Abstract
Giant hummingbirds (Patagona spp.) are extraordinarily large hummingbirds whose taxonomy has been muddled for two centuries. Patagona systematics were recently redefined in a study of migration, physiology, and genomics, revealing two species: the Southern Giant Hummingbird and Northern Giant Hummingbird. Here, we re-evaluate taxonomy and nomenclature of the genus in light of its newly-clarified biology and species limits, analyzing data from 608 specimens and wild-caught individuals spanning 1864–2023. The forms gigas and peruviana were both described based on multiple syntypes. No adequate syntypes for P. gigas are extant, so we designate a neotype for this taxon. We then critically consider the identity and usage of gigas and peruviana, respectively, and examine identification challenges that have fostered taxonomic uncertainty. We endorse the names Patagona gigas for the Southern Giant Hummingbird and P. peruviana for the Northern Giant Hummingbird. The genetic identity of the peruviana lectotype remains untested, but its plumage appears to match the northern species. We found that ∼33% of Patagona gigas specimens in major museum collections are misidentified as peruviana; we provide this list to correct the historical record. To facilitate identification and future study of these two cryptic species, we provide comprehensive information on plumage, measurements, and seasonal ranges.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
Significant updates to main text; additional data and analyses.
