Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Confidence is predicted by pre- and post-choice decision signal dynamics

View ORCID ProfileJohn P. Grogan, Wouter Rys, Simon P. Kelly, Redmond G. O’Connell
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.19.524702
John P. Grogan
1School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
2Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for John P. Grogan
  • For correspondence: John.grogan@tcd.ie
Wouter Rys
1School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon P. Kelly
3School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering and UCD Centre for Biomedical Engineering, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Redmond G. O’Connell
1School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
2Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

It is well established that one’s confidence in a choice can be influenced by new evidence encountered after commitment has been reached, but the processes through which post-choice evidence is sampled remain unclear. To investigate this, we traced the pre- and post-choice dynamics of electrophysiological signatures of evidence accumulation (Centro-parietal Positivity, CPP) and motor preparation (mu/beta band) to determine their sensitivity to participants’ confidence in their perceptual discriminations. Pre-choice CPP amplitudes scaled with confidence both when confidence was reported simultaneously with choice, or when reported 1-second after the initial direction decision. When additional evidence was presented during the post-choice delay period, the CPP continued to evolve after the initial choice, with a more prolonged build-up on trials with lower confidence in the alternative that was finally endorsed, irrespective of whether this entailed a change-of-mind. Further investigation established that this pattern was accompanied by earlier post-choice CPP peak latency, earlier lateralisation of motor preparation signals toward the ultimately chosen response, and faster confidence reports when participants indicated high certainty that they had made a correct or incorrect initial choice. These observations are consistent with confidence-dependent stopping theories according to which post-choice evidence accumulation ceases when a criterion level of confidence in a choice alternative has been reached. Our findings have implications for current models of choice confidence, and predictions they may make about EEG signatures.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no competing financial of interest.

  • https://osf.io/4dqkz/

  • https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7550911

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 20, 2023.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Confidence is predicted by pre- and post-choice decision signal dynamics
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Confidence is predicted by pre- and post-choice decision signal dynamics
John P. Grogan, Wouter Rys, Simon P. Kelly, Redmond G. O’Connell
bioRxiv 2023.01.19.524702; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.19.524702
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Confidence is predicted by pre- and post-choice decision signal dynamics
John P. Grogan, Wouter Rys, Simon P. Kelly, Redmond G. O’Connell
bioRxiv 2023.01.19.524702; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.19.524702

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4229)
  • Biochemistry (9108)
  • Bioengineering (6752)
  • Bioinformatics (23944)
  • Biophysics (12098)
  • Cancer Biology (9497)
  • Cell Biology (13742)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7616)
  • Ecology (11662)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15479)
  • Genetics (10620)
  • Genomics (14297)
  • Immunology (9465)
  • Microbiology (22793)
  • Molecular Biology (9078)
  • Neuroscience (48890)
  • Paleontology (355)
  • Pathology (1479)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2565)
  • Physiology (3823)
  • Plant Biology (8309)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1467)
  • Synthetic Biology (2290)
  • Systems Biology (6172)
  • Zoology (1297)