Abstract
The current “consensus” order in which amino acids were added to the genetic code is based on potentially biased criteria such as absence of sulfur-containing amino acids from the Urey-Miller experiment which lacked sulfur. Even if inferred perfectly, abiotic abundance might not reflect abundance in the organisms in which the genetic code evolved. Here, we instead exploit the fact that proteins that emerged prior to the genetic code’s completion are likely enriched in early amino acids and depleted in late amino acids. We identify the most ancient protein-coding sequences born prior to the archaeal-bacterial split. Amino acid usage in protein sequences whose ancestors date back to a single homolog in the Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA) largely matches the consensus order. However, our findings indicate that metal-binding (cysteine and histidine) and sulfur-containing (cysteine and methionine) amino acids were added to the genetic code much earlier than previously thought. Surprisingly, even more ancient protein sequences — those that had already diversified into multiple distinct copies in LUCA — show a different pattern to single copy LUCA sequences: significantly less depleted in the late amino acids tryptophan and tyrosine, and enriched rather than depleted in phenylalanine. This is compatible with at least some of these sequences predating the current genetic code. Their distinct enrichment patterns thus provide hints about earlier, alternative genetic codes.
Significance The order in which the amino acids were added to the genetic code was previously inferred from forty metrics. Many of these reflect abiotic abundance on ancient Earth. However, the abundances that matter are those within primitive cells that already had sophisticated RNA and perhaps peptide metabolism. Here we directly infer the order of recruitment from the relative amino acid frequencies of ancient protein sequences. Metal-dependent catalysis and a sulfur-rich environment shaped the early code, with implications for our understanding of early life and hence our search for life elsewhere in the universe.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
The revised manuscript includes a significance statement as well additions to the introduction and discussion.
https://github.com/sawsanwehbi/Pfam-age-classification/tree/main