Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

If it’s there, could it be a bear?

View ORCID ProfileFloe Foxon
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.14.524058
Floe Foxon
1Department of Data Management and Statistical Analysis, PinneyAssociates – Pittsburgh, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Floe Foxon
  • For correspondence: ffoxon@pinneyassociates.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

It has been suggested that the American black bear (Ursus americanus) may be responsible for a significant number of purported sightings of an alleged unknown species of hominid in North America. Previous analyses have identified correlation between ‘sasquatch’ or ‘bigfoot’ sightings and black bear populations in the Pacific Northwest using ecological niche models and simple models of expected animal sightings. The present study expands the analysis to the entire US and Canada by regressing sasquatch sightings on bear populations in each state/province while adjusting for human population and land area in a mixed-effects model. Sasquatch sightings were statistically significantly associated with bear populations such that, on the average, one ‘sighting’ is expected for every 900 bears. Based on statistical considerations, it is likely that many supposed sasquatch are really misidentified known forms. If bigfoot is there, it may be many bears.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AV3G2

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 18, 2023.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
If it’s there, could it be a bear?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
If it’s there, could it be a bear?
Floe Foxon
bioRxiv 2023.01.14.524058; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.14.524058
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
If it’s there, could it be a bear?
Floe Foxon
bioRxiv 2023.01.14.524058; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.14.524058

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Zoology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4105)
  • Biochemistry (8807)
  • Bioengineering (6508)
  • Bioinformatics (23446)
  • Biophysics (11783)
  • Cancer Biology (9196)
  • Cell Biology (13307)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7428)
  • Ecology (11402)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15141)
  • Genetics (10429)
  • Genomics (14036)
  • Immunology (9167)
  • Microbiology (22142)
  • Molecular Biology (8802)
  • Neuroscience (47533)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1427)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2489)
  • Physiology (3729)
  • Plant Biology (8076)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1437)
  • Synthetic Biology (2220)
  • Systems Biology (6036)
  • Zoology (1252)