Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Natural methylation epialleles correlate with gene expression in maize

View ORCID ProfileYibing Zeng, View ORCID ProfileR. Kelly Dawe, View ORCID ProfileJonathan I. Gent
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.23.525249
Yibing Zeng
University of Georgia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yibing Zeng
R. Kelly Dawe
University of Georgia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R. Kelly Dawe
  • For correspondence: kdawe@uga.edu gent@uga.edu
Jonathan I. Gent
University of Georgia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jonathan I. Gent
  • For correspondence: kdawe@uga.edu gent@uga.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

DNA methylation (5-methylcytosine) represses transposon activity and contributes to inaccessible chromatin structure of repetitive DNA in plants. It is depleted from cis regulatory elements in and near genes, but in some genes it is present in the gene body including exons. Methylation in exons solely in the CG context is called gene body methylation (gbM). Methylation in exons in both CG and non-CG contexts is called TE-like methylation (teM). To develop a broader understanding of methylation in maize genes, we utilized recent genome assemblies, gene annotations, transcription data, and methylome data to decipher common patterns of gene methylation. To compare between genomes, we analyzed each data source relative to its own genome assembly rather than the easier but less accurate method of using one assembly as reference for all. We found that teM genes are mainly silent across plant tissues, are limited to specific maize stocks, and exhibit evidence of annotation errors. We used these data to flag all teM genes in the 26 NAM founder genome assemblies (on average 3,693 genes, 9% of total). In contrast to teM, gbM genes are broadly expressed across tissues. We found that they exist in a continuum of CG methylation levels without a clear demarcation between unmethylated genes and gbM genes. Analysis of expression levels across diverse maize stocks revealed a weak but highly significant positive correlation between gbM and gene expression. gbM epialleles were associated with an approximately 3% increase in steady-state expression level relative to unmethylated epialleles. We hypothesize based on these data that gbM can contribute toward broad and robust gene expression.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 24, 2023.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Natural methylation epialleles correlate with gene expression in maize
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Natural methylation epialleles correlate with gene expression in maize
Yibing Zeng, R. Kelly Dawe, Jonathan I. Gent
bioRxiv 2023.01.23.525249; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.23.525249
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Natural methylation epialleles correlate with gene expression in maize
Yibing Zeng, R. Kelly Dawe, Jonathan I. Gent
bioRxiv 2023.01.23.525249; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.23.525249

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Plant Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4113)
  • Biochemistry (8815)
  • Bioengineering (6519)
  • Bioinformatics (23463)
  • Biophysics (11790)
  • Cancer Biology (9209)
  • Cell Biology (13323)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7438)
  • Ecology (11410)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15151)
  • Genetics (10436)
  • Genomics (14044)
  • Immunology (9171)
  • Microbiology (22154)
  • Molecular Biology (8812)
  • Neuroscience (47570)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1428)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2491)
  • Physiology (3730)
  • Plant Biology (8080)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1437)
  • Synthetic Biology (2221)
  • Systems Biology (6037)
  • Zoology (1253)