Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Assessing preferences for adult vs juvenile features in young animals: newly-hatched chicks spontaneously approach red and large stimuli

Laura Freeland, Vera Vasas, Josephine Gomes, Elisabetta Versace
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.17.528933
Laura Freeland
1School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vera Vasas
1School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Josephine Gomes
1School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elisabetta Versace
1School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: e.versace@qmul.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Young precocial birds benefit from staying close to both their mother and siblings, while prioritising adults, which provide better care. Which features of the stimuli are used by young birds to prioritise attachment to adults over siblings is unknown. We started to address this question in newly hatched domestic chicks (Gallus gallus), focusing on their spontaneous preferences for visual stimuli that systematically vary between adult and juvenile chickens: size (larger in adults than in juveniles) and colour (darker and redder in adults than in juveniles). Overall, chicks at their first visual experience, that had never seen a conspecific beforehand, were most attracted to the red and large stimuli (two adult features) and interacted with red stimuli more than with yellow stimuli. When tested with red large vs. small objects (Exp. 1), chicks preferred the large shape. When tested with yellow large and small objects (Exp. 2), chicks did not show a preference. These results suggest that the combination of size and colour form the predisposition that helps chicks to spontaneously discriminate between adult and juvenile features from the first stages of life, in the absence of previous experience.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • credits images

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 13, 2023.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessing preferences for adult vs juvenile features in young animals: newly-hatched chicks spontaneously approach red and large stimuli
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Assessing preferences for adult vs juvenile features in young animals: newly-hatched chicks spontaneously approach red and large stimuli
Laura Freeland, Vera Vasas, Josephine Gomes, Elisabetta Versace
bioRxiv 2023.02.17.528933; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.17.528933
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Assessing preferences for adult vs juvenile features in young animals: newly-hatched chicks spontaneously approach red and large stimuli
Laura Freeland, Vera Vasas, Josephine Gomes, Elisabetta Versace
bioRxiv 2023.02.17.528933; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.17.528933

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Animal Behavior and Cognition
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4235)
  • Biochemistry (9140)
  • Bioengineering (6784)
  • Bioinformatics (24008)
  • Biophysics (12132)
  • Cancer Biology (9537)
  • Cell Biology (13782)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7638)
  • Ecology (11707)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15513)
  • Genetics (10648)
  • Genomics (14330)
  • Immunology (9484)
  • Microbiology (22849)
  • Molecular Biology (9096)
  • Neuroscience (49007)
  • Paleontology (355)
  • Pathology (1483)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2570)
  • Physiology (3848)
  • Plant Biology (8332)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1471)
  • Synthetic Biology (2296)
  • Systems Biology (6194)
  • Zoology (1301)