Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

The sound of restored soil: Measuring soil biodiversity in a forest restoration chronosequence with ecoacoustics

View ORCID ProfileJake M. Robinson, View ORCID ProfileMartin F. Breed, View ORCID ProfileCarlos Abrahams
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.23.525240
Jake M. Robinson
1College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jake M. Robinson
  • For correspondence: jake.robinson@flinders.edu.au
Martin F. Breed
1College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Martin F. Breed
Carlos Abrahams
2Biosciences Department, School of Science and Technology, Clifton Campus, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG11 8NS, UK
3Baker Consultants Ltd, Cromford, Derbyshire, DE4 5JJ, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Carlos Abrahams
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Forest restoration requires monitoring to assess changes in above- and below-ground communities, which is challenging due to practical and resource limitations. With emerging sound recording technologies, ecological acoustic survey methods—also known as ‘ecoacoustics’—are increasingly available. These provide a rapid, effective, and non-intrusive means of monitoring biodiversity. Above-ground ecoacoustics is increasingly widespread, but soil ecoacoustics has yet to be utilised in restoration despite its demonstrable effectiveness at detecting meso- and macrofauna acoustic signals. This study applied ecoacoustic tools and indices (Acoustic Complexity Index, Normalised Difference Soundscape Index, and Bioacoustic Index) to measure above- and below-ground biodiversity in a forest restoration chronosequence. We hypothesised that higher acoustic complexity, diversity and high-frequency to low-frequency ratio would be detected in restored forest plots. We collected n = 198 below-ground samples and n = 180 ambient and controlled samples from three recently degraded (within 10 years) and three restored (30-51 years ago) deciduous forest plots across three monthly visits. We used passive acoustic monitoring to record above-ground biological sounds and a below-ground sampling device and sound-attenuation chamber to record soil communities. We found that restored plot acoustic complexity and diversity were higher in the sound-attenuation chamber soil but not in situ or above-ground samples. Moreover, we found that restored plots had a significantly greater high-frequency to low-frequency ratio for soil, but no such association for above-ground samples. Our results suggest that ecoacoustics has the potential to monitor below-ground biodiversity, adding to the restoration ecologist’s toolkit and supporting global ecosystem recovery.

Implications for Practice

  • This is the first known study to assess the sounds of soil biodiversity in a forest restoration context, paving the way for more comprehensive studies and practical applications to support global ecosystem recovery.

  • Soil ecoacoustics has the potential to support restoration ecology/biodiversity assessments, providing a minimally intrusive, cost-effective and rapid surveying tool. The methods are also relatively simple to learn and apply.

  • Ecoacoustics can contribute toward overcoming the profound challenge of quantifying the effectiveness (i.e., success) of forest restoration interventions in reinstating target species, functions and so-called ‘services’ and reducing disturbance.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 23, 2023.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The sound of restored soil: Measuring soil biodiversity in a forest restoration chronosequence with ecoacoustics
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The sound of restored soil: Measuring soil biodiversity in a forest restoration chronosequence with ecoacoustics
Jake M. Robinson, Martin F. Breed, Carlos Abrahams
bioRxiv 2023.01.23.525240; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.23.525240
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The sound of restored soil: Measuring soil biodiversity in a forest restoration chronosequence with ecoacoustics
Jake M. Robinson, Martin F. Breed, Carlos Abrahams
bioRxiv 2023.01.23.525240; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.23.525240

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Ecology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4239)
  • Biochemistry (9161)
  • Bioengineering (6799)
  • Bioinformatics (24056)
  • Biophysics (12153)
  • Cancer Biology (9564)
  • Cell Biology (13822)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7654)
  • Ecology (11734)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15538)
  • Genetics (10667)
  • Genomics (14355)
  • Immunology (9508)
  • Microbiology (22889)
  • Molecular Biology (9122)
  • Neuroscience (49100)
  • Paleontology (357)
  • Pathology (1487)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2580)
  • Physiology (3851)
  • Plant Biology (8349)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1473)
  • Synthetic Biology (2301)
  • Systems Biology (6205)
  • Zoology (1302)