Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Identifying representational structure in CA1 to benchmark theoretical models of cognitive mapping

View ORCID ProfileJ. Quinn Lee, View ORCID ProfileAlexandra T. Keinath, View ORCID ProfileErica Cianfarano, View ORCID ProfileMark P. Brandon
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.08.561112
J. Quinn Lee
1Department of Psychiatry, Douglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University; Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Quinn Lee
  • For correspondence: [email protected] [email protected]
Alexandra T. Keinath
1Department of Psychiatry, Douglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University; Montreal, Quebec, Canada
2Department of Psychology, University of Illinois Chicago; Chicago, Illinois, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alexandra T. Keinath
Erica Cianfarano
3Integrated Program in Neuroscience, McGill University; Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Erica Cianfarano
Mark P. Brandon
1Department of Psychiatry, Douglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University; Montreal, Quebec, Canada
3Integrated Program in Neuroscience, McGill University; Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mark P. Brandon
  • For correspondence: [email protected] [email protected]
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Decades of theoretical and empirical work have suggested the hippocampus instantiates some form of a cognitive map. Yet, tests of competing theories have been limited in scope and largely qualitative in nature. Here, we develop a novel framework to benchmark model predictions against observed neuronal population dynamics as animals navigate a series of geometrically distinct environments. In this task space, we show a representational structure in the dynamics of hippocampal remapping that generalizes across brains, discriminates between competing theoretical models, and effectively constrains biologically viable model parameters. With this approach, we find that accurate models capture the correspondence in spatial coding of a changing environment. The present dataset and framework thus serve to empirically evaluate and advance theories of cognitive mapping in the brain.

  • We identify representational structure in CA1 remapping that is reliable across brains.

  • We directly compare models of cognitive mapping to this representation in CA1.

  • Models based on local boundary distance and direction predict CA1 representation.

  • This approach reveals a biologically viable parameter space for model predictions.

  • Accurate models capture the correspondence of spatial codes across environments.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • Guided by feedback from reviewers, we have added new analyses, revisions and expansions of the text (we provide a total of 24 new display items in the main figures and 13 in supplement) that focus in detail on the pattern of hippocampal remapping in our paradigm and provide a specific and thorough evaluation of competing theoretical models to explain this fundamental process in the brain. Based on these new and expanded results, we highlight the novel finding that accurate models of cognitive mapping predict the correspondence in spatial coding of a changing environment (i.e., remapping).

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 22, 2024.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Identifying representational structure in CA1 to benchmark theoretical models of cognitive mapping
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Identifying representational structure in CA1 to benchmark theoretical models of cognitive mapping
J. Quinn Lee, Alexandra T. Keinath, Erica Cianfarano, Mark P. Brandon
bioRxiv 2023.10.08.561112; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.08.561112
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Identifying representational structure in CA1 to benchmark theoretical models of cognitive mapping
J. Quinn Lee, Alexandra T. Keinath, Erica Cianfarano, Mark P. Brandon
bioRxiv 2023.10.08.561112; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.08.561112

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (6024)
  • Biochemistry (13708)
  • Bioengineering (10437)
  • Bioinformatics (33163)
  • Biophysics (17112)
  • Cancer Biology (14180)
  • Cell Biology (20108)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (10868)
  • Ecology (16022)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (20348)
  • Genetics (13398)
  • Genomics (18634)
  • Immunology (13754)
  • Microbiology (32164)
  • Molecular Biology (13393)
  • Neuroscience (70079)
  • Paleontology (526)
  • Pathology (2191)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (3741)
  • Physiology (5866)
  • Plant Biology (12020)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1814)
  • Synthetic Biology (3367)
  • Systems Biology (8166)
  • Zoology (1842)