ABSTRACT
Age-related neurodegenerative diseases involve reduced cell numbers and impaired behavioral capacity. Neurodegeneration and behavioral deficits also occur during aging, and notably in the absence of disease. The cerebellum, which modulates movement and cognition, is susceptible to cell loss in both aging and disease. Here, we demonstrate that cerebellar Purkinje cell loss in aged mice is not spatially random but rather occurs in a pattern of parasagittal stripes. We also find that aged mice exhibit impaired motor coordination and more severe tremor compared to younger mice. However, the relationship between patterned Purkinje cell loss and motor dysfunction is not straightforward. Examination of postmortem samples of human cerebella from neurologically typical individuals supports the presence of selective loss of Purkinje cells during aging. These data reveal a spatiotemporal cellular substrate for aging in the cerebellum that may inform about how neuronal vulnerability leads to neurodegeneration and the ensuing deterioration of behavior.
INTRODUCTION
In addition to its well-known roles in motor function, the cerebellum is also involved in cognitive functions that include executive function, visuospatial memory, language, and emotional processing1–11. Accordingly, the cerebellum is a major culprit in movement disorders12–27, and it likely also contributes to autism spectrum disorders28–34, sleep disturbances35–39, and schizophrenia40–42. Despite the prevalence of cerebellar involvement in disease, the cerebellum is often overlooked in the context of aging. This omission has not gone unnoticed, with recent arguments for incorporating the cerebellum into our understanding of brain aging, which has historically focused on the cerebral cortex and hippocampus43. In support of this hypothesis, motor and cognitive behaviors are often impaired during normal aging. The decline in these behaviors may be accompanied by cerebellar pathology, such as variations in cerebellar volume and alterations in its circuit connectivity44–46. Therefore, the cerebellum is a potentially critical model system for better understanding structure, function, and behavior of the brain during aging.
Although neurodegeneration is associated with disease pathogenesis, cerebellar degeneration can also occur during aging in the absence of disease. Elderly patients have decreased cerebellar volume compared to young patients47–50, and longitudinal studies have shown decreased cerebellar volume in healthy older individuals over time51–55. At the cellular level, otherwise healthy aged patients have significantly decreased Purkinje cell density56–58. Depending on severity, age-related cerebellar atrophy can have detrimental and often debilitating effects on motor function. For example, decreased cerebellar volume in the elderly is correlated with impaired eyeblink conditioning, a cerebellum-dependent associative learning task, as well as slower gait and impaired balance, two aspects of motor function that involve the cerebellum59,60. Furthermore, there are reported structure-function relationships between the volume of specific cerebellar regions and the performance of sensorimotor tasks in young and old participants61. These results suggest that cerebellar atrophy is associated with deficits in cerebellum-related functions during normal aging. However, the nature of this structure-function relationship is poorly understood.
Similar to humans, control mice and rats also experience Purkinje cell loss during aging62–71, as well as motor dysfunction. At around 12 months of age, mice begin to display impaired performance on the rotarod task, a test of motor coordination and motor learning72–74, as well as impaired eyeblink conditioning73, now a classical test for Pavlovian learning. Interestingly, there is evidence to suggest that mice have significantly decreased Purkinje cell numbers starting at 18 months, corresponding with impaired delay eyeblink conditioning75. These studies suggest that cerebellum-associated motor function declines with age in mice and that this decline may be accompanied by Purkinje cell loss. However, the precise regionality of the cerebellum was not considered in these studies, and we argue that age-related changes follow a fundamental scheme.
Compared to the patterned Purkinje cell loss reported in different disease models, relatively little is known about how Purkinje cell loss affects different regions of the cerebellum during normal aging. Neuroimaging in humans has revealed that cerebellar volume in different lobules can be differentially affected by aging47,55,61,76–79. However, a closer examination of any region-specific cellular differences is lacking. Other studies have found minimal regional differences beyond the observation that most age-related Purkinje cell loss seems to occur in the anterior cerebellum56,57. In fact, multiple studies have found that Purkinje cell loss is uniform across the latero-lateral extent of the cerebellar cortex62–66,69. However, cerebellar organization and patterning are much more complex than the broad medio-lateral and anterior-posterior differences can account for.
The cerebellum is highly compartmentalized on multiple levels as determined by genetics and developmental, anatomical, and electrophysiological studies. Based on development and gene expression boundaries, the cerebellum can be divided into transverse zones: the anterior (lobules I-V), central (lobules VI and VII), posterior (lobule VIII and anterior lobule IX), and nodular zones (posterior lobule IX and lobule X)80. Within each transverse zone, subpopulations of Purkinje cells are divided into stripes based on gene expression patterns, which differ between transverse zones81–87. Numerous stripe markers exist, with overlapping, partially overlapping, or unique expression patterns. The most well-studied stripe marker is zebrin II88–90, the expression pattern of which is remarkably consistent from animal to animal and conserved across mammals91,92. The identity of individual Purkinje cells, which can express different combinations of patterned markers, is established when each Purkinje cell is born93–96, although the exact relationship between developmental Purkinje cell clusters and adult stripes has been only partially resolved97. The cerebellar stripe patterns represent one component of a greater network architecture. For example, longitudinal groups of Purkinje cells are related in the rostrocaudal axis based on specific inputs from the inferior olive through climbing fibers and specific outputs to the cerebellar nuclei through the Purkinje cell axons98. Each longitudinal zone together with its efferent and afferent pathways comprises a functional unit referred to as a cerebellar module99. Based on these overlapping levels of organization, the cerebellum is predicted to be composed of hundreds or thousands of modules. This hypothesis posits that the multiple maps of cerebellar compartmentation that are visualized with different approaches comprise a single overarching map, with alignment between zones, stripes, and modules98. Here, we wondered whether the patterns that are revealed by stripe markers reflect a map of Purkinje cell degeneration and eventual cell loss with age and if there is a functional significance to this patterned cellular demise.
To test for and investigate the potential contribution of patterned Purkinje cell loss to aging in mice, we used a combination of wholemount immunohistochemistry100,101 and analysis of Purkinje cell patterns on histological tissue slices. These techniques enabled us to visualize Purkinje cells across the surfaces of entire cerebella of normal aged mice and examine their cellular level changes, respectively. We also used genetically driven fluorescent reporter labeling to specifically label Purkinje cells. Using these techniques, we uncovered that some, but not all, aged mice have Purkinje cell loss that occurs in a pattern of parasagittal stripes. In addition, upon immunostaining coronal sections of cerebellar tissue, we found that the pattern of age-related Purkinje cell loss is unique compared to the most common patterns of Purkinje cell loss that have been reported in numerous mouse models of disease. Behavioral tests revealed deficits in motor function in aged mice compared to young mice. Finally, we observed significant Purkinje cell degeneration in postmortem tissue obtained from neurologically normal humans. We therefore have three key findings to report in this series of studies: 1) Purkinje cell degeneration and cell loss is a prominent feature of the otherwise healthy aging mouse cerebellum, 2) Purkinje cell loss during normal aging in mice does not occur in a random manner and instead occurs in an array of parasagittal stripes that reflect the normal developmental, anatomical, and functional topography of the mammalian cerebellum, and 3) this mode of patterned cell loss may be conserved and reflect a fundamental heterogeneity of the human cerebellum that distinguishes cells that are vulnerable versus resistant to deterioration in health and disease. Together, these data underscore the potential clinical significance of our findings of patterned Purkinje cell degeneration and loss in normal aging mice, as they may inform on the design and development of effective therapies for specific neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions that are defined by compromised cerebellar structure and function.
RESULTS
Adult-onset neurodegeneration typically impacts specific regions of the brain. For instance, in diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease, neurodegeneration affects the cortex and basal ganglia, resulting in defective cognitive versus motor circuits, respectively. A similar phenomenon occurs during normal aging, as certain brain regions are more susceptible to degeneration102. Interestingly, the cerebellum is a target in age-related degeneration, and its cellular demise can lead to both cognitive and motor impairments. We examine whether different populations of cells are more susceptible than others. What dictates this regional vulnerability and whether these processes and sensitive neuronal subpopulations are the same across different diseases and typical aging is unknown. To begin to address this problem, here we sought to test whether cerebellar Purkinje cell loss follows a region-specific pattern during normal aging.
Aged mice have Purkinje cell loss that occurs in parasagittal stripes
We started by asking whether normal mice exhibit patterned Purkinje cell loss during aging. Previous studies have relied on tissue sections alone for identifying the presence of degeneration and cell loss, although studying the complexity of the cerebellum on individual slices limits one’s ability to visualize topographic patterns. In our study, to test whether age-related Purkinje cell loss is indeed patterned, we examined a total of 49 cerebella from aged mice (between 13 and 25 months of age; Table 1). We used a combination of techniques to visualize Purkinje cells, including wholemount immunohistochemistry100,101 with calbindin antibodies (n=5), wholemount and light sheet imaging of a Purkinje cell-specific reporter in transgenic mice (n=19 and n=2, respectively), and histology of coronal tissue sections (n=31; Table 1). Using these techniques, we observed that Purkinje cell loss across the cerebella of aged mice is not uniform, as has been previously reported62–66,69, but forms a pattern of Purkinje cell loss. Importantly, the pattern was composed of parasagittal stripes that are symmetrical about the midline. In the calbindin-labeled wholemount cerebella, the stripes appeared as alternating dark stripes of surviving Purkinje cells and light stripes where Purkinje cells have presumably degenerated (Fig. 1A). The stripes were visible in the anterior, central, and posterior zones of the cerebellum, as well as in the paraflocculi. Closer inspection of the wholemount cerebella revealed the shapes of individual Purkinje cells within the dark stripes, with the dendrites and cell bodies clearly visible (Fig. 1B). Purkinje cell axons with torpedoes, a pathological sign of Purkinje cell neurodegeneration in disease103 and normal aging104, were also observed in wholemount cerebella (Fig. 1B). The presence of the axonal pathology suggests that the observed Purkinje cell loss in aged mice may be due to and potentially accompanied by a process of neurodegeneration that causes cell loss over time.
A) Wholemount cerebellum of a 16-month-old mouse immunostained for calbindin and viewed from different angles. D = dorsal; L = lateral; V = ventral; A = anterior; P = posterior. Scale bar = 2 mm. B) High-magnification images of Purkinje cells in the wholemount cerebellum of an aged mouse. Dotted lines indicate stripes of surviving Purkinje cells, and the white arrowhead indicates an axonal torpedo. C) Schematic of the pattern of age-related Purkinje cell loss based on wholemount cerebella, where dark gray stripes represent bands largely composed of surviving Purkinje cells and white stripes represent bands where most Purkinje cells have degenerated. Cerebellar lobules are labeled with Roman numerals. D-I) Wholemount cerebella of mice immuno-stained for calbindin and viewed from the anterior zone: D) 2-month-old mouse; E) 15-month-old mouse without Purkinje cell loss; F) 23-month-old mouse without Purkinje cell loss; G) 14-month-old mouse with striped Purkinje cell loss; H) 15-month-old mouse with striped Purkinje cell loss; I) 16-month-old mouse with striped Purkinje cell loss. Asterisks indicate staining artifacts, and arrows indicate bands of surviving Purkinje cells that are consistent across mice with striped Purkinje cell loss. D = dorsal; L = lateral; V = ventral. Cerebellar lobules are labeled with Roman numerals.
Mice from the same litter are indicated with the same letter.
We observed considerable variability in terms of Purkinje cell loss in the aged mice. Some aged mice displayed a lack of Purkinje cell loss comparable to young control mice, even at 23 months of age (Fig. 1D-F). Of the 49 aged cerebella examined, 19 lacked appreciable Purkinje cell loss, 23 had clearly striped Purkinje cell loss, and 7 had Purkinje cell loss that did not appear striped (Table 1). This discrepancy in the loss of Purkinje cells is not due solely to relative age, as a 14- month-old cerebellum had striped Purkinje cell loss (Fig. 1G), whereas a 23-month-old cerebellum did not (Fig. 1F; Table 1). Despite this, when striped Purkinje cell loss did occur in the aged mice, the neurodegeneration appears progressive, meaning that older aged mice tend to display more widespread Purkinje cell loss compared to younger aged mice (Fig. 1G-I). Aged mice with striped Purkinje cell loss consistently displayed the same pattern of neurodegeneration (Fig. 1G-I). Therefore, Purkinje cells that are more susceptible to age-related neurodegeneration may belong to the same subpopulation–and have the same identity–across different mice.
Of the 49 aged mice whose cerebella were examined, 30 were male and 19 were female. Eleven of the 19 aged female mice and 12 of the 30 aged male mice had striped Purkinje cell loss (Table 1, Supplementary Fig. 1). Analysis of the data with Fisher’s exact test revealed that the presence of striped Purkinje cell loss is not sex dependent. However, a greater percentage of the aged females displayed Purkinje cell loss compared to the aged males (Supplementary Fig. 1), suggesting that females may be more susceptible to Purkinje cell loss during aging. Overall, these results suggest that there is considerable variability in the spatiotemporal features of Purkinje cell degeneration and eventual cell loss and their associated pattern among aged mice.
Interestingly, among the mice born in the same litter, we found that one littermate could have striped Purkinje cell loss while the other littermate did not (Fig. 1E and H). This observation was especially evident as observed on surface mapping using the wholemount immunohistochemical staining approach (Fig. 1). This difference in cell loss was observed in five sets of littermates, with each set from a different litter (Table 1). This data suggests that even genetically similar mice raised in the same cage can display dramatic differences in age-related neurodegeneration.
Taken together, these findings suggest that 1) Purkinje cell subpopulations are differentially vulnerable to death during normal aging; 2) the loss of Purkinje cells, according to age-related vulnerability, can result specifically in a striking pattern of parasagittal stripes; and 3) the presence or absence of striped Purkinje cell loss in aged mice is not driven solely by sex or relative age.
Age-related Purkinje cell loss is due to neurodegeneration and the loss of cells
In mouse models with neurodegenerative ataxia, calbindin and other Purkinje cell-specific genes and proteins are downregulated prior to the onset of motor dysfunction and Purkinje cell loss105,106. This molecular signature raises the possibility that the indication of Purkinje cell loss revealed by antibody staining may in fact be the result of reduced Purkinje cell marker expression rather than neurodegeneration. To distinguish between these possibilities, we tested whether Purkinje cells in aged mice were degenerating. First, we observed common hallmarks of Purkinje cell neurodegeneration, such as thickened axons, axonal torpedoes, and shrunken dendritic arbors, in aged mice (n=8) but not in young mice (n=5; Fig. 2A and B). Quantification of molecular layer thickness in lobule VIII revealed that aged mice with striped Purkinje cell loss have significantly thinner molecular layers compared to young mice (Fig. 2C), likely due to the regressed dendrites of degenerating Purkinje cells. We also confirmed whether the pattern of Purkinje cell loss was the same using two different calbindin antibodies (young n=4, aged n=6; Supplementary Fig. 2).
A) Coronal cerebellar tissue sections of lobule III immunostained for calbindin. Black arrowheads indicate thickened axons, and pink arrowheads indicate axonal torpedoes. Dashed lines indicate the Purkinje cell layer (PCL). Scale bar = 100 μm. B) Coronal cerebellar tissue sections of lobule VIII immunostained for calbindin. Asterisks indicate shrunken dendritic arbors. Scale bar = 100 μm. C) Quantification of molecular layer thickness in lobule VIII; *** indicates p ≤ 0.001. D) Coronal cerebellar tissue sections either stained with Neutral Red or immunostained for calbindin and stained with Neutral Red. Asterisks indicate Purkinje cell bodies. Scale bar = 100 μm; inset scale bar = 50 μm.
Second, to verify that the loss of Purkinje cells was not due to downregulation of calbindin specifically, we used Neutral Red, a dye that stains lysosomes, to label surviving cells in cerebellar tissue107. Adjacent tissue sections were immunostained for calbindin and/or stained with Neutral Red to locate regions with striped Purkinje cell loss. In the aged mice (n=6), regions of the Purkinje cell and molecular layers without calbindin staining, which indicated missing Purkinje cells, also lacked Neutral Red-positive cell bodies, which based on their morphology were easily distinguished from other cell types by their size and position in young mice (n=6; Fig. 2D).
Third, to verify the presence of striped Purkinje cell degeneration during normal aging, we used adult Purkinje cell-specific fluorescent reporter mice, which express a fluorescent reporter specifically in all Purkinje cells. These mice present two advantages for visualizing age-related Purkinje cell loss: 1) Cre expression begins on E17 and continues until all Purkinje cells express Cre in adulthood108, meaning that even if Pcp2 gene and protein expression are downregulated in advanced age109 or prior to neurodegeneration106, reporter expression will remain constant as it would have already been activated in all Purkinje cells and its perdurance would allow continued marking of the recombined cells; and 2) Purkinje cell-specific reporter expression allows for the visualization of Purkinje cells without relying on calbindin, which can be downregulated with advanced age109–111 or prior to neurodegeneration105,106. We found that the cerebella of young Purkinje cell-specific fluorescent reporter mice (n=4) displayed uniform reporter expression across the surface, whereas the cerebella of aged Purkinje cell-specific fluorescent reporter mice (n=13) displayed reporter expression in alternating parasagittal bands of greater and lesser intensity (Fig. 3A and B). Furthermore, middle-aged mice (11-15 months old; n=4) tended to have less pronounced bands compared to mice 16 months and older, which had clearer, more widespread bands (Fig. 3A and B), suggesting a progression of Purkinje cell loss with advanced age. The cerebella of middle-aged mice have striped reporter expression in the anterior zone, large regions with reduced reporter expression in the medial vermis and paravermis, and alternating bands in lobule VIII (Fig. 3A and B), suggesting that age-related Purkinje cell loss may begin in these regions before spreading with advancing age. To confirm that the Purkinje cell-specific reporter expression and the calbindin wholemount staining reflected the same pattern, we co-stained coronal cerebellar tissue sections of Purkinje cell-specific fluorescent reporter mice for calbindin and GFP. In young mice, both calbindin and GFP were expressed in all Purkinje cells (n=3), and in aged mice, calbindin and GFP were expressed in identical, overlapping stripes (n=5; Fig. 3D) that reflected the pattern of age-related Purkinje cell loss. This indicates that the pattern of age-related Purkinje cell loss revealed with calbindin wholemount staining matches the pattern that was observed with reporter expression in Purkinje cell-specific fluorescent reporter mice.
A) Wholemount cerebella of Purkinje cell-specific fluorescent reporter mice visualized with blue light and viewed from different angles. Cerebellar lobules are labeled with Roman numerals. D = dorsal; L = lateral; V = ventral; A = anterior; P = posterior. B) Schematics of the dorsal view of cerebella from young, middle-aged, and older Purkinje cell-specific fluorescent reporter mice. Lighter colors indicate less intense reporter expression. C) Schematics of sagittal sections of the cerebellum and a wholemount cerebellum indicating the location of tissue sections. Dashed lines indicate the position and angle of tissue sections. D) Coronal cerebellar tissue sections of Purkinje cell-specific fluorescent reporter mice immunostained for calbindin and GFP. Dashed lines indicate boundaries between surviving Purkinje cells and degenerating Purkinje cells. Scale bar = 250 μm; inset scale bar = 100 μm.
A combination of dynamic calbindin expression and staining artifacts can affect the appearance of Purkinje cells even in the absence of Purkinje cell loss. We observed striped calbindin expression in both young and aged C57Bl/J6 control mice (Supplementary Fig. 3A), possibly due to calcium dynamics. We confirmed that these stripes were not due to widespread Purkinje cell loss by staining adjacent tissue sections with Neutral Red, which revealed that the Purkinje cell bodies were still present (Supplementary Fig. 3A). In addition, in young and aged cerebellar tissue from C57Bl/J6 mice, the Purkinje cell dendrites span the molecular layer (Supplementary Fig. 3A and B), whereas in degenerating tissue, shrunken dendrites, thickened axons, and torpedoes can be observed (Fig. 2A and B). Previous studies have shown that calbindin mRNA and protein are reduced in the cerebella of aged mice, rats, and humans110,111, and reduced calbindin immunoreactivity was observed in surviving Purkinje cells in aged rats and in patients with spinocerebellar degeneration112,113. Therefore, we argue that calbindin expression alone is not a reliable, sufficient indicator of Purkinje cell loss and should be supplemented with other histological and labeling techniques. Staining artifacts can also give the false appearance of Purkinje cell absence, but background staining or Neutral Red can reveal the Purkinje cells (Supplementary Fig. 3B). For this reason, we used multiple methods to visualize Purkinje cell degeneration and loss. Degenerative Purkinje cell pathology, multiple antibodies, Neutral Red staining, and a Purkinje cell-specific genetically driven fluorescent reporter confirmed that the striped cellular pattern we observed indicates the robust presence of regional Purkinje cell loss in aged mice and that it arises due to neurodegeneration in a subpopulation of Purkinje cells.
The pattern of age-related Purkinje cell loss overlaps with but is distinct from the overall pattern of zebrin II expression
In mutant mice with Purkinje cell loss (leaner and tottering114, nervous115, BALB/c npcnih116, C57BLKS/J spm116, Cacna1a null117, and acid sphingomyelinase knockout (ASMKO) mice118), as well as mice with global brain ischemia119, neurodegeneration occurs according to the expression of zebrin II120. Zebrin II (an antigen on the aldolase C protein121) is the most well-studied cerebellar patterning marker. In vertebrates, zebrin II reveals a striking pattern of parasagittal stripes across the cerebellar cortex91. For example, in the nervous mutant mouse, Purkinje cell loss occurs selectively in zebrin II-positive Purkinje cells115, whereas in models of Niemann-Pick type C disease, zebrin II-negative Purkinje cells die first116. Aged mice displayed three distinct stripes of surviving Purkinje cells in the anterior vermis (Fig. 1G-I), a pathology that resembles the pattern of zebrin II expression in young mice. Therefore, we asked whether the pattern of age-related Purkinje cell loss and survival reflected the pattern of zebrin II expression. To test this, we cut coronal cerebellar tissue sections from aged mice (n=5) and immunostained them for calbindin (to label surviving Purkinje cells) and zebrin II (to reveal Purkinje cell stripe patterning), using cerebellar tissue from young mice (n=4) as controls.
In the anterior zone, age-related Purkinje cell loss appears to respect zebrin II boundaries. For example, in lobules III and IV, Purkinje cells began to degenerate selectively in zebrin II-negative stripes P1- and P2-, while the zebrin II-positive stripes remained intact (Fig. 4B). In other regions, Purkinje cell loss forms clear stripes despite uniform zebrin II expression; for example, in lobule VI and anterior lobule VII, which are almost entirely zebrin II-positive, Purkinje cells degenerate in stripes (Fig. 4B). This is in contrast to lobule VIII in the same mouse, which appears unaffected by Purkinje cell degeneration despite the striped zebrin II expression in this lobule (Fig. 4B). Interestingly, we observed differences in the relationship between age-related Purkinje cell loss and zebrin II expression within a single lobule. In dorsal lobule IX, Purkinje cell loss occurs in zebrin II-negative stripes, whereas in ventral lobule IX, Purkinje cell loss occurs in the medial zebrin II-positive stripe P1+ (Fig. 4B). Taken together, these data show that although the pattern of age-related Purkinje cell loss appears to correspond with zebrin II expression in the anterior zone, the underlying pattern that dictates Purkinje cell loss during normal aging is more complicated than a single stripe marker would indicate. Instead, differential vulnerability to age-related neurodegeneration may result from complex interactions between Purkinje cell lineage, gene expression patterns, and specific functional properties. These distinct patterns in aged mice may uncover previously unidentified subsets within uniform zebrin II areas or provide clues into afferent fiber to Purkinje cell functional interacts that could influence long-term circuit health.
A) Schematics of wholemount cerebella and sagittal sections of the cerebellum indicating the location of tissue sections. Green indicates calbindin expression and alternating green and magenta indicates where calbindin and zebrin II are co-expressed. Dashed lines indicate the position and angle of tissue sections. Cerebellar lobules are labeled with Roman numerals. B) Coronal tissue sections co-stained for calbindin (green) and zebrin II (magenta). Zebrin II-positive stripes are indicated by P1, P2, and P3. Brackets indicate bands of degenerating Purkinje cells, and asterisks indicate bands of degenerating Purkinje cells in uniformly zebrin II-positive regions. Scale bar = 250 μm. C) Schematics of half of a wholemount cerebellum indicating calbindin and zebrin II expression (alternating green and magenta) and bands of surviving Purkinje cells as indicated by calbindin expression (dark gray). D) Paraflocculi of wholemount cerebella immunostained for calbindin and viewed from different angles. Cerebellar lobules are labeled with Roman numerals. D = dorsal; L = lateral; M = medial; V = ventral; A = anterior; P = posterior.
Even during extreme Purkinje cell loss, with few Purkinje cells surviving throughout the cerebellum, a pattern of parasagittal stripes remains visible. This was evident in serial sections taken from a 25-month-old mouse and immunostained for calbindin, revealing the subsets of Purkinje cells that were most resistant to degeneration (Fig. 5). The tissue sections displayed the same pattern of three parasagittal stripes in vermal lobules II through VI, though the width of the stripes was reduced, sometimes to one or two Purkinje cells per stripe. Most of Crus 1, the flocculi, and the paraflocculi had strong calbindin staining, indicating the presence of surviving Purkinje cells. Ventral lobule IX and lobule X were strikingly well preserved in comparison to the rest of the cerebellum. Even within regions with surviving Purkinje cells, the cells were undergoing degeneration. High magnification images of tissue from the 25-month-old mouse revealed extreme morphological abnormalities in Purkinje cells. Beaded recurrent axon collaterals formed plexuses where Purkinje cell somata likely used to be (Fig. 6A-E), and Purkinje cell dendrites were thickened and fractured (Fig. 6A and C). We also observed a putative recurrent axon collateral that extended to the top of the molecular layer in a large gap between surviving Purkinje cells (Fig. 6E). These morphological abnormalities may represent the last efforts of surviving Purkinje cells to reside in an aged cerebellum, where the majority of Purkinje cells have degenerated.
Coronal cerebellar tissue sections immunostained for calbindin and arrayed in order from anterior to posterior. Cerebellar lobules are labeled with Roman numerals. D = dorsal; L = lateral; V = ventral; A = anterior; P = posterior. Scale bar = 250 μm.
High-magnification images of cerebellar tissue sections immunostained for calbindin. Asterisks indicate recurrent axon collaterals, and arrows indicate thickened dendrites. Scale bar = 50 μm.
Light sheet imaging reveals a pattern of age-related Purkinje cell loss in the cerebellum
Light sheet imaging, when combined with tissue clearing, allows the visualization of labeled cells in multiple dimensions throughout a brain structure. Given the precise regional specificity of age-related Purkinje cell loss, we performed light sheet imaging of the cerebellum of an aged Purkinje cell-specific fluorescent reporter mouse (Video 1) to fully visualize the pattern. Light sheet imaging revealed that lobule X is resistant to Purkinje cell loss during normal aging, similar to our observations of wholemount cerebella immunostained for calbindin. Lobule X, the flocculi, and the paraflocculi comprise the nodular zone, a zebrin II-positive region (Fig. 4C). Despite uniform zebrin II expression, the paraflocculi showed stripes of Purkinje cell loss during aging, as seen on calbindin-stained wholemounts (Fig. 4D). By combining the advantages of a Purkinje cell-specific fluorescent reporter with the ability to reveal patterns within the core of the cerebellum (which are typically hard to appreciate due to the folding of the cortex), where antibodies do not penetrate, light sheet imaging provides a complete picture of the pattern of age-related Purkinje cell loss.
Taken together, our results from the wholemount cerebella, coronal tissue sections, and light sheet imaging of Purkinje cell-specific reporter expression indicate that despite some similarities, the pattern of age-related Purkinje cell loss is similar, but not identical to the expression pattern of zebrin II, a reliable marker that defined the endogenous map of Purkinje cell stripes and zones.
Motor function is impaired in aged mice compared to young mice
Our results show that Purkinje cell loss during normal aging is extensive and occurs throughout the cerebellum. Despite this, the general motor behavior of our cohort of aged mice was ostensibly normal when the mice were observed in their home cages. To investigate the effect of age-related Purkinje cell loss on motor behavior more closely, we performed a series of behavioral tests, including the accelerating rotarod, the horizontal ladder, and analysis in a tremor monitor, on young and aged mice before sacrificing them and histologically examining the cerebellum for Purkinje cell loss. We found that the aged mice (n=12) had a lower latency to fall from the accelerating rotarod compared to the young mice (n=8; Fig. 7B). Although the latency to fall was always lower in the aged mice compared to the young mice, the aged mice improved from day to day (Fig. 7B), demonstrating their continued capacity and ability to learn new motor skills.
A) Schematics of motor function tests. B) Latency to fall from accelerating rotarod. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. B’) Latency to fall with aged mice sorted based on presence or absence of Purkinje cell loss. C) Number of footslips when crossing horizontal ladder. ** indicates p ≤ 0.01, *** indicates p ≤ 0.001, and **** indicates p ≤ 0.0001. C’) Number of footslips with aged mice sorted based on presence or absence of Purkinje cell loss. D) Power spectrum of tremor detected by tremor monitor. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. D’) Power spectrum of tremor with aged mice sorted based on presence or absence of Purkinje cell loss.
To test skilled, voluntary movement and limb control, we used a horizontal ladder task. Mice were subjected to an “easy” trial, where every ladder rung was in place, and a “difficult” trial, where every other ladder rung was removed. The number of footslips was recorded per trial. As expected, both the young (n=8) and aged (n=12) groups had more footslips during the difficult trial compared to during the easy trial (Fig. 7C). However, we did not detect a significant difference in the number of footslips between the young and aged groups during either trial (Fig. 7C).
Because humans and mice have increased tremor with age122,123 and since the cerebellum is implicated in tremor pathophysiology17,19,21, we used a custom-built tremor monitor to quantify tremor power and frequency124. We found that aged mice (n=12) had significantly higher tremor power compared to young mice (n=11; Fig. 7D). Peak power in both cohorts occurred at a frequency of ∼ 10 Hz (Fig. 7D), consistent with the frequency of physiological tremor in mice.
We next wondered what structural and/or functional variables might contribute to the motor deficits observed in aged mice, using peak tremor power as an example. We tested whether peak power in aged mice (n=12) was influenced by body weight, relative age, or sex. Female aged mice tended to weigh less and have lower power tremor but still overlapped with male aged mice in terms of weight and peak tremor power (Supplementary Fig. 4). We did not find a statistical correlation between peak tremor power, weight, or relative age (defined as the age of an individual mouse in comparison to other mice in the aged group; Supplementary Fig. 4). This suggests that although aged mice have significantly increased tremor power compared to young mice (Fig. 7D), neither weight nor differences in relative age among aged mice contribute significantly to tremor within the aged group. In other words, tremor does not necessarily worsen with increased age beyond a certain point within a given age range. This may be related to our finding that middle aged mice can have Purkinje cell loss while some older mice do not (Table 1). Thus, aging is not a simple linear process in which increasing age is always negatively (or gradually) correlated with the loss of specific neural circuit functions and a decline in specific behaviors.
Given that not all aged mice have striped Purkinje cell loss, even within the same litter (Fig. 1D- I; Table 1), we wondered whether aged mice without Purkinje cell loss performed better on motor tasks compared to aged mice with Purkinje cell loss. To address this, after behavioral testing, we collected cerebellar tissue sections from the aged mice and immunostained them with calbindin antibody. We subdivided the behavioral data of the aged mice based on whether they had Purkinje cell loss or not. We found that there was no significant difference in rotarod performance, number of footslips on the horizontal ladder, or tremor between aged mice with Purkinje cell loss and aged mice without Purkinje cell loss, though both aged groups had lower latency to fall on the rotarod and an increased tremor power compared to young mice (Fig. 7B’, C’, and D’). Together, these results suggest that while aged mice exhibit abnormalities in tremor and motor coordination, Purkinje cell loss alone, and specifically mild Purkinje cell loss, may not cause these behavioral impairments. Alternatively, Purkinje cell dysfunction, to varying degrees, may set a platform for the development of tremor and motor incoordination in aging mice, which could then co-initiate different abnormal behaviors with a given amount Purkinje cell loss.
Postmortem tissue from neurologically normal humans reveals age-related Purkinje cell degeneration with the co-presence of healthy and pathological cells
We studied postmortem cerebellar tissue from three neurologically normal patients: a 21-year-old, a 57-year-old, and a 74-year-old. Using the calbindin antibody that effectively and reliably labels Purkinje cells in mice, on sagittal cut tissue sections through the vermis, we observed well-preserved Purkinje cells with expansive dendritic arbors in the tissue from the 21-year-old (Fig. 8). In contrast, the immunostained tissue from the 74-year-old revealed extensive Purkinje cell loss that was observed as noticeable gaps in the Purkinje cell layer that were devoid of somata. In addition, we observed Purkinje cell dendrites with poor integrity and span in their typically expansive architecture, a change that is indicative of retraction and degeneration of Purkinje cell dendrites (Fig. 8), similar to our observations of Purkinje cells in aged mice (Fig. 2A and B). Interestingly, the tissue from the 57-year-old represented an “intermediate” stage with many robust healthy Purkinje cells that were flanked by areas with Purkinje cell dendrite deterioration and gaps in the Purkinje cell layer (Fig. 8). These data imply progressive degeneration and cell loss.
Asterisks indicate remaining Purkinje cell bodies. Dashed lines indicate boundaries of Purkinje cell dendritic arbors. Scale bar = 100 μm.
DISCUSSION
We demonstrate that Purkinje cell loss that occurs during normal aging is not uniform. Instead, Purkinje cell loss occurs in a striking pattern of parasagittal stripes in aged mice. While this striped pattern bears some resemblance to the pattern of zebrin II expression in the anterior zone of the cerebellum, the overall pattern is different from zebrin II expression, which typically defines the known stripe patterns of Purkinje cell loss in disease models. Furthermore, we show that aged mice have increased tremor power and deficits in rotarod performance compared to young mice but that performance on the horizontal ladder is preserved. Overall, we have found that age-related Purkinje cell loss occurs in a distinct striped pattern that may provide insight into the selective vulnerability and resistance of cells to neurodegeneration in the normal aging cerebellum.
Striped Purkinje cell loss during normal aging is more complex than zebrin II expression
Although evidence of striped Purkinje cell loss has not been reported in aged mice prior to our study, striped Purkinje cell loss is widely appreciated in mouse models of disease. In disease models, Purkinje cell loss typically occurs preferentially in either zebrin II-positive (e.g. nervous mutant mice115) or zebrin II-negative (e.g. BALB/c npnih and C57BLKS/J spm mice116,118) Purkinje cells120. Interestingly, we found that although age-related Purkinje cell loss occurred preferentially in zebrin II-negative stripes in the anterior zone, it followed a unique region-to-region pattern in the rest of the cerebellar cortex, including stripes in the uniformly zebrin II-positive paraflocculi. Similar findings, in which Purkinje cell loss occurs in zebrin II-negative stripes in the anterior zone but not the posterior zone, have been observed in a mouse model of autosomal-recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS)125, yet the pattern of age-related Purkinje cell loss is distinct. This suggests that other factors in addition to zebrin II identity may influence the selective vulnerability to neurodegeneration. In addition, neurodegeneration is a continuous process. The loss of certain Purkinje cells may trigger the degeneration of nearby cells regardless of regional vulnerability, creating a domino effect that may not precisely reflect zonal markers.
Importantly, zebrin II stripes are not the only example of cerebellar molecular patterning, and therefore interpretation of patterned Purkinje cell loss should not be limited to the pattern of zebrin II expression alone. There are many molecular markers whose expression patterns form stripes in Purkinje cell subpopulations that correspond with the zebrin II stripes (e.g. GABA-B receptor83 and PLCβ382), are complementary to zebrin II stripes (e.g. PLCβ482), or have a more complex relationship (e.g. HNK1126, HSP25127, and NFH84). In multiple rodent models with Purkinje cell loss, Purkinje cells in the nodular zone that express HSP25 are more resistant to degeneration than HSP25-negative Purkinje cells116,118,127. In addition to molecular markers, cerebellar zones are also defined by their developmental lineage, climbing fiber and mossy fiber inputs, interneuron organization, and Purkinje cell outputs to the cerebellar nuclei98, any of which might contribute to differential Purkinje cell vulnerability. Therefore, the pattern of Purkinje cell loss during normal aging may reflect a previously unidentified zone marker or a combination of pattern modalities.
A combination of methods confirms patterned Purkinje cell degeneration and/or cell loss
Here, we report the presence of reproducible, striped Purkinje cell loss in aged mice, whereas previous studies of aged rodents have concluded that Purkinje cell loss is largely uniform throughout the cerebellum62–66. This discrepancy may be due to the limitations of using tissue sections alone to study patterned neurodegeneration. In previous studies, quantification of age-related Purkinje cell loss has been performed by counting cells in sagittal sections of the cerebellum taken every 320 μm63–66. To use the pattern of Purkinje cell loss observed in our study as an example, the observations would vary greatly depending on where a sagittal section was taken. For example, a sagittal section taken at the midline could reveal little or no Purkinje cell loss, whereas a section taken more laterally could reveal large swathes of missing Purkinje cells. The full stripes could only be properly and fully appreciated with coronal sections, which risks leaving out information about anterior-posterior dendrite defects that can be better appreciated with sagittal sections. Therefore, relying on only coronal or sagittal sections is likely insufficient to appreciate complex regional differences in Purkinje cell vulnerability during aging. Our study has the advantage of using wholemount visualization and light sheet imaging in addition to coronal and sagittal tissue sections, enabling the multi-dimensional visualization of cerebellar patterning.
Methods-based discrepancies in regional cerebellar degeneration have also been observed in elderly patients. One study found reduced volume in the hemispheres and vermal lobules VI-X while the anterior vermis was unaffected47, but a later study by the same authors found uniform vulnerability across the vermis and attributes the differences to methodological differences48, underscoring the importance of factoring technique into results about regional degeneration in the highly compartmentalized cerebellum. However, the majority of studies in elderly patients have found that when cerebellar atrophy is observed, atrophy is most severe in the anterior cerebellum55–57,61,77,79, with significant volume reduction or Purkinje cell loss often observed in the vermis55,58,76,78. Similarly, we found that aged mouse cerebella with striped Purkinje cell loss had the most profound loss in the anterior cerebellum, including the vermis (Fig. 1A). This similarity in morphological phenotype, combined with our finding of Purkinje cell loss in cerebellar tissue from middle-aged and older, neurologically normal human patients (Fig. 8), suggests translatability between our findings of Purkinje cell loss in aged mice and humans. However, a much larger study must be undertaken with a greater number of human tissue specimens, accounting for a wider span of ages, possible gender differences, race, and other person to person variabilities such as socioeconomic status, diet, exercise, and overall health.
Regional vulnerability creates distinct patterns of cerebellar degeneration in diseases versus during normal aging
In humans, cerebellar degeneration occurs in distinct patterns depending on the subtype of neurodegenerative disease128 and whether the patient is affected by a neurodegenerative disease or normal aging77,129. The pattern of cerebellar degeneration may impact the manifestation of symptoms because of the functional compartmentalization of the cerebellum. Purkinje cell synaptic plasticity and firing rates differ depending on the stripes they inhabit130, and modules differ in terms of behavioral function, although these functions likely overlap across modules to some degree131. This suggests that cerebellar compartments and Purkinje cell subpopulations may represent a key for unlocking the neural correlates of cerebellar dysfunction.
The mechanisms underlying patterned cerebellar degeneration remain unknown, though evidence points to the differential vulnerability of Purkinje cell subpopulations119,127,132–134. One potential mechanism for differential Purkinje cell vulnerability is stripe-specific excitotoxicity. Our study found that in aged mice, where Purkinje cell loss corresponds with zebrin II expression, Purkinje cell loss occurs preferentially in zebrin II-negative stripes. Zebrin II-negative Purkinje cells have a higher average firing frequency than zebrin II-positive Purkinje cells135,136, which may make zebrin II-negative Purkinje cells more susceptible to excitotoxicity. Accordingly, excitatory amino acid transporter 4 (EAAT4) expression is restricted to zebrin II-positive Purkinje cells, and deafferentation of Purkinje cells prevents ischemia-induced Purkinje cell loss in zebrin II-negative stripes119. This selective loss of Purkinje cell subpopulations during aging has functional implications. Recent work has shown that Purkinje cells in aged mice have a reduced firing rate compared to Purkinje cells in young mice137. Furthermore, the distribution of Purkinje cell firing frequencies is similar in young and aged mice, but higher-firing Purkinje cells are absent in aged mice137, suggesting that higher-firing Purkinje cells die while lower-firing cells survive. This corresponds with the results of our study, in which higher-firing zebrin II-negative Purkinje cells tend to degenerate before lower-firing zebrin II-positive Purkinje cells during aging. Stripe-specific excitotoxicity, in combination with potentially neuroprotective proteins such as HSP25138, may influence differential Purkinje cell vulnerability in aged mice. Understanding the mechanistic origins of differential vulnerability and resistance in distinct cell populations could shed light on therapeutic methods to block or even prevent neurodegeneration in disease and aging.
Mild age-related Purkinje cell loss alone may not cause overt motor impairments
The aged mice in our study displayed overtly normal motor behavior during observation, while behavioral tests revealed that aged mice had higher power tremor than young mice and impaired performance on the rotarod. These findings are in accordance with previous behavioral studies of normal aged mice74,123. Interestingly, aged mice performed as well as young mice on the horizontal ladder test, even when the difficulty was increased by removing every other ladder rung (Fig. 7C). This may be because aged mice can adapt abnormal kinematics for voluntary movements to compensate for gradual functional deficits during the aging process, whereas involuntary, whole-body tasks such as the accelerating rotarod prove more difficult to overcome.
Upon examination of the cerebella, the aged mice used in these behavioral tests had either no Purkinje cell loss or relatively mild Purkinje cell loss. To determine the influence of Purkinje cell loss on age-related motor deficits, we separated the behavioral data based on the presence or absence of Purkinje cell loss. We did not find a significant difference in motor behavior between the two aged subgroups, which suggests that mild Purkinje cell loss alone is not sufficient to cause the observed motor deficits. The aging process involves the dysfunction and degeneration of different classes of neurons within different brain regions (with both overlapping and distinct temporal onsets), which likely all co-contribute to the decline of motor behavior over time. Additionally, it remains to be determined whether the Purkinje cells in aging mice are functionally normal before their degeneration. It is possible that deterioration begins earlier and that they are contributing to network dysfunction well before their eventual degeneration and that all aged mice are vulnerable to motor deficits when Purkinje cells display abnormal physiological properties.
CONCLUSION
We show that Purkinje cell loss occurs in a striped pattern during normal aging. We revealed this patterned neurodegeneration using a combination of wholemount immunohistochemistry, tissue staining on sections, and transgenic mice encoded with a Purkinje cell-specific reporter. Our work establishes a fresh perspective for how patterns of degeneration in models of aging and disease could inform about symptomology and regional vulnerability. Despite the apparent chaos of widespread Purkinje cell degeneration, the strict organization of the cerebellum established early in development lends an order to the chaos. Future studies will benefit from identifying the causes of differential vulnerability across Purkinje cell subpopulations and between individual mice. By understanding the mechanisms of patterned, age-related Purkinje cell loss, we would better appreciate the functional implications of neurodegeneration during normal aging. Eventually, the characteristics that confer resistance to neurodegeneration in specific Purkinje cell subpopulations may prove useful for designing effective treatments that maximize features of healthy brain aging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mice
Mouse husbandry and experiments were performed under an approved Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocol at Baylor College of Medicine (BCM). All mice used in this study were maintained in our colony at BCM. Mice between 2 and 5 months of age were categorized as young mice, 11-15 months old were considered middle-aged, and older than 16 months were considered old (consistent with information at Jackson Laboratory). Both males and females were used. A mixed population of mice was used, some of which were C57BL/6J mice ordered from Jackson Laboratory (#000664) and some of which were multiple generations descended from the following Jackson Laboratory strains: #006207, #007900, #012882, #014647, #024948, #12569, #12897, #21162, #024109, #021188, and #24109. No conditional knockout or knock-in mice were used except for Pcp2Cre;Ai32 and Pcp2Cre;Ai40D mice, which were used to fluorescently tag Purkinje cells. Pcp2Cre;Ai32 and Pcp2Cre;Ai40D mice were used interchangeably and will be referred to as Purkinje cell-specific fluorescent reporter mice throughout the study. Aged mice found with visible masses upon perfusion were excluded from the study.
Perfusion and sectioning
Mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of Avertin (2, 2, 2-Tribromoethanol, Sigma-Aldrich catalog #T4). Cardiac perfusion was performed with 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4), followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (4% PFA) diluted in PBS. Brains were dissected and post-fixed at 4°C for at least 24 hr in 4% PFA. Brains were then cryoprotected in sucrose solutions (10% sucrose in PBS, then 20% sucrose, then 30% sucrose) and embedded in Tissue-Tek O.C.T. compound (Sakura Finetek USA; catalog #4583). Tissue sections were cut on a cryostat with a thickness of 40 μm and placed in PBS.
Free-floating tissue section immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry on free-floating frozen-cut tissue sections was performed as described previously139. Rabbit anti-calbindin (1:10,000; Swant) or mouse anti-calbindin (1:2,000; Sigma) was used to label all Purkinje cells. Mouse anti-zebrin II (1:250; gift from Dr. Richard Hawkes) was used to label Purkinje cells in stripes. Immunoreactive complexes were visualized with either 3,3’-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB, 0.5 mg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich), nickel-DAB (DAB Substrate Kit; Vector Labs), or anti-mouse or anti-rabbit secondary antibodies conjugated to fluorophores (1:1,500; Invitrogen). For DAB reactions, horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit and goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies (diluted 1:200 in PBS; DAKO) were used to bind the primary antibodies. Antibody binding was revealed by incubating the tissue in the DAB solution, which was made by either dissolving a 100 mg DAB tablet in 40 mL PBS and 10 μL 30% H2O2 or using the DAB Substrate Kit. The DAB reaction was stopped with PBS when the optimal color intensity was reached.
After staining, tissue sections were placed on electrostatically coated glass slides. Tissue sections were coverslipped using either Cytoseal (for DAB) or FluoroGel with Tris buffer (for immunofluorescence; Electron Microscopy Sciences).
Neutral red
After tissue sections were placed on electrostatically coated glass slides, they were left to dry overnight. Then, slides were dipped briefly in distilled water before being immersed in 1% Neutral Red for 30 min. Next, slides were subjected to an ethanol series and xylene before being coverslipped with Cytoseal.
Wholemount immunohistochemistry
Wholemount immunohistochemistry was performed as previously described100,101. Cerebella were post-fixed in Dent’s fixative for 6 hr at room temperature (RT) and bleached in Dent’s bleach overnight at 4°C. The next day, cerebella were dehydrated in two 30-min rounds of methanol (MeOH) at RT. The cerebella were then subjected to five freeze/thaw cycles before being placed at −80°C overnight. The next day, the cerebella were rehydrated via washes in 50% MeOH/50% PBS, 15% MeOH/85% PBS, and 100% PBS for 1 hr each at RT. The tissue was enzymatically digested with 10 ug/mL Proteinase K in PBS for 3 min. Then, the cerebella were washed in PBS three times for 10 min each at RT. Tissue was blocked in PBSMT overnight at 4°C. The next day, tissue was incubated in primary antibodies diluted in PBSMT with 5% DMSO for 48 hr at 4°C. After incubation, the cerebella were washed in PBSMT twice for 2 hr each at 4°C. Then, the tissue was incubated in secondary antibodies diluted in PBSMT with 5% DMSO at 4°C overnight. The next day, the cerebella were washed in PBSMT twice for 2 hr each at 4°C, followed by a single wash in PBT for 1 hr. Finally, the cerebella were incubated in DAB solution for 10 min. The reaction was stopped by placing the cerebella in 0.04% sodium azide.
Microscopy
Images of stained tissue sections were captured with either a Zeiss AxioCam MRm (fluorescence) camera mounted on a Zeiss Axio Imager.M2 microscope or a Leica DMC2900 (brightfield) camera mounted on a Leica DM4000 B LED microscope. Wholemount cerebella immunostained for calbindin were placed in 1% agar and immersed in PBS, then imaged with a Zeiss AxioCam MRc 5 camera mounted on a Zeiss Axio Zoom.V16 microscope. Brains from Purkinje cell-specific fluorescent reporter mice were imaged with a Zeiss AxioCam MRm camera mounted on a Zeiss Axio Zoom.V16 microscope immediately after perfusion. After imaging, the raw data was imported into Adobe Photoshop, which was used to correct brightness and contrast levels. Schematics were created in Adobe Illustrator.
Clearing and light sheet imaging
Brains were cleared with the EZ Clear method as described previously140. Whole brain images were acquired with a Zeiss Light Sheet Z1 at a refractive index of 1.52 with a 5x objective. Image tiles were stitched together with Stitchy and visualized with Arivis.
Accelerating rotarod
The rotarod (ENV-571M, Med Associates, Inc., Vermont, USA) was set to accelerate from 4 to 40 rpm in 5 min (setting 9) and was stopped at 300 sec if the mice successfully stayed on for this duration. Mice rested for at least 10 min between trials. Rotarod performance was measured in three trials per day for three consecutive days.
Tremor monitor
Tremor was measured using a custom-built model similar to that described previously124. Mice were placed in a translucent plastic box with an open top. The box was held steady in the air by eight elastic cords attached to corners of the box and to a scaffold. An accelerometer at the bottom of the box detected movements of the box. Signals from the accelerometer were recorded and analyzed in Spike2 software. Power spectrums of tremor across naturally occurring tremor frequencies (0-30 Hz) were made using a fast Fourier transform (FFT) with a Hanning window. An offset was applied to center the tremor waveform on 0, and the recordings were down sampled to produce frequency bins aligned to whole numbers. For each mouse, the first 120 sec of recording in the tremor monitor was defined as the acclimation period, and the following 180 sec of recording was used for analysis.
Horizontal ladder
The horizontal ladder test was performed on a custom-built ladder consisting of rods placed horizontally between two plexiglass walls. Mice were placed at the entrance of the ladder and allowed to walk across. If a mouse turned around before completing the test, the mouse was placed back at the entrance of the ladder to restart the trial. Video recordings of each trial were analyzed to count the number of foot slips per 50-cm section of ladder. A foot slip was counted when a foot passed below the level of the rungs. The easy horizontal ladder test involved rods spaced 1 cm apart, and the difficult test involved the removal of every other rod, resulting in rods spaced 2 cm apart. Each mouse completed three trials of the easy test in one day, followed by three trials of the difficult test the next day.
Human tissue
Use of human postmortem brain tissue was granted exemption by the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Review Board. All procedures involving a human participant were performed in accordance with the National Research Committee and the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The three brains were removed as part of routine hospital autopsy with no significant neurological history or neuropathological findings. Age was extracted from the autopsy report.
Quantitative analyses and statistics
Fisher’s exact test was performed to determine whether the presence of striped Purkinje cell loss in aged mice is sex dependent. Mice were grouped by sex and by whether striped Purkinje cell loss was observed.
Molecular layer thickness was calculated by measuring the molecular layer in dorsal lobule VIII in coronal tissue sections immunostained with calbindin DAB. One tissue section was used per mouse, and three measurements of the molecular layer were taken per tissue section (midline, left of midline, and right of midline). The three measurements in each tissue section were averaged, and the averages were plotted. The data was analyzed with an unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction.
For the accelerating rotarod and horizontal ladder tests, the three trials per day were averaged, and the averages were plotted. The horizontal ladder data was analyzed with one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons.
ETHICS
Animal experimentation: Mice were housed in an AAALAS-certified animal facility. All procedures to maintain and use these mice were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee for Baylor College of Medicine (Animal protocol number AN-5996).
CONTRIBUTIONS
Sarah G. Donofrio, Cheryl Brandenburg, Amanda M. Brown, and Roy V. Sillitoe contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by SGD, CB, AMB, and RVS. HCL provided human postmortem tissue, and TL processed and stained the human postmortem tissue. The first draft of the manuscript was written by SGD, and all authors commented on each version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURES AND VIDEOS
Supplementary Figure 1: The presence of Purkinje cell loss varies across aged mice.
Supplementary Figure 2: Different calbindin antibodies reveal matching expression patterns, including age-related striped Purkinje cell loss. Scale bar = 500 μm.
Supplementary Figure 3: Patterned calbindin expression and staining artifacts can obscure Purkinje cell loss due to neurodegeneration.
A) Coronal tissue sections from C57BL/6J mice either immunostained for calbindin alone or immunostained for calbindin and stained with Neutral Red. Brackets indicate regions of zonal calbindin expression. Dashed lines indicate boundaries formed by intact Purkinje cell dendrites and degenerating dendrites. Arrowheads indicate calbindin-negative Purkinje cell bodies that are stained with Neutral Red. Cerebellar lobules are labeled with Roman numerals. Scale bar = 250 μm; inset scale bar = 100 μm. B) Coronal tissue sections from aged C57BL/6J mouse either immunostained for calbindin alone or immunostained for calbindin and stained with Neutral Red. Arrowheads indicate Purkinje cell bodies that were not stained with calbindin antibody. Scale bar = 100 μm; inset scale bar = 50 μm.
Supplementary Figure 4: There is no correlation between weight, peak tremor power, or relative age. P-values were calculated using Spearman’s correlation.
Video 1: Light sheet imaging reveals pattern of age-related Purkinje cell loss throughout cerebellum.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children’s Hospital, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (RVS: R01NS119301 and R01NS127435; SGD: F31NS129279), Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number P50HD103555 for use of the Cell and Tissue Pathogenesis Core (the BCM IDDRC), and the BCM Optical Imaging and Vital Microscopy Core, with the expert assistance of Chih-Wei Hsu. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Center for Research Resources or the National Institutes of Health.
Footnotes
Competing Interests: RVS serves on the Governing Board of the Raynor Cerebellum Project, Fort Worth, Texas.
AMB was added as an author, and the contributions of AMB, HCL, and TL were added. Under Competing Interests, "Raynor Cerebellum Foundation" was changed to "Raynor Cerebellum Project."
REFERENCES
- 1.↵
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.↵
- 12.↵
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
- 16.
- 17.↵
- 18.
- 19.↵
- 20.
- 21.↵
- 22.
- 23.
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.
- 27.↵
- 28.↵
- 29.
- 30.
- 31.
- 32.
- 33.
- 34.↵
- 35.↵
- 36.
- 37.
- 38.
- 39.↵
- 40.↵
- 41.
- 42.↵
- 43.↵
- 44.↵
- 45.
- 46.↵
- 47.↵
- 48.↵
- 49.
- 50.↵
- 51.↵
- 52.
- 53.
- 54.
- 55.↵
- 56.↵
- 57.↵
- 58.↵
- 59.↵
- 60.↵
- 61.↵
- 62.↵
- 63.↵
- 64.
- 65.
- 66.↵
- 67.
- 68.
- 69.↵
- 70.
- 71.↵
- 72.↵
- 73.↵
- 74.↵
- 75.↵
- 76.↵
- 77.↵
- 78.↵
- 79.↵
- 80.↵
- 81.↵
- 82.↵
- 83.↵
- 84.↵
- 85.
- 86.
- 87.↵
- 88.↵
- 89.
- 90.↵
- 91.↵
- 92.↵
- 93.↵
- 94.
- 95.
- 96.↵
- 97.↵
- 98.↵
- 99.↵
- 100.↵
- 101.↵
- 102.↵
- 103.↵
- 104.↵
- 105.↵
- 106.↵
- 107.↵
- 108.↵
- 109.↵
- 110.↵
- 111.↵
- 112.↵
- 113.↵
- 114.↵
- 115.↵
- 116.↵
- 117.↵
- 118.↵
- 119.↵
- 120.↵
- 121.↵
- 122.↵
- 123.↵
- 124.↵
- 125.↵
- 126.↵
- 127.↵
- 128.↵
- 129.↵
- 130.↵
- 131.↵
- 132.↵
- 133.
- 134.↵
- 135.↵
- 136.↵
- 137.↵
- 138.↵
- 139.↵
- 140.↵