Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Automating an insect biodiversity metric using distributed optical sensors: an evaluation across Kansas, USA cropping systems

View ORCID ProfileKlas Rydhmer, View ORCID ProfileJames O. Eckberg, View ORCID ProfileJonathan G. Lundgren, View ORCID ProfileSamuel Jansson, View ORCID ProfileLaurence Still, John E. Quinn, Ralph Washington Jr., Jesper Lemmich, View ORCID ProfileThomas Nikolajsen, Nikolaj Sheller, View ORCID ProfileAlex M. Michels, View ORCID ProfileMichael M. Bredeson, Steven T. Rosenzweig, View ORCID ProfileEmily N. Bick
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.15.553397
Klas Rydhmer
1Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, Copenhagen University, Rolighedsvej 23, Fredriksberg C, 1958, Denmark
2FaunaPhotonics, Støberigade 14, Copenhagen, 2450, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Klas Rydhmer
James O. Eckberg
3Agriculture and Food Solutions, General Mills, Minneapolis, MN 55427, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for James O. Eckberg
Jonathan G. Lundgren
4Ecdysis Foundation, 46958 188th St, Estelline, SD 57234, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jonathan G. Lundgren
Samuel Jansson
2FaunaPhotonics, Støberigade 14, Copenhagen, 2450, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Samuel Jansson
Laurence Still
2FaunaPhotonics, Støberigade 14, Copenhagen, 2450, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Laurence Still
John E. Quinn
5Department of Biology, Furman University, 3300 Poinsett Hwy, Greenville, SC 29613, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ralph Washington Jr.
2FaunaPhotonics, Støberigade 14, Copenhagen, 2450, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jesper Lemmich
2FaunaPhotonics, Støberigade 14, Copenhagen, 2450, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Nikolajsen
2FaunaPhotonics, Støberigade 14, Copenhagen, 2450, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Thomas Nikolajsen
Nikolaj Sheller
2FaunaPhotonics, Støberigade 14, Copenhagen, 2450, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alex M. Michels
4Ecdysis Foundation, 46958 188th St, Estelline, SD 57234, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alex M. Michels
Michael M. Bredeson
4Ecdysis Foundation, 46958 188th St, Estelline, SD 57234, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael M. Bredeson
Steven T. Rosenzweig
3Agriculture and Food Solutions, General Mills, Minneapolis, MN 55427, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emily N. Bick
2FaunaPhotonics, Støberigade 14, Copenhagen, 2450, Denmark
6Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Dr, Madison, WI 53706, United States
7Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Emily N. Bick
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Global ecosystems and food supply depend on insect biodiversity for key functions such as pollination and decomposition. High-resolution, accurate data on invertebrate populations and communities across scales are critical for informing conservation efforts. However, conventional data collection methodologies for invertebrates are expensive, labor intensive, and require substantial taxonomic expertise, limiting researchers, practitioners, and policymakers. Novel optical techniques show promise for automating such data collection across scales as they operate unsupervised in remote areas. In this work, optical insect sensors were deployed in 20 agricultural fields in Kansas, USA. Measurements were compared to conventional assessments of insect diversity from sweep nets and Malaise traps. Species richness was estimated on optical insect data by applying a clustering algorithm to the optical insect sensor’s signal features of wing-beat frequency and body-to-wing ratio. Species richness correlated more strongly between the optical richness estimate and each of the conventional methods than between the two conventional methods, suggesting sensors can be a reliable indicator of invertebrate richness. Shannon- and Simpson indices were calculated for all three methods but were largely uncorrelated including between conventional methods. Although the technology is relatively new, optical sensors may provide next-generation insight into the spatiotemporal dynamics of invertebrate biodiversity and their conservation.

Significance Statement The implications of this research extend from the field level to the regional level. Much of what scientists understand about the decline of invertebrates comes from a small number of long-term studies that can be coarse and correlational in nature. High-resolution biodiversity data sets on fields to landscapes may provide the insight needed for the successful management and accounting of biodiversity by practitioners and policymakers. Such high-resolution data has the potential to support global efforts and coordination of biodiversity conservation.

Competing Interest Statement

Klas Rydhmer, Samuel Jansson, Laurence Still, Ralph Washington Jr., Nikolaj Sheller, Jesper Lemmich, and Thomas Nikolajsen are or were affiliated with FaunaPhotonics, who developed the sensor used in the study, as employees or stakeholders. Emily N. Bick was funded in part by FaunaPhotonics as part of a Postdoctoral Fellowship granted by the Danish Innovation Fund.

Footnotes

  • Competing Interest Statement: Klas Rydhmer, Samuel Jansson, Laurence Still, Ralph Washington Jr., Nikolaj Sheller, Jesper Lemmich, and Thomas Nikolajsen are or were affiliated with FaunaPhotonics, who developed the sensor used in the study, as employees or stakeholders. Emily N. Bick was funded in part by FaunaPhotonics as part of a Postdoctoral Fellowship granted by the Danish Innovation Fund.

  • The Author line for the online posting was edited to reflect the correct author line. The manuscript remains unchanged.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 17, 2023.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Automating an insect biodiversity metric using distributed optical sensors: an evaluation across Kansas, USA cropping systems
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Automating an insect biodiversity metric using distributed optical sensors: an evaluation across Kansas, USA cropping systems
Klas Rydhmer, James O. Eckberg, Jonathan G. Lundgren, Samuel Jansson, Laurence Still, John E. Quinn, Ralph Washington Jr., Jesper Lemmich, Thomas Nikolajsen, Nikolaj Sheller, Alex M. Michels, Michael M. Bredeson, Steven T. Rosenzweig, Emily N. Bick
bioRxiv 2023.08.15.553397; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.15.553397
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Automating an insect biodiversity metric using distributed optical sensors: an evaluation across Kansas, USA cropping systems
Klas Rydhmer, James O. Eckberg, Jonathan G. Lundgren, Samuel Jansson, Laurence Still, John E. Quinn, Ralph Washington Jr., Jesper Lemmich, Thomas Nikolajsen, Nikolaj Sheller, Alex M. Michels, Michael M. Bredeson, Steven T. Rosenzweig, Emily N. Bick
bioRxiv 2023.08.15.553397; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.15.553397

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Ecology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (6100)
  • Biochemistry (13882)
  • Bioengineering (10580)
  • Bioinformatics (33619)
  • Biophysics (17326)
  • Cancer Biology (14391)
  • Cell Biology (20386)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (10994)
  • Ecology (16223)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (20531)
  • Genetics (13527)
  • Genomics (18822)
  • Immunology (13949)
  • Microbiology (32535)
  • Molecular Biology (13547)
  • Neuroscience (70953)
  • Paleontology (533)
  • Pathology (2222)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (3781)
  • Physiology (5961)
  • Plant Biology (12169)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1826)
  • Synthetic Biology (3406)
  • Systems Biology (8246)
  • Zoology (1875)