Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Machine learning reveals the control mechanics of the insect wing hinge

Johan M. Melis, View ORCID ProfileMichael H. Dickinson
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.29.547116
Johan M. Melis
Division of Biology and Bioengineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael H. Dickinson
Division of Biology and Bioengineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael H. Dickinson
  • For correspondence: flyman@caltech.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Insects constitute the most species-rich radiation of metazoa, a success due primarily to the evolution of active flight. Unlike pterosaurs, birds, and bats, the wings of insects did not evolve from legs1, but are novel structures attached to the body via a biomechanically complex hinge that transforms the tiny, high-frequency oscillations of specialized power muscles into the sweeping back-and-forth motion of the wings2. Due to the minute size and morphological complexity, the basic mechanics of the hinge are poorly understood. The hinge consists of a series of tiny, hardened structures called sclerites that are interconnected to one another via flexible joints and regulated by the activity of a set of specialized steering muscles. In this study, we imaged the activity of these steering muscles in a fly using a genetically encoded calcium indicator, while simultaneously tracking the 3D motion of the wings with high-speed cameras. Using machine learning approaches, we created a convolutional neural network3 that accurately predicts wing motion from the activity of the steering muscles, and an autoencoder4 that predicts the mechanical role of the individual sclerites on wing motion. By replaying patterns of wing motion on a dynamically scaled robotic fly, we quantified the effects of steering muscle activity on the production of aerodynamic forces. A physics-based simulation that incorporates our model of the wing hinge generates flight maneuvers that are remarkably similar to those of free flying flies. This integrative, multi-disciplinary approach reveals the mechanical control logic of the insect wing hinge, arguably the most sophisticated and evolutionarily important skeletal structure in the natural world.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • This version of the manuscript was revised to correct minor typos within the main text and methods and a labeling error in Fig. 6e. There are no significant changes from the original submission.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 03, 2023.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Machine learning reveals the control mechanics of the insect wing hinge
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Machine learning reveals the control mechanics of the insect wing hinge
Johan M. Melis, Michael H. Dickinson
bioRxiv 2023.06.29.547116; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.29.547116
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Machine learning reveals the control mechanics of the insect wing hinge
Johan M. Melis, Michael H. Dickinson
bioRxiv 2023.06.29.547116; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.29.547116

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4838)
  • Biochemistry (10747)
  • Bioengineering (8020)
  • Bioinformatics (27201)
  • Biophysics (13944)
  • Cancer Biology (11088)
  • Cell Biology (16001)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (8760)
  • Ecology (13249)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (17324)
  • Genetics (11667)
  • Genomics (15887)
  • Immunology (10997)
  • Microbiology (26006)
  • Molecular Biology (10610)
  • Neuroscience (56371)
  • Paleontology (417)
  • Pathology (1729)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2999)
  • Physiology (4530)
  • Plant Biology (9593)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1610)
  • Synthetic Biology (2674)
  • Systems Biology (6961)
  • Zoology (1508)