Abstract
Neurovascular coupling, linking neuronal activity to cerebral blood flow, is essential for brain function and underpins functional brain imaging. Whereas mechanisms involved in vasodilation are well-documented, those controlling vasoconstriction remain overlooked. This study unravels the mechanisms by which pyramidal cells elicit arteriole vasoconstriction. Using patch-clamp recording, vascular and Ca2+ imaging in mouse cortical slices, we show that strong optogenetic activation of layer II/III pyramidal cells induces vasoconstriction, correlating with firing frequency and somatic Ca2+ increase. Ex vivo and in vivo pharmacological investigations indicate that this vasoconstriction predominantly recruits prostaglandin E2 through the cyclooxygenase-2 pathway, and activation of EP1 and EP3 receptors. We also present evidence that specific interneurons releasing neuropeptide Y, and astrocytes, through 20-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid, contribute to this process. By revealing the mechanisms by which pyramidal cells lead to vasoconstriction, our findings shed light on the complex regulation of neurovascular coupling.
Significance statement Cerebral blood flow is tightly controlled by neuronal activity, a process termed neurovascular coupling which serves as the physiological basis for functional brain imaging widely used to map neuronal activity in health and diseases. While the prevailing view links increased neuronal activity with enhanced blood perfusion, our data suggest that elevated neuronal activity can also reduce cerebral blood flow. By optically controlling the activity of pyramidal cells, we demonstrate that these excitatory neurons induce vasoconstriction when their action potential firing is increased by releasing glutamate and lipid messengers. These findings update the interpretation of functional brain imaging signals and help to better understand the etiopathogenesis of epilepsy and Alzheimer’s disease, in which hyperactivity, hypoperfusion and cognitive deficits overlap.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
The discussion on the difference between slice preparation and in vivo as well as the physiopathological relevance was expanded.