Abstract
Proprioception, the sense of body and limb position, is mediated by proprioceptors and is crucial for important motor functions such as standing and walking. Proprioceptor cell bodies reside within the peripheral dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and are tightly enveloped by satellite glial cells (SGCs). SCGs express a number of Gq protein-coupled receptors (Gq GPCRs), but their functional consequences on proprioceptor activity is unknown. Using a combination of chemogenetics, genetics, Ca2+ imaging, pharmacology, immunohistochemistry, and biochemistry, we provide evidence that SGC Gq GPCR signaling is sufficient to drive purinergic receptor-mediated Ca2+ responses in proprioceptor cell bodies. Our findings suggest a potential role for SGC Gq GPCR signaling in shaping proprioceptor information processing. Furthermore, this demonstration of SGC-induced proprioceptor activation has profound implications with SGC Gq GPCR signaling and purinergic receptors representing potential therapeutic targets for alleviating some proprioceptor and sensorimotor impairments associated with spinal muscular atrophy or Friedreich’s ataxia.
Introduction
Proprioceptors innervate muscle spindles and tendons, and synapse onto spinal ventral horn lower motor neurons (MNs) to provide reflexive information about the length and contraction of muscles. They are crucial for coordinating the activity of MNs and skeletal muscles to achieve essential motor tasks, such as posture, locomotion, manoeuvring one’s way around obstacles or reacting rapidly to external perturbations1,2. When receiving sensory inputs at their peripheral nerve endings, DRG sensory neurons fire action potentials, eliciting the release of neurotransmitters from their cell bodies within DRGs3 as well as from their axonal terminals in the spinal cord. There is emerging evidence that transmitters released from sensory neuron cell bodies activate receptors at the surface of SGCs4,5 and that SGC-to-neuron purinergic communication takes place in DRG11,12. Both SGCs and somata of sensory neurons express a plethora of receptors, including Gq GPCR purinergic receptors6–10, however, only a few studies have examined the involvement of SGC Gq GPCR signaling in SGC-to-sensory neuron interactions and no study has specifically examined SGC-to-proprioceptor interactions.
Therefore, in this study, we asked whether selective activation of SGC Gq GPCR signaling is sufficient to elicit proprioceptor responses in DRGs. We further clarified whether purinergic receptors contributed to such proprioceptor responses. Our findings have identified, for the first time, a SGC-to-proprioceptor communication involving purinergic receptor-mediated Ca2+ activity in proprioceptors.
Results
Chemogenetic and genetic strategies for selectively activating SGC Gq GPCR signaling in DRGs
To define the role of SGC Gq GPCR signaling in proprioceptor activity, we used the GFAP-hM3Dq transgenic mouse model expressing a chemogenetic hM3Dq under the control of the glial GFAP promoter13. In DRGs, we found that hM3Dq is expressed in ∼88% of SGCs with no detectable expression in neurons, indicating that this mouse line represents a valuable model to active GPCR signaling selectively in the vast majority of SGCs (Fig. 1a, Fig. S1, Supplementary Movie 1 and Table 1).
Then, to assess hM3Dq functionality in SGCs, we performed 2-photon Ca2+ imaging experiments in ex vivo intact DRGs from GFAP-hM3Dq::Cx43-CreERT2::GCaMP6 triple transgenic mice. These mice express hM3Dq and the genetically encoded Ca2+ indicator GCaMP6f (fast) selectively in SGCs (Fig. 1a and Fig. S2), enabling both hM3Dq-mediated Ca2+ elevations to be induced and detected selectively in SGCs. Indeed, bath application of 10 μM CNO elicited Ca2+ increases in ∼94% of SGCs, showing that, as expected, hM3Dq couples to Gq in these glial cells (amplitude: 16.62 ± 1.5 ΔF/F0; n = 119 SGCs from 9 DRGs and 3 mice; Fig. 1b,d and Supplementary Table 2). Importantly, no Ca2+ increase and no change in the frequency of spontaneous events were induced by CNO in DRGs from control Cx43-CreERT2::GCaMP6 double-transgenic mice14 (i.e. lacking hM3Dq expression in SGCs). However, a Gq GPCR agonist cocktail reliably triggered Ca2+ elevations in SGCs from these mice (n = 149 SGCs from 9 DRGs and 3 mice; Fig. 1c, Fig. S3 and Supplementary Table 2). Together, these data demonstrate that CNO has no non-specific effects in itself in our experimental conditions.
We next asked whether MAPK/ERK pathway was also activated downstream of hM3Dq stimulation in SGCs. Compared to control groups, DRGs from CNO-treated GFAP-hM3Dq mice (1mg/kg CNO intraperitoneal) exhibited a ∼76% increase in activated ERK1/2 (pERK) expression levels (Fig. 1e, Fig. S4 and Supplementary Table 3), which was found to be selective to SGCs and not to sensory neurons (Fig. 1f, Fig. S5 and Supplementary Table 3).
Together, these results validate the use of GFAP-hM3Dq mice for stimulating canonical Gq GPCR signaling cascades (i.e. Ca2+ and MAPK/ERK pathways) selectively in SGCs of DRGs.
SGC Gq GPCR activation induces Ca2+ responses in proprioceptor cell bodies
To determine whether activating SGC Gq GPCR signaling is sufficient to modulate proprioceptor activity, we used ex vivo DRGs from another GFAP-hM3Dq::PV-Cre::GCaMP6 triple transgenic mouse model. In this model hM3Dq expression is under the control of GFAP promoter control (Fig. 1a), while GCaMP6f expression is under the control of parvalbumin (PV) promoter. In DRGs, parvalbumin is primarily found in proprioceptors. This model therefore enables the vast majority of SGCs to be activated by the application of CNO (Fig. 1b) while monitoring Ca2+ responses in ∼97% of proprioceptors expressing GCaMP6f (Fig. 2a,c,d; Fig. S6 and Supplementary Table 1). Notably, while proprioceptors exhibited no spontaneous Ca2+ transients in DRG preparations, 10µM CNO bath application elicited Ca2+ increases in a subpopulation of proprioceptors (amplitude: 1.26 ± 0.13 ΔF/F0; rise time: 23.6 ± 2.2 s; duration: 93.1 ± 3.5 s; Fig. 2a,c,d and Supplementary Movie 2 & Table 5).
Furthermore, upon 10 μM CNO application, we observed that the onset of these proprioceptor Ca2+ responses (in GFAP-hM3Dq::PV-Cre::GCaMP6 mice) occurred 25.6 ± 2.5 s after the onset of Ca2+ elevations elicited in SGCs (in GFAP-hM3Dq::Cx43-CreERT2::GCaMP6 mice) (2-tailed unpaired t-test, P = 0.0002; Fig. 2a-d and Supplementary Movie 3 & Table 4). This result was confirmed in DRGs obtained from a fourth mouse model expressing hM3Dq in SGCs as well as GCaMP6f in both SGCs and proprioceptors (GFAP-hM3Dq::Cx43-CreERT2::PV-Cre::GCaMP6 quadruple transgenic; Fig. 3a). Calcium invariably increased in SGCs first, followed by proprioceptors with a similar delay, demonstrating that SGC Gq GPCR activation drives (or alters) the activity of a subpopulation of proprioceptors (2-tailed unpaired t-test, P < 0.0001; Fig. 3b-e; Fig. S6 and Supplementary Movie 4 & Table 4). In support of this conclusion, CNO never induced Ca2+ elevations in proprioceptors of control PV-Cre::GCaMP6 double transgenic mice, demonstrating that proprioceptor Ca2+ responses are not due to a non-specific effect of CNO directly on neurons (Fig. S7 and Supplementary Table 2).
SGC-induced proprioceptor Ca2+ responses are mediated by purinergic receptors
We next aimed to determine which receptors were involved in this SGC-to-proprioceptor communication. Because functional ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate, GABA and ATP receptors are expressed at the plasma membrane of the soma of small-diameter DRG nociceptors7,15,16, we hypothesized that soma of large proprioceptive neurons may express similar receptors.
Similar 2-photon Ca2+ imaging experiments as previously described were performed using DRGs from GFAP-hM3Dq::PV-Cre::GCaMP6 mice. We found that concomitant bath application of 10 μM CNO and inhibitors of glutamatergic (AMPAR, NMDAR, groups I, II, III mGluRs), GABAergic (GABAAR, GABABR) or purinergic (P2X3R and P2Y1R) receptors onto DRGs did not substantially depress the number of proprioceptors responding to CNO-induced SGC activation. Furthermore, proprioceptor Ca2+ response amplitude, rise time and duration were not significantly attenuated (Fig. 4a,b, Fig. S8 and Supplementary Table 5).
However, co-applying 10 μM CNO with the broad-spectrum purinergic receptor antagonist PPADS (100 μM) reduced proprioceptor Ca2+ increase amplitude and rise time by ∼34% and ∼49% as shown in the left shifted cumulative probability distributions (0.83 ± 0.16 ΔF/F0; 12.1 ± 1.3 s; Kolmogorov-Smirnov test: P = 0.0348, P = 0.0007; Fig. 4d,e), with no change in Ca2+ response duration (Fig. 4c, Fig. S8 and Supplementary Table 5). A decrease (∼57% drop) in the total number of responsive proprioceptors was also observed (Fig. 4b). Taken together, these results suggest that proprioceptor purinergic receptors - other than P2X3R and P2Y1R previously reported in nociceptors11,12 - and presumably ATP released by SGCs, mediate Ca2+ increases in proprioceptors.
We therefore examined whether proprioceptor cell bodies could respond to ATP through functional purinergic receptors. Adding 50 μM non-hydrolyzable ATPγS on DRGs from PV-Cre::GCaMP6 mice elicited Ca2+ responses in ∼33% of proprioceptors as compared to CNO application (Fig. 4f and Supplementary Table 6). Thus, a subpopulation of proprioceptors express purinergic receptors at their cell body plasma membrane. The fact that nonhydrolyzable ATPγS did not activate as many proprioceptors as CNO did, may suggest that another transmitter (e.g. ADP via ATP hydrolysis) is required for the full effectiveness in SGC-to-proprioceptor activation. In agreement with this hypothesis, 30 μM nonhydrolyzable ADPβS induced Ca2+ responses in ∼46% of proprioceptors as compared to CNO (Fig. S9 and Supplementary Table 6).
Proprioceptor Ca2+ responses require both extracellular and intracellular Ca2+
We next investigated the possible contribution of extracellular Ca2+ to the CNO-induced/SGC-mediated proprioceptor responses. To this end, a Ca2+ free extracellular solution was used to perform 2-photon imaging experiments, always using DRGs from GFAP-hM3Dq::PV-Cre::GCaMP6. We observed that the number of responsive proprioceptors was not appreciably modified upon 10 μM CNO application in an Ca2+ free extracellular solution (Fig. 4a,b), indicating that extracellular Ca2+ is not required for the induction of proprioceptor responses. However, the response amplitude, rise time and duration were markedly attenuated by 25%, 38% and 43%, respectively, suggesting that extracellular Ca2+ is required for reaching the largest proprioceptor responses (0.94 ± 0.12 ΔF/F0; 14.6 ± 1.8 s; 53.0 ± 5.4 s; Kolmogorov-Smirnov test: P = 0.0047, P = 0.007 and Kruskal Wallis test: P < 0.0001; Figure 4a,c-e, Fig. S8 and Supplementary Table 5).
The contribution of extracellular Ca2+ was further substantiated by the observation of a ∼41s delay in the proprioceptor response onset compared to the response onset obtained in regular extracellular solution condition (i.e. containing Ca2+) (Fig. S10 and Supplementary Table 4).
Overall, our data are consistent with a model in which activation of both ionotropic P2XR (mediating Ca2+ entry from extracellular space) and metabotropic P2YR (mediating Ca2+ release from internal stores) contribute to the full proprioceptor cytosolic Ca2+ responses. The P2XR-mediated Ca2+ increase preceding a subsequent delayed metabotropic P2YR-mediated Ca2+ increase. Such type of synergistic interactions between P2XR and P2XR has been previously described in marrow megakaryocytes and blood platelets17.
Discussion
The primary goal of this study was to address the role of SGC Gq GPCR signaling in proprioceptor activity. Collectively, our findings reveal a new mechanism of interaction between SGCs and proprioceptors involving, at least partially, purinergic P2XR and P2YR as well as ATP and/or ADP transmitters.
Although scarce, studies have suggested that ATP release from SGCs results in the co-activation of neuronal P2Y1R and P2X3R and Ca2+ rises in nociceptive neurons, with P2Y1R exerting an inhibitory action on the function of P2X3R4,5,10. However, our data show that these purinergic receptors are not involved in SGC-mediated proprioceptor Ca2+ responses. Indeed, selective antagonists of these two receptors do not prevent or alter Ca2+ responses in proprioceptors (Fig. 4). Instead, our results suggest that SGCs exert control on proprioceptor activity via other purinergic receptors (blocked by pan PPADS broad-spectrum purinergic antagonist). Thus, the purinergic system appears to be a conserved mechanism for SGC communication with both nociceptors and proprioceptors, but to involve different purinergic signaling modalities depending on the type of sensory neurons. To the best of our knowledge, differential communication between SGCs and different types of sensory neurons has never been documented before. Nevertheless, it represents a form of communication whereby SGCs could discern specific populations of sensory neurons and induce distinct control/alteration of the Ca2+ homeostasis of these neurons depending on the involved sensory modality or the physiopathological state.
Additionally, the partial reduction of SGC-induced proprioceptor Ca2+ responses in the presence of PPADs can be explained by the fact that PPADS is a general inhibitor of purinergic receptors that does not inhibit all purinergic receptors. Therefore, it remains possible that residual proprioceptor Ca2+ activity is due to the lack of inhibition of certain purinergic receptors, or possibly to the indirect opening of plasma membrane Ca2+ channels downstream of purinergic receptor activation. Elucidating these questions and mechanisms is beyond the scope of the present study. It will require using a combination of available purinergic receptor knockout animals and purinergic receptor and Ca2+ channel antagonists, which represent a considerable endeavor.
Clear proof of expression of functional purinergic receptors on proprioceptor cell bodies has not yet been described. Our data showing that non-hydrolyzable ATPγS and ADPβS induce Ca2+ elevations although additional indirect scenario involving another cell type cannot be totally ruled out. Furthermore, a recent transcriptional profiling study has uncovered that mRNAs of purinergic ionotropic P2X5R and P2X6R as well as metabotropic P2Y14R are enriched in proprioceptors18. Although the presence of these transcripts does not indicate that the corresponding receptors are expressed at the level of proprioceptor soma, P2X5R, P2X6R and P2Y14R represent interesting candidates potentially involved in SGC-to-proprioceptor communication. As mentioned above, further studies are necessary to address this hypothesis.
Not only proprioceptors, but also low-threshold mechanoreceptors, express parvalbumin. However, our PV-Cre::GCaMP6 mouse model (in which parvalbumin promoter controls GCaMP6f expression) exhibits the presence of the Ca2+ indicator primarily in proprioceptors (Fig. S6), suggesting that it is a suitable model to detect intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis changes specifically in proprioceptors. Yet, the possibility that a few low-threshold mechanoreceptors also express GCaMP6f and their activity is included in our data sets cannot be excluded.
Finally, irrespective of mechanism(s), our results raise the possibility that SGC Gq GPCR signaling-induced disruption of activity in a subpopulation of proprioceptors might be sufficient to modulate some type of proprioceptive information processing within DRGs and produce changes in sensorimotor behavior. In conclusion, our study is relevant to proprioceptive impairments as well as sensorimotor deficits and ataxia associated with spinal muscular atrophy or Friedreich’s ataxia, respectively19–21
Materials and Methods
Animals
Experiments were conducted on 2- to 3-month old male and female mice from the C57BL/6N background. Mice were grouped housed (5 mice/cage) and fed ad libitum. Illumination was controlled automatically with a 12/12h light-dark schedule. All experiments were conducted during the dark phase. Wildtype (WT) littermates were used as controls in experiments involving transgenic mice. The following mouse lines were used and/or generated (the mouse lines used in experiments appear in italic; Supplementary Table 7): (1) PV-Cre22 (Jackson Laboratories, stock #017320) and Cx43-CreERT223 mice were crossed with CAG-lox-STOP-lox-GCaMP624 (Jackson Laboratories, stock #024105) in order to obtain two new double transgenic mouse lines that we called PV-Cre::GCaMP6 and Cx43- CreERT2::GCaMP6, respectively. These two lines were used for running control Ca2+ imaging experiments to test the internees of CNO (e.g. to test whether or not CNO in itself evokes Ca2+ elevations were used for Western blot, immunohistochemical and behavioral experiments. These mice were crossed with both PV-Cre::GCaMP6 and Cx43-CreERT2::GCaMP614 transgenic mice in order to obtain two new triple transgenic mouse line that we named GFAP-hM3Dq::PV-Cre::GCaMP6 and GFAP- hM3Dq::Cx43-CreERT2::GCaMP6, respectively. These two triple transgenic mouse lines were used for Ca2+ imaging experiments. Finally, we crossed GFAP-hM3Dq::Cx43-CreERT2::GCaMP6 with PV- Cre::GCaMP6 in order to obtain a new quadruple transgenic mouse line that we called GFAP- hM3Dq::Cx43-CreERT2::PV-Cre::GCaMP6. To induce GCaMP6f expression in Cx43- CreERT2::GCaMP614 and in GFAP-hM3Dq::Cx43-CreERT2::GCaMP6, mice were treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1mg/day, Sigma) diluted in corn oil (Sigma) during 10 days and used 15 days after the first day of treatment. Animal care and procedures were carried out according to the guidelines set out in the European Community Council Directives.
Immunohistochemistry
Animals were sacrificed 2min after treatment (CNO 1mg/kg or 0.9% NaCl, i.p.) and DRGs were immediately harvested and drop fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 4h prior to cryoprotection in 0.02M PBS containing 20% sucrose overnight at 4°C. For other immunohistochemistry experiments (e.g. transgenic mice characterization), animals were transcardiacally perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde under ketamine/xylazine (100mg/kg / 10mg/kg respectively, i.p.) anesthesia. Lumbar L3, L4 and L5 DRGs were harvested, postfixed 2 h in 4% paraformaldehyde, and cryoprotected in 0.02M PBS containing 20% sucrose overnight at 4°C. Then, tissues were frozen in optimal cutting temperature compound (OCT). Fourteen µm sections were cut using a cryostat (Leica), mounted on Superfrost glass slides and stored at −80°C. The day of the experiment, sections were washed two times for 15 min each in 0.02M PBS. Sections were incubated overnight in 0.02M PBS (pH 7.4) containing 0.3% Triton X100, 0.02% sodium azide and primary antibodies (Supplementary Table 8) at room temperature in a humid chamber. The following day, sections were washed 3 times in 0.02M PBS, and incubated for 2h at room temperature with secondary antibodies diluted in 0.02M PBS (pH 7.4) containing 0.3% Triton X100 and 0.02% sodium azide. Then, sections were washed 3 times for 15min in 0.02M PBS and mounted between slide and coverslip with Vectashield medium containing DAPI (Vector Laboratories). Negative controls, i.e. slices incubated with secondary antibodies only, were used to set criteria (gain, exposure time) for image acquisition for each experiment. Images acquisition was performed with an Axio Observer Z1 epifluorescence Zeiss microscope, an ORCA Flash 2.8 million pixel camera, a PlanNeoFluar 20x/0.5NA objective, a LED COLIBRI 2 light source with 4 narrowband LED (365nm, 470nm,590nm, 625nm), as well as filters [DAPI (49), eGFP (38HE), Cy3 (43HE) and Cy5 (50)]. A Zeiss LSM710 confocal microscope with a Plan-apochromat 63x oil immersion objective (umerical aperture of 1.4) was also used. The same image acquisition settings were used for the negative control (Zeiss). Cell counting and mean grey value measurements were performed using ImageJ software software from the National Institute of Health (USA). Because it was difficult to discriminate individual SGCs within all SGCs surrounding a single neuronal cell body, “rings” surrounding neuronal cell bodies were quantified. For confocal imaging of GFAP-hM3Dq DRG sections, 12µm thick z-stacks were acquired with 0.3µm steps (40 z-stacks in total). 3D visualization was done using the 3D viewer plugin of Fiji. Raw data were analyzed and quantified.
Western Blots
Animals were sacrificed 2min, 30min and 4h after treatment (CNO 1mg/kg i.p.) and L3, L4, L5 DRGs were dissected, frozen and stored at −80°C. The tissues were homogenized in 150μL RIPA buffer (50mM Tris pH 8, 150mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0,5% deoxycholate, 0,1% SDS, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate) with 1X protease inhibitor cocktail cOmplete (Roche) and 1X Halt phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Scientific). Tissue lysate was obtained using a Bioruptor sonication system (Diagenode) and then centrifugated at 2000 RPM for 5min. Supernatant was kept and protein concentration was determined using a BCA assay (Bio-Rad). Aliquots of 25µg of protein for each mouse were deposited and run on 10% acrylamide SDS-page and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were cut (according to protein weight), and the pieces of membranes were then saturated in TBS-Tween (TBS-T) containing 5% fat-free milk for 30min. Membranes were then incubated overnight at 4°C in TBS-T containing primary antibodies (Supplementary Table 8). The day after, membranes were washed in TBS-T and then incubated with horse radish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies diluted in TBS-T (Supplementary Table 8) for 1h30 at room temperature. Clarity ECL chemiluminescence detection (Biorad) and ImageQuant LAS4000 (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) were used to reveal and visualize the proteins. The average exposure time was 30s and images were taken with 1s increments. The images obtained before saturation of the signal were used for quantification. The mean gray values corresponding to the signal were measured using ImageJ software. Western blot experiments were replicated 4 times to minimize the technique variability and the 4 mean grey values obtained per sample were then averaged. Then each average value was normalized to the values obtained for the control group. Furthermore, to average away any possible position effect, the order of the deposits was different in each replicate.
Two photon Ca2+ imaging
Acute intact DRG preparations were prepared from GFAP-hM3Dq::PV-Cre::GCaMP6, GFAP-hM3Dq::Cx43CreERT2::GCaMP6, and GFAP-hM3Dq::PV-Cre::Cx43-CreERT2::GCaMP6 mouse lines. PV-Cre::GCaMP6 and Cx43CreERT2::GCaMP6 mice were also used to perform prior control experiments to test the inertness of CNO. Vertebras and dura mater were removed and L4 and L5 were cold (slushy) incubation ACSF solution containing (in mM): 95 NaCl, 1.8 KCl, 1.2 KH2PO4, 0.5 CaCl2, 7 MgSO4, 26 NaHCO3, 15 glucose, and 50 sucrose, oxygenated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2. DRGs were harvested and incubated at 35°C for 30min in incubation solution and then left to recover for 1h30 at room temperature. A single DRG was placed in the recording chamber of a custom-built two-photon laser-scanning microscope with a 20x water immersion objective (x20/0.95w XLMPlanFluor, Olympus). GCaMP6f was excited at 920nm with a Ti:Sapphire laser (Mai Tai HP; Spectra-Physics). DRGs were continuously superfused with oxygenated recording solution identical to the incubation solution except for the following (in mM): 127 NaCl; 2.4 CaCl2; 1.3 MgSO4; and 0 sucrose at a rate of 4 ml/min. For experiments in Ca2+-free ACSF, the recording solution was identical to incubation solution except the following (in mM) : 127 NaCl; 0 CaCl2; 1.3 MgSO4; and 0 sucrose. Image acquisition was performed at a rate of 1 image/second (1Hz). Drugs applied are detailed in Supplementary Table 8. To determine the viability of proprioceptors GFAP-hM3Dq::PV-Cre::GCaMP6 mice, KCl (50mM) was applied as a positive control at the end of every experiment (Supplementary Movie 5); the number of proprioceptors responding to KCl represented the total number of proprioceptors indicated in Supplementary Tables 4, 5, 6. To determine the viability of SGCs in GFAP-hM3Dq::Cx43CreERT2::GCaMP6 and Cx43CreERT2::GCaMP6 mice, we considered SGCs responding to CNO and/or agonist cocktail to endogenous Gq GPCRs (50 μM DHPG, 10 μM histamine, 10 μM carbachol, 50 μM ATP-γS, 1 μM adenosine, 200 μM glutamate) as the total number of alive SGCs. Agonist cocktail was systematically applied at the end of every experiment. ImageJ and Metamorph (Molecular Devices) softwares were used to analyze the data. Regions of interest were determined on GCaMP6f-expressing cells and the relative changes in fluorescence (ΔF/F0) were calculated as the ratio of the fluorescence intensity to that recorded before any drug application. In GFAP-hM3Dq::Cx43-CreERT2::PV-Cre::GCaMP6 mice, in which GCaMP6f expression is driven both in SGCs and proprioceptors, the two cell types were discriminated by their distinct morphological features and GCaMP6f brightness differences (indeed SGCs expressed more GCaMP6f than proprioceptors and thus were brighter than proprioceptors in basal conditions). Positive responses were defined as those that exceeded 3 standard deviations (SD) above the baseline level. To determine the onset of Ca2+ responses, the time for the drug-containing ACSF to reach the recording chamber through the tubing was subtracted. Rise times were calculated as the 10-90% rise time. The designs of the different Ca2+ imaging experiments are presented in Supplementary Fig.11.
Statistics
Data were acquired and analyzed blind of genotype and treatment. Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M. n values correspond to the number of cells, DGR, or mice. All statistical tests were performed after verification of normal data distribution using D’Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test and, when applicable, equality of variances with F-test (Fisher). If normality assumptions were not met, we used Dunn’s multiple comparison test for analyzing more than 2 groups). If normality was met, we used parametric tests (two-tailed Student t-test for analyzing 2 groups and one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc for analyzing more than 2 groups). Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to analyze cumulative distributions of pairs of groups. All statistical tests were performed using GraphPad Prism 6. No statistical methods were used to pre-determine sample sizes.
Author disclosure statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author contributions
C.A. and Y.R. designed and interpreted experiments. Y.R. performed experiments and data analysis.
Y.R. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. C.A. edited and wrote the manuscript. C.A. conceived and supervised the project.
Funding
Research in the authors’ laboratories is supported by grants from Fonds de dotation Neuroglia, NeurATRIS Innovation for Translational Neuroscience, French Friedreich’s Ataxia Association (A.F.A.F), and Ile-de-France Regional Council to C.A. Initial experiments were supported by a starting grant (Chair of Excellence) from the Foundation Ecole des Neurosciences de Paris (ENP) to C.A. Y.R. was a recipient of a master 2 and a PhD fellowships from the Institute of Neuroscience and Cognition (Université Paris Descartes) and ED158 doctoral school, respectively.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Movie 1 (related to Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig.1)
360° rotation of z-stack acquisition corresponding to Supplementary Fig. 1. HA in red, Na/K-ATPase in green.
Supplementary Movie 2 (related to Fig. 2)
10 μM CNO application to ex vivo DRG from GFAP-hM3Dq::PV-Cre::GCaMP6 triple transgenic mice leads to Ca2+ responses in proprioceptors. CNO is applied at frame 120 until frame 240 (2-photon data acquisition rate: 1frame/s). Movie speed: 100 frames per second. AVI files were made with ImageJ.
10 μM CNO application to ex vivo DRG from GFAP-hM3Dq::Cx43-CreERT2::GCaMP6 triple transgenic mice induces Ca2+ elevations in SGCs. CNO is applied at frame 120 until frame 240 (2-photon data acquisition rate: 1frame/s). Movie speed: 100 frames per second. AVI files were made with ImageJ.
Supplementary Movie 4 (related to Fig. 3)
10 μM CNO application to DRG from GFAP-hM3Dq::Cx43-CreERT2::PV-Cre::GCaMP6 quadruple transgenic mice shows Ca2+ responses occurring first in SGCs and then in neighboring proprioceptors. CNO is applied at frame 120 until frame 240 (2-photon data acquisition rate: 1frame/s). Movie speed: 100 frames per second. AVI files were made with ImageJ.
Supplementary Movie 5 (related to Material & Methods – Calcium imaging section)
50mM KCl application to DRG from GFAP-hM3Dq::PV-Cre::GCaMP6 triple transgenic mice was used systematically as a positive control to determine proprioceptor viability (i.e. proprioceptors responding to KCl are considered alive). Movie speed: 100 frames per second. AVI files were made with ImageJ.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge C. Steinhäuser for providing the Cx43-CreERT2 mouse line; S. Antoine and S. Guinoiseau for animal care; J.M. Andrieu, F. Charbonnier, B. Delhomme, P. Djian, C. Levenes, C. Meunier and M. Oheim for sharing pieces of equipment and laboratory spaces; O. Biondi and E. Schmidt for advice and support on image acquisition; A. Bessis and S. Dieudonné for valuable discussions and feedback; T. Fiacco and J. Stinnakre for critical reading and I. Melnychuk for editing the manuscript; and both the imaging and mouse core facilities, which are supported and funded by CNRS, INSERM and Université Paris Cité.