter agonists for 6 or 24 hours at 37 °C. Crystal violet (0.1% in deionized water with 10% acetic acid) was used to stain remaining adherent cells. Stains were washed with deionized water and left to dry at room temperature. Stains were dissolved with 30% acetic acid in deionized water. Absorbance values at 590 nm were measured. XTT dye and phenazine methosulfate were added to cells in combination with bitter agonists. Measurements were taken at 475 and 660 nm over 6 hours. Absorbance values were measured on a Tecan (Spark 10M; Mannedorf, Switzerland). Lidocaine was dissolved in Matrigel (Corning) on ice. Thin formulation was made by combining 75 µL Matrigel and 75 µL of 20 mM lidocaine. Thick formulation was made by combining 150 µL Matrigel and 150 µL of 20 mM lidocaine. The lidocaine Matrigel was added on top of cells in 8-well glass chamber slides (∼0.86 cm2 surface area per well). After 24 hours, live cell images were taken on Olympus IX-83 microscope (20x 0.75 NA PlanApo objective), Orca Flash 4.0 sCMOS camera (Hamamatsu, Tokyo, Japan), Meta-Fluor (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA USA), and Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) filter.

Mitochondrial membrane potential and apoptosis measurements

Cells were loaded with JC-1 dye for 15 minutes. Bitter agonists were added as indicated. Fluorescence was measured at 488nm excitation and 535 (green) and 590 (red) nm emission. Live cell images of the assay were taken on Olympus IX-83 microscope (20x 0.75 NA PlanApo objective), FITC and TRITC filters (Chroma Technologies), Orca Flash 4.0 sCMOS camera (Hamamatsu, Tokyo, Japan), Meta-Fluor (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA USA), and XCite 120 LED Boost (Excelitas Technologies). Quantitative fluorescence values were measured on a Tecan Spark 10M. CellEvent Caspase 3/7 dye was added to cells in combination with bitter agonists. Fluorescence was measured at 495 nm excitation and 540 nm emission. Live cell images were taken as described above for JC-1 assays (only FITC filter). Quantitative fluorescence values were measured on a Tecan Spark 10M.

Western Blotting

Protein was harvested using lysis buffer (10 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM KCl, 0.5% deoxycholic, 0.5% Tween, 0.5% IGePawl, 0.1% SDS). Protein content was quantified using DC Protein Assay (BioRad; Hercules, CA, USA). 50 – 80 µg of protein were loaded into gel (Bis-Tris 4-12%, 1.5 mm) with 4x loading buffer (200 mM Tris pH 6.8, 40% glycerol, 8% SDS, 0.1% Bromophenol Blue), and 5% β- mercaptoethanol. Gel was run using MES running buffer (Tris Base 50 mM pH 7.3, MES 50 mM, SDS 0.1%, EDTA 1 mM). Novex Sharp Pre-Stained Protein Standard or SeeBlue Plus2 Pre-stained Protein Standard (Thermo Fisher) were used as molecular markers. Gel was transferred using Bis-Tris transfer buffer (25 mM bicine, 25 mM bis-tris, 1 mM EDTA, 10% methanol). Blots were blocked for 1 hour in TBST (24.8 mM tris acid & base, 1.5 NaCl, 0.5% Tween-20) with 5% milk. Primary antibodies were used 1:1000 in TBST with 5% BSA. Antibodies included caspase-3 (Cell Signaling #9662), caspase-7 (Cell Signaling #9492), cyclin D1 (Cell Signaling #2978), and β-Actin (Cell Signaling #3700). HRP-conjugated chemiluminescent secondary antibodies were used 1:1000 in TBST with 5% milk (Cell Signaling anti-Rabbit or anti-Mouse Goat Horse Radish Peroxidase). Blots were imaged using Clarity Max Western ECL Substrate (BioRad) using ChemDoc MP Imaging System (BioRad).

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using t-test (two comparisons only) or one-way ANOVA (>2 comparisons) in GraphPad Prism (San Diego, CA, USA). Both paired and unpaired t-test were used when appropriate. Bonferroni and Dunnett’s posttest for one-way ANOVA were used when necessary. All figures used the following annotations: P < 0.05 (*), P < 0.01 (**), P < 0.001 (***), and no statistical significance (ns). All data points represent the mean +/- SEM.

Results

Lidocaine stimulation causes an intracellular Ca2+ response

T2R14 is one of the T2R isoforms most strongly expressed in extraoral tissues [58]. To understand if lidocaine can activate T2R14 in HNSCC cells, Ca2+ responses were recorded in living cells loaded with Fluo-4 AM in response to bitter agonists [59] (peak responses shown in Fig 1A-C). Lidocaine induced the highest Ca2+ response among all compounds screened (at their maximum concentrations in aqueous solution), including denatonium benzoate (non-T2R14 agonist whose Ca2+ response is dependent on T2R4 in these cells [1]), thujone (T2R14 agonist), flufenamic acid (T2R14 agonist), and ATP (purinergic receptor agonist) [57, 60, 61] (Fig 1A-C). Dose dependent Ca2+ responses were recorded with lidocaine ranging from 100 µM to 10 mM, with 10 mM evoking the highest response [62, 63] (Fig 1D & E; Supplemental Fig 1A-C). At both 5 and 10 mM, lidocaine induced higher Ca2+ responses than denatonium benzoate (Fig 1D-G). Denatonium benzoate is a non-T2R14 agonist that induces apoptosis in HNSCC cells and is categorized as the most bitter compound in the world because it activates eight T2R isoforms [64, 65]. In addition, 10 mM lidocaine caused a sustained heightened Ca2+ level post-stimulation (Fig 1E). Lidocaine also induced a higher Ca2+ response than a closely related local anesthetic, procaine [66], at equivalent concentrations (Supplemental Fig 1D). Procaine is not known to activate T2R14. Thus, we hypothesized that the Ca2+ response is not due to Na+ channel inhibition but another mechanism, possibly from intracellular sources.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1. Lidocaine induced Ca2+ responses in HNSCC cells.

HNSSC cell lines SCC 47, FaDu, and RPMI 2650, were loaded with Fluo-4 and imaged for subsequent Ca2+ responses with bitter agonists. A) SCC 47 peak fluorescent Ca2+ responses with HBSS, 10 mM lidocaine, 10 mM denatonium benzoate, 15 mM denatonium benzoate, 3 mM thujone, 500 µM flufenamic acid, or 100 µM ATP. B) FaDu peak fluorescent Ca2+ responses with HBSS, 10 mM lidocaine, 10 mM denatonium benzoate, 15 mM denatonium benzoate, 3 mM thujone, 500 µM flufenamic acid, or 100 µM ATP. C) RPMI 2650 peak fluorescent Ca2+ responses with HBSS, 10 mM lidocaine, 10 mM denatonium benzoate, 15 mM denatonium benzoate, 3 mM thujone, 500 µM flufenamic acid, or 100 µM ATP. D) SCC 47 peak fluorescent Ca2+ responses with 0 – 10 mM lidocaine. E) SCC 47 representative fluorescent Ca2+ responses from one experiment over time with 0 – 10 mM lidocaine. F) SCC 47 peak fluorescent Ca2+ responses with 0 – 10 mM denatonium benzoate. G) SCC 47 representative fluorescent Ca2+ responses from one experiment over time with denatonium benzoate. Peak fluorescence mean +/- SEM with >3 experiments using separate cultures. Significance by 1-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest comparing HBSS to each agonist. P < 0.05 (*), P < 0.01 (**), P < 0.001 (***), and no statistical significance (ns).

Lidocaine exhausted secondary Ca2+ responses with ATP, used as a control due to its ability to activate intracellular Ca2+ responses via purinergic receptors [61]. ATP was used following lidocaine (1 – 10 mM) stimulation in SCC 4 and SCC 47 cells as Ca2+ levels returned to baseline. As lidocaine concentration increased, the post-ATP Ca2+ response decreased, suggesting immense depletion of Ca2+ stores by lidocaine (Fig 2A-D). Taken together, the Ca2+ responses observed in HNSCC cells with lidocaine indicates possible activation of a GPCR, perhaps T2R14.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2. Lidocaine exhausts purinergic Ca2+ responses in HNSCC cells.

SCC 47 and SCC 4 cells were loaded with Fluo-4 and imaged for subsequent Ca2+ responses with 1 – 10 mM lidocaine followed by 100 µM ATP. A) SCC 47 fluorescent Ca2+ responses over time and representative images of responses of baseline, lidocaine peak and ATP peak with 1 – 10 mM lidocaine followed by 100 µM ATP. Scale bars = 30 µm. B) SCC 4 fluorescent Ca2+ responses over time and representative images of responses of baseline, lidocaine peak and ATP peak with 1 – 10 mM lidocaine followed by 100 µM ATP. Scale bars = 30 µm. C) SCC 47 change in fluorescence with secondary ATP simulation. D) SCC 4 change in fluorescence with secondary ATP simulation.

We further tested if the Ca2+ response was from mobilization of intracellular Ca2+ stores or extracellular Ca2+ influx from outside of the plasma membrane, GPCRs, including T2Rs, induce intracellular Ca2+ responses, primarily from the ER [67-70].

To elucidate whether the initial Ca2+ responses with lidocaine stimulation were from intracellular or extracellular sources, we recorded Fluo-4 responses in HBSS, with or without Ca2+ (via EGTA chelation of the Ca2+). Cells stimulated with lidocaine in HBSS without Ca2+ had a similar Ca2+ peak but faster rate of returning to baseline fluorescence compared with cells stimulated in HBSS with Ca2+ (Fig. 3A). This shows that the initial Ca2+ response observed with lidocaine comes from an intracellular source as there was no significant differences between the peak Ca2+ with or without extracellular Ca2+ (Fig. 3B). However, the sustained response likely involves restorative Ca2+ influx, possibly via STIM1/Orai [71, 72]. As a control, cells were also incubated to kb-r7943, a plasma membrane Na+/Ca2+ exchanger inhibitor [73]. There were no significant changes in lidocaine-induced Ca2+ responses (Supplemental Fig 2A).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 3. Ca2+ response with lidocaine is due to intracellular Ca2+ release.

HNSSC cell line, SCC 47, was loaded with 5 µM Fluo-4-AM fluorescent Ca2+ dye indicator for 50 min and imaged for subsequent Ca2+ responses with 10 mM lidocaine. A) SCC 47 fluorescent Ca2+ response over time in HBSS with or without Ca2+ (+/- extracellular Ca2+). B) SCC 47 peak fluorescent Ca2+ responses with 10 mM lidocaine in HBSS with or without Ca2+. Peak fluorescent mean +/- SEM with >3 separate cultures. Significance by unpaired t-test. SCC 47 cells were transfected with pcDNA-4mt3cpv or pcDNA-D1ER 24 – 48 hours prior to Ca2+ imaging. C) SCC 47 mitochondrial peak CFP/CFP-YFP fluorescent Ca2+ responses with HBSS, ATP, 10 mM lidocaine, 10 mM denatonium benzoate, or 15 mM denatonium benzoate. Peak fluorescence mean +/- SEM with >3 experiments using separate cultures. Significance by 1-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest comparing HBSS to each agonist. D) SCC 47 mitochondrial fluorescent Ca2+ responses over time with HBSS, ATP, 10 mM lidocaine, 10 mM denatonium, or 15 mM denatonium. E) SCC 47 representative image of pcDNA-4mt3cpv CFP/YFP baseline fluorescence mitochondrial localization. Scale bar = 30 µm. F) SCC 47 ER peak CFP/CFP-YFP fluorescent Ca2+ responses with10 mM lidocaine, 10 mM denatonium benzoate, or 15 mM denatonium benzoate. Peak fluorescence mean +/- SEM with >3 experiments using separate cultures. Significance by 1-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest comparing HBSS to each agonist. G) SCC 47 ER fluorescent Ca2+ responses over time with 10 mM lidocaine, 10 mM denatonium benzoate, or 15 mM denatonium benzoate. H) SCC 47 representative image of pcDNA-D1ER CFP/YFP baseline fluorescence ER localization. Scale bar = 30 µm. P < 0.05 (*), P < 0.01 (**), P < 0.001 (***), and no statistical significance (ns or no indication).

GPCR activation and elevation of intracellular Ca2+ can also cause influx of Ca2+ into the mitochondria [74, 75]. We used a mitochondrial-specific fluorescent Ca2+ biosensor, pcDNA-4mt3cpv, to measure mitochondrial Ca2+ influx [3] (Fig 3E). Upon stimulation, a significant influx of Ca2+ into the mitochondria was observed with lidocaine and ATP (Fig 3C & D). The influx with lidocaine stimulation was significantly greater than both equivalent and greater concentrations of denatonium benzoate (10 and 15mM). In addition, an ER-specific fluorescent Ca2+ biosensor, pcDNA-D1ER, was used to measure ER Ca2+ efflux [3] (Fig 3H). Lidocaine stimulation caused a significant decrease in ER Ca2+ compared to equivalent or greater concentrations of denatonium benzoate (10 and 15 mM) (Fig 3F & G). The timing of the Ca2+ response with lidocaine in HBSS without Ca2+ coincided with that of the mobilization events of the mitochondria and the ER, suggesting that the influxes/effluxes were a product of the initial intracellular response (Fig 3A, 3D & 3G).

Lidocaine activates T2R14

Following GPCR activation, GTP-bound guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) disassociate from their receptors and carry out the effector actions [76, 77]. As GPCRs, T2Rs can couple to Gαgustducin or Gαi, Gβ1/3 and Gγ [24, 35, 78]. To test if lidocaine is activating a GPCR, cells were incubated with suramin, a pan-inhibitor of G protein association to their receptors. Fluo-4 Ca2+ responses were recorded with lidocaine stimulation with or without suramin [79]. Inhibition of G proteins with suramin significantly dampened Ca2+ responses with lidocaine (Fig 4A). Cells were also incubated with pertussis toxin, an inhibitor of Gαi/o subunits [80]. Upon stimulation with lidocaine, cells with pertussis toxin incubation had significantly dampened Ca2+ responses (Fig 4B). This is suggestive of the effects of G proteins and, therefore, GPCRs activated by lidocaine being responsible for primary Ca2+ responses in HNSCC cells. Interestingly, cells incubated with pertussis toxin and stimulated with denatonium benzoate had no significant differences in Ca2+ responses (Supplemental Fig 2B). Cells were also incubated with YM 254890, a Gαq/11 selective inhibitor [81]. While YM 25480 significantly decreased Ca2+ responses with T2R4 agonist denatonium benzoate, it did not affect responses with lidocaine (Supplemental Fig 2C). siRNA targeting T2R4 significantly downregulated Ca2+ responses with denatonium benzoate, while leaving responses with lidocaine unchanged (Supplemental Fig 2D-E). These data support previous studies that denatonium benzoate interacts with separate T2R isoforms than lidocaine [57].

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 4. Lidocaine increases intracellular Ca2+ through activation of T2R14.

HNSSC cell line, SCC 47, was loaded with Fluo-4 and imaged for subsequent Ca2+ responses with 10 mM lidocaine. A) SCC 47 peak fluorescent Ca2+ and accompanying representative Ca2+ traces over time of 10 mM lidocaine with or without 1 hour prior incubation with 100 µM suramin. B) SCC 47 peak fluorescent Ca2+ and accompanying representative Ca2+ traces over time of 10 mM lidocaine with or without 18 hour prior incubation with 50 ng pertussis toxin. Peak fluorescent mean +/- SEM with >3 separate cultures. Significance by unpaired t-test. SCC 47 cells were transduced with fluorescent DAG biosensor and imaged for subsequent DAG responses with 10 mM lidocaine. C) SCC 47 peak fluorescent DAG and representative DAG trace over time with HBSS or 10 mM lidocaine. Peak fluorescent mean +/- SEM with >3 separate cultures. Significance by unpaired t-test. SCC 47 cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1(-)Flamindo2 and imaged for subsequent cAMP responses with HBSS, 10 mM lidocaine or 100 µM isoproterenol. D) SCC 47 peak fluorescent cAMP and representative cAMP traces over time with HBSS, 100 µM isoproterenol, or 10 mM lidocaine. Peak fluorescence mean +/- SEM with >3 experiments using separate cultures. Significance by 1-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest comparing HBSS to each agonist. E) SCC 47 peak Ca2+ fluorescent responses and representative fluorescent images with 10 mM lidocaine with or without prior 1 hour incubation with 100 µM 6-methoxflavanone (6-MF). Peak fluorescent mean +/- SEM with >3 separate cultures. Significance by unpaired t-test between HBSS and bitter agonist response with 100 µM 6-MF. Image scale bars = 30 µm. P < 0.05 (*), P < 0.01 (**), P < 0.001 (***), and no statistical significance (ns or no indication).

GPCR activation of phospholipase C also produces diacylglycerol (DAG) [82]. To understand if lidocaine affected DAG production, an RFP DAG sensing baculovirus was transduced into cells. Lidocaine stimulation significantly increased DAG production compared to HBSS alone (Fig 4C).

In addition, Gαi-coupling would be expected to be accompanied by a decrease in cAMP, which was measured using a fluorescent cytosolic cAMP biosensor, Flamindo2 [4]. Lidocaine significantly decreased cAMP when compared to HBSS alone (Fig 4D). Isoproterenol, a β-adrenergic agonist, was used a positive control to increase cAMP. When taking timing of these events/productions into account, the observed PTX-senstive intracellular Ca2+ responses coincide with both increases in DAG and decreases in cAMP, suggesting lidocaine activates a Gαi-coupled GPCR.

To understand if lidocaine interacts with T2R14 specifically, cells were incubated with 100 µM 6-methoxyflavonone (6-MF), a T2R14 antagonist [83]. Incubation with 6-MF significantly decreased Ca2+ responses with lidocaine stimulation (Fig 4E & F). 6-MF also significantly dampened responses with flufenamic acid and thujone, two other T2R14 agonists (Fig 4E). 6-MF did not alter Ca2+ responses with denatonium benzoate, a non-T2R14 agonist (Fig 4E). Taken together, these data indicate that lidocaine interacts with a GPCR in HNSCC cells, likely T2R14, to trigger an intracellular Ca2+ response.

Lidocaine decreases cell viability and mitochondrial membrane potential

Lidocaine is actively being investigated as a chemotherapeutic for several cancers [56, 63, 84], but its mechanism of action is completely unknown. After establishing an interaction between T2R14 and lidocaine, we tested if it had anti-proliferative effects in HNSCC cells. Using a crystal violet assay, we found that 10 mM lidocaine significantly decreased cellular proliferation after just 6 hours (Supplemental Fig 3A). After 24 hours, concentrations as low as 1 mM significantly decreased cellular proliferation (Supplemental Fig 3B).

To measure cell viability, We used an XTT assay as an indirect measurement of cellular NADH production [85]. Lidocaine (5 mM and 10 mM) and denatonium benzoate reduced cell viability in SCC 47 cells (Fig 5A). This was observed after only 2 hours, with the full assay covering 6 hours. Although we previously showed the ability of denatonium benzoate to decrease cell viability, this finding with lidocaine in HNSCC cells is novel [1, 33]. These results were also observed in both FaDu and SCC 4 cells. FaDu cells appeared to be more sensitive to denatonium benzoate than lidocaine, as 5 mM denatonium benzoate decreased cell viability, but 5 mM lidocaine did not (Fig 5B). Both 10 mM lidocaine and 10 mM denatonium benzoate decreased FaDu cell viability (Fig 5B). Conversely, only 10 mM lidocaine (not denatonium benzoate) decreased SCC 4 cell viability (Supplemental Fig 3C). These data suggest that different types of HNSCCs may have different sensitivities to specific T2R agonists.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 5. Lidocaine decreases cell viability and depolarizes the mitochondrial membrane.

SCC 47 and FaDu cells were incubated with bitter agonists with XTT dye, an indicator of NADH production. A decrease in the difference of absorbance (475 nm – 660 nm) indicates reduced NADH production. A) SCC 47 XTT absorbance values (475 nm – 660 nm) after 120 minutes of incubation with media, 1 – 10 mM lidocaine, or 1 -10 denatonium benzoate. Absorbance values were measured over six hours as seen in representative traces. B) FaDu XTT absorbance values (475 nm – 660 nm) after 120 minutes of incubation with media, 1 – 10 mM lidocaine, or 1 -10 denatonium benzoate. Absorbance values were measured over six hours as seen in representative traces. Absorbance mean +/- SEM with >3 separate cultures. Significance by 1-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest comparing media to each concentration of lidocaine and denatonium benzoate. SCC 47 cells were loaded with fluorescent JC-1 dye 15 minutes prior to incubation with bitter agonists. An increase in FITC (dye monomers) / TRTIC (dye aggregates) represents depolarized mitochondrial membrane potential. C) FaDu fluorescent FITC/TRITC ratio at 100 minutes of incubation with 0 – 10 mM lidocaine and representative fluorescent values over 300 minutes. Fluorescent mean +/- SEM with >3 separate cultures. Significance by 1-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest comparing media to each concentration of lidocaine. D) FaDu representative images of change in TRITC red dye aggregates (indicative of loss of mitochondrial membrane potential) at 0 and 12 hours with 0 – 10 mM lidocaine. Scale bars = 30 µm. P < 0.05 (*), P < 0.01 (**), P < 0.001 (***), and no statistical significance (ns or no indication).

After observing Ca2+ mobilization with ATP in previous experiments (Fig 1A-C), we wanted to test if this molecule would also decrease cell viability. Concentrations ranging from 1 – 100 uM ATP did not affect cell viability (Supplemental Fig 3D).

Mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) is an indicator of overall mitochondrial health, as it affects the bulk supply of ATP production [86, 87]. A hyperpolarized MMP promotes a healthy state, while the MMP will become depolarized in response to cellular stressors [88, 89]. We used a ratiometric JC-1 assay to assess mitochondrial health in HNSCC cells in response to lidocaine. We found that 10 mM lidocaine significantly depolarized the mitochondrial membrane (Fig 5C-D). This was measured using a ratio of “green dye monomers” to “red dye aggregates”, where monomers represent a depolarized mitochondrial state and aggregates represent a hyperpolarized mitochondrial state. These changes were observed as early as 100 minutes during the assay. Both decreased cell proliferation and viability, and depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane highlights the potential chemotherapeutic effects of lidocaine.

Lidocaine induces apoptosis via T2R14

After establishing the ability of lidocaine to decrease cell proliferation and viability, and to depolarize the mitochondrial membrane, we wanted to know if lidocaine could induce cell death. Lidocaine induces apoptosis in a variety of cancer and non-cancer settings [41, 55, 90-94]. While lidocaine can induce apoptosis in cancers of the esophageal and thyroid (organs that are localized near the internal regions of the head and neck), it remains unknown if the local anesthetics induce apoptosis, or even cell death, in HNSCC cells [95-97].

We utilized the CellEvent assay to measure caspase-3 and -7 cleavage in HNSCC cells with lidocaine. The green CellEvent dye fluoresces upon cleavage with either caspase-3 or -7 if/when apoptosis occurs [98-100]. This assay revealed that lidocaine induces apoptosis in SCC 47 and FaDu cells (Fig 6A & B; Supplemental Fig 4A). Interestingly, SCC 47 cells were more sensitive to lidocaine-induced apoptosis than FaDu cells, as it took FaDu cells longer to undergo caspase cleavage (Fig 6B; Supplemental Fig 4A). Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) images were taken in parallel with the CellEvent assay in SCC 47 cells. The images reveal poor cellular morphology coinciding with the apoptosis (Supplemental Fig 4B). To further verify caspase cleavage, full length and cleaved forms of both caspases were Western blotted for in SCC 47 cells using 10 mM lidocaine over 6 hours. Caspase-7 cleavage occurred as early as 2 hours, while caspase-3 cleavage occurred as early as 4 hours (Fig 6C).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 6. Lidocaine induces apoptosis via T2R14.

SCC 47 cells were incubated with 10 mM lidocaine with CellEvent fluorescent dye, which fluoresces upon caspase-3 and caspase-7 cleavage. A) SCC 47 CellEvent fluorescence at 4 hours with 0 - 10 mM lidocaine. Representative trace of CellEvent fluorescence over 12 hours with 10 mM lidocaine. Fluorescent mean +/- SEM with >3 separate cultures. Significance determined by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest between untreated and treated cells. B) SCC 47 representative images of CellEvent caspase cleavage at 0 and 12 hours with 10 mM lidocaine. C) SCC 47 cells were treated with 10 mM lidocaine for 0, 2, 4, or 6 hours. Caspase-3, caspase-7, and β-Actin primary antibody (1:1000) incubation in Tris-Tween with 5% BSA was 1 hour at room temperature. Incubation with goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG-horseradish peroxidase secondary antibodies (1:1000) was 1 hour at room temperature. Immunoblots shown are representative of 3 independent experiments using cells at different passage number on different days. D) SCC 47 CellEvent fluorescence at 10 hours with 10 mM lidocaine with or without 100 µM 6-MF. Representative trace of CellEvent fluorescence over 10 hours with 10 mM lidocaine with or without 100 µM 6-MF. Mean +/- SEM with >3 separate cultures. Significance was determined by unpaired t-test with control between 10 mM lidocaine and 10 mM lidocaine + 100 µM 6-MF. P < 0.05 (*), P < 0.01 (**), P < 0.001 (***), and no statistical significance (ns or no indication).

To better understand if the observed apoptosis was a direct function of T2R14 activation via lidocaine, we used the CellEvent assay again, with or without 6-MF (T2R14 antagonist). When we first repeated the XTT assay in SCC 47 cells with or without 6-MF, the 6-MF did not rescue viability during co-incubation with lidocaine (Supplemental Fig 4D). However, we found that after 10 hours, 6-MF was able to block apoptosis in SCC 47 co-incubated with 10 mM lidocaine (Fig 6D & Supplemental Fig 4C). Complimentary to our original CellEvent data, DIC images revealed that 6-MF preserves overall cell morphology, even in the presence of lidocaine (Supplemental Fig 4C). We hypothesize that this is because 6-MF reduces T2R14 signaling to a level where apoptosis is blocked but proliferation is still halted. However, this shows for the first time that lidocaine can induce apoptosis in HNSCC via activation of a T2R, specifically T2R14. This is a novel mechanism that could be advantageous in treating HNSCCs or other cancers

Lidocaine may inhibit the proteasome as a mechanism of apoptosis

There are several mechanisms suggested by which lidocaine can induce apoptosis in mammalian cells [101-104]. However, similarly to studying the effects of lidocaine in HNSCCs, its mechanism(s) of inducing apoptosis following T2R14 activation is/are completely unknown. It is vital to understand how a compound induces apoptosis in order to utilize it appropriately.

When we Western blotted for caspase-3 and -7 cleavage as markers of apoptosis activation, we noticed that not only were the cleaved forms of the proteins increasing, but so were the full-length forms (Fig 6C). We wanted to know if HNSCC cells were upregulating caspase-3 and -7 production (i.e., mRNA transcription or protein translation) in response to lidocaine, or if there was inhibition of normal proteolytic degradation processes. Caspase-3 and -7 production was measured via qPCR. There were no differences between mRNA at 0- and 6-hours post-lidocaine (Fig 7A). These proteins were then blotted for +/- 10 mM lidocaine and/or cycloheximide, which blocks new translation of proteins in cells [105]. Even with this blockade, 10 mM lidocaine still showed upregulation of full-length caspase-3 and -7 proteins (Fig 7B & C). This indicates that lidocaine may inhibit normal protein degradation pathways as a mechanism of inducing apoptosis.

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 7. Lidocaine may inhibit the proteasome.

SCC 47 cells were incubated with 10 mM lidocaine for 6 hours. A) SCC 47 caspase-3 and caspase-7 mRNA expression at 0 and 6 hours with or without 10 mM lidocaine. Expression is relative to 0 hour Control. Mean +/- SEM with >3 separate cultures. Significance determined by paired t-test between lidocaine treated cells at 0 and 6 hours. SCC 47 cells were treated with 10 mM denatonium benzoate or 10 mM lidocaine for 6 hours with or without 15 ug/mL cycloheximide (CHX). Caspase-3, caspase-7, cyclin D (cycloheximide protein synthesis control) and β-Actin primary antibody (1:1000) incubation in Tris-Tween with 5% BSA was 1 hour at room temperature. Incubation with goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG-horseradish peroxidase secondary antibodies (1:1000) was 1 hour at room temperature. Immunoblots shown are representative of 3 independent experiments using cells at different passage number on different days. P < 0.05 (*), P < 0.01 (**), P < 0.001 (***), and no statistical significance (ns or no indication).

In order to investigate the clinical applications of lidocaine, a gel was formulated using Matrigel to model the actual vehicle in which the lidocaine would be applied. Using both “thin” and “thick” formulations, we found that lidocaine induced cell death over 24 hours when compared to control via DIC images. The thick formulation appeared to have the most death, as compared to the thin formulation (Fig 8).

Figure 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 8. Translation of lidocaine into the clinic.

SCC 47 cells were subjected to Matrigel containing 10 mM lidocaine for 24 hours. DIC images of SCC 47 cells after 24 hours of lidocaine-Matrigel exposure with both thick and thin formulations. Scale bars = 30 µm.

Discussion

With only 50% of patients surviving past five years even with treatment, the outlook for HNSCC patients is bleak [14, 106]. Standard treatment options (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy) leave lasting effects [107-110]. Cetuximab, an EGFR inhibitor, is considered to be the only “targeted” chemotherapy approved by the FDA to treat HNSCCs [18]. Still, this chemotherapy does not distinguish between cancerous and non-cancerous cells [111]. In addition, immunotherapies are actively being investigated for HNSCCs; however, there are none that have been approved by the FDA [10, 112]. Novel, and possible targeted, therapies must be discovered to improve outcomes for HNSCC patients.

Data here suggest that T2Rs may be an attractive target to leverage against HNSCCs using existing clinical compounds. T2R expression is not limited to just the oral cavity but also in all epithelial regions affected by HNSCCs [113]. Although T2Rs are low affinity-GPCRs, their agonists have detrimental effects on HNSCC cell health, mitochondrial membrane potential, and cell survival [1]. An advantage of HNSCC is that lidocaine could be implemented into the clinic as a topical chemotherapeutic (e.g., an eluting gel or topical rinse). This is due to the accessibility of the internal regions of the head. Essentially, this treatment would be localized to the interest of region, hopefully leaving surrounding normal tissue unaffected [114]. Lidocaine already comes in a topical/cream form, and topical chemotherapies are being investigated as new routes of treatment [115-117]. In some cases of oral and oropharynx SCC, we found that T2R14 expression is upregulated, indicating the potential of developing targeted therapies, on a case-by-case basis for this receptor [1]. As a local anesthetic that also activates T2R14, the potential effects of lidocaine as a chemotherapeutic bitter agonist for HNSCCs has not been explored [57]. With high solubility, documented safety data, and the use of it in the HNSCC surgery setting, lidocaine has the potential to be an easily translatable treatment for these cancers [118, 119].

Here, we established interactions between lidocaine and T2R14 first via Ca2+ responses in HNSCC immortalized cells lines. Compared to other T2R agonists including flufenamic acid, thujone, and denatonium benzoate (the most bitter compound currently known in terms of taste perception), lidocaine stimulation produced the largest Ca2+ responses. However, agonists could only be compared at their maximum aqueous solubility. Flufenamic acid is not nearly as soluble as the aforementioned compounds, which prevented us from using mM concentrations. While denatonium benzoate and thujone shared similar concentrations as lidocaine in the millimolar range, flufenamic acid did not, making this an inaccurate comparison of potency. However, this is indicative that lidocaine may be more easily translatable into the clinic due to high solubility. Procaine which has a bitter taste, but no identified T2R interaction, had minimal effects on Ca2+, suggesting the effects of lidocaine are not due to Na+ channel inhibition. In addition, ATP produced significant Ca2+ responses in HNSCC cells at only 100 uM yet did not have any effects on cell viability like bitter agonists (Fig 1A-C; Supplemental Fig 3E) [61].

Both suramin and pertussis toxin dampened lidocaine Ca2+ responses (Fig. 4A & B) [79, 80]. This further links the Ca2+ response induced by lidocaine and generalized GPCR activation. However, suramin and pertussis toxin did not fully abolish the Ca2+ response with lidocaine. Lidocaine can also activate TRPVA1 and TRPV1 Ca2+ influx in neuronal cells [120]. TRP channels might be expressed in HNSCC cells [121-123]. There may be some TRP channel activity causing the small Ca2+ responses with the G protein inhibitors. Additionally, TRP channels could play roles in the sustained Ca2+ response observed with lidocaine. Incubation with pertussis toxin did not affect Ca2+ response with denatonium benzoate, suggesting that the compound interacts with different T2Rs that are differently coupled (Supplemental Fig 2A) [124, 125]. Ca2+ responses with denatonium benzoate, but not lidocaine were dampened with YM-254890, a Gαq inhibitor, and with siRNA knockdown of T2R4 (Supplemental Fig 2A & C-E) [126]. Although T2Rs are primarily coupled to Gαgustducin or GαI, there is also evidence that they may be coupled to Gαq14 as well [127]. This could explain the dampened Ca2+ response with YM-254890.

Lidocaine also caused a decrease in cAMP and an increase in DAG, indicative of GPCR activation, likely coupled to pertussis toxin-sensitive Gαgustducin or Gαi [33, 128]. We found that 6-MF, a specific T2R14 antagonist, also dampened Ca2+ responses with lidocaine and other T2R14 agonists, suggesting activation of T2R14 [129]. Similar to suramin and pertussis toxin, the Ca2+ responses with 6-MF were not completely blocked, possibly due to incomplete antagonism or cross-reactivity with another T2R.

Some studies have investigated whether lidocaine can be repurposed as a chemotherapeutic in several cancers [51, 55, 130, 131]. This is a promising and low-cost endeavor as the local anesthetic is already used in surgical resection for many cancers and is FDA approved [132]. However, none of these studies have focused on HNSCCs, and none have considered activation of T2R14 [96, 133]. Here, we found that lidocaine alone significantly decreased HNSCC cell viability (measured via NADH production) and depolarized the mitochondrial membrane, which is indicative of poor mitochondrial health. Lidocaine decreased cell proliferation at just 6 hours. Mitochondria are a primary source of NADH production, showing the parallel of both observed cell viability (which measures NADH production) and observed mitochondrial membrane depolarization. Interestingly, 6-MF did not rescue cell viability with lidocaine. Whether this is indicative of mechanisms of decreased cell viability in response to lidocaine being independent from T2R14 activation and/or Ca2+ mobilization or simply incomplete antagonism of the receptor remains to be determined. 6-MF did block the apoptosis induced by lidocaine, as measured by caspase-3 and -7 cleavage with fluorescent dye [100, 134, 135].

Our data also suggest lidocaine inhibits proteasomal degradation of several proteins, including caspases and cyclin D [136, 137]. The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is a complex made up of many subunits that have protease activity. This complex can capture poly-ubiquinated proteins, unfold them, and subject them to proteolysis [138]. Whether or not lidocaine initiates this inhibition of the proteasome through activation of T2R14, or another independent mechanism, will be tested in future studies. Intracellular Ca2+ mobilization is essential for proper proteasome activity in neuronal models, mainly through the activation of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) [139-141]. In addition, the UPS is also responsible for regulating intracellular Ca2+ via degradation of Ca2+ channels and pores [142]. A link between T2R14-induced Ca2+ mobilization and inhibition of the UPS remains to be determined.

Another primary mechanism of UPS regulation is through the mitochondria. Mitochondria can negatively regulate proteasomal activity via increased ROS and decreased ATP [143-145], which can be a result of mitochondrial membrane depolarization, as observed here with lidocaine stimulation [146]. It is also possible that, independent of T2R14 activation, lidocaine is able to diffuse into the cell [147]. Lidocaine may inhibit the UPS by binding to the β5 subunit of the 20s proteasome in p53-postive cancer cells [148]. In any case, UPS inhibition can be linked to apoptosis [149-152]. Drugs that inhibit the catalytic activity of the UPS, including hallmark drugs like bortezomib and ixazomib [153] are used as chemotherapeutics as cancer cells have high rates of protein-turnover for survival [154]. This may contribute to apoptosis observed with lidocaine stimulation, either downstream of T2R14 activation or independently.

It is highly important to continue to study and uncover new therapeutics and therapeutic targets to better outcomes for HSNCC patients. Our data suggest using lidocaine to treat HNSCCs could prove to be a promising strategy, warranting further in vivo and clinical investigation. Due to accessibility of the internal regions of the head and neck, lidocaine could be delivered as a topical cream or local injection. This would enable the use of potent doses without affecting other regions of the body. We observed here that lidocaine in the form of gel inhibited proliferation in HNSCC cells. This strategy could be used post-surgery to kill residual cancer cells, perhaps decreasing the amount of tissue needed to be resected and chance of metastasis.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Zoey A. Miller: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing original draft, Writing – review & editing; Jennifer F. Jolivert: Investigation; Sahil Muthuswami: Investigation; Arielle Mueller: Investigation; Derek B. McMahon: Conceptualization, Methodology; Ryan M. Carey: Resources, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition; Robert J. Lee: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Project administration, Supervision, Funding acquisition.

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Victoria (University of Pennsylvania) for excellent technical assistance. This study was supported by T32GM008076 (Z.A.M.), an American Head and Neck Society Pilot Grant (R.M.C.), R01DC016309 (R.J.L.)

References

  1. 1.↵
    Carey, R.M., et al., T2R bitter taste receptors regulate apoptosis and may be associated with survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Oncol, 2022. 16(7): p. 1474–1492.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    Christensen, J.N., et al., Identification of robust reference genes for studies of gene expression in FFPE melanoma samples and melanoma cell lines. Melanoma Res, 2020. 30(1): p. 26–38.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    Palmer, A.E., et al., Ca2+ indicators based on computationally redesigned calmodulin-peptide pairs. Chem Biol, 2006. 13(5): p. 521–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Odaka, H., et al., Genetically-encoded yellow fluorescent cAMP indicator with an expanded dynamic range for dual-color imaging. PLoS One, 2014. 9(6): p. e100252.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Johnson, D.E., et al., Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2020. 6(1): p. 92.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.
    Solomon, B., R.J. Young, and D. Rischin, Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Genomics and emerging biomarkers for immunomodulatory cancer treatments. Semin Cancer Biol, 2018. 52(Pt 2): p. 228–240.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Jethwa, A.R. and S.S. Khariwala, Tobacco-related carcinogenesis in head and neck cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev, 2017. 36(3): p. 411–423.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Kawakita, D. and K. Matsuo, Alcohol and head and neck cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev, 2017. 36(3): p. 425–434.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Kamangar, F., G.M. Dores, and W.F. Anderson, Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol, 2006. 24(14): p. 2137–50.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Miyauchi, S., et al., Immune Modulation of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma and the Tumor Microenvironment by Conventional Therapeutics. Clin Cancer Res, 2019. 25(14): p. 4211–4223.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Matsuura, D., et al., Risk factors for salvage surgery failure in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope, 2018. 128(5): p. 1113–1119.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    Hannen, E.J. and D. Riediger, The quantification of angiogenesis in relation to metastasis in oral cancer: a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2004. 33(1): p. 2–7.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.
    Irani, S., Distant metastasis from oral cancer: A review and molecular biologic aspects. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent, 2016. 6(4): p. 265–71.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    Hashim, D., et al., Head and neck cancer prevention: from primary prevention to impact of clinicians on reducing burden. Ann Oncol, 2019. 30(5): p. 744–756.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Suh, Y., et al., Clinical update on cancer: molecular oncology of head and neck cancer. Cell Death Dis, 2014. 5: p. e1018.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Murphy, B.A., et al., Quality of life research in head and neck cancer: a review of the current state of the science. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2007. 62(3): p. 251–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Rajendra, A., et al., Palliative chemotherapy in head and neck cancer: balancing between beneficial and adverse effects. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther, 2020. 20(1): p. 17–29.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    Muraro, E., et al., Cetuximab in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Biological mechanisms involved in efficacy, toxicity and resistance. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2021. 164: p. 103424.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    Choi, S. and J.N. Myers, Molecular pathogenesis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: implications for therapy. J Dent Res, 2008. 87(1): p. 14–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    Barragan, R., et al., Bitter, Sweet, Salty, Sour and Umami Taste Perception Decreases with Age: Sex-Specific Analysis, Modulation by Genetic Variants and Taste-Preference Associations in 18 to 80 Year-Old Subjects. Nutrients, 2018. 10(10).
  21. 21.↵
    Zhang, J., et al., Sour Sensing from the Tongue to the Brain. Cell, 2019. 179(2): p. 392–402 e15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.
    Liman, E.R., Salty Taste: From Transduction to Transmitter Release, Hold the Calcium. Neuron, 2020. 106(5): p. 709–711.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.
    DeSimone, J.A. and V. Lyall, Taste receptors in the gastrointestinal tract III. Salty and sour taste: sensing of sodium and protons by the tongue. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 2006. 291(6): p. G1005–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    Ahmad, R. and J.E. Dalziel, G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Taste Physiology and Pharmacology. Front Pharmacol, 2020. 11: p. 587664.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    Kinnamon, S.C., Taste receptor signalling - from tongues to lungs. Acta Physiol (Oxf), 2012. 204(2): p. 158–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    Niki, M., et al., Gustatory signaling in the periphery: detection, transmission, and modulation of taste information. Biol Pharm Bull, 2010. 33(11): p. 1772–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    Romanov, R.A., et al., Afferent neurotransmission mediated by hemichannels in mammalian taste cells. EMBO J, 2007. 26(3): p. 657–67.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    Bachmanov, A.A., et al., Genetics of taste receptors. Curr Pharm Des, 2014. 20(16): p. 2669–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    Carey, R.M. and R.J. Lee, Taste Receptors in Upper Airway Innate Immunity. Nutrients, 2019. 11(9).
  30. 30.↵
    Wooding, S.P., V.A. Ramirez, and M. Behrens, Bitter taste receptors: Genes, evolution and health. Evol Med Public Health, 2021. 9(1): p. 431–447.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    Freund, J.R., et al., Activation of airway epithelial bitter taste receptors by Pseudomonas aeruginosa quinolones modulates calcium, cyclic-AMP, and nitric oxide signaling. J Biol Chem, 2018. 293(25): p. 9824–9840.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    Freund, J.R. and R.J. Lee, Taste receptors in the upper airway. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2018. 4(1): p. 67–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. 33.↵
    McMahon, D.B., et al., The bitter end: T2R bitter receptor agonists elevate nuclear calcium and induce apoptosis in non-ciliated airway epithelial cells. Cell Calcium, 2022. 101: p. 102499.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    Wu, S.V., et al., Expression of bitter taste receptors of the T2R family in the gastrointestinal tract and enteroendocrine STC-1 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2002. 99(4): p. 2392–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    Pydi, S.P., R.P. Bhullar, and P. Chelikani, Constitutive activity of bitter taste receptors (T2Rs). Adv Pharmacol, 2014. 70: p. 303–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    Goricanec, D., et al., Conformational dynamics of a G-protein alpha subunit is tightly regulated by nucleotide binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2016. 113(26): p. E3629–38.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    Sriram, K. and P.A. Insel, G Protein-Coupled Receptors as Targets for Approved Drugs: How Many Targets and How Many Drugs? Mol Pharmacol, 2018. 93(4): p. 251–258.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    Khan, A.S., A. Hichami, and N.A. Khan, Taste perception and its effects on oral nutritional supplements in younger life phases. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care, 2018. 21(5): p. 411–415.
    OpenUrl
  39. 39.
    Vesnina, A., et al., Genes and Eating Preferences, Their Roles in Personalized Nutrition. Genes (Basel), 2020. 11(4).
  40. 40.↵
    Jeruzal-Swiatecka, J., W. Fendler, and W. Pietruszewska, Clinical Role of Extraoral Bitter Taste Receptors. Int J Mol Sci, 2020. 21(14).
  41. 41.↵
    LaBonte, M.L. and M.A. Beers, An alternative laboratory designed to address ethical concerns associated with traditional TAS2R38 student genotyping. Biochem Mol Biol Educ, 2015. 43(2): p. 100–9.
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.
    Lee, R.J., et al., T2R38 taste receptor polymorphisms underlie susceptibility to upper respiratory infection. J Clin Invest, 2012. 122(11): p. 4145–59.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.
    Lee, R.J., et al., Mouse nasal epithelial innate immune responses to Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing molecules require taste signaling components. Innate Immun, 2014. 20(6): p. 606–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.
    Bloxham, C.J., S.R. Foster, and W.G. Thomas, A Bitter Taste in Your Heart. Front Physiol, 2020. 11: p. 431.
    OpenUrl
  45. 45.↵
    Clark, A.A., et al., TAS2R bitter taste receptors regulate thyroid function. FASEB J, 2015. 29(1): p. 164–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    Zehentner, S., et al., The Role of Bitter Taste Receptors in Cancer: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel), 2021. 13(23).
  47. 47.↵
    Martin, L.T.P., et al., Bitter taste receptors are expressed in human epithelial ovarian and prostate cancers cells and noscapine stimulation impacts cell survival. Mol Cell Biochem, 2019. 454(1-2): p. 203–214.
    OpenUrl
  48. 48.↵
    Singh, N., et al., Chemosensory bitter taste receptors T2R4 and T2R14 activation attenuates proliferation and migration of breast cancer cells. Mol Cell Biochem, 2020. 465(1-2): p. 199–214.
    OpenUrl
  49. 49.↵
    Sessler, D.I., Long-term consequences of anesthetic management. Anesthesiology, 2009. 111(1): p. 1–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. 50.↵
    Sheets, M.F., et al., Sodium channel molecular conformations and antiarrhythmic drug affinity. Trends Cardiovasc Med, 2010. 20(1): p. 16–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    Sun, D., Y.C. Li, and X.Y. Zhang, Lidocaine Promoted Ferroptosis by Targeting miR-382-5p /SLC7A11 Axis in Ovarian and Breast Cancer. Front Pharmacol, 2021. 12: p. 681223.
    OpenUrl
  52. 52.
    Sun, M., S. Huang, and Y. Gao, Lidocaine inhibits the proliferation and metastasis of epithelial ovarian cancer through the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Transl Cancer Res, 2021. 10(7): p. 3479–3490.
    OpenUrl
  53. 53.
    Wall, T.P., et al., Effects of Lidocaine and Src Inhibition on Metastasis in a Murine Model of Breast Cancer Surgery. Cancers (Basel), 2019. 11(10).
  54. 54.
    Sun, H. and Y. Sun, Lidocaine inhibits proliferation and metastasis of lung cancer cell via regulation of miR-539/EGFR axis. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol, 2019. 47(1): p. 2866–2874.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    Mirshahidi, S., et al., Bupivacaine and Lidocaine Induce Apoptosis in Osteosarcoma Tumor Cells. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2021. 479(1): p. 180–194.
    OpenUrl
  56. 56.↵
    Zhu, J. and S. Han, Lidocaine inhibits cervical cancer cell proliferation and induces cell apoptosis by modulating the lncRNA-MEG3/miR-421/BTG1 pathway. Am J Transl Res, 2019. 11(9): p. 5404–5416.
    OpenUrl
  57. 57.↵
    Meyerhof, W., et al., The molecular receptive ranges of human TAS2R bitter taste receptors. Chem Senses, 2010. 35(2): p. 157–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  58. 58.↵
    Jaggupilli, A., et al., Analysis of the expression of human bitter taste receptors in extraoral tissues. Mol Cell Biochem, 2017. 426(1-2): p. 137–147.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  59. 59.↵
    Spinelli, K.J. and P.G. Gillespie, Monitoring intracellular calcium ion dynamics in hair cell populations with Fluo-4 AM. PLoS One, 2012. 7(12): p. e51874.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. 60.↵
    Shaik, F.A., A. Jaggupilli, and P. Chelikani, Highly conserved intracellular H208 residue influences agonist selectivity in bitter taste receptor T2R14. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr, 2019. 1861(12): p. 183057.
    OpenUrl
  61. 61.↵
    Di Virgilio, F., et al., Extracellular ATP and P2 purinergic signalling in the tumour microenvironment. Nat Rev Cancer, 2018. 18(10): p. 601–618.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  62. 62.↵
    Teng, X., et al., Lidocaine exerts anticancer activity in bladder cancer by targeting isoprenylcysteine carboxylmethyltransferase (ICMT). Transl Androl Urol, 2021. 10(11): p. 4219–4230.
    OpenUrl
  63. 63.↵
    Ye, L., et al., Anti-tumor effects of lidocaine on human gastric cancer cells in vitro. Bratisl Lek Listy, 2019. 120(3): p. 212–217.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  64. 64.↵
    Carey, R.M., et al., T2R bitter taste receptors regulate apoptosis and may be associated with survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Oncol, 2021.
  65. 65.↵
    Straub, S.G., et al., Stimulation of insulin secretion by denatonium, one of the most bitter-tasting substances known. Diabetes, 2003. 52(2): p. 356–64.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. 66.↵
    Shah, J., E.G. Votta-Velis, and A. Borgeat, New local anesthetics. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2018. 32(2): p. 179–185.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  67. 67.↵
    McDonough, R.C., et al., Targeted Gq-GPCR activation drives ER-dependent calcium oscillations in chondrocytes. Cell Calcium, 2021. 94: p. 102363.
    OpenUrl
  68. 68.
    Wang, Y., et al., GPCR-induced calcium transients trigger nuclear actin assembly for chromatin dynamics. Nat Commun, 2019. 10(1): p. 5271.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  69. 69.
    Chakraborty, S. and G. Hasan, Store-Operated Ca(2+) Entry in Drosophila Primary Neuronal Cultures. Methods Mol Biol, 2018. 1843: p. 125–136.
    OpenUrl
  70. 70.↵
    Gruntovskii, G., [Ceramic plastic repair in treating giant cell bone tumors]. Ortop Travmatol Protez, 1986(8): p. 4–5.
  71. 71.↵
    Fahrner, M., et al., The STIM1/Orai signaling machinery. Channels (Austin), 2013. 7(5): p. 330–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. 72.↵
    Bodnar, D., et al., STIM-TRP Pathways and Microdomain Organization: Ca(2+) Influx Channels: The Orai-STIM1-TRPC Complexes. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2017. 993: p. 139–157.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  73. 73.↵
    Amran, M.S., N. Homma, and K. Hashimoto, Pharmacology of KB-R7943: a Na+-Ca2+ exchange inhibitor. Cardiovasc Drug Rev, 2003. 21(4): p. 255–76.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  74. 74.↵
    Zhang, B.X., et al., Differential regulation of intracellular calcium oscillations by mitochondria and gap junctions. Cell Biochem Biophys, 2006. 44(2): p. 187–203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  75. 75.↵
    Talmon, M., et al., Absinthin, an agonist of the bitter taste receptor hTAS2R46, uncovers an ER-to-mitochondria Ca(2+)-shuttling event. J Biol Chem, 2019. 294(33): p. 12472–12482.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. 76.↵
    Chung, Y.K. and Y.H. Wong, Re-examining the ‘Dissociation Model’ of G protein activation from the perspective of Gbetagamma signaling. FEBS J, 2021. 288(8): p. 2490–2501.
    OpenUrl
  77. 77.↵
    Lambert, N.A., Dissociation of heterotrimeric g proteins in cells. Sci Signal, 2008. 1(25): p. re5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  78. 78.↵
    Kim, D., et al., Coupling of Airway Smooth Muscle Bitter Taste Receptors to Intracellular Signaling and Relaxation Is via Galphai1,2,3. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol, 2017. 56(6): p. 762–771.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. 79.↵
    Chung, W.C. and J.C. Kermode, Suramin disrupts receptor-G protein coupling by blocking association of G protein alpha and betagamma subunits. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 2005. 313(1): p. 191–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  80. 80.↵
    Mangmool, S. and H. Kurose, G(i/o) protein-dependent and -independent actions of Pertussis Toxin (PTX). Toxins (Basel), 2011. 3(7): p. 884–99.
    OpenUrl
  81. 81.↵
    Uemura, T., et al., Biological properties of a specific Galpha q/11 inhibitor, YM-254890, on platelet functions and thrombus formation under high-shear stress. Br J Pharmacol, 2006. 148(1): p. 61–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  82. 82.↵
    Liu, B. and D. Wu, Analysis of G protein-mediated activation of phospholipase C in cultured cells. Methods Mol Biol, 2004. 237: p. 99–102.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  83. 83.↵
    Roland, W.S., et al., 6-methoxyflavanones as bitter taste receptor blockers for hTAS2R39. PLoS One, 2014. 9(4): p. e94451.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. 84.↵
    Zhou, D., et al., Repositioning Lidocaine as an Anticancer Drug: The Role Beyond Anesthesia. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2020. 8: p. 565.
    OpenUrl
  85. 85.↵
    Butler, M., M. Spearman, and K. Braasch, Monitoring cell growth, viability, and apoptosis. Methods Mol Biol, 2014. 1104: p. 169–92.
    OpenUrl
  86. 86.↵
    Zhang, B.B., et al., Mitochondrial membrane potential and reactive oxygen species in cancer stem cells. Fam Cancer, 2015. 14(1): p. 19–23.
    OpenUrl
  87. 87.↵
    Iijima, T., Mitochondrial membrane potential and ischemic neuronal death. Neurosci Res, 2006. 55(3): p. 234–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  88. 88.↵
    Soutar, M.P.M., et al., FBS/BSA media concentration determines CCCP’s ability to depolarize mitochondria and activate PINK1-PRKN mitophagy. Autophagy, 2019. 15(11): p. 2002–2011.
    OpenUrl
  89. 89.↵
    Katakam, P.V., et al., Depolarization of mitochondria in neurons promotes activation of nitric oxide synthase and generation of nitric oxide. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2016. 310(9): p. H1097–106.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. 90.
    Long, D., et al., Lidocaine promotes apoptosis in breast cancer cells by affecting VDAC1 expression. BMC Anesthesiol, 2022. 22(1): p. 273.
    OpenUrl
  91. 91.
    Wang, W.Z., et al., Lidocaine-induced ASC apoptosis (tumescent vs. local anesthesia). Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2014. 38(5): p. 1017–23.
    OpenUrl
  92. 92.
    Zhao, L., et al., Lidocaine Inhibits Hepatocellular Carcinoma Development by Modulating circ_ITCH/miR-421/CPEB3 Axis. Dig Dis Sci, 2021. 66(12): p. 4384–4397.
    OpenUrl
  93. 93.
    Werdehausen, R., et al., Lidocaine induces apoptosis via the mitochondrial pathway independently of death receptor signaling. Anesthesiology, 2007. 107(1): p. 136–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  94. 94.
    Xue, Y. and A.Z. Wang, DJ-1 plays a neuroprotective role in SH-SY5Y cells by modulating Nrf2 signaling in response to lidocaine-mediated oxidative stress and apoptosis. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2020. 36(8): p. 630–639.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  95. 95.↵
    Chang, Y.C., et al., Local anesthetics induce apoptosis in human thyroid cancer cells through the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. PLoS One, 2014. 9(2): p. e89563.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  96. 96.↵
    Kobayashi, K., et al., Cytotoxicity and type of cell death induced by local anesthetics in human oral normal and tumor cells. Anticancer Res, 2012. 32(7): p. 2925–33.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  97. 97.↵
    Zhu, G., et al., Differential effects and mechanisms of local anesthetics on esophageal carcinoma cell migration, growth, survival and chemosensitivity. BMC Anesthesiol, 2020. 20(1): p. 126.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  98. 98.↵
    Choudhary, G.S., S. Al-Harbi, and A. Almasan, Caspase-3 activation is a critical determinant of genotoxic stress-induced apoptosis. Methods Mol Biol, 2015. 1219: p. 1–9.
    OpenUrl
  99. 99.
    Lamkanfi, M. and T.D. Kanneganti, Caspase-7: a protease involved in apoptosis and inflammation. Int J Biochem Cell Biol, 2010. 42(1): p. 21–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  100. 100.↵
    Brentnall, M., et al., Caspase-9, caspase-3 and caspase-7 have distinct roles during intrinsic apoptosis. BMC Cell Biol, 2013. 14: p. 32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  101. 101.↵
    Zeng, W., et al., Lidocaine suppresses the malignant behavior of gastric cancer cells via the c-Met/c-Src pathway. Exp Ther Med, 2021. 21(5): p. 424.
    OpenUrl
  102. 102.
    Tan, Y., et al., GNB2 is a mediator of lidocaine-induced apoptosis in rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells. Neurotoxicology, 2016. 54: p. 53–64.
    OpenUrl
  103. 103.
    Villarruel, E.Q., et al., Lidocaine-induced apoptosis of gingival fibroblasts: participation of cAMP and PKC activity. Cell Biol Int, 2011. 35(8): p. 783–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  104. 104.↵
    Gao, J., H. Hu, and X. Wang, Clinically relevant concentrations of lidocaine inhibit tumor angiogenesis through suppressing VEGF/VEGFR2 signaling. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 2019. 83(6): p. 1007–1015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  105. 105.↵
    Huerta-Bahena, J., R. Villalobos-Molina, and J.A. Garcia-Sainz, Cycloheximide: an adrenergic agent. Life Sci, 1982. 30(20): p. 1757–62.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  106. 106.↵
    Westra, S.I.P.W.H., Molecular pathology of head and neck cancer: implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease, 2009. 4: p. 49–70.
    OpenUrl
  107. 107.↵
    Cramer, J.D., et al., The changing therapeutic landscape of head and neck cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2019. 16(11): p. 669–683.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  108. 108.
    Bossola, M., Nutritional interventions in head and neck cancer patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy: a narrative review. Nutrients, 2015. 7(1): p. 265–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  109. 109.
    De Felice, F., D. Musio, and V. Tombolini, Head and neck cancer: metronomic chemotherapy. BMC Cancer, 2015. 15: p. 677.
    OpenUrl
  110. 110.↵
    Specenier, P.M. and J.B. Vermorken, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck cancer: should it be revisited? Cancer Lett, 2007. 256(2): p. 166–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  111. 111.↵
    Concu, R. and M. Cordeiro, Cetuximab and the Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer. Curr Top Med Chem, 2018. 18(3): p. 192–198.
    OpenUrl
  112. 112.↵
    Mei, Z., et al., Immune checkpoint pathways in immunotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oral Sci, 2020. 12(1): p. 16.
    OpenUrl
  113. 113.↵
    Lu, P., et al., Extraoral bitter taste receptors in health and disease. J Gen Physiol, 2017. 149(2): p. 181–197.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  114. 114.↵
    Leppert, W., et al., Transdermal and Topical Drug Administration in the Treatment of Pain. Molecules, 2018. 23(3).
  115. 115.↵
    Pe’er, J., Ocular surface squamous neoplasia: evidence for topical chemotherapy. Int Ophthalmol Clin, 2015. 55(1): p. 9–21.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  116. 116.
    Jain, R., et al., Nanocarrier Based Topical Drug Delivery-A Promising Strategy for Treatment of Skin Cancer. Curr Pharm Des, 2020. 26(36): p. 4615–4623.
    OpenUrl
  117. 117.↵
    Gilani, S.J., et al., Nano-Based Therapy for Treatment of Skin Cancer. Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov, 2018. 13(2): p. 151–163.
    OpenUrl
  118. 118.↵
    Gutierrez, A., M. Atilhan, and S. Aparicio, A theoretical study on lidocaine solubility in deep eutectic solvents. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2018. 20(43): p. 27464–27473.
    OpenUrl
  119. 119.↵
    Kirkland, D.J., et al., A weight of evidence assessment of the genotoxicity of 2,6-xylidine based on existing and new data, with relevance to safety of lidocaine exposure. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 2021. 119: p. 104838.
    OpenUrl
  120. 120.↵
    Eberhardt, M., et al., TRPA1 and TRPV1 are required for lidocaine-evoked calcium influx and neuropeptide release but not cytotoxicity in mouse sensory neurons. PLoS One, 2017. 12(11): p. e0188008.
    OpenUrl
  121. 121.↵
    Kiss, F., et al., Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) Channels in Head-and-Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas: Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Potentials. Int J Mol Sci, 2020. 21(17).
  122. 122.
    Chen, T.M., et al., TRPM7 via calcineurin/NFAT pathway mediates metastasis and chemotherapeutic resistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Aging (Albany NY), 2022. 14(12): p. 5250–5270.
    OpenUrl
  123. 123.↵
    Zhao, L.Y., et al., The overexpressed functional transient receptor potential channel TRPM2 in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Sci Rep, 2016. 6: p. 38471.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  124. 124.↵
    McLaughlin, S.K., et al., Gustducin and transducin: a tale of two G proteins. Ciba Found Symp, 1993. 179: p. 186-96; discussion 196-200.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  125. 125.↵
    Liu, M., et al., Denatonium enhanced the tone of denuded rat aorta via bitter taste receptor and phosphodiesterase activation. Eur J Pharmacol, 2020. 872: p. 172951.
    OpenUrl
  126. 126.↵
    Tietze, D., et al., Structural and Dynamical Basis of G Protein Inhibition by YM-254890 and FR900359: An Inhibitor in Action. J Chem Inf Model, 2019. 59(10): p. 4361–4373.
    OpenUrl
  127. 127.↵
    Tizzano, M., et al., Expression of Galpha14 in sweet-transducing taste cells of the posterior tongue. BMC Neurosci, 2008. 9: p. 110.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  128. 128.↵
    1. S. Markossian, et al., Editors
    Wang, T., et al., Measurement of cAMP for Galphas- and Galphai Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs), in Assay Guidance Manual, S. Markossian, et al., Editors. 2004: Bethesda (MD).
  129. 129.↵
    Medapati, M.R., et al., Bitter taste receptor T2R14 detects quorum sensing molecules from cariogenic Streptococcus mutans and mediates innate immune responses in gingival epithelial cells. FASEB J, 2021. 35(3): p. e21375.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  130. 130.↵
    Wall, T.P. and D.J. Buggy, Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine and Metastatic Cancer Recurrence - A Narrative Review. Front Oncol, 2021. 11: p. 688896.
    OpenUrl
  131. 131.↵
    Zhang, C., C. Xie, and Y. Lu, Local Anesthetic Lidocaine and Cancer: Insight Into Tumor Progression and Recurrence. Front Oncol, 2021. 11: p. 669746.
    OpenUrl
  132. 132.↵
    Kirtonia, A., et al., Repurposing of drugs: An attractive pharmacological strategy for cancer therapeutics. Semin Cancer Biol, 2021. 68: p. 258–278.
    OpenUrl
  133. 133.↵
    Wiese, K.G., et al., The effect of lidocaine on growth of cells of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 1993. 21(4): p. 157–62.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  134. 134.↵
    Budihardjo, I., et al., Biochemical pathways of caspase activation during apoptosis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 1999. 15: p. 269–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  135. 135.↵
    Crowley, L.C. and N.J. Waterhouse, Detecting Cleaved Caspase-3 in Apoptotic Cells by Flow Cytometry. Cold Spring Harb Protoc, 2016. 2016(11).
  136. 136.↵
    Ennis, H.L. and M. Lubin, Cycloheximide: Aspects of Inhibition of Protein Synthesis in Mammalian Cells. Science, 1964. 146(3650): p. 1474–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  137. 137.↵
    Frasor, J., et al., Gene expression preferentially regulated by tamoxifen in breast cancer cells and correlations with clinical outcome. Cancer Res, 2006. 66(14): p. 7334–40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  138. 138.↵
    Nandi, D., et al., The ubiquitin-proteasome system. J Biosci, 2006. 31(1): p. 137–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  139. 139.↵
    Kawahara, H. and H. Yokosawa, Intracellular calcium mobilization regulates the activity of 26 S proteasome during the metaphase-anaphase transition in the ascidian meiotic cell cycle. Dev Biol, 1994. 166(2): p. 623–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  140. 140.
    Djakovic, S.N., et al., Regulation of the proteasome by neuronal activity and calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. J Biol Chem, 2009. 284(39): p. 26655–65.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  141. 141.↵
    Park, J.Y., et al., Calcium-dependent proteasome activation is required for axonal neurofilament degradation. Neural Regen Res, 2013. 8(36): p. 3401–9.
    OpenUrl
  142. 142.↵
    Lee, D. and J.H. Hong, Physiological Overview of the Potential Link between the UPS and Ca(2+) Signaling. Antioxidants (Basel), 2022. 11(5).
  143. 143.↵
    Ross, J.M., L. Olson, and G. Coppotelli, Mitochondrial and Ubiquitin Proteasome System Dysfunction in Ageing and Disease: Two Sides of the Same Coin? Int J Mol Sci, 2015. 16(8): p. 19458–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  144. 144.
    Eytan, E., et al., ATP-dependent incorporation of 20S protease into the 26S complex that degrades proteins conjugated to ubiquitin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1989. 86(20): p. 7751–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  145. 145.↵
    Dahlmann, B., L. Kuehn, and H. Reinauer, Studies on the activation by ATP of the 26 S proteasome complex from rat skeletal muscle. Biochem J, 1995. 309 (Pt 1): p. 195–202.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  146. 146.↵
    Brookes, P.S., et al., Calcium, ATP, and ROS: a mitochondrial love-hate triangle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, 2004. 287(4): p. C817–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  147. 147.↵
    Sawant, P.D., et al., Drug release from hydroethanolic gels. Effect of drug’s lipophilicity (logP), polymer-drug interactions and solvent lipophilicity. Int J Pharm, 2010. 396(1-2): p. 45–52.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  148. 148.↵
    Bahrudin, U., et al., Inhibitory effects of local anesthetics on the proteasome and their biological actions. Sci Rep, 2017. 7(1): p. 5079.
    OpenUrl
  149. 149.↵
    Guo, F., et al., Crosstalk between cardiomyocytes and noncardiomyocytes is essential to prevent cardiomyocyte apoptosis induced by proteasome inhibition. Cell Death Dis, 2020. 11(9): p. 783.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  150. 150.
    Chen, D., et al., Inhibition of prostate cancer cellular proteasome activity by a pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate-copper complex is associated with suppression of proliferation and induction of apoptosis. Front Biosci, 2005. 10: p. 2932–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  151. 151.
    Wu, W.K., et al., Proteasome inhibition: a new therapeutic strategy to cancer treatment. Cancer Lett, 2010. 293(1): p. 15–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  152. 152.↵
    Concannon, C.G., et al., Apoptosis induced by proteasome inhibition in cancer cells: predominant role of the p53/PUMA pathway. Oncogene, 2007. 26(12): p. 1681–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  153. 153.↵
    Fricker, L.D., Proteasome Inhibitor Drugs. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol, 2020. 60: p. 457–476.
    OpenUrl
  154. 154.↵
    Nunes, A.T. and C.M. Annunziata, Proteasome inhibitors: structure and function. Semin Oncol, 2017. 44(6): p. 377–380.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 24, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Lidocaine Induces Apoptosis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells Through Activation of Bitter Taste Receptor T2R14
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Lidocaine Induces Apoptosis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells Through Activation of Bitter Taste Receptor T2R14
Zoey A. Miller, Jennifer F. Jolivert, Ray Z. Ma, Sahil Muthuswami, Arielle Mueller, Derek B. McMahon, Ryan M. Carey, Robert J. Lee
bioRxiv 2022.11.22.517413; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.22.517413
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Lidocaine Induces Apoptosis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells Through Activation of Bitter Taste Receptor T2R14
Zoey A. Miller, Jennifer F. Jolivert, Ray Z. Ma, Sahil Muthuswami, Arielle Mueller, Derek B. McMahon, Ryan M. Carey, Robert J. Lee
bioRxiv 2022.11.22.517413; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.22.517413

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Cancer Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4246)
  • Biochemistry (9173)
  • Bioengineering (6806)
  • Bioinformatics (24064)
  • Biophysics (12158)
  • Cancer Biology (9565)
  • Cell Biology (13826)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7660)
  • Ecology (11737)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15544)
  • Genetics (10672)
  • Genomics (14362)
  • Immunology (9515)
  • Microbiology (22912)
  • Molecular Biology (9132)
  • Neuroscience (49158)
  • Paleontology (358)
  • Pathology (1487)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2584)
  • Physiology (3851)
  • Plant Biology (8351)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1473)
  • Synthetic Biology (2301)
  • Systems Biology (6206)
  • Zoology (1303)