Abstract
Objectives Mapping the neurobiology of meditation using 3 Tesla functional MRI (fMRI) has burgeoned recently. However, limitations in signal quality and neuroanatomical resolution have impacted reliability and precision of extant findings. Although ultra-high strength 7 Tesla MRI overcomes these limitations, investigation of meditation using 7 Tesla fMRI is still in its infancy.
Methods In this feasibility study, we scanned 10 individuals who were beginner meditators using 7 Tesla fMRI while they performed focused attention meditation and non-focused rest. We also measured and adjusted the fMRI signal for key physiological differences between meditation and rest. Finally, we explored the 2-week impact of the single fMRI meditation session on mindfulness, anxiety and focused attention attributes.
Results Group-level task fMRI analyses revealed significant reductions in activity during meditation relative to rest in Default-mode network hubs, i.e., antero-medial prefrontal and posterior cingulate cortices, precuneus, as well as visual and thalamic regions. These findings survived stringent statistical corrections for fluctuations in physiological responses which demonstrated significant differences (p < 0.05/n, Bonferroni controlled) between meditation and rest. Compared to baseline, State Mindfulness Scale (SMS) scores were significantly elevated (F = 8.16, p<0.05/n, Bonferroni controlled) following the fMRI meditation session, and were closely maintained at 2-week follow up.
Conclusions This pilot study establishes the feasibility and utility of investigating focused attention meditation using ultra-high strength (7 Tesla) fMRI, by supporting widespread evidence that focused attention meditation attenuates Default-mode activity responsible for self-referential processing. Future functional neuroimaging studies of meditation should control for physiological confounds and include behavioural assessments.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
↵* Last author
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no other declarations of competing interests.
Ethical standards The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data.
Funding This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. SG is supported by Australian Research Training Program (RTP) scholarship. AZ is supported by NHMRC Senior Research fellowship (APP1118153) and the Rebecca L. Cooper Fellowship. VL is supported by an AI and Val Rosenstrauss Senior Research Fellowship. NTVD is supported by the Contemplative Studies Centre, founded by a philanthropic gift from the Three Springs Foundation Pty Ltd.
Data availability Data can be shared upon reasonable request.