Abstract
Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) are a group of rare childhood disorders characterized by severe epilepsy and cognitive deficits. Numerous DEE genes have been discovered thanks to advances in genomic diagnosis, yet putative molecular links between these disorders are unknown. CDKL5 deficiency disorder (CDD, DEE2), one of the most common genetic epilepsies, is caused by loss-of-function mutations in the brain-enriched kinase CDKL5. To elucidate CDKL5 function, we looked for CDKL5 substrates using a SILAC-based phosphoproteomic screen. We identified the voltage-gated Ca2+ channel Cav2.3 (encoded by CACNA1E) as a novel physiological target of CDKL5 in mice and humans. Recombinant channel electrophysiology and interdisciplinary characterization of Cav2.3 phosphomutant mice revealed that loss of Cav2.3 phosphorylation leads to channel gain-of-function via slower inactivation and enhanced cholinergic stimulation, resulting in increased neuronal excitability. Our results thus show that CDD is partly a channelopathy. The properties of unphosphorylated Cav2.3 closely resemble those described for CACNA1E gain-of-function mutations causing DEE69, a disorder sharing clinical features with CDD. We show that these two single-gene diseases are mechanistically related and could be ameliorated with Cav2.3 inhibitors.
Introduction
Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEE) are characterized by severe early-onset epileptic activity accompanied by global developmental and cognitive impairments. The genetic aetiology approximately 90 DEEs has been identified 1, but targeted therapies remain scarce. Elucidating shared pathways in infantile-onset epilepsies will reveal molecular links between disease genes and greatly advance common targeted treatments.
Cyclin dependent kinase like-5 (CDKL5) is a brain-enriched serine-threonine kinase. De novo loss-of-function mutations in the X-linked CDKL5 gene, including missense, nonsense and insertions/deletions, cause CDKL5 deficiency disorder (CDD) (OMIM 300672, 300203) 2–5. Pathogenic missense mutations, almost exclusively located in the kinase domain, indicate that kinase activity is critical for CDD pathology 6–9. CDD is characterized by infantile-onset, intractable seizures, profound neurodevelopmental impairment in motor and sensory function, impaired language acquisition and autonomic disturbances 3, 5. The estimated incidence for CDD is 1/42,000 live births each year 10–12 with approximately 80% being female patients, making it one of the most common types of genetic childhood epilepsy 13, 14.
CDKL5 is highly enriched throughout the forebrain with expression starting at late embryonic stages in rodents and humans 15–19. Low levels of expression were reported in other tissues 16. Phosphorylation targets include microtubule binding proteins EB2 and MAP1S 6, 20 and transcriptional regulators ELOA 21 and Sox9 22, showing its diverse cellular roles. CDKL5 knockout (KO) neurons have deficits in synaptic transmission, dendritic spine development, neurite outgrowth, cilia elongation and microtubule dynamics 23–29. However, molecular mechanisms linking CDKL5 loss to neuronal hyperexcitability remain unknown. The identification of key physiological targets of CDKL5 directly involved in the regulation of cellular excitability may help elucidate epileptogenic mechanisms and lead to effective therapies.
Voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCC) have a key role in physiology, driving neuronal excitability and allowing influx of second messenger Ca2+ ions in response to membrane depolarization 30–32. VGCC subtype Cav2.3 is formed by the ion-conducting α1E subunit (encoded by CACNA1E) in complex with accessory subunits from the β and α2δ families. Cav2.3 is highly expressed in the CNS, where it is localized at both pre-and post-synaptic sites in neurons, as shown functionally and by immuno-EM 33–35. CACNA1E knockout mice demonstrated that Cav2.3 mediates neuronal R-type Ca+2 currents 35–37, so-called due to their “resistance” to organic VGCC channel inhibitors 38, 39. Cav2.3 is dynamically regulated by phosphorylation at multiple sites 40, 41. In general, VGCC phosphorylation is an important mechanism by which neuromodulators and their G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) exert their effect on cellular excitability 42.
De novo heterozygous missense mutations in CACNA1E cause an infantile epileptic encephalopathy (OMIM 618285) 43, 44. Cav2.3 variants studied in vitro have altered gating and/or inactivation kinetics, leading to gain-of-function (GoF) of Cav2.3 43, 44. Patients with CACNA1E mutations have overlapping clinical phenotypes with CDD, such as intractable seizures, profound intellectual disability and hypotonia. Single-gene DEEs such as this one are estimated to impact approximately 1/2100 live births 10, but their real prevalence is unknown as more genes are being identified rapidly due to recent advances in genetic diagnosis 45, 46. Despite, overlapping clinical features, potential molecular links between these rare disorders remain to be elucidated.
In this work, we apply for the first time a global phosphoproteomics approach in CDKL5 knockout mice and identify and validate Cav2.3 as a novel substrate of CDKL5 in human and mouse neurons. Through our analysis of Cav2.3 function and characterization of a novel Cav2.3 phosphomutant mouse line, in which CDKL5 phosphorylation site is mutated, we reveal that lack of phosphorylation leads to Cav2.3 gain-of-function and hyperexcitability. Our results indicate that developmental and epileptic encephalopathies caused by CDKL5 and CACNA1E are related at the molecular level. We propose Cav2.3 as a converging therapeutic target for these disorders.
Results
Cav2.3 is a CDKL5 phosphorylation substrate in mice and humans
We used stable isotope labelling of amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) 47 to differentially tag newly synthesized proteins in primary cortical cultures from wild type (WT) and CDKL5 knockout (KO) mice 48 and compare changes in protein phosphorylation levels (Fig. 1a). As expected in CDKL5 KO neurons, we observe a significant reduction in CDKL5 pS407 and in EB2 pS222, a known CDKL5 phosphorylation target 20. Phosphorylation of EB2 S221 was also decreased, indicating co-regulation of these neighbouring sites. More importantly, a potential new target protein, the ion channel Cav2.3, showed strongly reduced phosphorylation at S15 (pS15), in CDKL5 KO neurons. Strikingly, the Cav2.3 S15 site matches the RPXS/T* consensus motif 6, 20, suggesting direct CDKL5 phosphorylation (Fig. 1a, b). S15, located in the N-terminus of the α1E channel pore subunit (Fig. 1b), is conserved in humans (S14) but absent in the related Cav2.1 (CACNA1A) and Cav2.2 (CACNA1B) channels (Fig. 1b).
To test if CDKL5 can phosphorylate Cav2.3 S15, we generated a phosphospecific antibody targeting this site. Overexpression of Cav2.3 (& ancillary subunits) together with the CDKL5 kinase domain in HEK293 cells shows strong Cav2.3 phosphorylation in vitro (Cav2.3 pS14, Fig. 1c, f). This phosphorylation is absent when overexpressing phosphomutant Cav2.3 or kinase-dead CDKL5, demonstrating the specificity of the antibody and the dependence of phosphorylation at this site on CDKL5 kinase activity. Importantly, full-length CDKL5 also directly phosphorylated Cav2.3 in vitro (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b). Cav2.3 phosphorylation is consistently reduced in the cortex of CDKL5 KO mice at postnatal day P20 (Cav2.3 pS15), validating the substrate in vivo (Fig. 1d, g). Finally, Cav2.3 pS14 was decreased in human iPSC-derived neurons from CDD patients (Fig. 1e, h), demonstrating altered phospho-regulation of this target in CDD. Together, these results show that Cav2.3 is a bona fide CDKL5 phosphorylation target in mice and humans.
Loss of Cav2.3 Ser14 phosphorylation slows baseline channel kinetics and amplifies muscarinic regulation
Cav2.3 is causally linked to epilepsy by two main lines of evidence. First, channel deletion renders mice resistant to tonic-clonic seizures 49–51. On the other hand, Cav2.3 GoF leads to severe epileptic encephalopathy in humans 43, 44. The remarkable overlap in clinical manifestations between CACNA1E and CDD patients, including seizures and neurodevelopmental delays, raises the possibility that Cav2.3 regulation by CDKL5 might affect channel function and in turn neuronal excitability.
To test the effect of pS14 on Cav2.3 channel properties we used a HEK293 cell line stably expressing the human auxiliary subunits β3 and α2δ1 and transiently transfected human α1E and full-length CDKL5 plasmids (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b). Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings of Cav2.3 Ba2+ currents revealed slower decay kinetics (inactivation τ) in S14A mutant channels (Fig. 2a-c). Notably, in absence of CDKL5, WT Cav2.3 decay kinetics were indistinguishable from S14A Cav2.3 mutant (Fig. 2d). We also found a statistically significant increase in whole-cell current density at maximum activation voltages in S14A when compared to WT Cav2.3 in presence of CDKL5 (Fig. 2e). To account for differences in biophysical properties that may be introduced by α1E association with a different β subunit 52, 53, we conducted parallel experiments in a HEK293 cell line stably expressing human α2δ1 and β1b, another Cavβ subunit associated with α1E in the brain 54. We used Ca2+ as charge carrier to examine channel properties in a more physiological context. Decay kinetics of WT Cav2.3 currents with β1b were substantially slower than currents with β3 (Supplementary Fig. 2a, b vs. Fig 1a, b), as previously reported 52. In absence of CDKL5 phosphorylation (S14A α1E mutant or kinase-dead CDKL5 conditions), Cav2.3 current inactivation was further slowed (Supplementary Fig. 2a-c), recapitulating our results with β3 (Fig. 2a-c). Current density at maximal activation voltages did not reach significance in the β1-expressing cells, where currents were generally larger (Supplementary Fig. 2d). Finally, we observed no changes in half maximal activation and inactivation potential or time course of recovery from fast inactivation in β3-or β1-expressing cells (Fig. 2f and Supplementary 2e,f).
Altogether, our results indicate that CDKL5-mediated Ser14 phosphorylation of α1E speeds up the inactivation of human Cav2.3 and suppresses current amplitude, independent of Cavβ subtype or charge carrier. Consequently, absence of CDKL5 leads to Cav2.3 GoF, with larger and more prolonged currents. A subset of CACNA1E GoF mutations described in human DEE patients also cause slower inactivation kinetics and/or increased current density 43, mirroring the phenotypes observed in the unphosphorylated channel. Thus, the functional deficits in Cav2.3 observed in absence of CDKL5 phosphorylation match those caused by pathological point mutations in Cav2.3 and could partly explain the pathophysiology of CDD.
Cav2.3 channels are downstream targets of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, which modify channel function predominantly via PKC-mediated phosphorylation, leading to current enhancement in HEK293 cells and neurons 55–57. Given the observed GoF in S14A Cav2.3, we hypothesized that muscarinic receptor enhancement may also be affected by CDKL5 phosphorylation. To test this, we co-expressed Cav2.3, CDKL5 and muscarinic acetylcholine receptor type 3 or 1 (M3 or M1), which are prominent brain subtypes known to regulate neuronal Cav2.3 post-synaptically. As expected, application of the non-hydrolysable agonist carbachol substantially increased current amplitude regardless of Ser14 phosphorylation in both β3 and β1 stable cell lines (Fig. 2g-l). The current increase with carbachol was 1.5 to 2 fold greater in cells without phospho-Ser14 at -10 mV (Fig. 2g, h, j, l), reflecting Cav2.3 gain-of-function in absence of phosphorylation. The half-maximal activation potential (V1/2) was left-shifted by 5 mV for WT channels in both cell lines, a described effect of muscarinic receptor activation 56, 58. Interestingly, without Ser14 phosphorylation this shift was significantly greater, implying an effect of phospho-Ser14 on the modulation of Cav2.3 gating (Fig. 2m-p). This represents an additional gain-of-function due to loss of CDKL5, a phenotype comparable to pathogenic CACNA1E mutations that alter V1/2 43.
Upon GPCR activation, Cav2.3 channels can be suppressed by Gβγ subunits. This effect is has been observed in Gαq-coupled receptors including M1/M3 in HEK293 cells 56 and CA1 neurons 55. The Cav2.3 N-terminus and Cavβ are involved in Gβγ regulation 59, 60. For this reason, we investigated the possibility that the enhanced carbachol effects in absence of N-terminal pS14 could be due to reduced Gβγ suppression. To distinguish between PKC-mediated enhancement and Gβγ suppression, we boosted PKC activity prior to carbachol application using phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), reliably increasing Cav2.3 currents 56, 61. With further addition of carbachol we found no evidence of muscarinic inhibition of human WT Cav2.3 channels (Supplementary Fig. 2g, h). Moreover, co-expression of Cav2.3 and Gi-coupled dopamine D2 receptors to further probe Gβγ inhibition in our system, revealed significant reduction in peak currents upon D2 activation with quinpirole 59. However, there was no difference in inhibitory modulation with or without Ser14 phosphorylation (Supplementary Fig. 2i, j). The above manipulations suggest that Gβγ is not involved in pathological Cav2.3 GoF.
Our results describe two Cav2.3 gain-of-function (GoF) mechanisms in the absence of CDKL5 phosphorylation: slower decay kinetics and a left shift in voltage-dependence of activation (V1/2) upon muscarinic activation, both reflected in increased Ca2+ influx through Cav2.3 channels. These GoF features are reminiscent of those described for pathological Cav2.3 variants.
Altered R-type current inactivation and increased excitability in neurons from Cav2.3 S15A phosphomutant mice
To investigate the role of Cav2.3 S15 phosphorylation in neurons, we generated Cav2.3 S15A phosphomutant mice using CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. We found that the total S15 phosphorylation levels detected by our phosphoantibody were reduced to <20% of control levels in homozygous S15A mice (HOM S15A) while total Cav2.3 levels were not changed (Fig. 3a-c). Cav2.3 is highly expressed in the somato-dendritic region of CA1 hippocampal neurons 34 where it underlies most of the R-type current and regulates intrinsic excitability 35, 55. We performed whole-cell somatic recordings in acute slices from young mice and recorded pharmacologically isolated Cav2.3 Ca2+ currents in these cells. When compared to wild type littermates (WT), HOM S15A mice showed significantly slower inactivation τ at maximal conductance voltages, recapitulating HEK293 cell results (Fig. 3d, e). Current amplitudes at the soma did not differ (Fig. 3f).
We next tested the effect of Cav2.3 S15A on neuronal excitability and cholinergic neuromodulation in response to depolarising current injections in adult CA1 pyramidal cells. Resting membrane potential (Vrest), input resistance (Rin) and firing properties were identical between WT and S15A mice under baseline conditions (Fig. 3g-i). Following bath application of carbachol, we observed a 4 mV depolarisation in Vrest and a 25% increase in Rin (Fig 3g), changes that were comparable between WT and S15A neurons (Supplementary Fig. 3a). These alterations are likely due to conductances other than Cav2.3, in line with previous reports 58, 62, 63.
In neurons, cholinergic activation can elicit sustained depolarizing plateau potentials (DPPs): all-or-none, large amplitude depolarizations that outlast stimulus-evoked firing 58, 64, 65. A muscarinic medium duration afterdepolarization (ADP) is also reported in CA1 pyramidal cells 66. Up-regulation of Cav2.3-mediated R-type currents is required for DPPs and ADPs in hippocampus 67 and cortex 65. We inspected these Cav2.3-dependent hyper-excitability measures in S15A mice. Carbachol application significantly increased action potential firing frequency in WT and S15A neurons (Fig. 3 h-k). At current injections greater than 250 pA, however, phosphomutant neurons responded with fewer spikes and depolarization block towards the end of the stimulus step, indicating greater underlying depolarization. The percentage of cells exhibiting at least one DPP or all-or-none afterdepolarization (ADP) >8 mV upon carbachol treatment was significantly higher in S15A mice, showing an enhanced depolarization response (Fig. 3j, k). Importantly, the occurrence of DPP/large ADPs was shifted towards lower current injections in S15A cells (Fig. 3l). Greater perisomatic depolarization in S15A neurons was also reflected in a larger ADP at 100ms post stimulus and more spike attenuation (Supplementary Fig. 3b, c). Together with the enhanced carbachol-mediated left-shift in V1/2 observed in phosphomutant channels in HEK293 cells (Fig. 2 j,l), these increased neuronal depolarizations in Cav2.3 phosphomutant mice suggest facilitation of gating of endogenous Cav2.3 without S15 phosphorylation upon cholinergic agonist application.
We tested if other conductances known to be regulated by carbachol are altered in Cav2.3 phosphomutants. The medium-and slow-afterhyperpolarizations (AHPs) are critical for spike frequency regulation and their underlying K+ and mixed-cationic currents are targets of the muscarinic system 62, 68, 69. Baseline AHPs elicited by a short spike burst were not different between WT and S15A mice and were equally suppressed by carbachol application (Supplementary Fig. 3d). We also analysed baseline small-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ (SK) currents and spontaneous excitatory synaptic currents (EPSCs), known to be functionally coupled to 70 or modulated by 71 Cav2.3 in CA1 neurons. We hypothesized that these may be affected given the prolonged Cav2.3 currents in S15A mice, but our measurements show no differences between genotypes (Supplementary Fig. 3e-h). Therefore, we suggest that the increased carbachol-induced excitability of CA1 neurons in Cav2.3 S15A knock-in mice is specifically due to Cav2.3 GoF.
Cav2.3 S15A phosphomutant mice have behavioural and EEG deficits
Multiple CDKL5 KO mouse models have been generated by deleting exons 4, 2 or 6, all of which led to loss of CDKL5 protein 15, 18, 48. Numerous behavioural deficits were reported in CDKL5 KO mice 15, 48, 72–74, thus we investigated behavioural phenotypes in Cav2.3 S15A phosphomutant mice to see if any of the CDKL5 KO impairments are recapitulated. We observed no spontaneous behavioural seizures in Cav2.3 S15A, as reported for CDKL5 KO mice 15, 18, 48, but see 75, 76. When monitored in a home-cage environment for prolonged periods, S15A showed reduced locomotion and voluntary wheel use (Fig. 4a, b), also observed in CDKL5 KO mice 48. We observed minor changes in locomotion and zone preference in the open field test, but only towards the end of a 30 min trial (Supplementary Fig. 4c, 4a), potentially indicating fatigue rather than anxiety. Unlike CDKL5 KOs, S15A mice did not present hindlimb clasping (mean scores: WT 0.041, HOM S15A 0, p=0.334, unpaired t test) and performed equally in the rotarod test (Fig. 4d) when compared to WT littermates. Cognitive abilities in the Y-and Barnes maze were also unchanged in phosphomutants (Supplementary Fig. 4b-e). On the other hand, S15A mice had mild impairments in sociability (Fig. 4e). A consistently reported phenotype of CDKL5 KO mice is altered contextual fear conditioning responses 15, 73. Memory formation, retention and extinction in this task were also defective in Cav2.3 S15A (Fig. 4f), indicating a clear overlap with CDKL5 KOs.
Finally, given the high epilepsy incidence in human CDKL5 and CACNA1E DEE patients, seizure susceptibility was analysed in a separate cohort using wireless electrocorticogram (ECoG) transmitters 77 and repeated low-dose kainic-acid (KA) injections 78 (Fig. 4g-i). We found no changes in baseline ECoG (Fig 4g) or overall KA-induced seizure susceptibility in S15A mice (Fig. 4h), similar to KA-induced seizures in CDKL5 KO mice 18, 48. Interestingly, however, female S15A mice had a reduced threshold to stage 5 behavioural seizures with an increase in ECoG activity during KA (Fig. 4h,i).
In summary, our in vivo analyses of Cav2.3 S15A mice demonstrate similarities with CDD mouse models and patients, including social, motor and cognitive impairments, and to some extent increased seizure susceptibility. These observations suggest that loss of pS15 is a key contributor to the phenotypic features of CDD.
Discussion
There are currently no disease-targeting therapies for CDD and the causes of aberrant excitability in absence of CDKL5 are unknown. Here we identify the alpha subunit of Cav2.3 channel complex as a CDKL5 phosphorylation substrate in mouse and human neurons. CACNA1E mutations cause severe early onset epilepsy in humans and there is remarkable overlap between CDD and patients with CACNA1E mutations. These include intractable seizures, global developmental delay, intellectual disability, hypotonia, hyperkinetic movements and sleep disturbances. A consistent feature of Cav2.3 variants associated with epilepsy is GoF of the channel, by left-shifting the activation voltage, altering maximal current and/or by slowing inactivation 43. Our data shows that deletion of CDKL5 results in loss of Cav2.3 S15 phosphorylation, leading to GoF due to slowed inactivation and amplified gating modulation, similar to the effects observed in Cav2.3 variants. Our results establish Cav2.3 overactivity as a common feature of CACNA1E (DEE69) and CDKL5 (DEE2) epileptic encephalopathies, potentially explaining overlapping clinical features of these diseases.
Cytoplasmic N-terminal S15 phosphorylation of Cav2.3 has been previously detected in global phosphoproteomics screens from brain (phosphosite.org), but the responsible kinase and the role of this phosphorylation were unknown. N-terminal deletions in Cav2.3 59 or the related Cav2.2 79, 80, result in channels with normal gating and conduction properties. Inactivation kinetics were not measured in these studies, yet interestingly Cav2.2 N-terminal deletion mutants seemed to have slower decaying currents, indicating that this region participates in the regulation of inactivation 79. Analogously, loss of N-terminal Ser14/15 phosphorylation slows Cav2.3 inactivation in HEK293 cells and neurons, underscoring a previously overlooked regulatory role of the Cav2.3 N-terminus. This domain may interact with Cavβ, as previously suggested for Cav2.2 80.
We also find that cholinergic stimulation amplifies Cav2.3 GoF in absence of CDKL5 phosphorylation, by prominently shifting activation V1/2 and increasing currents at maximal activation voltages, thus revealing a second molecular mechanism by which loss of pS14/15 enhances Cav2.3 function. It is known that muscarinic enhancement of Cav2.3 depends on Gαq signalling and PKC phosphorylation at multiple sites, including the intracellular loop I-II 61, the most prominent site of α1-β interaction 53. We show that loss of pS14 interferes with PKC enhancement upon carbachol application, but the mechanisms of this interplay are yet to be established.
Our recordings from hippocampal neurons in Cav2.3 S15A mice demonstrate that S15 regulates Cav2.3 function in neurons. We show that pS15 is critical for R-type current inactivation and regulation of firing by cholinergic stimulation. Isolating Cav2.3 currents is challenging due to space clamp limitations and the need for inhibitors of other voltage-gated channels. These drugs may have promiscuous effects on Cav2.3 81 or incompletely block other Ca2+ currents 55. We observed enhanced neuronal excitability and increased pro-epileptiform cholinergic ADPs/DPPs 58, 63 in Cav2.3 phosphomutant mice, an effect that was not linked to carbachol suppression of AHPs or other intrinsic excitability properties in these cells. Instead, we suggest that the GoF of unphosphorylated Cav2.3 underlies the hyper-excitability seen in response to muscarinic stimulation. Interestingly, CDKL5 KO mice have altered cholinergic tone 82 and the muscarinic antagonist Solifenacin was shown to ameliorate network defects in CDD patient-derived neurons 83, supporting an enhanced cholinergic modulation in this human model.
We find striking behavioural similarities between our Cav2.3 phosphomutant mice and CDKL5 KOs. Specifically, S15A mice show reduced encoding and retention of fear memory, a robust phenotype found in full body 15, 73, 84 and excitatory neuron-specific 85 CDKL5 KO mice. Cav2.3 KO mice display enhanced contextual fear conditioning 37. Cav2.3 S15A mice recapitulate the reduced home-cage locomotion behaviour in CDKL5 KO mice 48, 73. The deficits observed in voluntary wheel in Cav2.3 phosphomutants could be indicative of mild hypotonia 86, 87. Finally, reduced social interaction in Cav2.3 phosphomutant mice was also observed in CDKL5 KO mice 15, 48, 73 and inhibitory neuron specific deletion of CDKL5 88. Importantly, these phosphomutant mouse phenotypes mirror human clinical manifestations of CDD, arguing that slowed inactivation and enhanced cholinergic modulation of unphosphorylated Cav2.3 may contribute to these symptoms.
Cav2.3 KO mice exhibit reduced susceptibility to chemical absence seizures 89–91 and hippocampal KA-induced seizures 51. In agreement with Cav2.3’s role in epilepsy, we find increased seizure susceptibility in females in the low-dose KA injection paradigm in our Cav2.3 S15A mice. The difference between males and females, observed in both ECoG and behavioural seizure analysis, may arise from increased basal function of Cav2.3 in the female brain downstream of hormonal signals. Therefore, gender should be taken into consideration in future mouse CDKL5 KO studies, where seizure susceptibility has not been observed in one gender. In CDKL5 KO males, KA-induced seizure susceptibility changes have not been observed 18, 48. Reduced latency to seizure initiation with pentylenetetrazole (PTZ, a GABAA receptor inhibitor) injections has been reported in CDKL5 KO males 84 as well as heterozygous females 74. Finally, increased severity of seizures upon NMDA injections were observed in male CDKL5 KO mice due to increase NMDAR function 18, however NMDAR function is not altered in CDKL5 KO rats 29. In absence of pro-convulsants, disturbance-associated seizures are observed only in aged heterozygous females in two different CDD mouse models 75, an occurrence that may be linked to developmental changes in Cav2.3 regulation.
In rodents, it is possible to reverse adult phenotypes with reintroduction of CDKL5 genetically 72 or using AAV viruses 92, indicating an open therapeutic window for treatment. Here, we report a novel functional regulation of Cav2.3 by CDKL5 phosphorylation, which impinges of neuronal excitability. Thus Cav2.3 GoF in absence of CDKL5 may be an important molecular mechanism in CDD pathology. In addition to CDKL5 and CACNA1E encephalopathies, increased Ca2+ influx through Cav2.3 may contribute to seizures in Fragile X syndrome, as reduced FMRP function leads to increased Cav2.3 expression 93. Cav2.3 also increases susceptibility to drug-induced Parkinson’s disease 95, 96. We propose that Cav2.3 inhibitors/ modulators could be beneficial for CDD patients and potentially for a broader population of neurological patients in the future.
Methods
Mouse handling and mutant generation
Animals were housed in a controlled environment with 12-hour light/dark cycle. They were fed ad libitum and used in accordance with the principles of the “3Rs” and the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 of the United Kingdom. Protocols and procedures were approved by The Francis Crick Institute and UCL Institute of Neurology oversight committees. Except for some in vivo experiments, mice were housed in groups. Mouse strains were backcrossed into C57 Bl/6 (Jackson) and none of the experimental mice were immunocompromised. Male and female mice aged embryonic day (E)16.5 to postnatal 30 weeks were used as specified.
CDKL5 KO animals were a kind gift from Cornelius Gross 48. Mutant Cav2.3 Ser15Ala animals were created in-house using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. The guide contained the sequence 5’AGGCUCAGGCGAUGGAGACU3’. This replaced the original DNA sequence of 5’ AGGCGCAGGCGATGGAGACT 3’ in CACNA1E. Genetically altered C57Bl6 embryos were obtained using electroporation as part of Francis Crick Institute’s Genetic Modification Services. Genotype was determined by in-house PCR or Sanger sequencing (Source Bioscience).
SILAC phosphoproteomics
Sample preparation
Mouse cortical neurons were cultured from individual male E16.5 embryos from a heterozygous Cdkl5 female. Cdkl5 +/Y (WT) or -/Y (KO) genotype of embryos was determined afterwards. Neurons were plated at a density of 8x10^6 cells per 10 cm dish coated with 60 μg/ml poly-D-lysine (Sigma) and 2.5 μg/ml laminin (Sigma). Cells were grown in neurobasal media free of L-Arginine and L-Lysine (Invitrogen) supplied with either Lysine 8 (U-13C6, U-15N2) and Arginine 10 (U-13C6, U-15N4) or Lysine 4 (4, 4, 5, 5-D4) and Arginine 6 (U-13C6). L-Proline (200mg/ml) was supplemented to prevent Arginine to Proline conversion. At DIV4, 1 μM Ara-C was added to inhibit glia growth. For every embryo, one dish was labelled with K8R10 (heavy) and one dish was labelled with K4R6 (light).
At DIV12, SILAC labelled primary neurons from 3 Cdkl5 WT and 3 Cdkl5 KO animals were lysed in lysis buffer containing 20 mM Tris pH7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.25% IGEPAL NP40, 0.5 mM DTT, 1x Protease Inhibitor Cocktail, 1 μM Okadaic Acid. Each sample was checked for SILAC label incorporation and Arginine to Proline conversion. Lysates were mixed to obtain 3x heavy WT/light KO and 3x heavy KO/light WT samples containing 1 mg total protein. Proteins were digested overnight with Sequencing Grade Modified Trypsin/Lys-C (Promega) at 370C, desalted using Sep-Pak Classic C18 Cartridges (Waters) and vacuum dried completely. Samples were enriched for phosphopeptides using Titansphere titanium dioxide beads (GL Science) in batch mode with the following buffers: Loading buffer: 80% ACN, 5% TFA, 1M Glycolic Acid, Wash buffer 1: 80% ACN 1% TFA, Wash buffer 2: 10% ACN, 0.2% TFA, Elution buffer 1: 1% Ammonium Hydroxide, Elution buffer 2: 5% Ammonium Hydroxide. Phosphopeptides were cleaned up using C18 Stage Tips with a centrifuge protocol and vacuum dried completely. Samples were stored at -800C until required for analysis by mass spectrometry.
Mass spectrometry
Each sample was resuspended in 35 μl 1% TFA, sonicated for 15 minutes and injected 3 times (10 μl per injection). Peptide mixtures were separated on a 50 cm, 75 μm I.D. Pepmap column over a 3 hr gradient and eluted directly into the mass spectrometer (Orbitrap Velos). Xcalibur software was used to control data acquisition. The instrument ran in data dependent acquisition mode with the top 10 most abundant peptides selected for MS/MS by CID, MSA or HCD fragmentation techniques (one fragmentation technique per replicate).
Data processing was performed using the MaxQuant bioinformatics suite (v 1.3.0.5) and protein database searching was done by the Andromeda search engine using a Uniprot database of Mus musculus proteins amended with common contaminants. Default search settings were used including an FDR of 1% on the phosphosite, peptide and protein level and matching between runs for peptide identification. K4R6 and K8R10 were set as labels with a maximum of 3 labeled AAs. Phosphorylation at serine, threonine or tyrosine residues, oxidation (Met) and protein N-terminal acetylation were set as variable modifications. Carbamidomethylation of Cys-residues was set as a fixed modification.
Data was further processed in Perseus v.1.6.15.0. Phospho (STY) sites from the six experimental samples in the MaxQuant search were loaded and site tables expanded. Potential contaminants and reversed hits were removed. Normalized H/L ratios were log2 transformed and filtered for rows containing at least three valid values. Potential CDKL5 substrates were annotated using the R-P-X-pS/pT motif 20. A one-sample t-test was performed comparing the normalized ratios to the null hypothesis and visualized as a volcano plot.
Mutagenesis
Point mutations were introduced using QuickChange site-directed mutagenesis (Agilent). Complimentary primers contained the desired mutations flanked by at least 18 bp. To ensure mutagenesis efficiency for each construct, two separate PCR reactions with each primer were set up: 0.2 μM primer, 100 ng template DNA, 0.2 mM dNTP mix, 1x Pfu buffer and 2.5 U Pfu Ultra HF. The PCR programme was run 4x, after which complementary samples were combined and the PCR run repeated 20x. PCR products were treated with DpnI for 1hr at 370C and transformed into XL-10 Gold competent cells. At least 4 colonies were used for each DNA miniprep (QIAprep, Qiagen) and mutations were confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Source Bioscience). The constructs used were as follow: 1) HA-tagged human α1E subunit (gene bank L27745.2, gift from L. Parent, Université de Montréal), in a commercial vector under control of CMV promoter 97. 2) The N-terminal FLAG-tagged full-length human CDKL5107 and N-terminal HA-tagged human CDKL51-352 kinase domain construct kinase as previously described 20.
Cell line maintenance and transfection
Tetracycline-inducible HEK293 cells expressing human Cavβ3 and α2δ1 subunits were obtained from SB Drug Discovery (Glasgow, UK). HEK293 cells stably expressing human Cav β1b and α2δ1 subunits were kindly provided by Andrew Powell (GSK Ltd., Middlesex, UK). Naïve HEK293T cells were supplied by Francis Crick Institute’s Cell Services.
All cells were cultured in high glucose DMEM with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (tetracycline free, Clontech or Gibco) and penicillin/streptomycin 50units/ml-50 mg/ml. They were passaged using TrypLE Express and maintained under selection antibiotics as appropriate: HEKβ3/ α2δ1, Zeocin 300mg/ml (Invivogen) & Blasticidin 5mg/ml (Invivogen); HEKβ1b/α2δ1, Puromycin 1mg/ml and Hygromycin-B 200mg/ml. Cell culture reagents were obtained from Gibco/Invitrogen unless specified.
Selection antibiotics were removed before transfection and doxycycline 1μg/μl added in the case of β3-expressing cells. Transient transfection was carried out using X-tremeGENETM 9 reagent (Roche) following manufacturer’s instructions. Total DNA was 1.5-1.6μg. For Western blot experiments, human α1E-HA subunit and CDKL5 (HA-kinase domain or FLAG-full length) were co-transfected in a 1:1 ratio, substituting kinase for empty pcdna3 vector in some cases. For electrophysiological recordings α1E-HA, FLAG-CDKL5 full length and GFP (pcdna3) were co-transfected at a ratio of 10:4:1 (HEK β3 cell line) or 8:4:1 (HEKβ1b cell line). To study muscarinic regulation, human α1E-HA, FLAG-CDKL5, muscarinic receptor type 3/1 (CHRM3/1, Addgene) and GFP were co-expressed at a ratio of 8:4:3:1. For dopamine modulation experiments, human α1E-HA, FLAG-CDKL5 and dopamine D2 receptor (gfp-DRD2, Addgene) were co-transfected at a ratio of 2:0.75:1.
Western Blotting
Three different types of sample were used for Western blot experiments: 1) HEK293 cells 48 hr post-transfection, 2) Mouse brain tissue collected after cervical dislocation, followed by dissection and snap-freezing in liquid nitrogen, 3) Human iPSC derived neurons obtained as frozen pellets from Cleber Trujillo (UCSD, USA). Protocols for iPSC generation, patient CDKL5 mutations and related control details are described in 83. All lysates were prepared in 1x/2x sample buffer (Invitrogen) with 0.1-0.2 M dithiothreitol (Sigma). This was followed by sonication, centrifugation at 13000g and denaturation at 700C, 10 min. Protein was loaded onto NuPAGE 8% Bis-Tris polyacrylamide gels (Invitrogen) for electrophoresis and subsequently transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore) for 15-22 hr at 20V in 10% MetOH, Tris Glycine buffer. Membranes were blocked for 30 min in 5-10% skimmed milk and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 40C or 1hr at room temperature (RT). Secondary incubation in horseradish peroxidase-conjugated (HRP) antibodies was for 1hr at RT. Chemiluminescence signals were detected using Amersham ECL (Cytiva) and Amersham Imager (GE Healthcare). Analysis was perfomed using Fiji 2.1. Phospho-S14/15 channel levels were measured as the ratio between pS14/15 Cav2.3 signal and total Cav2.3 signal. Total channel levels are expressed as the ratio over loading control GAPDH. Each replicate in a blot constitutes a data point normalized to the average internal control signal in each blot. At least two independent immunoblot experiments with technical replicates were used for quantification, as specified in figure legends.
Primary antibodies used in each sample were: mouse anti-HA 1:2000 (Biolegend, 901513; HEK293), rabbit anti Cav2.3 N-terminus 1:250 (Covalab, custom 1, HEK293 & brain), rabbit anti pS15 Cav2.3 1:500 (Covalab, custom 2, HEK293, brain & human neurons), mouse anti Cav α1E 1:1000 (Synaptic Systems, 152411, human neurons), rabbit anti CDKL5 1:2000 (Atlas, HPA002847, HEK293), mouse anti GAPDH 1:50000 (Abcam, ab8245, brain & human neurons). Custom made Cav2.3 Ser15 phosphospecific antibodies were raised by immunizing rabbits with peptide PRPG(pS)GDGDSDQSRNC. Phosphorylated Cav2.3 antibody was obtained after double purification. First, they were selected against non-phosphorylated peptide PRPGSGDGDSDQSRNC. This antibody is used as total Cav2.3 antibody (custom 1). Next the eluted fraction was purified again by binding to PRPG(pS)GDGDSDQSRNC -linked beads, obtaining pSer15 Cav2.3 (custom 2). Secondary antibodies used were: donkey anti rabbit HRP 1:10000 (Jackson, 711-035-152), donkey anti mouse HRP 1:10 000 (Jackson, 715-035-151).
In vitro electrophysiology
HEK293 cells
Cells were split 24hr after transfection and replated on glass coverslips and allowed to recover overnight. Whole-cell patch clamp recordings in isolated cells were performed 48-72 hr post-transfection at room temperature. Transfected cells were identified by GFP fluorescence. Data were sampled at 20kHz and filtered at 1-2 kHz. Cells were continuously perfused (1ml/min) with extracellular solution containing (in mM): NaCl 120, TEACl 20, HEPES 10, glucose 10, KCl 5, MgCl2 1, CaCl2 or BaCl2 5, pH 7.4 with NaOH. Pipettes (2.5-3.5 ΩM) were pulled from borosilicate glass (1.2x0.69mm, Harvard Bioscience) and filled with the following intracellular solutions adapted from 40 to minimize current run-down (in mM): CsMeS 140, EGTA 5, MgCl2 0.5, MgATP 5, HEPES 10, for GPCR experiments; CsMethanesulfonate 125, TEACl 5, EGTA 5, MgATP 5, Na3GTP 0.3, Na-phosphocreatine 5, Na-pyruvate 2.5, HEPES 10, pH 7.25, 285-295 mOsm, all other recordings. Upon seal break, currents were evoked every 5/10s with a step from -80/-100mV (holding potential, HP) to 0/+10mV. After an initial run-up period, steady state current voltage (IV) relationships were obtained with 100ms depolarising test steps to +60/+80 in 10mV increments every 10s. For voltage dependence of inactivation the protocol consisted of a 1s pulse from -140 to +20mV in 10 mV increments, followed by a 50 ms test pulse to 0 mV, every 10s. Peak currents (Ipeak) in response to test voltages (Vtest) were used to plot IVs and measure the voltage dependence of activation and inactivation. Reversal voltage (Erev) was estimated by extrapolating a linear fit to the IV curve from +20-+40 mV. Conductance (g) was calculated using the equation (g=(Ipeak)/(Vtest-Erev)). Voltage of half-maximal activation or inactivation (V1/2) were measured by fitting with a Boltzmann equation (Y= A+(B-A)/(1+exp((V-V1/2)/K)) where Y is the conductance or the current, and A and B are the minimum and maximum amplitudes of the fit. Time course of open state inactivation (tinact) was estimated by fitting a single exponential function to current decay in response to test pulses. The average of 3 fits at each voltage was used. For all transfection conditions, cells with outward currents >40% of the peak current at +10mV or with τinact that did not decay uniformly with depolarization were excluded from analysis. Similarly, cells were not used for current density or τinact comparisons if run-down was >30% of the maximal current recorded in the experiment as this is known to affect inactivation time 40. To examine recovery from inactivation, an inactivating pulse to +10mV of 0.8-1s (pulse 1), was followed by a variable recovery period (Δ150-200ms) and a test pulse to +10mV (pulse 2), at 0.1-0.3 Hz. Time course of recovery was calculated using the ratio of Ipeak in response to pulse 2/pulse 1 plotted against duration of recovery period and fitted with single exponential equation. Carbachol, quinpirole and PMA were bath applied at ∼3 ml/min whilst activating Cav2.3 currents with brief monitoring (25ms) test steps to 0 or +10mV, every 2, 5 or 10s, depending on speed of run-down. Upon steady state, IVs were obtained. Cells included in the analysis showed no significant changes in series resistance and a consistent shift in activation V1/2, with current amplitude matching between IV and brief monitoring steps. Leak and capacitance subtraction was applied to all recordings using -P/5 protocol and series resistance compensated from 75-95% to keep voltage error <5mV.
Ex vivo electrophysiology
Hippocampal slices
Mice older than P10 were anaesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (80mg/kg) and xylazine (10mg/kg). To avoid bias, the genotype was unknown at the time of experiment. Animals were decapitated and the brain transferred to ice cold artificial cerebrospinal fluid (standard aCSF) containing (in mM): NaCl 125, NaH2PO4 1.25, NaHCO3 26, KCl 2.5, glucose 25, MgCl2 1, CaCl2 1, saturated with carbogen. Cerebellum and olfactory bulb were discarded. Coronal or transverse hippocampal slices (300μm) were prepared with a Leica VTS 1200S vibratome and transferred to an immersion storage chamber containing bubbled aCSF at 350C for 30 min. Slices were allowed to recover for a further 30 min at room temperature (RT) before electrophysiology experiments. Somatic whole-cell patch clamp recordings were obtained from CA1 pyramidal neurons using borosilicate electrodes (3-4.5 MΩ). Series resistance (Rs) and input resistance (Rin) were monitored throughout recordings using a 100ms, -5mV step from -60mV to evoke passive membrane responses. Rs was calculated from the amplitude of the capacitive transient and Rin from the steady state currents. These were sampled at 20kHz and filtered at 10kHz. The maximum change in Rs permitted was 25%.
R-type Ca2+ currents - Recordings were obtained from young neurons (P10-11) no longer than 6h post slicing using the blind technique. Currents were recorded at RT from P10-11 coronal slices during bath application of a modified aCSF solution (in mM): NaCl 115, TEACl 10, NaHCO3 26, KCl 2.5, NaH2PO4 1.25, glucose 25, MgCl2 1, CaCl2 2; and in presence of the following inhibitors (in μM): TTX 0.5, gabazine 1, APV 25, NBQX 5, 4AP 5, Nifedipine 10 (Tocris), w-conotoxin GVIA 2, w-agatoxin IVA 0.2, w-conotoxin MVIIC 2 (Alomone) and BSA 1mg/ml. Drug stock solutions were prepared in water and stored at -200C. External solution was constantly bubbled and re-circulated. Slices were exposed to ion channel inhibitors for at least 20 min before voltage clamp acquisition. Patch pipettes were filled with (in mM): CsMethanesulfonate 130, TEACl 10, Na-phosphocreatine 5, MgATP2 4, Na3GTP 0.3, HEPES 10, EGTA 2 and biocytin 0.2% pH 7.3 with CsOH. After 10 min stabilization in the whole-cell configuration, IV curves were obtained with voltage steps from -80 to +40, HP=-70mV. A -P/5 leak and capacitance subtraction protocol was used and Rs was compensated 65-85%, to minimize voltage error. Capacitance (Cm) was calculated using equation: Cm [pF] = τm [ms]/Rs[MΩ], where τm is the decay time constant of capacitative transients. Time course of open state inactivation was estimated by iterative single exponential fit to current decay. A positive correlation was found between τinact and Cm for Cm<80pF, thus this was established as the cut off cell size criteria for inclusion in τinact comparisons. Cells with large cells outward currents at depolarising voltages (>50% of the peak current at +10mV) were also excluded. Small-conductance Ca2+-activated (SK) currents and excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSC)-Recordings were obtained from adult neurons (5-6 weeks) in transverse slices. SK currents were measured as tail currents following a 100ms step from -50 mV to +10mV (0.3 Hz) to engage VGCCs. Standard aCSF (CaCl2 2mM, RT) was supplemented with (in μM): TTX 0.5, TEA 1000 and XE991 5, to isolate SK currents by inhibiting temporally overlapping voltage-gated Na+ and K+ conductances. The intracellular solution was (in mM): KGluconate 135, KCl 10, Na-phosphocreatine 10, MgATP2 2, Na3GTP 0.3, HEPES 10, pH 7.3, supplemented with 8-cloro-phenylthio cAMP 50μM, to inhibit the slow afterhyperpolarizing current. SK current identity was confirmed at the end of all experiments by reversible d-tubocurarine (dTC, 50μM) inhibition. dTC-subtracted currents were used for quantification. Traces were sampled at 5 kHz and filtered at 1kHz. SK current amplitude was measured at the peak of the after-current and charge as the integral 500ms post stimulus. EPSCs were isolated at -70 mV in standard aCSF (1) (CaCl2 2.5mM, 30-320C) with gabazine 1 μM and Kgluconate-based internal solution. Traces were sampled at 10kHz and filtered at 2kHz. Upon 5 min stabilization in whole-cell, a 2 min gap free trace was analysed using template-based event detection and threshold match >3.
Current clamp recordings - Recordings were obtained from adult neurons (5-6 weeks) in coronal slices in standard aCSF (2mM Ca2+, 30-320C) and Kgluconate-based internal solution. Membrane potential (Vrest) was measured throughout the recording with 0 current injection and maintained around -65mV during stimulation. Input-output relationships were obtained with 1s current injections from -100 to 450 pA in 50 pA increments. Traces were sampled at 10kHz and filtered at 5kHz. Action potentials were identified with threshold-based event detection (0mV) and amplitude measured from Vrest. Spike attenuation during the train was calculated as ratio between last and first spike amplitudes. Depolarizing plateau potentials (DPPs) were defined as sustained depolarizations >20mV upon stimulus termination. Medium duration afterdepolarizations (ADPs) were measured 100ms post-1s step depolarization. Firing patterns were compared using binomial tests or comparisons of non-linear least squares regression fits to the data distribution. The effect of carbachol on the medium and slow afterhyperpolarizations (mAHP and sAHP) was used as positive control for muscarinic receptor activation. AHPs were evoked at -65mV by a burst of five 2nA, 2ms somatic current injections at 100Hz every 20s and measured at the peak and 500ms post stimulus respectively.
All patch clamp data was obtained with Multiclamp 700B, Digidata 1440A and pClampTM 10 software (Molecular Devices). Data were analysed using Clampfit 10.7/11.2 and OriginPro 9.8. Liquid junction potential was not corrected.
In vivo electrophysiology
Chronic electrocorticogram recordings
Surgical procedures were performed in adult male and female mice (8-10 weeks old) using a stereotaxic frame (Kopf) under isoflurane anaesthesia and temperature control. Each animal was subcutaneously implanted with an electrocorticogram (ECoG) transmitter (A3022B-CC-B45-B, Open Source Instruments, Inc.). The recording electrode was placed above the visual cortex (AP -2, ML 1.5) and the ground electrode in the contralateral prefrontal hemisphere (AP 1.8, ML 1.5). Implanted WT and Hom S15A animals (total 18) were housed individually and no drug treatment was given. The ECoG was recorded wirelessly (sampling frequency 512 Hz, band-pass filter 1-160 Hz) for two weeks using software from Open Source Instruments, Inc. Simultaneous video recordings were obtained (6x/hour) using IP cameras from Microseven (https://www.microseven.com/index.html). The coastline, kurtosis and power spectrum analysis (1-160Hz) were performed using Python. Researchers were blinded to animal genotype during data acquisition and analysis.
Kainic acid susceptibility
At the end of the chronic recordings, low dose 5mg/kg kainic acid (Tocris Bioscience) dissolved in sterile saline was administrated intraperitoneally every 30 minutes to assess brain susceptibility to increasing dosage of chemo convulsant. The clock started at the first injection from 0 minute. Seizure severity was initially assessed while the experiment was ongoing at 10-minute intervals, using a modified Racine scale: 1. immobility; 2, hunched position with facial jerks, 3. rearing and forelimb clonus, 4. persistent rearing and forelimb clonus, falling, 5. generalized tonic clonic convulsions, or wild jumping 78. These assessments were confirmed by re-analyzing the video recordings. Latency measures the length of time from the start of the experiment to the first indication of generalized seizure (Stage 5 on Racine scale). Both kainic acid inductions and analysis were performed by a researcher blinded to the genotypes. A total of 17 implanted mice were used for susceptibility experiments, one male mouse was removed from the study due to surgical complications with the transmitter. In a subset of these where transmitter performance was not compromised, ECoG recordings during seizure inductions were recovered and used for quantification. Traces were analysed using semi-automated seizure detection as described previously 77. The cumulative coastline was calculated from when the first epileptiform activity was detected until the mice reached generalized seizure (stage 5).
Behavioural analysis
Home Cage monitoring
Two separate cohorts of WT and homozygous S15A Cav2.3 mice of both sexes and aged between 12-16 weeks were used. Animals were housed individually and monitored using the Digital Ventilated Cage system (DVC®,Techniplast, Italy). The DVC consists of standard size, barcoded IVC units equipped with a 3x4 arrangement of cage-floor electrodes. Capacitance sensing-based detection of animal position allows for real-time tracking of locomotion activity 24/7. Following a 2-week-acclimatization period, baseline activity was recorded and analysed. Rotating wheels (Ø 4.4 in) were then introduced, and animals allowed to familiarize themselves for another week before data collection. All activity metrics were calculated using the DVC Analytics 3.4.0 platform 98. For locomotion index, the average signal of all 12 cage electrodes was used. Data were grouped in 60 min bins for each day.
Behaviour tests
Behaviour experiments were conducted in 8-week-old WT and homozygous S15A Cav2.3 littermates of both sexes, housed under an inverted light cycle. Mice were handled daily for one week prior to experiments. All tests were video recorded for off-line analysis. Tracking data were analysed using Ethovision XT 15 (Noldus Information Technology, Netherlands) equipped with three-point (nose, body centre, and tail) detection settings. One cohort of mice was used for all 7 tests, carried out in the order described below. Mice were allowed to habituate to the testing room for at least an hour before the behaviour test.
Hind-Limb clasping – Mice were suspended by the middle of the tail and lifted 15 cm above the ground; the extent of hind-limb clasping was recorded for 15 seconds. The room lighting was kept at 90 Lux. Hind-limb clasping was scored from 0 to 3: score 0 = both hind limbs were splayed outward away from the abdomen; score 1 = one hind limb retracted inward toward the abdomen for at least 50% of the observation period; score 2 = both hind limbs partially retracted inward toward the abdomen for at least 50% of the observation period; score 3 = both hind limbs completely retracted inward toward the abdomen for at least 50% of the observation period. Hind-limb extension reflex severity scores were calculated by averaging three trials separated by 1 min.
Open field test - The apparatus consisted of an illuminated (70 lux) white floor PVC foam arena (50 x 50 x 40 cm). A central zone (16 x 16 cm) was pre-defined. Test mice were placed in the centre of the open field and allowed to explore the arena for 30 minutes. At the end of each trial, the mouse was returned to the home cage and the arena was cleaned. Total distance travelled in 30 minutes and percentage of time spent in the central zone were used as measures of locomotor activity and anxiety levels, respectively.
Accelerating Rotarod test - Day 1: Mice walked on a rotating rod (Ugo Basile model 47650, Italy) at constant speed (4 rpm) for three minutes for two acclimatization trials. Day 2: Each mouse was placed on the rotating rod for three test trials, during which the rotation speed gradually increased from 4 to 40 rpm within four minutes. The inter trial interval was 1 hr. Performance was evaluated by measuring the latency to fall.
Three-chamber social interaction test – The apparatus consisted of a white rectangular PVC foam arena (62x42x23 cm) divided into one central and two adjacent compartments of equal size compartments connected by square openings. Empty cylindrical wire cages (Ø 8 cm, height 18 cm) were placed in the lateral chambers. Each mouse was placed in the central chamber and allowed to explore the arena for 10 min. The brightness of the room was kept at 10 lux. Chamber occupancy during habituation was equal between groups. After this, the mouse was returned to the waiting cage for 3 minutes. To assess social preference, an unfamiliar WT mouse of the same age, sex and strain (stranger 1) was gently introduced inside one of the wire cages to serve as a social stimulus. An unfamiliar and inanimate object was added to the other wire cage as the non-social stimulus. The test mouse was placed in the apparatus containing the social and non-social stimuli for 10 minutes. After that, the test mouse was removed and kept in the waiting cage for 3 minutes. All compartments were cleaned with 30% ethanol solution before the next test phase. To assess preference for social novelty, the non-social object from the previous test phase was replaced by an unfamiliar mouse (stranger 2) and the previous stranger 1 (now familiar mouse) was placed into the wire cage of the opposite compartment. The test mouse was placed in the central chamber and allowed to explore the arena for the next 10 minutes, after which it was returned to the home cage. The location of the novel and familiar mice with respect to the side compartments was counterbalanced across trials. The exploration of the target mouse/object was scored when the mouse’s nose was detected within 2 cm from the cylindrical wire cage.
Y-maze spontaneous alternation test – Testing occurs in a Y-shaped maze with three arms (1,2,3) made of opaque plastic (34 x 9 x 14 cm) oriented in a 1200 angle. Each mouse was randomly placed into one arm and allowed to explore the maze for 10 minutes. Room lighting was kept at 10 lux. An arm entry was recorded manually when the mouse moved beyond the central triangle of the maze and entered an arm with all four paws. Alternation behaviour was defined as consecutive entries into each of the three arms in overlapping triplet sets (e.g.: 1, 2, 3 or 2, 1, 3 or 3, 2, 1). The percentage of alternations was calculated as the number of actual alternations divided by the maximum possible number of arm entries.
Barnes-maze test – Twenty-four hours before training, the animal was habituated to the apparatus and escape box for a minute. During the training phase (4 days), mice were trained to locate the target hole (with an escape chamber underneath) from among 20 holes evenly spaced around the perimeter of an elevated circular open field (Ø 96 cm). Each animal was initially placed in the centre of the arena covered by an opaque cylinder, which was removed 10-20s after the start of the trial. Room lighting was kept at 635 lux. The mouse is then free to explore the platform for 3 minutes using four visual cues to aid navigation. If the mouse does not enter the escape chamber within 3 minutes the experimenter guides the mouse gently to the escape box (20x11x7cm) and leaves the mouse inside for 1 min. This step is repeated two more times a day (3 trials in total per day) with at least 20 minutes in between where the mouse is placed back in its home cage. To assess learning, a probe test in carried out 24h after the last training, where the escape box has been removed from the target hole. The mouse is placed on the platform and free to explore it for 3 minutes. Distance to first: distance walked from the centre of the arena to the target hole (centre-point detection); latency to first: time to reach the target hole from the centre of the arena (centre-point detection); errors to first are defined as checking any hole before reaching the escape box (nose-point detection).
Contextual fear conditioning – The fear conditioning chamber (27x27x35 cm, Ugo Basile, Italy) was equipped with a shock grid floor and a digital Near Infrared Red Video Fear Conditioning system. Mice from each genotype and sex were examined in four successive phases comprising: conditioned acquisition (day 1), memory of the conditioned background context A (day 2), exploration in new background context B (day 3) and memory extinction in the conditioned context A (day 4-7).
Context A was characterized by a cubic shape, illuminated at 100 Lux and the presence of a vanilla odour. The floor consisted of metal rods, mediating the foot shock. Context B was also cubic shaped, not illuminated and without additional odour cues. On day 1: Mice were introduced in the conditioning chambers scented with vanilla odour for 8 min and received 3 unconditioned stimuli (US: 1s, 0.25 mA foot shock, 2 min inter-trials interval). To examine the conditioned response to the context, mice were reintroduced in the training context 24 h later (day 2) and monitored for 5 minutes in the absence of the US. On day 3, the mice were introduced to a new context (context B) for 5 min to examine whether freezing behaviour is associated to a specific context (context A). During days 4-7 mice were placed back in context A without US to assess extinction of the association of the specific context A and the US (which is described as a form of new learning).
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed in GraphPad Prism 9. Two-tailed Student’s T tests and one-or two-way ANOVA with Geisser-Greenhouse correction followed by Fisher’s LSD test were used for most statistical comparisons, unless otherwise specified. Repeated measures ANOVA was used as appropriate if there were no missing values. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. Box and whiskers (min to max) or violin plots are used to illustrate data spread and frequency distribution respectively; percentile 25/75, median and mean are indicated by lines/markers.
Data availability
The datasets generated and analysed during this study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
List of supplementary materials
Author contributions
M.S.C., L.L.B., G.L. and S.K.U. designed the experiments. M.S.C. performed and analysed electrophysiology and biochemistry experiments. L.L.B. performed mass spectrometry. Y.Q. and G.L. conducted/ analysed EEG and kainic acid-induced seizure experiments. A.T.L. and M.S.C. performed behaviour experiments/ analysis. L.S., S.M., S.C. provided technical assistance in molecular biology and electrophysiology. M.S.C. and S.K.U. wrote the initial version of the manuscript. J.R. contributed to the original draft and review/editing along with all authors.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Materials and Correspondence
Correspondence and material requests should be addressed to Sila K. Ultanir and Marisol Sampedro-Castañeda
Acknowledgements
We thank Ultanir lab members for valuable discussion and thoughtful comments. We thank Helen Flynn for valuable assistance with mass spectrometry. We thank Crick GEMS team for creation of CACNA1E S15A mice. This work was supported by the Francis Crick Institute which receives its core funding from Cancer Research UK (CC2037), the UK Medical Research Council (CC2037), and the Wellcome Trust (CC2037); Loulou Foundation Project Grant (11015); Crick-MSD Framework collaboration grant (11202). For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
Footnotes
Small edits to Abstract, last section of the Discussion and Figure Legends 1 Author affiliation updated
References
- 1.↵
- 2.↵
- 3.↵
- 4.
- 5.↵
- 6.↵
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.↵
- 10.↵
- 11.
- 12.↵
- 13.↵
- 14.↵
- 15.↵
- 16.↵
- 17.
- 18.↵
- 19.↵
- 20.↵
- 21.↵
- 22.↵
- 23.↵
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.
- 27.
- 28.
- 29.↵
- 30.↵
- 31.
- 32.↵
- 33.↵
- 34.↵
- 35.↵
- 36.
- 37.↵
- 38.↵
- 39.↵
- 40.↵
- 41.↵
- 42.↵
- 43.↵
- 44.↵
- 45.↵
- 46.↵
- 47.↵
- 48.↵
- 49.↵
- 50.
- 51.↵
- 52.↵
- 53.↵
- 54.↵
- 55.↵
- 56.↵
- 57.↵
- 58.↵
- 59.↵
- 60.↵
- 61.↵
- 62.↵
- 63.↵
- 64.↵
- 65.↵
- 66.↵
- 67.↵
- 68.↵
- 69.↵
- 70.↵
- 71.↵
- 72.↵
- 73.↵
- 74.↵
- 75.↵
- 76.↵
- 77.↵
- 78.↵
- 79.↵
- 80.↵
- 81.↵
- 82.↵
- 83.↵
- 84.↵
- 85.↵
- 86.↵
- 87.↵
- 88.↵
- 89.↵
- 90.
- 91.↵
- 92.↵
- 93.↵
- 94.
- 95.↵
- 96.↵
- 97.↵
- 98.↵