Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Computational modeling reveals latent components of mouse behavior in the sucrose preference test

Jeroen P H Verharen, Johannes W de Jong, Yichen Zhu, Stephan Lammel
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.30.518425
Jeroen P H Verharen
1Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johannes W de Jong
1Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yichen Zhu
1Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephan Lammel
1Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lammel@berkeley.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The sucrose preference test (SPT) measures the relative preference of a sucrose solution over water to assess hedonic behaviors in rodents. The SPT involves numerous complex behaviors, including learning, motivation, and choice. Yet, it remains uncertain whether its main outcome measure, sucrose preference, can reflect these behavioral subcomponents. Here, we conducted an experimental and computational decomposition of mouse behavior in the SPT and discovered previously unrecognized behavioral subcomponents associated with changes in sucrose preference. While both acute and chronic stress reduced sucrose preference, only chronic stress evoked anhedonia. Additionally, reduced sucrose preference induced by optogenetics is not always indicative of anhedonia but can also reflect learning deficits. Even small variations in experimental conditions influence behavior, task outcome and interpretation. Thus, an ostensibly simple behavioral task can entail high levels of complexity, demonstrating the need for careful dissection of behavior into its subcomponents when studying the underlying neurobiology.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 01, 2022.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Computational modeling reveals latent components of mouse behavior in the sucrose preference test
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Computational modeling reveals latent components of mouse behavior in the sucrose preference test
Jeroen P H Verharen, Johannes W de Jong, Yichen Zhu, Stephan Lammel
bioRxiv 2022.11.30.518425; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.30.518425
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Computational modeling reveals latent components of mouse behavior in the sucrose preference test
Jeroen P H Verharen, Johannes W de Jong, Yichen Zhu, Stephan Lammel
bioRxiv 2022.11.30.518425; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.30.518425

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4087)
  • Biochemistry (8766)
  • Bioengineering (6480)
  • Bioinformatics (23346)
  • Biophysics (11751)
  • Cancer Biology (9149)
  • Cell Biology (13255)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7417)
  • Ecology (11369)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15088)
  • Genetics (10402)
  • Genomics (14011)
  • Immunology (9122)
  • Microbiology (22050)
  • Molecular Biology (8780)
  • Neuroscience (47373)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1420)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2482)
  • Physiology (3704)
  • Plant Biology (8050)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1431)
  • Synthetic Biology (2209)
  • Systems Biology (6016)
  • Zoology (1250)