Abstract
To cause meningitis, bacteria move from the bloodstream to the brain, crossing the endothelial cells of the blood-brain barrier. Most studies on how bacteria cross the blood-brain barrier have been performed in vitro using cultured endothelial cells, due to a paucity of animal models. Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is the leading cause of bacterial meningitis in neonates and is primarily thought to cross the blood-brain barrier by transcytosis through endothelial cells. To test this hypothesis in vivo, we used optically transparent zebrafish larvae. Timelapse confocal microscopy revealed that GBS forms extracellular microcolonies in brain blood vessels and causes perforation and lysis of blood-brain barrier endothelial cells, which promotes bacterial entry into the brain. Vessels infected with GBS microcolonies were distorted and contained thrombi. Inhibition of clotting worsened brain invasion, suggesting a host-protective role for thrombi. The GBS lysin cylE, implicated in brain invasion in vitro, was found dispensable in vivo. Instead, pro-inflammatory mediators associated with endothelial cell damage and blood-brain barrier breakdown were specifically upregulated in the zebrafish head upon GBS entry into the brain. Therefore, GBS crosses the blood-brain barrier in vivo not by transcytosis, but by endothelial cell lysis and death. Given that we observe the same invasion route for a meningitis-associated strain of Streptococcus pneumoniae, our findings suggest that streptococcal infection of brain blood vessels triggers endothelial cell inflammation and lysis, thereby facilitating brain invasion.
Introduction
Breaching the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is one way bacteria can invade the brain from the circulation [1]. This barrier is formed by highly selective endothelial cells, pericytes, and astrocytes lining the small blood vessels of the brain, shielding the CNS from circulating toxins and pathogens [2]. Bacterial brain infections affect 2.5 million people annually and are associated with high mortality rates (∼10%) [3, 4]. Despite treatment, 25-50% of patients suffer permanent neurological damage resulting from this central nervous system (CNS) infection [5, 6]. Neonates and children under five years old are the highest risk group for meningitis, with Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus, GBS) being the primary causative agent in neonates [3, 4, 7]. GBS is a Gram-positive extracellular pathogen that commonly colonizes the vaginal and gastrointestinal tract [8, 9], but can enter the bloodstream and cause bacteremia. Clinical studies have linked GBS bacteremia to an increased risk of CNS entry and subsequent brain infection [10].
In vitro and mouse studies have proposed various mechanisms for how bacteria may breach the BBB, including direct lysis of endothelial cells, Trojan horse entry (where bacteria enter the CNS within leukocytes), and transcytosis (passage through host cells) [11, 12]. Several mechanisms of brain entry have been suggested for GBS, including: (1) in vitro studies demonstrating that GBS invades and traverses human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMECs) via transcytosis [13], (2) an in vitro, mouse, and zebrafish study that suggests GBS enters the brain between endothelial cells by manipulating the tight junction protein regulator SNAIL1 [14], and (3) a mouse study that found that GBS modifies signaling in meningeal macrophages to facilitate brain invasion [15]. However, the mechanism of brain invasion and the route of entry for most bacterial infections, including streptococci, remain incompletely understood in vivo.
Traditional models for studying brain infections, such as cultured HBMECs and rodent models, have limitations in visualizing real-time interactions between GBS and the BBB. Tissue culture, although convenient for live cell imaging, fails to replicate the complexity of an intact vertebrate brain. Rodents, a well-established animal model, are limited by the opacity and thickness of the mammalian brain, which hinders direct observation of bacteria and host cells during the earliest stages of infection. To overcome these challenges, we employ zebrafish larvae as a model system [16]. In this model, transparent larvae are intravenously infected in the caudal (tail) vein, allowing for the visualization of interactions between the host and pathogen as the bacteria naturally disseminate from the blood into the brain [17]. Zebrafish are a useful model because of: (1) their innate immune system, which resembles that of humans [18, 19], (2) their optical transparency, (3) their small brain size which allows for live imaging of the entire organ within the working distance of a confocal microscope objective, and (4) the availability of well-established genetic tools, such as transgenics, CRISPR mutagenesis, and genetic screening [20, 21].
Importantly, zebrafish have an intact BBB within 3-10 days post fertilization (dpf), which resembles that of the mammalian BBB in structure and function [22, 23]. All the components of the mammalian BBB are present in zebrafish, including endothelial cells, pericytes, glia, neurons, microglia, and meningeal perivascular cells [22, 24]. The zebrafish BBB expresses markers of the mammalian BBB, including: (1) pericyte expression of pdgfrb, tagln, notch3, acta2, and abcc9, (2) astrocyte expression of gfap, glast, glutamate synthetase, and aquaporin-4, (3) endothelial cell expression of MDR-1 and Glut1/Slc2a1, and (4) brain blood vessel angiogenesis that is dependent upon vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and Wnt signaling [22–25]. Functionally, the zebrafish BBB has decreased permeability of high molecular weight tracers/dyes starting at 2.5-3 dpf.
Treating GBS meningitis is particularly difficult due to the rapid dissemination of the infection throughout the body and the limited penetration of many antibiotics into the brain [26]. Understanding the earliest interactions between GBS and brain blood vessel endothelial cells is crucial for developing more effective treatments. In this study, we observe interactions between GBS and endothelial cells of the BBB to determine how GBS enters the brain in vivo. Our findings demonstrate that GBS forms microcolonies in brain blood vessels, which leads to endothelial cell perforations and lysis, likely triggered by inflammation in response to GBS.
Results
GBS infects the brain of zebrafish larvae in a time- and inoculum-dependent manner
Zebrafish have been used to model GBS meningitis, revealing that GBS infects the brain of larval and adult zebrafish [16, 27]. In mammals, bacteremia is a prerequisite for meningitis, suggesting that GBS disseminates via the bloodstream before entering the brain [1, 12]. To visualize bacteria in the bloodstream, we infected the zebrafish caudal vein with GFP-expressing GBS COH1 (GBS-GFP), a strain of GBS associated with meningitis (Fig 1A) [28]. Within 24 hours post-infection (hpi), GBS-GFP was observed in both the body and brain (Fig 1A, yellow and white arrowheads). To assess bacterial replication, we employed fluorescent pixel count (FPC) analysis [29], which measures GBS-GFP fluorescence per larva, corresponding to total body colony forming units (CFU). An initial inoculum of 50 or 250 CFU showed an increase in GBS-GFP within the larvae from 0 to 24 hours post infection (hpi) (Fig 1B). Compared to uninfected larvae, mortality significantly increased by 48 hpi in infected larvae (Fig 1C). Larvae infected with 20 CFU had 41% mortality by 48 hpi, while those infected with 120 or 500 CFU exhibited over 95% mortality (Fig 1C). These data confirm the ability of circulating GBS to replicate in zebrafish larvae and cause mortality.
Brain infection was directly observed in these larvae. Starting at 12 hpi, more GBS-GFP were observed in the brains of animals infected with 250 CFU compared to 50 CFU (Fig 1D and 1E). Brain infection increased over time, such that by 16 hpi, 95% of larvae infected with 250 CFU had GBS in the brain while 63% of larvae infected with 50 CFU had GBS in the brain (Fig 1E). At 24 hpi, nearly all infected larvae exhibited GBS in the brain (Fig 1E). These results demonstrate that intravenous GBS infection causes body and brain infection that increases over time, with body infection preceding brain infection and mortality.
We next sought to demonstrate that GBS factors associated with meningitis in mammals also contribute to meningitis in zebrafish. Therefore, we infected larvae with isogenic GBS-GFP COH1 lacking iagA (invasion-associated gene A). iagA encodes a glycosyltransferase homolog, and an ΔiagA mutant is attenuated for brain invasion in mice [30]. The ΔiagA mutant was cleared from the larvae, and by 48 hpi, no larvae infected with the ΔiagA mutant died, compared to 75% mortality in larvae infected with wildtype GBS (Fig 1F and 1G). These data indicate that the ΔiagA mutant fails to establish infection of the brain in zebrafish larvae which may be due to an attenuation of growth in the blood [30].
GBS does not use transcytosis to cross the blood-brain barrier
For GBS to invade the brain, it must first engage with the endothelial cells of the BBB. Our collaborative studies have previously showed GBS infection of and transcytosis through HBMECs [13, 30, 31], and therefore we sought to determine if transcytosis occurs in vivo. We infected 3 dpf transgenic larvae (FliE:RFP, FliE:dsRed, or Flt1:tomato) to observe GBS interactions with fluorescent BBB endothelial cells [32, 33]. Whole brain confocal imaging revealed the formation of GBS microcolonies within brain blood vessels, particularly at vessel bifurcations (Fig 2A and 2B). Timelapse imaging demonstrated the presence of both persistent and transient GBS microcolonies (Fig 2C and 2D). All GBS microcolonies examined in 17 larvae were confined to the vessel lumen and not inside endothelial cells, suggesting that transcytosis through endothelial cells is not the primary mechanism for GBS brain entry (Fig 2E and 2F).
Phagocytes are dispensable for GBS to cross the blood-brain barrier
Another proposed mechanism of bacterial brain entry is the Trojan Horse mechanism, where a pathogen uses phagocytes to cross the BBB [12]. We observed GBS-GFP crossing the BBB, potentially within monocytes or neutrophils. To investigate the necessity of monocytes for brain entry by GBS, we depleted them in larvae by intravenously injecting lipoclodronate (LC) at 2 dpf [34]. We utilized mpeg1:dsRed transgenic larvae with fluorescent myeloid cells to confirm the depletion of monocytes [35] (Fig 2G and 2H). To determine whether GBS can cross the BBB in the absence of monocytes, we infected PBS or LC-treated larvae. Infection of the two groups was matched by FPC, to ensure the same bacterial load on the day of the assay (Fig 2I and 2J). Compared to PBS-treated larvae, LC-treated larvae contained a similar volume of GBS in the brain (Fig 2K to 2M). However, when the same inoculum was administered to both groups, rather than FPC-matched groups, the LC-treated larvae showed a significantly higher volume of GBS in the brain, compared to PBS-treated (Fig S1A to S1C). Together these findings suggest that monocytes are not necessary for GBS to enter the brain, but instead play a protective role in limiting GBS burden outside of the brain.
To investigate the role of neutrophils in transporting GBS into the brain, we utilized lyz:EGFP transgenic larvae, which have fluorescent neutrophils [36]. Brain imaging was performed on GBS-infected larvae at the time of brain entry. Among the 19 brains imaged, no colocalization of GBS and neutrophil fluorescence was observed where GBS crossed the BBB (Fig 2N and 2O). Although neutrophils were frequently present in the brain, they were not found at specific sites of GBS crossing (Fig 2N, yellow arrowhead), indicating that neutrophils do not mediate GBS brain entry. Thus, these results collectively suggest that GBS does not enter the brain via a Trojan Horse mechanism.
GBS lyses leptomeningeal endothelial cells to enter the brain
With transcytosis and the Trojan Horse mechanism ruled out, we next investigated endothelial cell lysis and death as a potential mechanism for GBS brain entry. To determine whether GBS causes endothelial cell damage, we created 3D renderings of GBS-infected vessels, compared to uninfected contralateral (control) vessels (Fig 3A). These renderings revealed numerous small perforations in the endothelial cell membrane near the microcolony. Most infected vessels exhibited multiple perforations around the microcolony, averaging 5 perforations per vessel with an average diameter of 6 µm (Fig 3A to 3C). To verify the permeability of these perforations, we injected 0.02 µm Alexa Fluor-647 beads into the caudal vein and immediately imaged the brain vessels. Uninfected vessels retained beads in the circulation (Fig 3D and 3E). In contrast, beads escaped from the circulation into the brain in most infected vessels (Fig 3E). These data confirm that GBS microcolonies can cause endothelial cell damage by triggering perforations that result in leakage of vessel contents into the brain.
We speculated that the observed membrane perforations could be indicative of endothelial cell death, providing an opportunity for GBS to enter the brain. To detect endothelial cell death, we injected infected larvae with two live/dead cell stains: propidium iodide and Annexin V. Propidium iodide labels the nuclei of lysed cells, while Annexin V binds to the phosphatidylserine exposed during apoptosis, labeling apoptotic cells [37, 38]. We infected FliE:dsRed transgenic larvae, which have fluorescent endothelial cell nuclei and membranes. We found a significant number of propidium iodide-positive endothelial cell nuclei in GBS-infected vessels compared to uninfected ones, indicating that endothelial cell lysis is associated with GBS microcolonies (Fig 3F and 3G). Notably, some uninfected vessels in infected larvae also displayed signs of endothelial cell lysis, possibly due to microcolony clearance or to a systemic response to infection (Fig 3G). Moreover, there were more propidium iodide-positive cell nuclei in the brain surrounding the GBS microcolony (Fig S2A and S2B) compared to uninfected vessels, suggesting that other cells in the brain (likely neurons or neuroglia) lyse in response to GBS infection in vivo or are undergoing developmentally appropriate cell death [39].
To evaluate the contribution of endothelial cell apoptosis to GBS infection, we injected Annexin V-Cy5 into larvae infected with GBS-GFP. Annexin V staining increased in infected vessels compared to uninfected vessels (Fig 3H and 3I), with a higher proportion of apoptotic endothelial cells detected at 23 hpi compared to 15 hpi (Fig 3I). Similar to propidium iodide, some uninfected vessels in infected larvae also exhibited Annexin V staining (Fig 3I). This supports the hypothesis that endothelial cell damage is not limited to infected vessels but can occur throughout the brain in infected larvae. To assess the relative prevalence of apoptosis versus cell lysis, we compared the staining patterns of propidium iodide and Annexin V at the same time point. Infected and uninfected vessels in infected larvae were more likely to be Annexin V positive than propidium iodide-positive (Fig 3J), suggesting that apoptosis precedes lysis as an early mechanism of endothelial cell death in GBS infection. This finding is consistent with the increase of apoptosis markers observed in human brain microvascular endothelial cells infected with GBS in vitro [31].
The leptomeningeal vessels supply the meninges, where bacteria appear in GBS meningitis in humans [40, 41]. To determine if GBS crosses the BBB through damaged leptomeningeal vessels, we imaged brain infection at the critical time point when GBS crosses the BBB, around 18-24 hpi. GBS commonly crossed the BBB from leptomeningeal vessels, which are known to be more permissive to circulating molecules than brain parenchymal vessels (Fig 3K to 3M), with crossing particularly observed from the posterior cerebral vein (PCeV) (Fig S2C) [42, 43]. In all observed instances of GBS-GFP crossing leptomeningeal vessels in 19 larvae, endothelial cells at the site of GBS exit were stained with Annexin V (Fig 3N and 3O). Together, these findings suggest that endothelial cell death via apoptosis and lysis facilitates GBS traversal of the leptomeningeal vessels and entry into the meningeal space.
Endothelial cell lysis occurs independently of the primary GBS cytolytic toxin
We next investigated whether the major GBS cytolysin, cylE, which is associated with brain infection in mice, causes perforations and cell lysis in zebrafish [31, 44]. We infected zebrafish larvae with wildtype and isogenic ΔcylE GBS-GFP strains, and compared equivalent infections by increasing the inoculum for ΔcylE to compensate for its apparent in vivo growth defect (Fig 4A and 4B). The total volume of GBS-GFP in the brain and the proportion of larvae with GBS-GFP in the brain were similar between the two strains (Fig 4A, 4C, and 4D). When the same inoculum of the wildtype and mutant strains was administered, larvae exhibited lower total body GBS-GFP in the ΔcylE mutant, suggesting a role for cylE in GBS survival in the blood outside the brain (Fig S3A). Using 3D renderings, we observed that vessels infected with the ΔcylE mutant developed endothelial cell perforations and bead leakage (Fig 4E and 4F). To assess cell lysis, we administered propidium iodide, and found equivalent staining in GBS ΔcylE and wildtype (Fig 4G and 4H). Therefore, GBS infection triggers endothelial cell perforations and lysis in vivo, independent of cylE.
Upregulation of inflammatory mediators contributes to GBS brain inflammation
The accumulation of endothelial cell death, independent of cylE, led us to hypothesize that host immune signaling contributes to endothelial cell injury during GBS infection. In patients with bacterial meningitis, transcripts of inflammatory mediators are present in the cerebrospinal fluid [45, 46], most of which are expressed downstream of the transcription factor NFκB. To examine the role of NFκB in GBS brain infection, we infected NFκB-GFP transgenic larvae, which express GFP from the NFκB promoter [47]. In larvae infected with 100 CFU blue fluorescent GBS-eBFP, NFκB-GFP fluorescence was associated with GBS microcolonies. Infected vessels had significantly higher NFκB expression compared to uninfected vessels within the same animal, indicating a direct response of the endothelial cells to infection (Fig 5A and 5B). Moreover, most NFκB-positive vessels (17 out of 18) exhibited perforations, as evidenced by the escape of beads from the circulation (Fig 5C to 5E). NFκB fluorescence correlated with Annexin V staining, likely since NFκB can trigger apoptosis [48]. Endothelial cells in infected vessels often exhibited both NFκB and Annexin V positivity (Fig 5F and 5G). This suggests that NFκB expression is increased in apoptotic endothelial cells associated with GBS microcolonies.
NFκB triggers transcription of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), an inflammatory mediator associated with meningitis that leads to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and endothelial cell death [49, 50]. To detect ROS, we used the live cell stain CellROX, which fluoresces upon interaction with ROS [51]. In larvae infected with 100 CFU GBS-eBFP, CellROX staining revealed a significantly higher proportion of ROS-positive endothelial cells (77%) compared to uninfected vessels (23%) (Fig 5H and 5I). Infected vessels contained more CellROX-positive puncta surrounding the vessel compared to uninfected vessels (Figs 5H, white arrowhead, and S4A). These findings suggest that GBS infection induces ROS production in endothelial cells and the surrounding tissue, contributing to the pro-inflammatory and oxidative environment in brain blood vessels during infection. The increased NFκB signaling observed in infected vessels correlates with elevated oxidative stress, suggesting that GBS infection leads to endothelial cell death and facilitates bacterial entry into the brain.
Given the upregulation of NFκB in infected vessels, we next assessed the downstream production of pro-inflammatory transcripts in the head of infected zebrafish larvae. To determine which meningitis-associated transcripts were upregulated in humans and zebrafish, we isolated RNA from the head versus body of larvae infected with 100 CFU GBS-GFP. All transcripts identified in human meningitis cerebrospinal fluid were upregulated in GBS-infected larvae at the time when GBS enters the brain (18-24 hpi), including tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-8 (IL-8), granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP9), matrix metalloproteinase-13 (MMP13) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) [45, 46] (Fig 5J to 5P). Transcript expression followed two distinct patterns: upregulation in just the head (Fig 5J to 5M), or upregulation in the body and head (Fig 5N to 5P). Several immune markers were upregulated in the head more than the body at 18-24 hpi, including G-CSF (zebrafish csf3b), IL-8 (zebrafish cxcl8a), IL-1β and MPO (Fig 5J to 5M). Transcripts upregulated in both the body and head of infected larvae include TNF, MMP9, and MMP13 (Fig 5N to 5P). Head-specific upregulation of meningitis-associated transcripts likely exacerbates endothelial cell inflammation and death, promoting GBS entry into the brain. These findings highlight two key points: first, they identify potential mediators of inflammatory vessel injury during GBS brain infection; second, they underscore the similarities between the transcriptional responses to GBS in humans and zebrafish. The head-specific upregulation of these meningitis-associated transcripts likely exacerbates endothelial cell inflammation and death, thereby facilitating GBS crossing the BBB.
GBS microcolonies distort vessels and form obstructions
Vessel dilation and constriction have been observed in human meningitis patients and rat models [6, 52]. Although it is unclear when this occurs during infection, rats infected with GBS had neuronal injury and cell death near sites of vascular dilation and constriction [6, 52]. We observed the same changes in zebrafish. Infected vessels exhibited a significantly larger diameter (11.6 µm) than uninfected contralateral vessels (5.7 µm) (Fig 6A and 6B). In contrast, directly adjacent to the microcolony site, infected vessels had a significantly smaller diameter (3.5 µm) than uninfected vessels (5.8 µm) (Fig 6A and 6C). Timelapse imaging revealed that infected vessels increased in diameter over time, compared to the uninfected vessel which maintained a constant diameter (Figs 6D, and movie S1). These findings indicate that GBS infection causes vessel distortion, highlighting the similarities in infection of zebrafish larvae and mammals [6, 52].
Ischemic stroke occurs in 15-37% of meningitis patients when an obstruction blocks brain blood vessels, leading to significant neurological injury and potentially death [6, 53–56]. These obstructions are often associated with thrombi containing blood cells and platelets [57]. In Gata1:dsRed transgenic larvae with fluorescent red blood cells [58], we frequently observed that red blood cells stop circulating and adhere to GBS microcolonies (Fig 6E). Similarly, in CD41:GFP transgenic larvae with fluorescent platelets [59], platelets attached to some GBS microcolonies (Fig 6F). On average, 7% of microcolonies resulted in obstructed vessels per larval brain (Fig S5A). Furthermore, injected fluorescent dextran failed to perfuse beyond the GBS microcolony, indicating interrupted flow of blood and other luminal contents (Fig 6E and 6F). These findings suggest that vessel obstructions resembling thrombi can occur in the brain as a result of GBS infection, contributing to the occurrence of ischemic-like events.
To assess the role of thrombus formation in GBS infection, we employed the anticoagulant drug warfarin, commonly used to prevent thrombosis in humans [60] and zebrafish [61, 62]. After confirming the dose of warfarin to use in zebrafish larvae (Fig S5B), we assessed its efficacy by quantifying the number of vascular obstructions (GBS microcolonies with trapped red blood cells) and found fewer obstructions in warfarin-treated larvae (Fig 6G and 6H). Total body bacterial burden was lower in warfarin-treated larvae (Fig 6I), suggesting that warfarin limits GBS replication or survival in vivo. At 18-24 hpi, we observed GBS-GFP entering the brain by escaping brain blood vessels at microcolony sites (Fig 6J). Paradoxically, GBS entered the brain more rapidly in warfarin-treated larvae despite lower overall burden (Fig 6K). Accordingly, infected larvae treated with warfarin had higher mortality than untreated larvae (Fig 6L). Despite the decreased GBS-GFP body burden, mortality increased in warfarin-treated larvae. These results suggest that while warfarin reduces thrombus formation and bacterial burden, the inability to form thrombi is associated with increased GBS brain entry and higher mortality. This implies that proper clotting homeostasis may play a protective role by delaying GBS entry into the brain, and that thrombosis might serve as a host defense mechanism during GBS infection.
Streptococcus pneumoniae perforates blood vessels to invade the brain
Our data thus far have focused on GBS. However, it remains unclear whether a lysis mechanism is shared by other streptococci that cause meningitis. To test this, we infected zebrafish larvae with a meningitis-associated strain of Streptococcus pneumoniae (SPN), a major cause of bacterial meningitis in humans [63–66]. Two mechanisms of brain entry have been suggested for SPN: (1) crossing human brain microvascular endothelial cells by transcytosis, or (2) pneumolysin-mediated disruption of the BBB [67–69]. We observed that SPN-GFP caused diffuse microcolony formation in the brain by 24 hpi (Fig 7A and 7B), where vessel diameter was increased (Fig 7B and 7C). After finding perforations and bead leakage at the microcolony site (Fig 7E, 7D, and 7F), we stained with Annexin V and found increased staining in endothelial cells, similar to GBS infection (Fig 7G and 7H). These results suggest that the endothelial cell death pathway identified for GBS also occurs in other streptococci that cause meningitis.
Discussion
The zebrafish model provided novel insights into the in vivo mechanisms of GBS and SPN brain invasion [1, 13, 15, 30]. Contrary to in vitro data [1, 13, 15, 30], our findings suggest that GBS enters the brain primarily through vessel perforation and endothelial cell death. Brain entry is independent of the primary GBS cytolysin, cylE, indicating that another cytolysin or the host’s immune responses, particularly those downstream of NFκB signaling, contribute to endothelial cell death. Furthermore, the rapid escape of circulating beads through vessel perforations suggests that, in addition to bacteria, vessel contents escape into the brain, potentially leading to increased inflammation, cell death, and neuronal injury [70].
Our findings in GBS-infected zebrafish recapitulate features of human GBS meningitis. In zebrafish, GBS infection induced brain blood vessel dilation and constriction at the site of the microcolony. Human patients exhibit the same vessel changes, although it is unclear if this is specifically associated with GBS bacteria in the vessel [6, 52]. Inflammatory mediators upregulated in zebrafish, including TNF, IL-1β, and G-CSF, parallel those found in human cerebrospinal fluid during meningitis [45, 46]. Later in human disease, ischemic stroke is a major contributor to meningitis mortality [6, 53]. The presence of vessel obstructions associated with GBS suggests the occurrence of ischemic-like events in infected zebrafish, which further mirrors the pathophysiology of human meningitis [53–55]. Finally, GBS exited the zebrafish leptomeningeal vessels first, consistent with the pattern of early infection of the meninges and subarachnoid space observed in human GBS meningitis [40]. These findings illustrate the similar response to GBS brain infection in zebrafish and humans.
Several mechanisms have been proposed for how GBS enters into the brain in vivo, including transcytosis, weakening of tight junctions, and the Trojan Horse route [1]. In vitro studies have shown that GBS can infect HBMECs and reside within membrane-bound vacuoles, suggesting transcytosis [13, 71]. However, in zebrafish, we did not observe endothelial cell infection, with GBS microcolonies forming exclusively extracellularly. This could be due to the downregulation of transcytosis in brain endothelial cells in vivo, compared to in vitro [72]. Another hypothesis is that GBS enters the brain by disrupting the tight junctions between endothelial cells. However, we found that GBS infection of vessels led to endothelial cell perforation and death, rather than passing between endothelial cells. Finally, a mouse study demonstrated that GBS and SPN can hijack signaling through calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor activity modifying protein 1 (CGRP-RAMP1) in meningeal macrophages, helping to facilitate invasion of the meninges [15]. However, infected macrophages were not observed carrying bacteria across the BBB. Consistent with this, we find that GBS enters the brain through blood vessels in the meninges, without evidence of brain invasion via infected macrophages [15, 42].
Several bacterial factors have been implicated in the interaction between GBS and host molecules, including lipoteichoic acid [30], serine-rich repeat (Srr) proteins [73], streptococcal fibronectin-binding protein (SfbA) [74], alpha C protein [75], pili proteins [76], and hypervirulent GBS adhesin [77]. Lipoteichoic acid, in particular, has been shown to contribute to brain invasion in both zebrafish and mouse models, as evidenced by reduced brain infection observed with the ΔiagA mutant, which lacks this cell wall component [30]. However, our findings suggest that the iagA mutant may be attenuated for brain infection due to its reduced survival in vivo, rather than a brain-specific defect. GBS proteins SfbA and Srr, which bind to fibronectin and fibrinogen respectively, have been implicated in promoting brain invasion in mice [73, 74]. Fibronectin and fibrinogen contribute to the structural integrity of thrombi, which are often associated with meningitis and negatively affect patient outcomes [78]. We show that warfarin, an anticoagulant, reduces thrombosis and GBS burden in the body. This suggests that GBS embedded in thrombi are more likely to survive in the bloodstream, where they are protected from circulating components of the immune system. Given the association of GBS with thrombi, SfbA and Srr may indirectly promote brain invasion by binding fibronectin and fibrinogen in thrombi. Paradoxically, inhibition of clotting by warfarin increased brain invasion and mortality. This may be explained by the release of GBS from thrombi into the circulation by warfarin, making the bacteria more susceptible to killing in the blood but also more available to attach to endothelial cells of the BBB.
One primary GBS factor that has been implicated in brain invasion is the beta-haemolysin/cytolysin cylE that is important for lysing various cell types [44]. However, we observed robust lysis of BBB endothelial cells and effective GBS brain entry by the ΔcylE mutant, suggesting that cylE is not necessary for brain invasion in vivo. While the cylE lysin is not involved in this process, another lysin, such as Christie Atkins Munch-Petersen (CAMP), may contribute to endothelial cell death [79–81].
Our data suggest that key mediators of cell death originate from host immune responses at the site of infection. This aligns with studies on Gram-negative bacteria, where BBB breakdown is mediated by pro-inflammatory Gasdermin D, a host-derived pore-forming protein that induces plasma membrane permeabilization and death in brain endothelial cells [82, 83]. Accordingly, we observed the induction of inflammation in infected vessels and zebrafish heads, including mediators produced as a result of NFκB signaling. Increased TNF, which we detected in the head and body of infected larvae, increases NFκB expression and can induce cell death [84–87]. As a transcription factor, NFκB induces expression of IL-8, G-CSF, MMP9, and IL-1β, which can trigger cell death or BBB breakdown [86–98]. Therefore, BBB endothelial cells both produce and are susceptible to inflammatory mediators during GBS infection, which can drive cell death and promote bacterial entry into the brain. This raises the possibility that host-directed therapies aimed at attenuating the inflammatory impact of these mediators, such as the NFκB inhibitors, auranofin and memantine, could be an effective strategy for improving patient outcomes in GBS meningitis [49, 99].
Our research sheds light on the initial stages of streptococcal interaction with endothelial cells in vivo, and the route through which these bacteria infiltrate the brain. Perturbation and leakage of the BBB, a hallmark of bacterial meningitis, is also a feature of more common neurological disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease [88, 100]. Activation of the brain’s immune system resulting from BBB leakage is crucial to the early pathogenesis of these disorders, and in bacterial meningitis. By identifying early, conserved immune mechanisms and the strategies that bacteria use to invade the brain, our work supports the development of effective neuroinflammation therapies [101]. Moreover, our study not only offers a deeper understanding of the early responses of the BBB to streptococcal infection but also establishes an experimental platform for investigating other pathogens that cause meningitis.
Materials and Methods
Zebrafish husbandry and infections
Zebrafish husbandry and experiments were conducted in compliance with guidelines from the U.S. National Institutes of Health and approved by the University of California San Diego Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and the Institutional Biosafety Committee of the University of California San Diego. Wildtype AB strain zebrafish or transgenics in the AB background were used, including Tg(fliE:GAL4;UAS:dsRed) [33], Tg(fliE:GFP) [33], Tg(flk:GFP) [102], Tg(flk:GAL4;UAS:Lifeact-GFP) [103], Tg(mpeg1:dsred) [35], Tg(flt1: tomato) [32], Tg(gata1:dsRed) [58], Tg(CD41:GFP) [59], Tg(nfkB:GFP) [47], and Tg(lyz:EGFP) [36]. Larvae were anesthetized with 2.8% Syncaine (Syndel Cat# 886-86-2) prior to imaging or infection. Larvae of indeterminate sex were infected by injection of 10nL into the caudal vein at 3 days post fertilization (dpf) using a capillary needle containing bacteria diluted in PBS + 2% phenol red (Sigma #P3532), as previously described [104]. For GBS infections, after caudal vein injections, the same needle was used to inject onto Todd Hewitt (Avantor, Cat# 90003-430) agar plates with erythromycin (Fisher Scientific, Cat# BP920-25) or spectinomycin (Teknova, Cat# S9525) in triplicate to determine colony forming units (CFUs) of the inoculum. For SPN, blood agar plates (Fisher Scientific, Cat# R02019) were used.
When two different bacterial strains were compared for bacterial burden directly, several groups of larvae (n = 20 or more) were infected with different inocula of each strain. On the day of the comparison, equivalently infected groups of larvae were determined by FPC, as described [104], to assure the comparison was not biased by in vivo growth differences between the two strains. ∼100 CFU of wildtype GBS and ∼1000 CFU of SPN were administered to the larvae for experiments unless otherwise specified. After infection, larvae were housed at 28.5°C, in fish water containing ddH2O, 0.25M sodium chloride (JT Baker, Cat# 3628-F7), 0.008M potassium chloride (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat# P3911), 0.016M calcium chloride (G-Biosciences, Cat# RC-030), 0.0165M magnesium sulfate heptahydrate (MP Biomedicals, Cat# 194833), methylene blue chloride (Millipore Sigma, Cat# 284), and 0.003% 1-phenyl-2-thiourea (PTU, Sigma-Aldrich, Cat# 189235) to prevent melanocyte development.
Bacterial strains and growth conditions
The principal wild-type GBS strain used was COH1 (serotype III, sequence type (ST)- 17), isolated from the cerebrospinal fluid of a septic human neonate [28] with proven virulence in murine and zebrafish larvae meningitis models [16, 30, 31]. COH1 and isogenic mutant strains ΔcylE [31, 44] and ΔiagA [30] were either engineered to express GFP from the pDESTerm plasmid [74], or to express mCherry or eBFP from the pBSU101 plasmid [105]. To create the pBSU101-mCherry and pBSU101-BFP plasmids, mCherry and eBFP were PCR amplified with BamH1 and Xbal restriction sites, then ligated into the multiple cloning site of the PBSU101 plasmid. Electrocompetent GBS COH1 cells were prepared by growing GBS in THB+0.6% glycine overnight at 37°C. The cells were pelleted, resuspended in ice-cold 0.625M sucrose (pH 9), pelleted again, and resuspended in ice-cold sucrose buffer (0.625M sucrose + 20% glycerol). The plasmids were transformed into electrocompetent GBS COH1 cells by electroporation. Confirmation of mCherry and eBFP expression in GBS COH1 was done using a fluorescent plate reader and microscope. For GBS infections, typically ∼100 CFUs were injected per larva. All GBS strains were grown at 35-37°C with 5% CO2 in Todd Hewitt Broth or on Todd Hewitt Agar plates. For SPN infections, serotype 2 D39 strain expressing GFP fused to the histone-like protein HlpA was used [65].
Drug treatment
For warfarin experiments, zebrafish larvae were treated with 125µM, 62.5µM, and 31.25µM warfarin (Millipore Sigma, Cat# A2250) in fish water + 0.02M DMSO at 3 dpf to determine the appropriate treatment concentration. For all subsequent experiments, infected and uninfected zebrafish larvae were treated at 3 dpf with 31.25µM warfarin in fish water. To deplete monocytes by lipoclodronate (LC) (Liposoma, Cat# CP-005-005) treatment, zebrafish larvae were injected at 2 dpf with a 1:5 dilution of LC in PBS + 2% phenol red (Millipore Sigma, Cat # P0290) in the caudal vein. Untreated larvae were injected at 2 dpf with PBS + 2% phenol red. FPC was performed at 3 dpf to confirm LC depletion of monocytes by measuring fluorescence in mpeg1:dsRed.
Stains in zebrafish
For experiments involving 0.02 µM beads (ThermoFisher, Cat# F8782), Annexin-V Cy5 (Abcam, Cat# ab14147), Cascade Blue dextran (ThermoFisher, Cat# D1976), or Alexa647 dextran (ThermoFisher, Cat# D22914), the reagent was diluted 1:10 in PBS; for propidium iodide (Cat# P3566), a 1:5 dilution was used; for CellROX (ThermoFisher, Cat# C10422) a 1:5 dilution was used. All reagents were then injected into the caudal vein at the time of imaging.
Real time-PCR
Heads from GBS-infected or PBS-injected (uninfected) zebrafish larvae were removed at 0, 6, 12, 18, or 24 h post-infection (hpi). RNA was extracted from the heads or bodies using Trizol (ThermoFisher, Cat# 15596026), and the larvae were passed through 24-gauge syringe needles. After DNase treatment (ThermoFisher, Cat# 89836) to remove genomic DNA, RNA concentration was determined using spectrophotometry. Equivalent amounts of RNA were used as templates for first-strand cDNA synthesis, performed using the Applied Biosystems High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit and random hexamer primers (Thermo Fisher, Cat# 4368814). Real-time PCR of cDNA was conducted using the 2x AzuraView GreenFast qPCR Blue Mix LR (Azura, Cat# AZ-2301), with fluorescence serving as a measure of transcript abundance. Reactions were carried out on a CFX384 Real-Time System (BioRad). To assess fold change in mRNA abundance, the transcripts were normalized to the housekeeping gene elfA transcript, and each time point was compared to control uninfected cells using the delta-delta-Ct method.
Live confocal imaging and image analysis
For confocal imaging, larvae were embedded in 1.2% low melting-point agarose (Fisher Scientific, Cat# 15-455-202) in a glass bottom plastic dish (WilCo, Cat# GWST-5030) and immersed in water containing 2.8% Syncaine [106]. A series of z stack images with a 0.82-1 µm step size were generated through the brain using the Zeiss LSM 880 laser scanning microscope with an LD C-Apochromat 40x objective. Imaris (Bitplane Scientific Software) was used to measure fluorescence intensity and construct three-dimensional surface renderings [107]. When comparing infected vessels to uninfected vessels, threshold sizes and values were determined using the uninfected vessel and were then applied to the paired (usually contralateral) infected vessel in the same fish. When events were compared between larvae, identical confocal laser settings, software settings, and Imaris surface-rendering algorithms were used. Imaris optical sectioning was employed to detect extracellular GBS. Time lapse movies were captured at 5-minute intervals.
Experimental reproducibility and statistical analysis
Most experiments were repeated 3 times to ensure reproducibility. The number of experimental replicates is indicated in the corresponding figure legend. If no number is listed, the experiment was conducted once. The following statistical analyses were performed using Prism 8 (GraphPad): Student’s and paired t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, Kaplan-Meier test and Fisher’s exact test. The statistical tests used for each figure can be found in the corresponding figure legend. The n values for larvae and microcolonies are given below each corresponding graph.
PCR primer sequences
mCherry+BamH1PBSU Forward: taggatccgaaaggaggcatatcaaaATGGTGAGCAAG
mCherry+XbalPBSU Reverse: gctctagaCTACTTGTACAGCTCGTCCATGCCGCC
eBFP+BamH1PBSU Forward: atggatcctatgaaaggaggcatatcaaaatggtgagcaag
eBFP+XbalPBSU Reverse: gctctagattacttgtacagctcgtccatgccgagagt
qPCR Primer sequences
TNF
F- GCGCTTTTCTGAATCCTACG
R- TGCCCAGTCTGTCTCCTTCT
IL1B
F- TGAGCTACAGATGCGACATGC
R- TCAGGGCGATGATGACGTTC
MMP9
F- CTTCTGGAGACTTGATGTAAAGGC
R- AAT CAA CGG GCA CTC CAC CG
MMP13
F: ATGGTGCAAGGCTATCCCAAGAGT
R: GCCTGTTGTTGGAGCCAAACTCAA
MPO
F- AGGCTCAGCAACACCTCCTA
R- AGGGCGTGACCATGCTATAC
Cxcl8a
F- AGCCGACGCATTGGAAAACA
R- CCAGTTGTCATCAAGGTGGCAA
Csf3b
F- GGATTTAACACTGGAGGAGCGTG
R- GCGAGGTCGTTCAGTAGGTTC
Elf1a
F- GGAGACTGGTGTCCTCAA
R- GGTGCATCTCAACAGACTT
Supplemental Figures
Supplemental movies
Supplemental movie S1. Time-lapse confocal imaging of a brain blood vessel from a 3 dpi larva with red vasculature infected with GBS-GFP. Images acquired every 5 minutes for 8 hours. Scale bar = 70 µm.
Acknowledgements
We thank L. Ramakrishnan for discussion and guidance throughout the project and advice and for critical review of the paper and M. Reitano, W. Morrill, and the University of California, San Diego aquatics facility staff for zebrafish husbandry.
References
- 1.↵
- 2.↵
- 3.↵
- 4.↵
- 5.↵
- 6.↵
- 7.↵
- 8.↵
- 9.↵
- 10.↵
- 11.↵
- 12.↵
- 13.↵
- 14.↵
- 15.↵
- 16.↵
- 17.↵
- 18.↵
- 19.↵
- 20.↵
- 21.↵
- 22.↵
- 23.↵
- 24.↵
- 25.↵
- 26.↵
- 27.↵
- 28.↵
- 29.↵
- 30.↵
- 31.↵
- 32.↵
- 33.↵
- 34.↵
- 35.↵
- 36.↵
- 37.↵
- 38.↵
- 39.↵
- 40.↵
- 41.↵
- 42.↵
- 43.↵
- 44.↵
- 45.↵
- 46.↵
- 47.↵
- 48.↵
- 49.↵
- 50.↵
- 51.↵
- 52.↵
- 53.↵
- 54.
- 55.↵
- 56.↵
- 57.↵
- 58.↵
- 59.↵
- 60.↵
- 61.↵
- 62.↵
- 63.↵
- 64.
- 65.↵
- 66.↵
- 67.↵
- 68.
- 69.↵
- 70.↵
- 71.↵
- 72.↵
- 73.↵
- 74.↵
- 75.↵
- 76.↵
- 77.↵
- 78.↵
- 79.↵
- 80.
- 81.↵
- 82.↵
- 83.↵
- 84.↵
- 85.
- 86.↵
- 87.↵
- 88.↵
- 89.
- 90.
- 91.
- 92.
- 93.
- 94.
- 95.
- 96.
- 97.
- 98.↵
- 99.↵
- 100.↵
- 101.↵
- 102.↵
- 103.↵
- 104.↵
- 105.↵
- 106.↵
- 107.↵