Abstract
Many recent studies indicate that control of decisions and actions is integrated during interactive behavior. Among these, several carried out in humans and monkeys conclude that there is a co-regulation of choices and movements. Another perspective, based on human data only, proposes a decoupled control of decision duration and movement speed, allowing for instance to trade decision duration for movement duration when time pressure increases. Crucially, it is not currently known whether this ability to flexibly dissociate decision duration from movement speed is specific to humans, whether it can vary depending on the context in which a task is performed, and whether it is stable over time. These are important questions to address, especially to rely on monkey electrophysiology to infer the neural mechanisms of decision-action coordination in humans. To do so, we trained two macaque monkeys in a perceptual decision-making task and analyzed data collected over multiple behavioral sessions. Our findings reveal a strong and complex relationship between decision duration and movement vigor. Decision duration and action duration can co-vary but also “compensate” each other. Such integrated but decoupled control of decisions and actions aligns with recent studies in humans, validating the monkey model in electrophysiology as a means of inferring neural mechanisms in humans. Crucially, we demonstrate for the first time that this control can evolve with experience, in an adapted manner. Together, the present findings contribute to deepening our understanding of the integrated control of decisions and actions during interactive behavior.
New & noteworthy The mechanism by which the integrated control of decisions and actions occurs, coupled or interactive but decoupled, is debated. In the present study, we show in monkeys that decisions and actions influence each other in a decoupled way. For the first time, we also demonstrate that this control can evolve depending the subject’s experience, allowing to trade movement time for decision time and limit the temporal discounting of reward value.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
Acknowledgements/Funding: The authors have no financial or non-financial interests to declare. The authors wish to thank Sonia Alouche and Jean-Louis Borach for their administrative assistance, Gislène Gardechaux and Amélie Reynaud for helping to train the monkeys and collect data, Frédéric Volland for his expertise during the technical preparation and maintenance of this experiment, and Julien Dessenne for creating the illustration shown in Figure 1A. This work is supported by a CNRS/Inserm ATIP/Avenir grant to DT.
Information added to the introduction and discussion sections. Figures clarified. Supplemental files updated.