Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Boundary stacking interactions enable cross-TAD enhancer-promoter communication during limb development

View ORCID ProfileTzu-Chiao Hung, View ORCID ProfileDavid M. Kingsley, View ORCID ProfileAlistair Boettiger
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.06.527380
Tzu-Chiao Hung
1Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tzu-Chiao Hung
David M. Kingsley
1Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford CA
2Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David M. Kingsley
Alistair Boettiger
1Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alistair Boettiger
  • For correspondence: boettiger@stanford.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

While long-range enhancers and their target promoters are frequently contained within a TAD, many developmentally important genes have their promoter and enhancers within different TADs. Hypotheses about molecular mechanisms enabling such cross-TAD interactions remain to be assessed. To test these hypotheses, we use Optical Reconstruction of Chromatin Architecture (ORCA) to characterize the conformations of the Pitx1 locus on thousands of single chromosomes in developing mouse limbs. Our data supports a model in which neighboring boundaries are stacked with each other as a result of loop-extrusion, bringing boundary-proximal cis-elements into contact. This stacking interaction also explains the appearance of architectural stripes in the population average maps (e.g. Hi-C data). Through molecular dynamics simulations, we further propose that increasing boundary strengths facilitates the formation of the stacked boundary conformation, counter-intuitively facilitating border bypass. This work provides a revised view of the TAD borders’ function, both facilitating as well as preventing cis-regulatory interactions, and introduces a framework to distinguish border-crossing from border-respecting enhancer-promoter pairs.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • https://github.com/BoettigerLab/Pitx1-ORCA-2022

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 06, 2023.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Boundary stacking interactions enable cross-TAD enhancer-promoter communication during limb development
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Boundary stacking interactions enable cross-TAD enhancer-promoter communication during limb development
Tzu-Chiao Hung, David M. Kingsley, Alistair Boettiger
bioRxiv 2023.02.06.527380; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.06.527380
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Boundary stacking interactions enable cross-TAD enhancer-promoter communication during limb development
Tzu-Chiao Hung, David M. Kingsley, Alistair Boettiger
bioRxiv 2023.02.06.527380; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.06.527380

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Developmental Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4381)
  • Biochemistry (9581)
  • Bioengineering (7086)
  • Bioinformatics (24844)
  • Biophysics (12597)
  • Cancer Biology (9952)
  • Cell Biology (14345)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7944)
  • Ecology (12101)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15984)
  • Genetics (10921)
  • Genomics (14735)
  • Immunology (9869)
  • Microbiology (23645)
  • Molecular Biology (9477)
  • Neuroscience (50838)
  • Paleontology (369)
  • Pathology (1539)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2681)
  • Physiology (4013)
  • Plant Biology (8655)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1508)
  • Synthetic Biology (2391)
  • Systems Biology (6427)
  • Zoology (1346)