Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

At Which Low Amplitude Modulated Frequency Do Infants Best Entrain? A Frequency Tagging Study

View ORCID ProfileJames Ives, View ORCID ProfilePierre Labendzki, View ORCID ProfileMarta Perapoch Amadó, View ORCID ProfileEmily Greenwood, View ORCID ProfileNarain Viswanathan, View ORCID ProfileTom Northrop, View ORCID ProfileSam Wass
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.08.519576
James Ives
UEL Baby Development Lab, University of East London, Water Lane, London, E15 4LZ, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for James Ives
  • For correspondence: u2067263@uel.ac.uk
Pierre Labendzki
UEL Baby Development Lab, University of East London, Water Lane, London, E15 4LZ, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Pierre Labendzki
Marta Perapoch Amadó
UEL Baby Development Lab, University of East London, Water Lane, London, E15 4LZ, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marta Perapoch Amadó
Emily Greenwood
UEL Baby Development Lab, University of East London, Water Lane, London, E15 4LZ, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Emily Greenwood
Narain Viswanathan
UEL Baby Development Lab, University of East London, Water Lane, London, E15 4LZ, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Narain Viswanathan
Tom Northrop
UEL Baby Development Lab, University of East London, Water Lane, London, E15 4LZ, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tom Northrop
Sam Wass
UEL Baby Development Lab, University of East London, Water Lane, London, E15 4LZ, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sam Wass
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Previous infant entrainment research has shown neural entrainment to a wide range of stimuli and amplitude modulated frequencies. However, it is unknown if infants neurally entrain more strongly to some frequencies more than others, and to which low amplitude modulated frequency infants show the strongest entrainment. The current study seeks to address this by testing the neural entrainment of N=23 4–6-month-old infants and N=22 control group adult caregivers while they listened to a range of sinusoidally amplitude modulated beep stimuli at rest (no sound), 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 Hz. Analysis examined differences across power and phase, regions of interest predetermined by previous literature and by segmented time windows. Results showed that the strongest entrainment was at 2Hz for both adult and infant participants; that there was no significant difference in power and phase, entrainment was occipital temporal and slightly left fronto-central in adults and right fronto-central and left occipito-temporal in infants, leading to some regions of interest used in previous studies being significant in infants and all regions of interest being significant in adults. Segmenting by time window did not show any significant increase or decrease in entrainment over time, but longer time windows showed a stronger entrainment response. In conclusion, it is important to choose appropriate stimulation frequencies when investigating entrainment between stimulation frequencies or across ages; whole head recording is recommended to see the full extent of activation; there is no preference on power vs phase analyses; and longer recordings show stronger effects.

Author Contribution Statement Ives, J., conceptualisation, data collection and curation, formal analysis, methodology, writing – original draft; Labendzki, P., data collection and curation, formal analysis, writing – review & editing; Perapoch Amadó, M., data collection and curation, writing – review & editing; Greenwood, E., data collection and curation, participant recruitment, writing – review & editing; Viswanathan, N., data collection and curation, writing – review & editing; Northrop, T., data collection and curation, participant recruitment, writing – review & editing; Wass, S., conceptualisation, funding acquisition, methodology, project administration, supervision, writing – review & editing.

Highlights 2Hz amplitude modulation stimulation showed the strongest neural entrainment

We discuss power vs phase analyses of infant and adult frequency tagging responses

We illustrate topographic differences in adult and infant neural responses

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • https://e1.pcloud.link/publink/show?code=kZlkQYZ2Jjab25UEGu8WcGTTXqvMXG5dVmV

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 08, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
At Which Low Amplitude Modulated Frequency Do Infants Best Entrain? A Frequency Tagging Study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
At Which Low Amplitude Modulated Frequency Do Infants Best Entrain? A Frequency Tagging Study
James Ives, Pierre Labendzki, Marta Perapoch Amadó, Emily Greenwood, Narain Viswanathan, Tom Northrop, Sam Wass
bioRxiv 2022.12.08.519576; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.08.519576
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
At Which Low Amplitude Modulated Frequency Do Infants Best Entrain? A Frequency Tagging Study
James Ives, Pierre Labendzki, Marta Perapoch Amadó, Emily Greenwood, Narain Viswanathan, Tom Northrop, Sam Wass
bioRxiv 2022.12.08.519576; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.08.519576

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4369)
  • Biochemistry (9546)
  • Bioengineering (7068)
  • Bioinformatics (24767)
  • Biophysics (12559)
  • Cancer Biology (9923)
  • Cell Biology (14297)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7930)
  • Ecology (12074)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15954)
  • Genetics (10904)
  • Genomics (14705)
  • Immunology (9844)
  • Microbiology (23582)
  • Molecular Biology (9454)
  • Neuroscience (50691)
  • Paleontology (369)
  • Pathology (1535)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2674)
  • Physiology (3997)
  • Plant Biology (8639)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1505)
  • Synthetic Biology (2388)
  • Systems Biology (6415)
  • Zoology (1344)