Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Structural basis for binding of Smaug to the GPCR Smoothened and to the germline inducer Oskar

Jana Kubikova, Gabriele Ubartaite, View ORCID ProfileJutta Metz, View ORCID ProfileMandy Jeske
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.19.529116
Jana Kubikova
Heidelberg University Biochemistry Center, (BZH), Im Neuenheimer Feld 328, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gabriele Ubartaite
Heidelberg University Biochemistry Center, (BZH), Im Neuenheimer Feld 328, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jutta Metz
Heidelberg University Biochemistry Center, (BZH), Im Neuenheimer Feld 328, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jutta Metz
Mandy Jeske
Heidelberg University Biochemistry Center, (BZH), Im Neuenheimer Feld 328, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mandy Jeske
  • For correspondence: jeske@bzh.uni-heideiberg.de
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Drosophila Smaug and its orthologs comprise a family of mRNA repressor proteins that exhibit various functions during animal development. Smaug proteins contain a characteristic RNA-binding sterile-a motif (SAM) domain and a conserved but uncharacterized N-terminal domain (NTD). Here, we resolved the crystal structure of the NTD of the human SAM domain-containing protein 4A (SAMD4A, a.k.a. Smaug1) to 2.0 Å resolution, which revealed its composition of a homodimerization D-subdomain and a subdomain with similarity to a PHAT domain. Furthermore, we show that Drosophila Smaug directly interacts with the Drosophila germline inducer Oskar and with the Hedgehog signaling transducer Smoothened through its D-PHAT domain. We determined the crystal structure of the D-PHAT domain of Smaug in complex with a Smoothened a-helical peptide to 1.61 Å resolution. The peptide binds within a groove that is formed by both the D- and PHAT subdomains. Structural modeling supported by experimental data suggested that an a-helix within the disordered region of Oskar binds to the D-PHAT domain in a mode similar to Smoothened. Together, our data uncover the N-terminal D-PHAT domain of Smaug as peptide-binding domain.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 19, 2023.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Structural basis for binding of Smaug to the GPCR Smoothened and to the germline inducer Oskar
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Structural basis for binding of Smaug to the GPCR Smoothened and to the germline inducer Oskar
Jana Kubikova, Gabriele Ubartaite, Jutta Metz, Mandy Jeske
bioRxiv 2023.02.19.529116; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.19.529116
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Structural basis for binding of Smaug to the GPCR Smoothened and to the germline inducer Oskar
Jana Kubikova, Gabriele Ubartaite, Jutta Metz, Mandy Jeske
bioRxiv 2023.02.19.529116; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.19.529116

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Biochemistry
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4397)
  • Biochemistry (9623)
  • Bioengineering (7118)
  • Bioinformatics (24928)
  • Biophysics (12651)
  • Cancer Biology (9984)
  • Cell Biology (14392)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7982)
  • Ecology (12141)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (16019)
  • Genetics (10946)
  • Genomics (14772)
  • Immunology (9895)
  • Microbiology (23729)
  • Molecular Biology (9500)
  • Neuroscience (51034)
  • Paleontology (370)
  • Pathology (1544)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2690)
  • Physiology (4035)
  • Plant Biology (8687)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1512)
  • Synthetic Biology (2403)
  • Systems Biology (6452)
  • Zoology (1349)