Abstract
Treatment with antibiotics is one of the most extreme perturbations to the human microbiome. Even standard courses of antibiotics dramatically reduce the microbiome’s diversity and can cause transitions to dysbiotic states. Conceptually, this is often described as a ‘stability landscape’: the microbiome sits in a landscape with multiple stable equilibria, and sufficiently strong perturbations can shift the microbiome from its normal equilibrium to another state. However, this picture is only qualitative and has not been incorporated in previous mathematical models of the effects of antibiotics. Here, we outline a simple quantitative model based on the stability landscape concept and demonstrate its success on real data. Our analytical impulse-response model has minimal assumptions with three parameters. We fit this model in a Bayesian framework to previously published data on the year-long effects of four common antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, minocycline, and amoxicillin) on the gut and oral microbiomes, allowing us to compare parameters between antibiotics and microbiomes. Furthermore, using Bayesian model selection we find support for a long-term transition to an alternative microbiome state after courses of ciprofloxacin and clindamycin in both the gut and salivary microbiomes. Quantitative stability landscape frameworks are an exciting avenue for future microbiome modelling.
Footnotes
(liam.philip.shaw{at}gmail.com)
(hassan.bassam.17{at}ucl.ac.uk)
(christopher.barnes{at}ucl.ac.uk)
(rmjlasw{at}ucl.ac.uk)
(n.klein{at}ucl.ac.uk)
(f.balloux{at}ucl.ac.uk)
Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.