Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Altering the redox status of Chlamydia trachomatis directly impacts its developmental cycle progression

Vandana Singh, View ORCID ProfileScot P. Ouellette
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.26.591247
Vandana Singh
1Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scot P. Ouellette
1Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Scot P. Ouellette
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Chlamydia trachomatis is an obligate intracellular bacterial pathogen with a unique developmental cycle. It differentiates between two functional and morphological forms: elementary body (EB) and reticulate body (RB). The signals that trigger differentiation from one form to the other are unknown. EBs and RBs have distinctive characteristics that distinguish them, including their size, infectivity, proteome, and transcriptome. Intriguingly, they also differ in their overall redox status as EBs are oxidized and RBs are reduced. We hypothesize that alterations in redox may serve as a trigger for secondary differentiation. To test this, we examined the function of the primary antioxidant enzyme alkyl hydroperoxide reductase subunit C (AhpC), a well-known member of the peroxiredoxins family, in chlamydial growth and development. Based on our hypothesis, we predicted that altering the expression of ahpC will modulate chlamydial redox status and trigger earlier or delayed secondary differentiation. To test this, we created ahpC overexpression and knockdown strains. During ahpC knockdown, ROS levels were elevated, and the bacteria were sensitive to a broad set of peroxide stresses. Interestingly, we observed increased expression of EB-associated genes and concurrent higher production of EBs at an earlier time in the developmental cycle, indicating earlier secondary differentiation occurs under elevated oxidation conditions. In contrast, overexpression of AhpC created a resistant phenotype against oxidizing agents and delayed secondary differentiation. Together, these results indicate that redox potential is a critical factor in developmental cycle progression. For the first time, our study provides a mechanism of chlamydial secondary differentiation dependent on redox status.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 26, 2024.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Altering the redox status of Chlamydia trachomatis directly impacts its developmental cycle progression
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Altering the redox status of Chlamydia trachomatis directly impacts its developmental cycle progression
Vandana Singh, Scot P. Ouellette
bioRxiv 2024.04.26.591247; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.26.591247
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Altering the redox status of Chlamydia trachomatis directly impacts its developmental cycle progression
Vandana Singh, Scot P. Ouellette
bioRxiv 2024.04.26.591247; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.26.591247

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Microbiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (6057)
  • Biochemistry (13769)
  • Bioengineering (10500)
  • Bioinformatics (33359)
  • Biophysics (17194)
  • Cancer Biology (14277)
  • Cell Biology (20215)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (10916)
  • Ecology (16104)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (20418)
  • Genetics (13450)
  • Genomics (18713)
  • Immunology (13840)
  • Microbiology (32284)
  • Molecular Biology (13436)
  • Neuroscience (70366)
  • Paleontology (529)
  • Pathology (2210)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (3761)
  • Physiology (5920)
  • Plant Biology (12077)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1820)
  • Synthetic Biology (3382)
  • Systems Biology (8198)
  • Zoology (1852)