Abstract
Background Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has transformed the treatment landscape of hematologic cancers by engineering T cells to specifically target and destroy cancer cells. Monitoring CAR T cell activity and function is essential for optimizing therapeutic outcomes, but existing tools for CAR detection are often limited in specificity and functional assessment capability.
Methods We developed antigen-dextramers by conjugating multiple CAR-specific antigens to a dextran backbone. The dextramers were compared to previously reported antigen-tetramers for their ability to stain and detect CAR T cells. Because these multimers incorporate the CAR target antigen, they uniquely enable assessment of CAR T cell functionality by facilitating binding and activation analyses. We tested the staining and functional properties of the multimers across a range of CAR constructs with different affinities, using flow cytometry, microscopy, and NFAT-luciferase reporter assays.
Results The antigen-dextramers demonstrated high specificity and sensitivity in staining CAR T cells, with adjustable antigen density to optimize binding. Antigen-dextramers also enabled effective clustering and subsequent activation of CARs, showing their utility as both a staining and functional assessment tool. The dextramers revealed that CARs with different affinities and clustering tendencies displayed varied binding and activation in response to different antigen densities.
Conclusion Antigen-dextramers offer a dual advantage as versatile reagents for both staining and functional analysis of CAR T cells. Their capacity to engage CARs with the specific antigen provides a valuable platform for evaluating CAR functionality, informing CAR design improvements, and enhancing therapeutic precision.
Competing Interest Statement
SRH is the co-inventer of patents (EP2017/083862 and EP3810188A1); further, SRH is the co-inventor of patents WO2015185067 and WO2015188839 for the barcoded MHC technology that is licensed to Immudex. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest in the context of the present study.